Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 806.10 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 806.10 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 806.10

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XLVI
CRIMES
Chapter 806
ARSON AND CRIMINAL MISCHIEF
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 806.10
806.10 Preventing or obstructing extinguishment of fire.
(1) Any person who willfully and maliciously injures, destroys, removes, or in any manner interferes with the use of, any vehicles, tools, equipment, water supplies, hydrants, towers, buildings, communication facilities, or other instruments or facilities used in the detection, reporting, suppression, or extinguishment of fire shall be guilty of a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(2) Any person who willfully or unreasonably interferes with, hinders, or assaults, or attempts to interfere with or hinder, any firefighter in the performance of his or her duty shall be guilty of a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
History.s. 9, sub-ch. 4, ch. 1637, 1868; RS 2433; GS 3280; RGS 5113; CGL 7214; s. 1, ch. 69-232; s. 795, ch. 71-136; s. 28, ch. 74-383; s. 19, ch. 75-298; s. 1229, ch. 97-102.

F.S. 806.10 on Google Scholar

F.S. 806.10 on Casetext

Amendments to 806.10


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 806.10
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S806.10 - HEALTH-SAFETY - RENUMBERED. SEE REC # 8388 - F: T
S806.10 1 - DAMAGE PROP - INJUR DEST REMOVE INTERFER W FIREFIGHTER EQUIP - F: T
S806.10 2 - HEALTH-SAFETY - HINDER ASSAULT INTERFERE FIREFIGHTER DUTY - F: T



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE A. DOSS, A. v., 588 B.R. 516 (Bankr. E.D. Wis. 2018)

. . . . §§ 806.10 and 806.15. In sum, Wis. . . .

SHUKER v. SMITH NEPHEW, PLC, 885 F.3d 760 (3rd Cir. 2018)

. . . . §§ 803.50, 806.10. See generally 21 U.S.C. §§ 360(b), (j), 360i(a)(1), (g)(1). . . .

IN RE INTUITIVE SURGICAL SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION, 146 F. Supp. 3d 1106 (N.D. Cal. 2015)

. . . . § 806.10(b), a manufacturer is required to report to the FDA any corrective action taken to reduce . . .

IN RE INTUITIVE SURGICAL SECURITIES LITIGATION, 65 F. Supp. 3d 821 (N.D. Cal. 2014)

. . . . § 806.10. Id. ¶¶ 53,159. . . . violated FDA regulations by issuing recalls without reporting them to the FDA, in violation of 21 C.F.R. § 806.10 . . .

D. ALTON, v. MEDTRONIC, INC. USA,, 970 F. Supp. 2d 1069 (D. Or. 2013)

. . . . §§ 803.50(a)(1), 806.10(a)(1). . . .

v. MEDTRONIC, INC., 944 F. Supp. 2d 1193 (M.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . . § 806.10(a), 21 C.F.R. § 814.84(a), and 21 C.F.R. §§ 820.198(a) & (c). Id. at ¶ 30. . . .

STENGEL v. MEDTRONIC INCORPORATED, a, 704 F.3d 1224 (9th Cir. 2013)

. . . . §§ 803.50(a)(1), 806.10(a)(1). . . .

STENGEL v. MEDTRONIC INCORPORATED, a, 676 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 2012)

. . . the FDA noted that Medtronic’s Educational Brief of July 2003 was “a reportable correction under CFR 806.10 . . . reduce a risk to health posed by a device was not reported in writing to FDA, as required by 21 CFR 806.10 . . . The FDA also believes that the July 2003 Educational Brief is a reportable correction under 21 CFR 806.10 . . .

UNITED STATES v. GUIDANT LLC,, 708 F. Supp. 2d 903 (D. Minn. 2010)

. . . . § 806.10. . . .

PEOPLES, v. STATE, 760 So. 2d 1141 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . .; 806.10(1), Fla. Stat. (1997). . . .

H. STACHEL D. v. CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, a B. F. W., 51 F. Supp. 2d 1326 (M.D. Fla. 1999)

. . . Section 806.10(2) of the Florida Statutes provides that “Any person who willfully or unreasonably interferes . . . The plaintiff argues that there was no probable cause for her arrest under § 806.10 because that section . . . State of Flonda, 673 So.2d 114, 115 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), the court found that the defendant violated § 806.10 . . . The court in Robinson read § 633.30 in pari materia with § 806.10 to find that § 806.10 is violated by . . . Thus, because there was arguable probable cause for the charge of violating § 806.10(2), the arrest was . . .

ROBINSON, v. STATE, 686 So. 2d 1370 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . WILLFUL AND MALICIOUS REQUIREMENT OF SECTION 806.10(1) Appellant also argues that his conviction under . . . subsection 806.10(1), Florida Statutes (1995), cannot be sustained because the state did not prove that . . . We find that the terms “willfully and maliciously” as used in subsection 806.10(1), Florida Statutes . . . Section 806.10, Florida Statutes (1995) provides: 806.10. . . .

J. ROBINSON, v. STATE, 673 So. 2d 114 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . Robinson was convicted under section 806.10, Florida Statutes (1993), which reads in pertinent part: . . . Reading section 633.30 in para materia with section 806.10, it is clear that an individual violates section . . . 806.10 by interfering with a firefighter who, in the course of his or her employment, is attempting . . .

In J. DERRICK, M. J. DERRICK M. v. RICHARD L. GRAFE COMMODITIES, INC., 190 B.R. 346 (Bank. W.D. Wis. 1995)

. . . . § 806.10, at the time a judgment is entered, and “upon payment of the [required] fee,” the judgment . . .

W. PELFRESNE, v. VILLAGE OF WILLIAMS BAY,, 917 F.2d 1017 (7th Cir. 1990)

. . . . § 806.10(1). The card notes the damages and costs but not the raze order. . . . Wis.Stat. § 806.10(1). . . .

UNITED STATES, v. DOUGLAS AIRCRAFT CO., 510 F.2d 1387 (C.C.P.A. 1975)

. . . . — The following provisions apply only to items 806.10, 806.20, and 806.30: (a) The value of repairs . . .

v. Co., 62 C.C.P.A. 53 (C.C.P.A. 1975)

. . . . — Tbe following provisions apply only to items 806.10, 806.20, and 806.30: (a) Tbe value of repairs . . .

Co. v., 72 Cust. Ct. 10 (Cust. Ct. 1974)

. . . .— The following provisions apply only to items 806.10, 806.20 and 806.30 : (a) The value of repairs, . . .