The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . Id. at 777 (quoting § 877.02(1), Fla. Stat. (1981) ). . . . Sections 877.02, "Solicitation of legal services or retainers therefor; penalty," and 817.234, "False . . .
. . . The UST contends that at least $14,000.00 in annual bonuses, $877.02 in monthly deductions for 401 (k . . .
. . . the solicitation of legal business in violation of the so-called anti-solicitation statute, section 877.02 . . . solicitation of legal business is subject to professional discipline by the Florida Supreme Court, section 877.02 . . . Section 877.02(1), Florida Statutes (1973), provided in pertinent part, as follows: (1) It shall be unlawful . . .
. . . upholding constitutionality of section 454.23), review dismissed, 677 So.2d 840 (Fla.1996); see also § 877.02 . . . State, 384 So.2d 1261 (Fla.1980) (upholding constitutionality of section 877.02). . . . .
. . . DCA), rev. denied, 492 So.2d 1334 (Fla.1986) (attorney whose fee contract is void for violation of § 877.02 . . .
. . . Ap-pellee, an attorney, was charged with violations of sections 817.234(8), (9), and 877.02(1) and (3 . . .
. . . State, 368 So2d 340 (Fla.1979) [F.S. 877.02(1), the antisolicitation of legal business statute attacked . . .
. . . 483 So.2d 775 (Fla. 3d DCA) (agreement to employ attorney was void where agreement violated Section 877.02 . . .
. . . We hold that because the employment of Gerson was solicited in violation of Section 877.02(1), Florida . . . Speiller was invalid because illegally procured in violation of Section 877.02(1), Florida Statutes ( . . . 476 So.2d 1311 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), deals not with subsection 1, but rather subsection 2 of Section 877.02 . . .
. . . Florida Statute, Section 877.02(2) (1979) reads in part as follows: “It shall be unlawful for any person . . . See Section 877.02(3) Florida Statutes, (1979). . . . The defendants pled that the contract was void for reasons other than Section 877.02 of the Florida Statutes . . . Florida Statute, Section 877.02(2) (1979) “It shall be unlawful for any person in the employ of or in . . . The issue presented in both cases is the applicability of section 877.02, Florida Statutes (1981) to . . . Ratiner, we held the fee contract obtained by the doctor/attorney in derogation of section 877.02 to . . . Perhaps section 877.02 (albeit implicitly) suggests an analogous defense. . . . As appellees admitted, section 877.02 was never raised below at all. . . . . Button was similar to section 877.02. . . . demonstrate that the attorney-client agreement in question was entered into in violation of section 877.02 . . .
. . . directed verdict on the ground that Thomas had solicited his contract with Nieves in violation of Section 877.02 . . . he signed the contract with Nieves he was contacting him as a lawyer, not as a doctor, thus Section 877.02 . . . Section 877.02(2) provides: “It shall be unlawful for any person in the employ of or in any capacity . . . Therefore, we find that Thomas acquired the retainer agreement from Nieves in violation of Section 877.02 . . . Certainly Section 877.02, Fla.Stat. (1983) renders formation of Thomas’ retainer agreement unlawful and . . . See Section 877.02 of the Florida Statutes (1981). Therefore the petition for rehearing is denied. . . .
. . . .-05 and 877.02, Fla.Stat. (1977). . . . The defendant was charged with felonious extortion and solicitation of legal business. §§ 836.05 and 877.02 . . .
. . . 9,1978, respondent was found guilty on three counts of soliciting legal business in violation of section 877.02 . . .
. . . trial in the County Court of Dade County, of solicitation of legal business in violation of section 877.02 . . . Williams, 183 So.2d 537 (Fla.1966), this Court upheld section 877.02 against contentions that it was . . . The Court held the statute valid and elaborated as follows: The object of § 877.02(1) is to prohibit . . .
. . . . § 877.02(1), F.S.A., prohibiting solicitation of legal business; McArthur v. . . .
. . . Complaint also charges, and the record shows that the respondent was found guilty of violating Chapter 877.02 . . .
. . . . § 877.02(1), F. S.A. . . . statutes creating and establishing it were enacted contrary to the Florida Constitution and (2), F.S. § 877.02 . . . Section 877.02(1), F.S.A., reads as follows: “(1) It shall be unlawful for any person or his agent, employee . . . Petitioner contends that F.S. § 877.02(1), F.S.A.,. is so broad it prohibits a friend, acquaintance or . . . The object of § 877.02(1) is to prohibit the solicitation of legal business by ait attorney directly . . .
. . . Supp. 1962), §§877.01 to 877.02; Ga. Code Ann., 1953 (Cum. Supp. 1961), §§ 26-4701, 26-4703; Miss. . . .