Cases from cite.case.law:

M. S. a v. STATE, 260 So. 3d 552 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . Stat. (2017) (providing that "value" as used in sections 812.012-812.037 means, inter alia, "the market . . .

IN RE TREXLER, J. v., 528 B.R. 842 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2015)

. . . convincing evidence that he or she has been injured in any fashion by reason of any violation of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . .

PROU, v. GIARLA,, 62 F. Supp. 3d 1365 (S.D. Fla. 2014)

. . . evidence, that he or she has been injured in any fashion by reason of any violation of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . .

UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. v. SANCTUARY SURGICAL CENTRE, INC. LLC, LLC, LLC, PSG S. LLC, a k a, 5 F. Supp. 3d 1350 (S.D. Fla. 2014)

. . . convincing evidence that he or she has been injured in any fashion by reason of any violation of 812.012-812.037 . . .

BLACKMON, v. STATE Of, 121 So. 3d 535 (Fla. 2013)

. . . See ch. 77-342, Laws of Florida; §§ 812.012-812.037, Fla. Stat.. (1977). . . . liberally, but shall be construed in light of their purposes to achieve their remedial goals.” §§ 812.005, 812.037 . . .

BURGER, a v. HARTLEY,, 896 F. Supp. 2d 1157 (S.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . convincing evidence that he or she has been injured in any fashion by reason of any violation of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . .

RUSSO, v. FINK, 87 So. 3d 815 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . convincing evidence that he or she has been injured in any fashion by reason of any violation of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . .

MARRERO, v. STATE, 71 So. 3d 881 (Fla. 2011)

. . . Section 812.012, Florida Statutes (2010), which defines specific terms used in sections 812.012-812.037 . . .

In LAS VEGAS CASINO LINES, LLC, LLC, v., 454 B.R. 223 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . convincing evidence that he or she has been injured in any fashion by reason of any violation of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . .

In LORENZO, A. R US, LLC, v., 434 B.R. 695 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2010)

. . . Sections 812.012 through 812.037, or Section 825.103(1) of Chapter 812 of the Florida Statutes. . . .

H. WINTERS, v. MULHOLLAND, E., 33 So. 3d 54 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . or she has been injured in any fashion by reason of any violation of the provisions of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . .

KELLY, v. PALMER, REIFLER, ASSOCIATES, P. A., 681 F. Supp. 2d 1356 (S.D. Fla. 2010)

. . . convincing evidence that he or she has been injured in any fashion by reason of any violation of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . .

NAVARRO, v. STATE, 19 So. 3d 1180 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Section 812.035(10) provides that “a criminal ... action or proceeding under ss. 812.012-812.037 or s . . .

G. DIAZ, v. ANDY,, 987 So. 2d 698 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . or she has been injured in any fashion by reason of any violation of the provisions of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . .

OCALA JOCKEY CLUB, LLC, L. v. ROGERS,, 981 So. 2d 1245 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . convincing evidence that he or she has been injured in any fashion by reason of any violation of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . .

STATE v. RAMOS,, 975 So. 2d 638 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . otwithstanding any other provision of law, a criminal or civil action or proceeding under ss. 812.012-812.037 . . .

NEALS, v. STATE, 962 So. 2d 926 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . As used in ss. 812.012-812.037: (8) “Traffic” means: (a) To sell, transfer, distribute, dispense, or . . .

NEW LENOX INDUSTRIES, INC. a v. H. FENTON, LLC., 510 F. Supp. 2d 893 (M.D. Fla. 2007)

. . . applicable to this case — now includes in the list of enumerated crimes “any violation of §§ . 812.012-812.037 . . .

In STATE STREET ASSOCIATES, L. P. In, 342 B.R. 32 (Bankr. N.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . convincing evidence that he or she has been injured in any fashion by reason of any violation of §§ 812.012-812.037 . . .

In HAMBLEY TE v., 329 B.R. 382 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . that he has been injured in any fashion by reason of any violation of the provisions of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . . Sections 812.012-812.037 include embezzlement, fraud, false pretenses, embezzlement, and other theft . . .

STATE v. TELESZ,, 873 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . provides that, “[notwithstanding any other provision of law,” a criminal proceeding under sections 812.012-812.037 . . . 812.035 does not require a strict construction but is to be construed in light of its remedial goal. § 812.037 . . .

SHER v. COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC. a f k a d b a s, 848 So. 2d 1246 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Section 772.11 provides that, in a suit for civil theft pursuant to sections 812.012-812.037, Florida . . .

In CARIBBEAN K LINE, LTD. R. v. T., 288 B.R. 908 (S.D. Fla. 2002)

. . . that he has been injured in any fashion by reason of any violation of the provisions of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . .

JLM ENTERPRISES, INC. L. Sr. v. HOUSTON GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY,, 196 F. Supp. 2d 1299 (S.D. Ga. 2002)

. . . aiding and abetting fraud by falsifying bills of lading, and violations of Florida Statute Ann. 812.012-812.037 . . .

STATE v. DIAZ,, 814 So. 2d 466 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . 812.035(10) provides: Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a criminal .... proceeding under ss. 812.037 . . . -812.037 _ may be commenced at any time within 5 years after the cause of action accrues. . . .

In K. ATCHISON, v. K., 255 B.R. 790 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2000)

. . . he or she has been injured in any fashion by reason of any violation of the provisions of §§ 812.012-812.037 . . .

ANTON, v. G. ANTON,, 763 So. 2d 404 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . or she has been injured in any fashion by reason of any violation of the provisions of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . .

PADILLA, v. STATE v. v., 753 So. 2d 659 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . shall not constitute a defense to a prosecution for any violation of the provisions of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . . officer solicited a person predisposed to engage in conduct in violation of any provision of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . . solicitation would not induce an ordinary law-abiding person to violate any provision of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . .

In D. JACOBS, v. D., 243 B.R. 836 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2000)

. . . or she has been injured in any fashion by reason of any violation of the provisions of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . .

SNYDER, v. G. BELL, U A D G. U A D v., 746 So. 2d 1096 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . that he has been injured in any fashion by reason of any violation of the provisions of §§ 812.012-812.037 . . . See § 812.037, Fla. . . . Stat. (1995) (“Notwithstanding §§ 775.021, 812.012-812.037 shall not be construed strictly or liberally . . .

In C. CLAYTON, d b a v. C., 234 B.R. 195 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1999)

. . . been injured in any fashion by reason of a violation of the provisions of Florida Statutes 812.012 - 812.037 . . .

W. STANDAFER v. SCHALLER,, 726 So. 2d 352 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . or she has been injured in any fashion by reason of any violations of the provisions of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . .

SNYDER, v. STATE, 715 So. 2d 367 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . Section 812.005, Florida Statutes (1995) pro: vides that sections 812.012-812.037, which include grand . . .

STATE v. R. HAMPTON,, 692 So. 2d 278 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a criminal or civil action or proceeding under ss. 812.012-812.037 . . .

ESCUDERO, v. HASBUN,, 689 So. 2d 1144 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . due provisions for the rights of innocent persons, enjoin violations of the provisions of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . .

SEABRIDGE, INC. a A. v. SUPERIOR KITCHENS, INC., 672 So. 2d 848 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . Finally, section 772.11 itself limits its remedy to violations of only sections 812.012 through 812.037 . . . specified statutes deeming a violation of section 713.345 to be the crime of theft under sections 812.012-812.037 . . .

In BRITT, DAVID M. LANDIS, P. A. v. BRITT,, 200 B.R. 409 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1996)

. . . that he has been injured in any fashion by reason of any violation of the provisions of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . .

BOARD OF REGENTS OF STATE OF FLORIDA, By UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA, v. TABORSKY,, 648 So. 2d 748 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . situations including, specifically, actions for civil theft arising from violations of sections 812.012 and 812.037 . . .

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, v. ECHEVARRIA, Sr., 864 F. Supp. 1254 (S.D. Fla. 1994)

. . . . §§ 812.012-812.037 (1990). Denson v. Stack, 997 F.2d 1356, 1362 (11th Cir.1993). . . .

L. AMES, M. D. v. PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY,, 942 F. Supp. 551 (S.D. Fla. 1994)

. . . that he has been injured in any fashion by reason of any violation of the provisions of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . .

STATE v. VIKHLYANTSEV,, 622 So. 2d 1365 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . court found that the cheating statute had been repealed by implication by sections 812.012 through 812.037 . . .

N. DENSON, v. J. E. STACK, Jr., 997 F.2d 1356 (11th Cir. 1993)

. . . . §§ 812.012-812.037 (West Supp.1990). . . .

STATE v. VIKHLYANTSEV,, 602 So. 2d 636 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . the cheating statute, section 817.29, had been repealed by implication by sections 812.012 through 812.037 . . . The legislative history reveals that sections 812.012 through 812.037 were patterned after the Model . . .

STATE v. Jo CAMP,, 596 So. 2d 1055 (Fla. 1992)

. . . Moreover, section 812.037, Florida Statutes (1989), expressly requires that section 812.019 “be construed . . .

HERRERA, v. STATE, 594 So. 2d 275 (Fla. 1992)

. . . .-012 through 812.037. § 812.028(4), Fla.Stat. (1977)1 This Court found that act, including its codification . . .

In E. KEENE J. JOHNSON v. E. KEENE J., 135 B.R. 162 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1991)

. . . Any person who is injured in any fashion by reason of any violation of the provisions of §§ 812.012-812.037 . . .

WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP. INC. v. SHULER BROTHERS, INC. d b a, 590 So. 2d 986 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . that [it had] been injured in any fashion by reason of any violation of the provisions of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . .

ARABIAN AMERICAN OIL COMPANY, a v. SCARFONE,, 939 F.2d 1472 (11th Cir. 1991)

. . . proves ... that he has been injured ... by reason of any violation of the provisions of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . .

AAGAARD- JUERGENSEN, INC. v. LETTELIER,, 579 So. 2d 404 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . Any person who is injured in any fashion by reason of any violation of the provisions of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . .

TOBIN THOMSON, P. A. v. GOLAN,, 568 So. 2d 100 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . .-012-812.037 or s. 812.081 by issuing appropriate orders and judgments, including, but not limited to . . .

STATE v. GUTHRIE,, 567 So. 2d 544 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . . § 812.037, Fla. Stat. (1983). . . .

DANIELS, v. STATE, 570 So. 2d 319 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . Florida Anti-Fencing Act by chapter 77-342, § 2, Laws of Florida (1977), codified as sections 812.012-812.037 . . .

BEDELL, v. MARSHALL, 42 Fla. Supp. 2d 63 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1990)

. . . that he has been injured in any fashion by reason of any violation of the provisions of §§ 812.012 - 812.037 . . .

WARREN, v. MONAHAN BEACHES JEWELRY CENTER, INC., 548 So. 2d 870 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . 1985), provided: Any person who is injured in any fashion by reason of any violation of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . .

RUSSO v. HEIL CONSTRUCTION, INC., 549 So. 2d 676 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . Any person who is injured in any fashion by reason of any violation of the provisions of ss. 812.012, 812.037 . . .

JONES v ORLANDO SECOND CAR CENTER, INC., 30 Fla. Supp. 2d 105 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1988)

. . . use of any person not entitled thereto, [emphasis added] 812.012 definitions — As used in §§ 812.012-812.037 . . .

L. LAMAR, v. KEESEE,, 512 So. 2d 1066 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . shall not constitute a defense to a prosecution for any violation of the'provisions of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . .

ROSENTHAL TOYOTA, INC. v. M. THORPE, a M. F., 824 F.2d 897 (11th Cir. 1987)

. . . Any person who is injured in any fashion by reason of any violation of the provisions of §§ 812.012-812.037 . . . that it has been injured in any fashion by reason of any violation of the provisions of §§ 812.012-812.037 . . .

T. SIKORA v. PINEBROOK BUILDERS, INC., 507 So. 2d 1167 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . Pinebrook and treble damages for civil theft against Sikora and Practical pursuant to sections 812.005-812.037 . . .

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. G. PRIDGEN,, 498 So. 2d 1245 (Fla. 1986)

. . . .-012-812.037, Florida Statutes, as one means of carrying out “theft” and the exclusion does not make . . .

ROSEN, v. MARLIN,, 486 So. 2d 623 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . Any person who is injured in any fashion by reason of any violation of the provisions of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . .

McARTHUR DAIRY, INC. v. ORIGINAL KIELBS, INC., 481 So. 2d 535 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . Any person who is injured in any fashion by reason of any violation of the provisions of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . . Any person who is injured in any fashion by reason of any violation of the provisions of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . .

J. GETELMAN, v. R. LEVEY,, 481 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . person who is injured in any fashion by reason of any violation of the provisions of ss. 812.012 — 812.037 . . .

ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. a v. AUTOMATED INSTRUMENTS, INC. a, 777 F.2d 1504 (11th Cir. 1985)

. . . Any person who is injured in any fashion by reason of any violation of the provisions of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . .

STATE v. CHACON,, 479 So. 2d 229 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a criminal ... action or proceeding under ss. 812.012-812.037 . . .

G. PRIDGEN, v. BILL TERRY S INCORPORATED, S. III,, 478 So. 2d 837 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . conversion, as applied to the facts at bar, is included within Florida’s Anti-Fencing Act (Sections 812.012-812.037 . . .

STATE v. BARE,, 473 So. 2d 799 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a criminal or civil action or proceeding under ss. 812.012-812.037 . . . brought, or intervened in, to punish, prevent, or restrain any violation of the provisions of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . .

ALVAREZ v. STRIEGEL a K. a A. F., 471 So. 2d 1356 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . .-035(11) provides that a civil remedy under any provision of sections 812.012-812.037 is not exclusive . . . , section 812.037 states that section 812.035(11) “shall not be construed strictly or liberally, but . . . Any person who is injured in any fashion by reason of any violation of the provisions of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . . Statutes (1983) provides: (11) The application of one civil remedy under any provision of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . . shall not preclude the application of any other remedy, civil or criminal, under ss. 812.012-812.037 . . .

AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL REALTY, INC. a S. v. SOUTHEAST FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI, N. A., 468 So. 2d 383 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . Any person who is injured in any fashion by reason of any violation of the provisions of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . .

A. CRUZ, v. STATE, 465 So. 2d 516 (Fla. 1985)

. . . shall not constitute a defense to a prosecution for any violation of the provisions of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . . officer solicited a person predisposed to engage in conduct in violation of any provision of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . . solicitation would not induce an ordinary law-abiding person to violate any provision of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . .

In E. D. PRESLEY CORP. LTD. s BAKST, v. D. PRESLEY, a k a E. D., 44 B.R. 781 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1984)

. . . Any person who is injured in any fashion by reason of any violation of the provisions of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . .

MONCO OF ORLANDO, INC. v. ITT INDUSTRIAL CREDIT CORPORATION,, 458 So. 2d 332 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . Any person who is injured in any fashion by reason of any violation of the provisions of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . .

GODDARD, v. STATE, 458 So. 2d 230 (Fla. 1984)

. . . . § 812.037 (1983). . . .

SENFELD, v. BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA TRUST COMPANY CAYMAN LIMITED,, 450 So. 2d 1157 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a criminal or civil action or proceeding under ss. 812.012-812.037 . . . that it intended that the limitations period for civil and criminal actions under Sections 812.012-812.037 . . . The statute itself, in Section 812.037, states that “notwithstanding s. 775.021 [strict construction . . . Any person who is injured in any fashion by reason of any violation of the provisions of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . .

STATE v. WYNN,, 433 So. 2d 1341 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . In 1977 the Florida legislature enacted sections 812.012-812.037, Florida Statutes (1977), known as the . . . shall not constitute a defense to a prosecution for any violation of the provisions of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . . officer solicited a person predisposed to engage in conduct in violation of any provision of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . . solicitation would not induce an ordinary law-abiding person to violate any provision of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . .

STATE v. J. DUNMANN, STATE v. C. BAXLEY,, 427 So. 2d 166 (Fla. 1983)

. . . statute, chapter 77-342, Laws of Florida (codified as the Florida Anti-Fencing Act, sections 812.012 — 812.037 . . . Chapter 77-342, codified as sections 812-012 — 812.037, is an omnibus theft act and is entitled the “ . . .

JAYRE INCORPORATED v. WACHOVIA BANK AND TRUST CO. N. A. a, 420 So. 2d 937 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . Any person who is injured in any fashion by reason of any violation of the provisions of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . . final judgment or decree rendered in favor of the state in any criminal proceeding under ss. 812.012-812.037 . . . Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a criminal or civil action or proceeding under ss. 812.012-812.037 . . . following its termination. “(11) The application of one civil remedy under any provision of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . . shall not preclude the application of any other remedy, civil or criminal, under ss. 812.012-812.037 . . .

ROUSH, v. STATE, 413 So. 2d 15 (Fla. 1982)

. . . Given the remedial nature of the act (section 812.037), we find nothing unreasonable about this directive . . . of endeavor as the enterprise in which he was engaged in violation of the provisions of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . . the course of, derived from, or realized through, conduct in violation of a provision of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . . Any person who is injured in any fashion by reason of any violation of the provisions of ss. 812.012-812.037 . . . shall not preclude the application of any other remedy, civil or criminal, under ss. 812.-012-812.037 . . . Since we know that “fencing” refers to the marketing of stolen goods, and since sections 812.012-812.037 . . .

C. BAXLEY, C. v. STATE TAYLOR, v. STATE, 411 So. 2d 194 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . See § 812.012-812.037, Fla.Stat. (1979). . . . .

HUDSON, v. STATE HUDSON, v. STATE, 408 So. 2d 224 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . . — Sections 812.012-812.037 shall be known as the Florida Anti-Fencing Act. 812.012 Definitions. — As . . . used in ss. 812.012-812.037: ‡ sfc s}: (7) “Traffic” means: (a) To sell, transfer, distribute, dispense . . .

H. L. A. a v. STATE, 395 So. 2d 250 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . obtaining property by false pretenses, now embraced under the Florida Anti-Fencing Act, Sections 812.012-812.037 . . .

STATE v. DICKINSON,, 370 So. 2d 762 (Fla. 1979)

. . . .-012-812.037 in order to gain evidence against that person, provided such solicitation would not induce . . . an ordinary law-abiding person to violate any provision of ss. 812.012-812.037. . . .