The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . Like all affirmative defenses and pursuant to § 893.10(1), Fla. . . . Stats. 893.10(1), 893.13(6)(a), and 499.03(1) are silent, however, as to the burden of persuasion for . . .
. . . Like all affirmative defenses and pursuant to § 893.10(1), Fla. . . . Stats. 893.10(1), 89S.13(6)(a), and 199.03(1) are silent, however, as to the burden of persuasion for . . .
. . . At the same time, the Legislature did not amend section 893.10, which applies to all of chapter 893. . . . Section 893.10 is entitled “Burden of Proof; photograph or video recording of evidence” and provides . . . the evidence with respect to any exemption or exception is upon the person claiming its benefit. § 893.10 . . . appellate courts have not expressly interpreted the “burden of going forward,” as provided for in section 893.10 . . . Those cases seem to support the jury instructions, given the fact that section 893.10(1) provides that . . . Section 893.10(1), Florida Statutes (2012), provides: It is not necessary for the state to negative any . . . Still, the plain language of section 893.10(1) — without judicial interpretation — does not resolve with . . . State, 226 So.2d 399, 400 (Fla.1969), but the current statute, section 893.10, states that the “burden . . . Without explicitly citing to section 893.10, one district court of appeal has observed, in dicta, that . . . No Florida appellate court has addressed the effect of section 893.10(1) in the specific context of the . . .
. . . State, 336 So.2d 687 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976) (noting by way of example that under section 893.10, if a defendant . . .
. . . The clerk of court denied $893.10 of Mr. . . .
. . . stems are not “mature stalks”, it held that the definitional issue was “immaterial” because Section 893.10 . . . Although Section 893.10(1) does not define precisely the types of “exemption or exception” to which it . . . It seems apparent that the exemptions and exceptions mentioned in Section 893.10(1) have reference to . . . The crucial difference between an 893.02(2) exclusion and 893.10(1) exemption (or exception) is that . . . In other words, Section 893.10(1) provides an excuse for what would otherwise be criminal conduct, and . . .
. . . which it was held that Purifoy failed to meet the burden of proof placed upon him pursuant to Sec. 893.10 . . .
. . . Section 893.10(1), Florida Statutes (1975), expressly provides that it is not necessary for the State . . .
. . . To accomplish this the State relies upon Section 893.10(1), Florida Stat-. utes (1973), which provides . . . prescription or order of a practitioner while acting in the course of his professional practice . . ” Under § 893.10 . . .
. . . Under Section 330.10, Wis.Stat.1961 (now Section 893.10, Wis.Stat. 1965), an adverse possession of ten . . .
. . . 46919, dated October 12,1922, disallowed the sum of $1,626.25 and paid plaintiff thereon in the sum of $893.10 . . .
. . . Columbia were fully paid, and there remained in the hands of the ancillary administrator the sum of $893.10 . . .