Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 849.29 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 849.29 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 849.29

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XLVI
CRIMES
Chapter 849
GAMBLING
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 849.29
849.29 Persons against whom suits may be brought to recover on gambling contracts.The following persons shall be jointly and severally liable for the items which are authorized by this act to be sued for and recovered, and any suit brought under the authorization of this act may be brought against all or any of such persons, to wit: The winner of the money or property lost in the gambling transaction; every person who, having direct or indirect charge, control or management, either exclusively or with others, of the place where the gambling transaction occurs, procures, suffers or permits such place to be used for gambling purposes; whoever promotes, sets up or conducts the gambling transaction in which the loss occurs or has an interest in it as backer, vendor, owner or otherwise; and, as to anything of value other than money, the transferees and assignees, with notice, of the persons hereinabove specified in this section; and the personal representatives of the persons specified in this section.
History.s. 4, ch. 26543, 1951.

F.S. 849.29 on Google Scholar

F.S. 849.29 on Casetext

Amendments to 849.29


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 849.29
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 849.29.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

MUCI, v. POSADAS DE PUERTO RICO ASSOCIATES, INC., 716 So. 2d 294 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . We conclude that section 849.29, Florida Statutes (1997), does not have effect within a foreign jurisdiction . . .

H. H. O. COMPANY v. UNITED STATES, 12 Cl. Ct. 147 (Ct. Cl. 1987)

. . . called for 40 cubic yards of select borrow rather than the rip-rap and you were paid an additional $849.29 . . .

S. P. v., 87 T.C. 1087 (T.C. 1986)

. . . loss-granted options (£27,315) £866.47 (£28,181.47) 1976 Short-term capital gain-purchased options 26,075 849.29 . . .