Cases from cite.case.law:

HASLETT, v. BROWARD HEALTH IMPERIAL POINT MEDICAL CENTER M. D., 197 So. 3d 124 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Secondly, it alleged a cause of action for abuse of a vulnerable adult pursuant to section 415.111, Florida . . .

MARTIN, II, v. WOOD,, 648 F. App'x 911 (11th Cir. 2016)

. . . . §§ 415.111(1), 415.1034(1)(a)(5). . . . Stat. §§ 415.1034(l)(a)(5), 415.111, 415.1111, he was entitled to civil relief as a result. . . . willfully fails to report a case of known or suspected abuse may be subject to criminal penalties, id. § 415.111 . . .

A. POTTER, Jr. v. UNITED STATES,, 124 Fed. Cl. 469 (Fed. Cl. 2015)

. . . Subsection 415.111 S. 775.083 or S. 775.082”; violation of "health care surrogate subsection 765-201- . . .

CHAPPELLE, v. SOUTH FLORIDA GUARDIANSHIP PROGRAM, INC., 169 So. 3d 291 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . The complaint alleged counts for: (1) elderly exploitation pursuant to section 415.111, Florida Statutes . . .

E. TARDIF, Jr. v. PEOPLE FOR ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, a, 829 F. Supp. 2d 1219 (M.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . . § 415.107(3), (6), 415.111(2) (reports of vulnerable adult abuse); Fla. . . .

E. BRAKE, Jr. v. STATE, 746 So. 2d 527 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . State, 639 So.2d 22 (Fla.1994), our supreme court held that the term “illegal use” in section 415.111 . . .

MORA, v. SOUTH BROWARD HOSPITAL DISTRICT, 710 So. 2d 633 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . Rather, misdemeanor penalties are provided in section 415.111 for violation of the mandatory reporting . . .

AYRES, v. STATE, 708 So. 2d 318 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . In this case, Ayres was charged with exploitation of the elderly, a violation of section 415.111(5), . . . hearing held on August 15, 1994, the public defender moved to withdraw Ayres’ plea because section 415.111 . . .

TACCARIELLO, v. STATE, 692 So. 2d 231 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . Fla. 4th DCA 1995), we reversed the convictions for exploitation of the elderly pursuant to section 415.111 . . .

MICKLER, v. STATE, 682 So. 2d 607 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . Section 415.111(3), Florida Statutes (1989). . . .

STARLING, v. STATE, 677 So. 2d 4 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . the exploitation charge because the statute that Starling had been prosecuted on previously, section 415.111 . . . Starling never deposited any of her money into the account. . § 415.111(5), Fla.Stat. (1991). . § 812.014 . . .

JAMES, v. STATE, 668 So. 2d 1072 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . The appellant pled guilty to the charges of exploitation of an aged person in violation of section 415.111 . . .

TACCARIELLO, v. STATE, 664 So. 2d 1118 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . section 817.034(4)(a)(2), Florida Statutes, and exploitation of the elderly in violation of section 415.111 . . . the convictions for both grand theft and fraud violate double jeopardy prohibitions; and (3) section 415.111 . . . We find that appellant’s conviction under section 415.111(5), Florida Statutes (1991), requires reversal . . . therefore compelled to reverse appellant’s convictions for exploitation of the elderly pursuant to section 415.111 . . . with directions that the trial court dismiss the charges brought against appellant pursuant to section 415.111 . . .

WILLIAMS, v. STATE, 659 So. 2d 366 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . We review Williams’ appeal from conviction of exploitation of an aged person pursuant to section 415.111 . . . We reverse the appellant’s conviction for violation of section 415.111(5) and vacate the sentence therefor . . . In light of our reversal of appellant’s conviction under section 415.111(5), Florida Statutes, appellant . . .

GARCIA, v. STATE, 651 So. 2d 1300 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . and sentence imposed for exploitation of an aged person and disabled adult, in violation of section 415.111 . . . On June 30, 1994, the supreme court found section 415.111(5) to be unconstitutionally vague. . . .

DERANGER, a k a v. STATE, 652 So. 2d 400 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . and sentences for three counts of grand theft and for exploitation of an aged person under section 415.111 . . . The supreme court has recently held section 415.111(5), Florida Statutes (1991), unconstitutionally vague . . .

WARE, v. STATE, 652 So. 2d 402 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . Robert Lane Ware appeals his convictions for exploitation of an aged person, as proscribed by section 415.111 . . .

KING, Sr. v. STATE, 642 So. 2d 1206 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . Appellant’s conviction, vacate the sentence, and remand with directions that he be discharged under section 415.111 . . .

STATE v. J. ROQUE,, 640 So. 2d 97 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . Pridgeon, 158 Fla. 737, 30 So.2d 102 (1947), and concluded that Section 415.111(5) was unconstitutional . . .

CUDA, v. STATE, 639 So. 2d 22 (Fla. 1994)

. . . .2d 502 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993), in which the Fifth District Court of Appeal expressly declared section 415.111 . . . Chrysler Corp., 397 So.2d 1187, 1190 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), the use of the word “illegal” in section 415.111 . . . Further, section 415.111(5) also suffers from the same constitutional infirmities noted by this Court . . . However, there are critical differences between those statutes and section 415.111(5). . . . Therefore, we find section 415.111(5) to be unconstitutionally vague. . . .

AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RE SENTENCING GUIDELINES, 628 So. 2d 1084 (Fla. 1993)

. . . Thefts, forgery, fraud: Sections 192.037 and 206.56, chapters 322 and 409, section 370.142, section 415.111 . . .

STATE v. CUDA a k a A., 622 So. 2d 502 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . appeals because they have as a common issue the determination by the respective trial courts that section 415.111 . . . following statutory provisions that were considered by the trial courts in the instant cases: Section 415.111 . . . The only reported case construing section 415.111(5) is a recent Second District case. In State v. . . . We view the use of the word “illegal” in section 415.111(5) in the same manner and hold that one who . . . We apply the Cramp test to section 415.111(5): (1) Separation of unconstitutional provisions from the . . .

REPUBLIC NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI, v. JOHNSON, By GUARDIANSHIP PROGRAM OF DADE COUNTY, INC., 622 So. 2d 1015 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . . § 415.111(1). . . .

STATE v. BETANCOURT,, 616 So. 2d 82 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . question charged Carlos Betancourt with abuse, neglect, or torture of an aged person, contrary to section 415.111 . . .

AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE- SENTENCING GUIDELINES RULES, 613 So. 2d 1307 (Fla. 1993)

. . . Thefts, forgery, fraud: Sections 192.037 and 206.56, chapters 322 and 409, section 370.142, section 415.111 . . .

STATE v. DYER, 607 So. 2d 482 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . defendants were charged with grand theft and financial exploitation of an aged person pursuant to section 415.111 . . . Section 415.111(5) states: A person who knowingly or willfully exploits an aged person or disabled adult . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 606 So. 2d 227 (Fla. 1992)

. . . Thefts, forgery, fraud: Sections 192.037 and 206.56, chapters 322 and 409, section 370.142, section 415.111 . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE- SENTENCING GUIDELINES RULES, 589 So. 2d 271 (Fla. 1991)

. . . Thefts, forgery, fraud: Sections 192,037 and 206.56, Cchapters 322 and 409, section 370.142, section 415.111 . . .

STATE OF FLORIDA v. WASHINGTON, 46 Fla. Supp. 2d 28 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1991)

. . . charging him with knowingly and willfully neglecting or exploiting an aged person in violation of § 415.111 . . . The effective date of § 415.111(4) was October 1, 1986. . . . This criminal statute, like § 415.111(4) seeks to protect the elderly from the willful abuse, neglect . . . or exploitation by others, although its scope is broader than §415.111(4) and its penal consequence . . . is more severe than § 415.111(4). . . .

FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RE SENTENCING GUIDELINES RULES AND, 576 So. 2d 1307 (Fla. 1991)

. . . Chapter 810 and subsection 806.13(3) Category 6: Thefts, forgery, fraud: Chapters 322 and 409, section 415.111 . . .

In FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND SENTENCING GUIDELINES, 566 So. 2d 770 (Fla. 1990)

. . . Chapter 810 and subsection 806.13(3) Category 6: Thefts, forgery, fraud: Chapters 322 and 409, section 415.111 . . .