The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XLVI
CRIMES

Chapter 817
FRAUDULENT PRACTICES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 817.68

817.68 Part II not exclusive.—This part shall not be construed to preclude the applicability of any other provision of the criminal law of this state which presently applies or may in the future apply to any transaction which violates this part, unless such provision is inconsistent with the terms of this part.

History.—s. 11, ch. 67-340.

F.S. 817.68 on Google Scholar

F.S. 817.68 on Casetext

Amendments to 817.68

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 817.68

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 817.68.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

In FLORES, v. U. S., 282 B.R. 847 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2002)

. . . dollars ($28,800.00) of the total Sixty-three Thousand Eight Hundred Seventeen and 68/100 dollar ($63,-817.68 . . .

MARTIN, v. MABUS, KIRKSEY, v. MABUS,, 734 F. Supp. 1216 (S.D. Miss. 1990)

. . . Expert Attendance Fee + ($30/day) Other § 1821 Expenses = Total Chandler Davidson $180.00 $ 637.68 $ 817.68 . . .

STATE v. WEIR,, 488 So. 2d 557 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . Section 817.68 of the state Credit Card Crime Act suggests no legislative retreat from this practice. . . .

SMITH, v. STATE, 383 So. 2d 959 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . This was based upon a literal interpretation of the language of Section 817.68, Florida Statutes, which . . .

STATE v. YOUNG,, 357 So. 2d 416 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . Section 817.68, Florida Statutes (1973). Affirmed. HOBSON, A. C. J., and GRIMES, J., concur. . . .

STATE v. J. LUCK, 336 So. 2d 464 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . defendants base their argument upon the language of the State Credit Card Crime Act of 1967, Sections 817.57-817.68 . . .

F. FAYERWEATHER, v. STATE, 332 So. 2d 21 (Fla. 1976)

. . . Section 817.68 provides that the act, “ . . . shall not be construed to preclude the applicability of . . . In Lore, the Fourth District Court of Appeal interpreted Section 817.68 of the Credit Card Crime Act . . . McCurdy, supra, the Second District Court of Appeal interpreted Section 817.68 to require irreconcilable . . . The court noted that the intent of Section 817.68 is to make prosecution under the act non-exclusive, . . . Section 817.68 of the State Credit Card Crime Act suggests no legislative retreat from this practice. . . .

R. PASTORIA, v. STATE, 312 So. 2d 808 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . intent of the legislature as manifested by the State Credit Card Crime Act and specifically Section 817.68 . . .

McCONNELL, v. STATE, 298 So. 2d 550 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . The court also referred to § 817.68, F.S.A., which specifically provides that the State Credit Card Crime . . .

LORE, Jr. v. STATE, 267 So. 2d 699 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

. . . S.1969, F.S.A., is a part, specifically provides in Section 817.68 thereof : “817.68 Part II not exclusive . . . what we believe to be the intent of the legislature as reflected by the emphasized language of Section 817.68 . . .

STRADA, v. STATE, 267 So. 2d 702 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

. . . intent of the legislature as manifested by the State Credit Card Crime Act and specifically Section 817.68 . . .

STATE v. McCURDY,, 257 So. 2d 92 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

. . . . § 817.68, F.S.A., provided as follows: “This part shall not be construed to preclude the applicability . . .