The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . Harrell , 709 So.2d at 1371 ; see also § 837.02(1), Fla. . . .
. . . order granting Chester Kwitowski's motion to dismiss three counts of perjury in violation of section 837.02 . . . See § 837.02(2), Fla. Stat. (1997). . . . Any other perjury during an official proceeding is a third-degree felony. § 837.02(1). . . . Neither affords a legitimate basis for its construction of section 837.02(2). . . . Nothing in section 837.02(2) shows that the term has a different meaning there. . . .
. . . See §§ 777.011, 837.02(1), Fla. Stat. (2011). . . . See §§ 777.011, 837.02(1). The elements of tampering are: 1. . . .
. . . (2) of the Florida Statutes; c.. suborning perjury and obstructing justice in violation of sections 837.02 . . . See § 837.02(1), Fla. Stat. (1999).”). . . . .
. . . . § 837.02 (defining felony perjury); Fla. Stat. § 837.012 (defining misdemeanor perjury). . . . Stat. § 837.02(1). . . .
. . . Plaintiffs also cite to Florida Statute § 837.02, entitled “Perjury in official proceedings,” which states . . .
. . . STATEMENTS MADE IN THIS PETITION ARE BEING MADE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, PUNISHABLE AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 837.02 . . . statements made in this affidavit are being made under penalty of perjury, punishable as provided in Section 837.02 . . .
. . . record before us, it appears that the alleged victim was never charged with a violation of section 837.02 . . . investigator testified that he believed she lied at the VOP hearing which would have been a violation of 837.02 . . .
. . . Section 837.02, Florida Statutes (2008), provides: Perjury in official proceedings.— (1) Except as provided . . .
. . . . § 837.02, Fla. Stat. (2010) ("Perjury in official proceedings"). . . .
. . . Appellants’ contradictory statements “rise[ ] to the level of perjury in official proceedings (Section 837.02 . . .
. . . 1989) (holding that a racketeering charge was properly dismissed when felony perjury under section 837.02 . . .
. . . . §§ 837.02, 837.012 and 837.05. (Doc. #135, pp. 8-10.) PETA relies on Kaminer v. . . . Florida Statutes § 837.02 makes it illegal to make a false statement, under oath, in any official proceeding . . . Stat. § 837.02 would not apply in any case. See Schramm v. . . .
. . . To permit or assist a client or other witness to testify falsely is prohibited by section 837.02, Florida . . .
. . . The perjury charge alleged that Cohen, in violation of section 837.02, Florida Statutes (1999), falsely . . . See § 837.02(1), Fla. Stat. (1999). See also Hirsch v. State, 279 So.2d 866, 869 (Fla.1973). . . . Section 837.02(2), Florida Statutes (1999) provides: "Whoever makes a false statement, which he or she . . .
. . . . §§ 837.012, 837.02. . . .
. . . See § 837.02, Fla. Stat. (describing the third-degree felony of perjury in an official proceeding). . . .
. . . See § 837.02(1), Fla. Stat. (2002). . . .
. . . perjury in official proceedings and by contradictory statements in violation of Florida Statues §§ 837.02 . . . (Corrigenda at Exh. 5 ¶¶ 23, 25, 28, alleging violations of Fla Stats. §§ 817.034(4)(a) and (b), 837.02 . . .
. . . To permit or assist a client or other witness to testify falsely is prohibited by section 837.02, Florida . . .
. . . statements made in this affidavit are being made under penalty of perjury, punishable as provided in Section 837.02 . . .
. . . The defendants were charged with violating section 837.02(1), Florida Statutes (1989). . . .
. . . . § 837.02(1) (1999); see also Hirsch v. . . .
. . . .” § 837.02, Fla. Stat. (2000). . . .
. . . STATEMENTS MADE IN THIS PETITION ARE BEING MADE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, PUNISHABLE AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 837.02 . . .
. . . I can’t bend to the left side or the right side”, in violation of s. 837.02, Fla. Stat. . . .
. . . STATEMENTS MADE IN THIS PETITION ARE BEING MADE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, PUNISHABLE AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 837.02 . . .
. . . Section 837.02 defines the crime of perjury in an official proceeding and limits the statute’s sweep . . . official proceeding in regard to any material matter shall be guilty of a felony of the third degree.... § 837.02 . . . . § 837.02, Fla. Stat. (1993) (emphasis supplied). . . .
. . . Anderson was convicted of both perjury in an official proceeding (section 837.02) and providing false . . .
. . . In Florida, section 837.02, Florida Statutes (1995), states that the offense of perjury in an official . . .
. . . See §§ 775.15(2)(b) and 837.02,- Fla. Stat. (1991). . . . See §§ 775.15(2)(b), 837.02(1), Fla. Stat. (1993). . . . .
. . . Whether the double jeopardy clause permits a defendant to be convicted and sentenced under both section 837.02 . . .
. . . Whether the double jeopardy clause permits a defendant to be convicted and sentenced under both section 837.02 . . . As noted above, section 837.02 punishes one who knowingly makes a false statement under oath in an official . . . Under section 837.02, the violation is of a formal oath, while under section 903.035, it is not. . . . Section 837.02, Florida Statutes (1991), provides in relevant part: (1) Whoever makes a false statement . . . Alternatively, the defendant could be prosecuted under section 837.02 for committing perjury in an official . . .
. . . materiality is not an element of the perjury prosecution in the present case, which was pursued under section 837.02 . . . State, 279 So.2d 866 (Fla.1973), and section 837.02(1) expressly provides that: Whoever makes a false . . . In the instant case, Lauri Ellis was charged with perjury under section 837.02, Florida Statutes. . . . For example, in 1971, section 837.02 provided: Whoever being lawfully required to depose the truth in . . . The 1974 legislature rewrote the perjury statute, codifying section 837.02 in its current form effective . . . Section 837.02 now clearly defines the elements of perjury consistent with previous case law and does . . . Although it is true that the words “material matter” appear in the body of section 837.02, it is also . . .
. . . See §§ 775.15(2)(b), 837.02, Fla.Stat. (1995). . . .
. . . . § 837.02, Fla.Stat. (1993). Reversed and remanded. . . .
. . . Since perjury is a crime, see §§ 837.012, 837.02, Fla.Stat. (1993), Baiton asserts that his allegations . . .
. . . WHETHER THE DOUBLE JEOPARDY CLAUSE PERMITS A DEFENDANT TO BE CONVICTED AND SENTENCED UNDER BOTH SECTION 837.02 . . . Applying section 775.021 to the instant facts, Anderson’s convictions for violating both section 837.02 . . . the crime of providing false information in an application for bail, the perjury charge under section 837.02 . . . connection with an application for bail, is merely a lesser degree of the offense enumerated in section 837.02 . . . Here, sections 903.035 and 837.02 have different “core offenses.” . . . Subsections 837.02(1) and (2), relating to perjury in official proceedings, provide: (1) Whoever makes . . . Hollie, to the emergency room of the Central Florida Regional Hospital in Sanford, contrary to Sections 837.02 . . . GOSHORN, J., dissents, with opinion. . § 837.02, Fla.Stat. (1991). . § 903.035, Fla.Stat. (1991). .Although . . . batteiy” describes conduct that is neither a crime nor an offense. . § 837.012, Fla.Stat. (1993). . § 837.02 . . .
. . . . § 837.02, Fla.Stat. (1993). Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. . . .
. . . Cf § 837.02, Fla.Stat. (1993) (“Whoever makes a false statement, which he does not believe to be true . . .
. . . See §§ 775.15(2)(b) and 837.02, Fla.Stat. (1991). . . .
. . . The perjury statute in pertinent part reads as follows: 837.02 Peijury in official proceedings.— (1) . . .
. . . or assist a client or other witness to testify falsely is prohibited by -Florida Statute § section 837.02 . . .
. . . PERJURY (Amended) (NOT IN AN OFFICIAL PROCEEDING — F.S. 837.012) (IN AN OFFICIAL PROCEEDING — F.S. 837.02 . . . Give if applicable F.S. 837.012(2) & 837.02(2) Knowledge of the materiality of the statement is not an . . .
. . . On May 16, 1990, the appellant was charged in count I with perjury in violation of section 837.02, Florida . . .
. . . Ralph Kermit Ellis by recanting his sworn testimony and committing Perjury in violation of Section 837.02 . . .
. . . . § 837.02, was directly caused by a City policy, custom or usage that required or allowed police officers . . . arrested John Dees charging him with five counts of perjury in an official proceeding (Fla.Stat. § 837.02 . . .
. . . Florida Statutes (1987), and two counts of perjury in an official proceeding in violation of section 837.02 . . .
. . . . §§837.02, 914.22 (1989), and its courts have subpoena and contempt powers available to bring recalcitrant . . .
. . . . §§ 837.02 and 817.49; see also Doe v. Gonzalez, supra at 694. . . . Section 837.02 provides: (1) Whoever makes a false statement, which he does not believe to be true, under . . .
. . . To permit or assist a client or other witness to testify falsely is prohibited by Florida Statute § 837.02 . . .
. . . The perjury count charges both appellants with violation of section 837.02, Fla. . . . Section 837.02, Fla.Stat. (1987), reads in pertinent part: “Whoever makes a false Statement, which he . . . indicates a legislative intent that false swearing before a notary public may violate either section 837.02 . . . perjury charge, the predicate acts which led to the State’s charge of felony perjury under section 837.02 . . . However, because the perjury charge delineated in the RICO count only alleges violation of section 837.02 . . .
. . . proceeding — 837.012 None None CHARGED OFFENSES CATEGORY 1 CATEGORY 2 Perjury if official proceeding — 837.02 . . .
. . . . § 837.02(1), Fla.Stat. (1987). . Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701.A6. . . .
. . . information in which the defendant, David Marlow, was charged with perjury in violation of section 837.02 . . . See also, § 837.02, Fla.Stat. (1983). . . . the arraignment on the misdemeanor charges was not a material matter within the meaning of section 837.02 . . .
. . . For example, the legislature has distinguished between penury in an official proceeding (Section 837.02 . . .
. . . court in Schramm, in regard to a charge of perjury in an official proceeding in violation of section 837.02 . . . Schramm’s statements were not made during an official proceeding, his conviction for violation of Section 837.02 . . .
. . . The indictment asserted the allegedly perjurious testimony to be violative of section 837.02, Florida . . .
. . . James William Ness-mith was convicted of perjury in an official proceeding in violation of section 837.02 . . . indicates a legislative intent that false swearing before a notary public may violate either section 837.02 . . . 3d DCA 1984), the appellate court reversed the dismissal of a count charging perjury under section 837.02 . . . that if Nessmith committed any offense, it was in violation of section 837.012 rather than section 837.02 . . . Section 837.02 states: (1) Whoever makes a false statement, which he does not believe to be true, under . . . The conviction was under Section 837.02, Florida Statutes, perjury in official proceedings, a third degree . . .
. . . 951.88 Lube, oil, and grease. 487.54 Tires, batteries, and accessories. 472.02 Facilities and equipment. 837.02 . . .
. . . in violation of section 839.25(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1981), and perjury, in violation of section 837.02 . . .
. . . a State Attorney investigation is an official proceeding for the purpose of the perjury statute, § 837.02 . . . COMMIT PERJURY Appellant was charged with solicitation to commit perjury under Sections 777.-04(2) and 837.02 . . . Section 837.02 provides: Perjury in official proceedings.— (1) Whoever makes a false statement, which . . . 368 So.2d 1369 (Fla.1979) (in prosecution for perjury in a State Attorney investigation under Section 837.02 . . . Cf. § 837.02, Fla.Stat. (1979). . . . . Rouen to commit perjury in an Official Proceeding, an offense prohibited by Section 837.02, Florida Statutes . . .
. . . PERJURY BY LATER CONTRADICTORY STATEMENTS UNDER SECTION 837.021; AND (b) FOR PERJURY UNDER SECTION 837.02 . . . addressed in that opinion the second part of the certified question, relating to prosecution under section 837.02 . . .
. . . 837.011, Florida Statutes (1981), so as to subject the defendant to a charge of perjury under Section 837.02 . . . One of the information charged Witte with perjury in an official proceeding in violation of Section 837.02 . . . Making a knowing false statement under oath in an official proceeding is a felony under Section 837.02 . . . placed under oath is official as a predicate to prosecuting the witness for a felony under Section 837.02 . . . Section 837.02(1), Florida Statutes (1981), provides in pertinent part: "Whoever makes a false, statement . . .
. . . Clausell is being prosecuted for perjury in violation of Section 837.02, Florida Statutes (1981). . . .
. . . Appellant pled nolo contendere to the offense of perjury, Section 837.02, Florida Statutes (1979), reserving . . .
. . . supreme court pointed out in Doe that the state is not precluded from prosecuting her under section 837.02 . . . extremely difficult for the state to prosecute Fowler for perjury in official proceedings under section 837.02 . . . PERJURY BY LATER CONTRADICTORY STATEMENTS UNDER SECTION 837.021; AND (b) FOR PERJURY UNDER SECTION 837.02 . . .
. . . was charged in the indictment summarized as follows: Count 1 charged that Judge Leon violated section 837.02 . . . Count 2 charged that Judge Leon violated section 837.02(1), Florida Statutes, when he stated under oath . . .
. . . Tabor and Virgil Douglas did in fact not burn down the Lake Butler Middle School, contrary to Section 837.02 . . .
. . . Perjury is made a criminal violation by and defined in § 837.02, Fla.Stat. (1979), as: (1) Whoever makes . . .
. . . . § 837.02, Fla.Stat. (1979). . . .
. . . . § 837.02, Fla.Stat. (1979); see § 837.012, Fla. Stat. (1979). . . . .
. . . Adams was charged with the crime of perjury in violation of section 837.02, Florida Statutes (1973). . . . Section 837.02, Florida Statutes (1973), provides: Whoever being lawfully required to depose the truth . . . reasoning to be directly applicable to the question of whether there can be an attempt to violate section 837.02 . . .
. . . brought criminal charges against Agar in this matter for perjury in violation of sections 777.011 and 837.02 . . .
. . . inconsistent statements, it does not follow, however, that if they now commit perjury, in violation of section 837.02 . . .
. . . a licensed and practicing chiropractor charged with perjury in an official proceeding under section 837.02 . . .
. . . Perjury in official proceedings is defined in Section 837.02, Florida Statutes (1977): (1) Whoever makes . . .
. . . is charged by Information in this cause with two Counts of Perjury in violation of Florida Statute § 837.02 . . . Florida Statute, § 837.02(1) provides that a violation of this Statute is committed only if the statement . . .
. . . Schramm’s statements were not made during an official proceeding, his conviction for violation of Section 837.02 . . . of a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in § 775.082, § 775.083, or § 775.084.” . “837.02 . . .
. . . Petitioner Adams was indicted in 1974 for the crime of perjury, in violation of section 837.02, Florida . . .
. . . made certain statements which formed the basis for a subsequent Information charging perjury under § 837.02 . . .
. . . Appellee was charged with the crime of perjury under Section 837.02(1), Florida Statutes (1977) as the . . .
. . . Sections 837.02, .021, Florida Statutes (1975). . . .
. . . William Allan Mob-ley from an adjudication of guilty of perjury in an official proceeding under Section 837.02 . . . Affirmed. . “837.02 Perjury in official proceedings “(1) Whoever makes a false statement, which he does . . .
. . . Stocksdale, was charged in an amended information with one count of perjury in a judicial proceeding, F.S. 837.02 . . . self-incrimination certainly causes prosecutorial scrutiny of previous testimony for violations of §837.02 . . .
. . . The parties hereto stipulate that Respondent’s testimony although not legally perjurious, (See F.S. 837.02 . . .
. . . Section 837.02, F.S.A. . . . Section 837.02, F.S.A. . . .
. . . . § 837.02, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. We affirm. . . .
. . . of having given false testimony before the grand jury, which constitutes an offense as provided in § 837.02 . . .
. . . . § 837.02, F.S.A. . Nix v. State, (Fla.App.1965) 173 So. 2d 465. . United States v. . . .
. . . An additional payment of excess profits tax in the amount of $837.02 subsequently was made, making its . . .
. . . An additional payment of excess profits tax in the amount of $837.02 subsequently was made, making its . . .
. . . record, before the beginning of the trial, that the State would proceed under Florida Statutes Sec. 837.02 . . . , F.S.A., which provides: “837.02 Perjury in judicial proceeding ; punishment. . . . of perjury, says: “The crime of perjury committed in a judicial proceeding is condemned by Section 837.02 . . . since the County Solicitor had stipulated that the case would be tried under Florida Statutes Sec. 837.02 . . .
. . . The crime of perjury committed in a judicial proceeding is condemned by Section 837.02, Florida Statutes . . .