Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 818.05 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 818.05 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 818.05

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XLVI
CRIMES
Chapter 818
SALE OF MORTGAGED PERSONAL PROPERTY; SIMILAR OFFENSES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 818.05
818.05 Sale, concealment, or disposal of property held under contract or conditional sale; penalty.
(1) No person who is in possession of any personal property under and by virtue of any contract or conditional sale or otherwise where the title to said personal property does not vest in the possessor, shall sell, conceal or dispose of such personal property without first having the written consent of the person then having or retaining the bona fide title to such personal property so to sell, dispose of, or conceal the same.
(2) Any person who shall violate the provisions of this section shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
History.ss. 1, 2, ch. 7860, 1919; CGL 7230, 7321; s. 891, ch. 71-136.

F.S. 818.05 on Google Scholar

F.S. 818.05 on Casetext

Amendments to 818.05


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 818.05
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S818.05 - FRAUD - SALE DISPOSE OF PERSONAL PROPERTY UND CONTRACT - M: S



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

In AMBERJACK INTERESTS, INC. W. v., 326 B.R. 379 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2005)

. . . Id The 40% fee is therefore calculated as follows: 40% times ($81,-818.05 plus $103,772.72) equals $74,236.31 . . .

FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY, v. HANUS, 491 So. 2d 570 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . The complaint further alleged that Ocean City had violated Sections 818.01 and 818.05, Florida Statutes . . . Section 818.05(1) provides: No person who is in possession of any personal property under and by virtue . . .

ILLINOIS TERMINAL CO. v. THE UNITED STATES, 73 Ct. Cl. 263 (Ct. Cl. 1931)

. . . railroad properties during the period of Federal control in excess of the “ standard return ” of $390,-818.05 . . .

ILLINOIS TERMINAL CO. v. UNITED STATES, 53 F.2d 904 (Ct. Cl. 1931)

. . . Plaintiff received from the government $390,-818.05, representing the “standard return,” for the use . . . Commissioner’s determination for the three years mentioned, in so far as.it held that the amount of $390,-818.05 . . . his final determination for 1922, which determination excluded from taxable income the item of $390',-818.05 . . . since the United States Board of Tax Appeals had held that the amount on. the standard return of $390,-818.05 . . .

FRIEDEN v. UNITED STATES, 5 F.2d 556 (4th Cir. 1925)

. . . $4,409.52, payments $4,-342.42; August, purchases $3,254.28, payments $50.00; September, purchases $10,-818.05 . . .

FOWLER v. PALMER, 160 F. 1 (4th Cir. 1908)

. . . deceased, for $9,250, with interest at 5% from January 18, 1904, till paid, and costs amounting to 818.05 . . .