Cases from cite.case.law:

MANATEE COUNTY, a v. J. RICHARD KAISER ENTERPRISES, INC. a a, 874 So. 2d 38 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . offering evidence to establish that OuterLimits constituted a public nuisance as defined by section 823.05 . . . injunction and that if Manatee County wanted OuterLimits declared a public nuisance as defined by section 823.05 . . .

FLO- SUN, INC. v. R. KIRK, v. R., 783 So. 2d 1029 (Fla. 2001)

. . . and water, pollution; accordingly, because Respondents’ claims were based on violations of section 823.05 . . .

J. LEWIS, v. COUNTY OF ORANGE,, 772 So. 2d 558 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . See § 823.05, Fla. Stat. (1997). . . .

WINDWARD MARINA, L. L. C. v. CITY OF DESTIN, 743 So. 2d 635 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . See § 823.05, Fla. . . .

FLORIDA ROCK INDUSTRIES, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 45 Fed. Cl. 21 (Fed. Cl. 1999)

. . . . § 823.05 (1979). . . .

R. KIRK, A. B. v. UNITED STATES SUGAR CORPORATION A QO, 726 So. 2d 822 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Plaintiffs’ amended complaint alleged that Defendants maintain a public nuisance as defined in section 823.05 . . . In dismissing Plaintiffs’ complaint with prejudice, the trial court also ruled that section 823.05 of . . . there, we shall explain why chapter 403 should not be perceived as superseding or repealing section 823.05 . . . This being so, something might be a public nuisance under section 823.05 while still being in compliance . . . Accordingly, construing section 823.05 as impliedly repealed or superseded is not the only reasonable . . .

STATE v. PANZINO A., 583 So. 2d 1059 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . 796.01, Florida Statutes, (1987); and maintaining a public nuisance in violation of sections 823.01, 823.05 . . .

STATE OF FLORIDA v. CALLARO, 42 Fla. Supp. 2d 168 (Palm Beach Cty. Ct. 1990)

. . . . § 823.05, by implication, held that the language of the Town of Palm Beach’s ordinance was not unconstitutionally . . . The town states that the pertinent part of section 823.05 is: Whoever shall erect, establish, continue . . . However, the Supreme Court in Orlando, supra, quoted the operative part of § 823.05, for purpose of their . . .

STATE v. WARREN, 558 So. 2d 55 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . Ch. 7367, § 1, Laws of Fla. (1917) (currently § 823.05, Fla.Stat. (1987)). . . .

THE FLORIDA BAR RE STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS- CRIMINAL, 508 So. 2d 1221 (Fla. 1987)

. . . figure of $100.00 will be changed to $300.00; (15) An amendment to the worthless check instruction, F.S. 823.05 . . . is hereby changed to read $150.00; (16) An amendment to the worthless check-obtaining property, F.S. 823.05 . . .

THE FLORIDA BAR, v. PIERCE,, 498 So. 2d 431 (Fla. 1986)

. . . through, and the client asked respondent to return a check she had given him six months earlier for $823.05 . . .

A. COWAN D. D. S. P. A. v. PEOPLE FLORIDA DENTAL ASSOCIATION, INC., 463 So. 2d 285 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . the circuit court against both dentists individually and the P.A., alleging nuisance under Section 823.05 . . .

GM DRUG COMPANY, a d b a F. Jr. J. J. H. Co. v. J. TAYLOR, B. d b a MG a, 412 So. 2d 943 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . .-05(1), Florida Statutes (1979) and section 823.05, Florida Statutes (1979). . . . Section 823.05 states: “[Wjhoever shall . . . maintain, own or lease any building . .. which tends to . . .

THOMPSON, v. STATE, 392 So. 2d 1317 (Fla. 1981)

. . . vacated without prejudice to the state to institute an appropriate action in accordance with sections 823.05 . . .

HEALTH CLUBS OF JACKSONVILLE, INC. v. STATE Ed AUSTIN,, 381 So. 2d 1174 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . from various orders entered in the proceeding below brought by the State under Florida Statutes, § 823.05 . . . temporary and permanent injunctions support the relief granted, which relief is within the terms of § 823.05 . . .

ODOM v. DELTONA CORPORATION, BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND, v. DELTONA CORPORATION,, 341 So. 2d 977 (Fla. 1976)

. . . Section 60.05, Florida Statutes, as amended by Chapter 71-268, Laws of Florida, 1971, and Section 823.04 [823.05 . . . of Section 60.05, Florida Statutes, as amended by Chapter 71-268, Laws of Florida, 1971, and Section 823.05 . . .

HEALTH CLUBS, INC. a v. STATE EAGAN,, 338 So. 2d 1324 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . abate or enjoin a public nuisance alleging that the trial court had jurisdiction pursuant to Sections 823.05 . . . Section 823.05, Florida Statutes (1975), provides: “Places declared a nuisance; may be abated and enjoined . . . Statutes (1975), provides as follows: “Abatement of nuisances.— (1) When any nuisance as defined in § 823.05 . . . —The court shall make such orders on proper proof as will abate all nuisances mentioned in § 823.05, . . . indecent act and thus constitutes lewdness and is subject to being declared a nuisance under Section 823.05 . . .

STATE L. SHEVIN, v. INDICO CORPORATION,, 319 So. 2d 173 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . Corporation’s Pinnacle Port Condominium project would create a public nuisance pursuant to § 60.05 and 823.05 . . . action brought under § 60.05, Florida Statutes, to abate an alleged public nuisance as defined by § 823.05 . . . We agree. § 60.05 provides in pertinent part as follows: “(1) When any nuisance as defined in § 823.05 . . .

STATE v. GOODWIN, 43 Fla. Supp. 149 (Broward Cty. Cir. Ct. 1975)

. . . The defendant’s motion to strike sham pleadings is denied for the reason that Florida Statute 823.05 . . .

UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, a v. SAVE SAND KEY, INC. a, 303 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 1974)

. . . untenable as to the facts in the case sub judice, and its application limited to those cases referred to in 823.05 . . .

STATE C. GARDNER v. SAILBOAT KEY, INC., 295 So. 2d 658 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . maintenance of a place which would tend to annoy the community, as provided for by §§ 60.05(1) and 823.05 . . .

STATE L. SHEVIN, v. MORGAN,, 289 So. 2d 782 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . Section 60.05 of the Florida Statutes [F.S.A.] provides that when any nuisance as defined in Section 823.05 . . . Section 823.05 of the Florida Statutes [F.S.A.] provides that one who maintains, own, [sic] or leaáes . . . automatic scarecrow device, as set forth in the complaint, is not the type of nuisance defined in Section 823.05 . . . Section 60.05, supra, and that the complaint does state a cause of action under the provisions of Section 823.05 . . . rights. . ” The supreme court, in the cited case,.upheld the constitutionality of Sections 60.05 and 823.05 . . .

STATE L. SHEVIN, v. TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY,, 291 So. 2d 45 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . . §§ 60.05 and 823.05, F.S.A.1971, which authorize the Attorney General to bring such suits . . . . See, e. g., § 823.05 n. 1 supra. . See, e. g., n. 7 supra. . . . .

SAVE SAND KEY, INC. a v. UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, a v. STATE L. SHEVIN, Co-, 281 So. 2d 572 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

. . . See, history of §§ 60.06 and 823.05, F.S. 1973, F.S.A. . See, e. g., Dept. of Administration v. . . .

E. WADE J. v. D. R. GAINES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, 279 So. 2d 394 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

. . . end, and which will fill with stagnant salt water, which will be a nuisance as set forth in Section 823.05 . . .

STATE CONNER, W. v. W. TURNER, W. a To Be a, 260 So. 2d 274 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

. . . Section 823.05, F.S.A., and are subject to injunction under F.S. Section 60.05, F.S.A. . . .

ORLANDO SPORTS STADIUM, INC. a v. STATE W. POWELL,, 262 So. 2d 881 (Fla. 1972)

. . . .: Secs. 823.05 and 823.10 F.S.A. are palpably void and unconstitutional on their face. . . . . § 823.05, F.S.A., provides, inter alia, that “Whoever shall erect, establish, continue, or maintain . . . Fla.Stat. § 60.05(1), F.S.A., reads as follows: “When any nuisance as defined in § 823.05, exists, the . . . Appellants first say that Fla.Stat. §§ 60.05, 823.05 and 823.10, F.S.A., quoted above, do not satisfy . . . Stat. § 823.05, F.S.A. . . .

MITCHUM, a a v. STATE, 244 So. 2d 159 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

. . . holding that said conduct by appellants constituted a public nuisance within the purview of Section 823.05 . . .

MITCHUM, d b a v. E. FOSTER, M. J. W. L., 315 F. Supp. 1387 (N.D. Fla. 1970)

. . . in the Circuit Court for Bay County, Florida, under that state’s general nuisance statutes, Sections 823.05 . . .

STATE BROWN v. H. SUSSMAN, a, 235 So. 2d 46 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970)

. . . governmental authority may be but is not necessarily a nuisance within the meaning of * * * section [823.05 . . . Section 823.05, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., provides that one who maintains, owns, or leases a building which . . . Section 60.05 provides that when any nuisance as defined in § 823.05 exists any citizen of the county . . . The various conditions enumerated in § 823.05 are all unlawful. . . . Reversed. . “823.05 Places declared a nuisance; may be abated and enjoined. . . .

GREATER LORETTA IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION, a v. STATE T. BOONE,, 234 So. 2d 665 (Fla. 1970)

. . . . § 823.05, F.S.A. . . .

SAWYER, v. W. R. ROBBINS, Jr., 213 So. 2d 515 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

. . . requirements of the City of Miami was a nuisance and, as such, was subject to injunctive relief pursuant to § 823.05 . . . provides minimum standards for rental premises, any violation of the housing code is a nuisance under § 823.05 . . . standard for rental housing as set by a governmental authority is not a nuisance within the meaning of § 823.05 . . . An examination of § 823.05 convinces us that it is designed to protect the public health and morals of . . .

STATE DADE COUNTY OPTOMETRIC ASSOCIATION, v. FAMILY OPTICAL SERVICE,, 209 So. 2d 267 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

. . . . § 823.05, F.S.A., as to entitle the plaintiff to bring this action pursuant to Fla.Stat. § 64.11, F.S.A . . .

SARASOTA COUNTY ANGLERS CLUB, INC. v. BURNS, O. a a CC a, 193 So. 2d 691 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

. . . the facts in the case sub judice, and its application limited to those cases referred to in Section 823.05 . . .

CENTRAL THEATRES, INC. v. STATE BRAREN, 161 So. 2d 558 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)

. . . On the question of furnishing bond, § 823.05, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., permits the enjoining of places . . . Stat, F.S.A., and in particular, Sec. 823.05, which statute defines certain places as nuisances, but . . .

CITY OF NORTH MIAMI BEACH v. STEVEN S MARKET,, 22 Fla. Supp. 5 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1963)

. . . Argument revolves around §64.11, Florida Statutes, authorizing action to abate any nuisance as defined in §823.05 . . .

STATE v. RAPUANO,, 153 So. 2d 353 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963)

. . . . § 823.05 (1961), F.S.A. . . .

R. T. BAIR v. CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, L. C. A. C., 144 So. 2d 818 (Fla. 1962)

. . . Sec. 64.11 et seq., See. 823.05, and Sec. 387.08, F.S.A. . . .

FIVE SKY, INC. a O v. STATE E. GERSTEIN,, 131 So. 2d 39 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1961)

. . . See §§ 64.12, 64.14, 64.15, 823.05 Fla.Stat., F.S.A. . . .

FLORIO d b a H. d b a s v. STATE A. L. EPPERSON, 119 So. 2d 305 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1960)

. . . instituted by the state attorney of Hillsborough County under the provisions of sections 64.11, 823.01, and 823.05 . . . raising the question as to whether the complaint stated a cause of action under section 64.11 and section 823.05 . . . “Whenever any nuisances as defined in § 823.05 is kept, maintained or exists, the state’s attorney, county . . .

DEMETREE v. STATE D. MARSH,, 89 So. 2d 498 (Fla. 1956)

. . . The injunction was obtained pursuant to the provisions of Section 823.05, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., which . . . The original complaint announced that the appellee was proceeding under Sections 64.-11 and 823.05, supra . . .

BOYNTON v. STATE C. MINCER, D., 75 So. 2d 211 (Fla. 1954)

. . . they engaged in the business -of-, operating a lottery and book-ma.king business contrary to Section 823.05 . . . Section 823.05, F.S.A., enumerates the places that may be abated as nuisances under Section 64.11, Florida . . . gambling and no more is sufficient in itself to abate the place as a nuisance under the statute, F.S. § 823.05 . . . In other words, under the terms of the act, Section 823.05, F.S.A., when the purchaser procures his stamp . . .

ELLIS v. STATE MARSH,, 73 So. 2d 853 (Fla. 1954)

. . . 64.11, F.S.A., authorizes a county solicitor to sue as relator to enjoin a nuisance as defined in Sec. 823.05 . . .

FLORIDA BAR, v. STATE BEVERAGE DIRECTOR, 6 Fla. Supp. 81 (Palm Beach Cty. Cir. Ct. 1954)

. . . The third charge was that petitioner violated section 823.05 of the statutes in that it maintained a . . .

PETERS v. THOMPSON, 68 So. 2d 581 (Fla. 1953)

. . . conduct, namely, betting on horse races, in her place of business, and had violated Sections 849.01 and 823.05 . . .

BOYNTON v. STATE, 64 So. 2d 536 (Fla. 1953)

. . . Section 823.05, F.S.A. makes the maintenance of a gambling establishment a nuisance. . . . Section 561.29, F.S.A. with reference to the revocation or suspension of a beverage license, and Section 823.05 . . .

STATE TAYLOR, v. SIMBERG,, 2 Fla. Supp. 178 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1952)

. . . individual to proceed — as relator, in the state’s name — against public nuisances as defined in section 823.05 . . . community,” bringing it expressly within those activities which are defined as public nuisances in section 823.05 . . . Abatement of nuisance; parties; by whom maintained. — Whenever any nuisance as defined in § 823.05 is . . .

ORBAN, v. STATE BEVERAGE DIRECTOR, 2 Fla. Supp. 33 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1952)

. . . owners of the DeLuxe Bar & Package Goods did maintain, own or lease the premises contrary to section 823.05 . . .

BORIS RIVKIND J- M CORP. a v. STATE OF FLORIDA, THEO R. GIBSON, 159 Fla. 553 (Fla. 1947)

. . . abate a nuisance, proceeding on the theory that any place to sell liquor is a nuisance as defined by 823.05 . . .

HOWARD LOSEY, v. STATE OF FLORIDA VINCENT C. GIBLIN, 158 Fla. 381 (Fla. 1947)

. . . It will be observed that Section 823.05, F.S.A. defines a nuisance as “any house or place of prostitution . . .

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, VINCENT C. GIBLIN v. JIMMY SULLIVAN,, 157 Fla. 496 (Fla. 1946)

. . . place in Miami, Florida, as defined by the laws of Florida under the terms and provisions of Section 823.05 . . .

L. v., 6 B.T.A. 312 (B.T.A. 1927)

. . . This proceeding is for the redetermination of a deficiency of $10,-823.05 in income taxes for the year . . .