Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT, 260 So. 3d 1024 (Fla. 2018)

. . . . § 934.02(12), Fla. Stat. and Fla. Stat. § 668.602(7), Fla. Stat. . . .

SMITH, II, v. STATE, 261 So. 3d 714 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . . § 934.02(2). . . .

MCDONOUGH, v. FERNANDEZ- RUNDLE,, 862 F.3d 1314 (11th Cir. 2017)

. . . Stat. § 934.02 (2016) (emphasis added). . . . Section 934.02 does not apply to the recording of all oral communications. . . . . § 934.02 (emphasis added). . . . Stat. § 934.02. . . . Stat. § 934.02. . . .

STATE v. CARABALLO,, 198 So. 3d 819 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Section 934.02(2) defines oral communication as “any oral communication uttered by a person exhibiting . . . See § 934.02(2). Accordingly, we reverse the order granting Ms. . . .

BELLE, v. STATE, 177 So. 3d 285 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . communication is not subject to interception under circumstances justifying such expectation.... ” § 934.02 . . . See § 934.02(2). It may be that Mr. . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT NO., 163 So. 3d 478 (Fla. 2015)

. . . Stat., § 934.02, Fla. Stat., and § 943.10, Fla. . . .

B. STALLELY, In v. ADS ALLIANCE DATA SYSTEMS, INC., 602 F. App'x 732 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 934.02(3). . . . Id. § 934.02(4). . . . Stat. § 934.02(4)(a)(l). • In granting summary judgment in favor of ADS, the district court relied on . . .

R. McDADE, v. STATE, 154 So. 3d 292 (Fla. 2014)

. . . Section 934.02(2), Florida Statutes (2010), defines the term “oral communication” for purposes of chapter . . . personally to the victim in the victim’s home is an “oral communication” within the definition of Section 934.02 . . . Similarly, under the definition of oral communication provided by section 934.02(2), Florida Statutes . . . statements “under circumstances justifying” his expectation that his statements would not be recorded. § 934.02 . . . sense either in the Fourth Amendment context or under the definition of “oral communication” in section 934.02 . . .

E. ABDO, v. STATE, 144 So. 3d 594 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . communication is not subject to interception under circumstances justifying such expectation .... ” § 934.02 . . . occurring inside an enclosed area or in a secluded area are more likely to be protected under section 934.02 . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT NO., 143 So. 3d 893 (Fla. 2014)

. . . Trial judges may consult sections 790.001, 934.02, and 943.10 in deciding whether and how to define “ . . . Trial judges may consult sections 790.001, 934.02, and 943.10 in deciding whether and how to define “ . . . Trial judges may consult sections 790.001, 934.02, and 943.10 in deciding whether and how to define “ . . .

B. STALLEY, v. ADS ALLIANCE DATA SYSTEMS, INC., 997 F. Supp. 2d 1259 (M.D. Fla. 2014)

. . . See § 934.02(3), Fla. Stat. . . . See § 934.02(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (emphasis added). . . . Stat. applied to the factual situation- — -rather than section 934.02(4)(a), Fla. . . . (Doc. #243 at 6; Doc. #269 at 14); see § 934.02(1), Fla. Stat. . . .

B. BRUGMANN, v. STATE, 117 So. 3d 39 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . Section 934.02(2), Florida Statutes (2004), defines the term “oral communication” as “any oral communication . . . .1985), the Florida Supreme Court held that the definition of “oral communication” set forth in section 934.02 . . . Supreme Court has interpreted the test set forth [in the definition of “oral communication” under section 934.02 . . . such communication is not subject to interception under circumstances justifying such expectation.” § 934.02 . . . party to the unlawfully intercepted communication, San Roman was not an “aggrieved party” under section 934.02 . . .

R. McDADE, v. STATE, 114 So. 3d 465 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . . §§ 934.02(5), .03(1). . . . communication has a reasonable expectation of privacy in that communication under the circumstances. § 934.02 . . . from the strong language in section 934.03(1) to the definition of “oral communication” in section 934.02 . . . Inciarrano changed this policy by its reliance on the definition of “oral communication” in section 934.02 . . . By relying on section 934.02(2) instead of section 934.03, the holding in Inciarrano flips the burden . . .

CUOMO, v. STATE, 98 So. 3d 1275 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . subject to interception under circumstances justifying such expectation Id. at 852 (citing to section 934.02 . . .

ENOCH, v. STATE, 95 So. 3d 344 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . “Electronic communication” has the meaning provided in s. 934.02[ (12), Fla. . . .

Z. FRANCE, v. P. FRANCE,, 90 So. 3d 860 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . . § 934.02(3), Fla. Stat. (2009). . . . .

AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF ILLINOIS, v. ALVAREZ,, 679 F.3d 583 (7th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 934.02(2); Ohio Rev.Code Ann. § 2933.51(B); Texas Penal Code § 16.02(b)(1), incorporating Tex.Code . . .

PERDUE, v. STATE, 78 So. 3d 712 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . picked up over the telephone, which clearly meet the definition of “wire communication” in section 934.02 . . . or in a secluded area are more likely to fall within the definition of oral communication in section 934.02 . . .

TRACEY, v. STATE, 69 So. 3d 992 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . .” § 934.02(20), Fla. Stat. (2009). . . . . .” § 934.02(21), Fla. . . .

HENTZ, v. STATE, 62 So. 3d 1184 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . . § 934.02(1-3), Fla. Stat. (2008). . . . originated within the Mozos’ home and thus exhibited the required expectation of privacy demanded by section 934.02 . . .

V. MINOTTY, M. D. v. A. BAUDO, M. D. M. D. M. D. V. M. D. v. A. M. D. M. D. M. D., 42 So. 3d 824 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . .” § 934.02(3), Fla. Stat. (2007) (emphasis added). . . . electronic, or oral communication through the use of any electronic, mechanical, or other device.” § 934.02 . . . While FEI/doctors contend that the silent video captures the contents of the communication, section 934.02 . . . essentially the same language, we conclude that silent video surveillance is not covered by section 934.02 . . .

JACKSON, v. STATE, 18 So. 3d 1016 (Fla. 2009)

. . . . § 17-30-15(2) (2005); cf § 934.02(2), Fla. Stat. (2005). . . .

WARD, v. STATE, 965 So. 2d 308 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Stat. (2002) (defining “federal law enforcement officer”); § 934.02(6), Fla. . . .

DELGADO, v. STATE, 948 So. 2d 681 (Fla. 2006)

. . . Stat. (2002) (making legislative findings); § 934.02(20), Fla. . . .

WILLIAMS, v. B. CARNEY,, 157 F. App'x 103 (11th Cir. 2005)

. . . .” § 934.02(2), Fla. Stat. . . .

MIGUT, v. FLYNN,, 131 F. App'x 262 (11th Cir. 2005)

. . . Section 934.02(3) defines “intercept” as “the aural or other acquisition of the contents of any wire, . . . Ann. § 934.02(3) (emphasis added). . . . Section 934.02(2) defines “oral communication” as any oral communication uttered by a person exhibiting . . . Ann. § 934.02(2) (emphasis added). . . . occurring inside an enclosed area or in a secluded area are more likely to be protected under section 934.02 . . .

GUILDER, v. STATE, 899 So. 2d 412 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . .” § 934.02(3), Fla. Stat. In Shevin v. . . . A majority of the court answered affirmatively finding: Intercept is defined by section 934.02(3) to . . . Thus pursuant to section 934.02(3), “to intercept” means to gain control or possession of a communication . . . When section 934.02(2)(d) was amended to provide that it was lawful to intercept a wire or oral communication . . .

O BRIEN, v. O BRIEN,, 899 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . .” § 934.02(3), Fla. Stat. (2003). . . . The term "electronic communications” is defined in section 934.02(12), Florida Statutes (2003), as "any . . .

COHEN BROTHERS, LLC. LLC, v. ME CORP. S. A., 872 So. 2d 321 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . . § 934.02(5), Fla. Stat. (1999). . . . electronic, or oral communication through the use of any electronic, mechanical, or other device." § 934.02 . . .

I. FIGUEROA, v. STATE, 870 So. 2d 897 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . The term, “contents,” is defined in section 934.02(7), Florida Statutes (2000), as it relates to wire . . . An “electronic communication” is defined by section 934.02(12), Florida Statutes (2000), as “any transfer . . . fall within the definition of “contents” of an “electronic communication,” as contemplated by sections 934.02 . . . See § 934.02(20), Fla. Stat. (2000). . . . That is to say, the pager transmission included “contents,” as defined by section 934.02. . . .

STATE v. FRATELLO, 835 So. 2d 312 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . communications by the Department of Law Enforcement or any law enforcement agency as defined in s. 934.02 . . .

PINELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, v. SUNCAM, INC., 829 So. 2d 989 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Morever, the Legislature in s. 934.02(1), F.S., appears to implicitly recognize the public’s right to . . . Section 934.02(2), Florida Statutes, however, defines “oral communication” as specifically excluding . . .

JATAR, v. LAMALETTO a, 758 So. 2d 1167 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Inciarrano, 473 So.2d 1272, 1275 (Fla.1985), Section 934.02(2) in defining oral communication, expressly . . . threat delivered to the victim in the victim’s home is an oral communication as defined by section 934.02 . . .

PAREDES, v. STATE, 760 So. 2d 167 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . . § 934.02(3), (4); 934.03(1). . . .

In MEEKS, 237 B.R. 856 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1999)

. . . (Claim No. 7) GMAC had a remaining unsecured claim of $934.02. . . .

STATE v. McCORMICK, 719 So. 2d 1220 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . .” § 934.02(3), Fla. Stat. (1997). . . .

STATE v. M. HERSHKOWITZ,, 714 So. 2d 545 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . fact that, in 1988, the definition of “investigative or law enforcement officer” contained in section 934.02 . . . communications by the Department of Law Enforcement or any law enforcement agency as defined in s. 934.02 . . .

KOCH, v. KIMBALL,, 710 So. 2d 5 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . .” § 934.02(1), Fla. Stat. (1995) (emphasis supplied). . . .

BRANDIN, v. STATE, 669 So. 2d 280 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . An “oral communication” is defined in section 934.02(2) as: any oral communication uttered by a person . . . circumstances justifying such expectation” falls within the ambit of statutorily protected communications. § 934.02 . . .

STEVENSON, v. STATE, 667 So. 2d 410 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . Section 934.02(2), Florida Statutes (1993), defines “oral communication” as “any oral communication uttered . . . occurring inside an enclosed area or in a secluded area are more likely to be protected under section 934.02 . . .

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES, v. EDWARDS,, 654 So. 2d 628 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . the official being recorded fully expected the recording to take place, the question whether section 934.02 . . . “Oral communication” is defined in section 934.02(2), Florida Statutes, which provides: “Oral communication . . . a telephone conversation without the consent of the other party constitutes a violation of section 934.02 . . . The supreme court noted that those cases did not address the section 934.02(2) requirement of a reasonable . . . such communication is not subject to interception under circumstances justifying such expectation.” § 934.02 . . .

STATE v. MOZO, 655 So. 2d 1115 (Fla. 1995)

. . . “Oral communication” intended to be protected by chapter 934 is defined by section 934.02(2) as: [A]ny . . . originated within the Mozos’ home and thus exhibited the required expectation of privacy demanded by section 934.02 . . .

STATE v. JACKSON,, 650 So. 2d 24 (Fla. 1995)

. . . INFORMATION TRANSMITTED TO A DISPLAY PAGER CONSTITUTE AN ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION AS DEFINED BY SECTION 934.02 . . . See § 934.02(12)(c), Fla. Stat. (1991); 18 U.S.C. § 2510(12)(c) (1988). . . . by wire, we rejected the argument that such messages constituted wire communications under section 934.02 . . . identify the numbers dialed or transmitted on the telephone line to which the device is attached. § 934.02 . . . Section 934.02(12), Florida Statutes (1991), defines "electronic communication” as any transfer of signs . . .

STATE v. EDWARDS,, 645 So. 2d 588 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . Section 934.02(2), Florida Statutes, defines “oral communications” as any communication “uttered by a . . .

STATE v. SMITH,, 641 So. 2d 849 (Fla. 1994)

. . . .” § 934.02(2), Fla.Stat. (1991) (emphasis added). . . .

CINCI, v. STATE, 642 So. 2d 572 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . occurring inside an enclosed area or in a secluded area are more likely to be protected under section 934.02 . . .

JACKSON, v. STATE, 636 So. 2d 1372 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . Ch. 88-184, § 1, at 1017 (codified as amended at § 934.02(12), Fla.Stat. . . . Ch. 88-184, § 1, at 1016 (codified as amended at § 934.02(3), Fla.Stat. . . . we hold that information transmitted to a display pager is an electronic communication under section 934.02 . . . The court rejected the argument that such messages were wire communications under section 934.02(1), . . . Section 934.02(20), Florida Statutes (1991), defines pen register to mean "a device which records or . . .

MOZO, v. STATE, 632 So. 2d 623 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . Eber, 502 So.2d 32 (Fla. 3d DCA) (where defendant was not an “aggrieved person,” defined in section 934.02 . . . Section 934.02(1) defines “wire communication” as: any aural transfer made in whole or in part through . . . An “electronic communication” is defined in section 934.02(12) as: any transfer of signs, signals, writing . . . cordless phone conversations are covered by “oral communication” as protected and defined by section 934.02 . . . Accordingly, we hold cordless communications do not qualify as an “oral communication” under section 934.02 . . . Section 934.02(2), Florida Statutes (1991), defines a protected oral communication as “any communication . . .

SOGO, v. GARCIA S NATIONAL GUN, INC., 615 So. 2d 184 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . available for inspection during normal business hours by any law enforcement agency as defined in Section 934.02 . . . as defined in section 943.10, Florida Statutes; (4) A law enforcement agency as defined in Section 934.02 . . .

ROYAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES, INCORPORATED, d b a v. JEFFERSON- PILOT LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 924 F.2d 215 (11th Cir. 1991)

. . . . § 934.02(3) (West Supp.1990). . . . Fla.Stat.Ann. § 934.02(4)(a) (West Supp. 1990) (emphasis added). . . . Fla.Stat.Ann. § 934.02(4)(a) (West Supp.1990). .JP Life makes other arguments we need not address because . . .

LEWIS, v. STATE JONES, v. STATE, 570 So. 2d 346 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . reasonable expectation that their oral communications would not be subject to interception under section 934.02 . . .

STATE v. JONES,, 562 So. 2d 740 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . aggrieved person to bring an action to suppress the contents of an unlawful interception, and section 934.02 . . .

SGOUROS v. STATE OF FLORIDA, 41 Fla. Supp. 2d 35 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1990)

. . . The court focused on the definition of oral communication in § 934.02(2) in allowing the introduction . . . battery, his expectation of privacy dissolved and there was no oral communication as defined by section 934.02 . . .

SHAKTMAN, v. STATE, 553 So. 2d 148 (Fla. 1989)

. . . . § 934.02(20), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1988). See also 18 U.S.C. § 3126(3) (1988); United States v. . . .

STATE OF FLORIDA v. ROSA,, 37 Fla. Supp. 2d 157 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1988)

. . . specifically finds that the “bionic ear” or amplified microphone is a device as defined by Section 934.02 . . . and the occupants of Defendant’s vehicle was, in fact, an oral communication as defined by Section 934.02 . . . Negri eavesdropped on that conversation that constituted an intercept as defined by Section 934.02(3) . . .

SHAKTMAN, J. v. STATE, 529 So. 2d 711 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . register use, it could easily have included pen registers in its list of definitions enumerated in section 934.02 . . . The absence of pen registers in section 934.02 supports the reasonable assumption that the type of privacy . . .

UNITED STATES v. NELSON, a k a S. Jr. H. a k a Mr. a k a a k a a k a, 837 F.2d 1519 (11th Cir. 1988)

. . . . § 934.02(3). . . .

J. LaPORTE, v. STATE, 512 So. 2d 984 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . Section 934.02(2) defines “oral communication” as “any oral communication uttered by a person exhibiting . . .

STATE v. EBER STATE v. DELMONICO, STATE v. SPECTOR, STATE v. ROMAN, STATE v. WOLCOFF,, 502 So. 2d 32 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . Unlike the other defendants, San Roman is not an aggrieved person as that term is defined in Section 934.02 . . . Section 934.02(9) reads: " ‘Aggrieved person’ means a person who was a party to any intercepted wire . . .

SNOWDON, v. SAMBO S, 491 So. 2d 1154 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . ." § 934.02(2), Fla. Stat. (1983). . . .

UNITED STATES v. VAN HORN, UNITED STATES v. HARVEY, a k a, 789 F.2d 1492 (11th Cir. 1986)

. . . . § 934.02(8). . . .

STATE v. INCIARRANO,, 473 So. 2d 1272 (Fla. 1985)

. . . admitted into evidence did not constitute “oral communications” within the meaning of Florida Statutes 934.02 . . . In Walls, this Court addressed the constitutionality of sections 934.02(2), 934.-03, and 934.06 and the . . . Section 934.02(2), in defining oral communication, expressly provides: “ ‘Oral communication’ means any . . .

DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION v. RENTFAST, INC., 467 So. 2d 486 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . Section 934.02(5), Florida Statutes (1983) provides, "‘Person’ means any employee or agent of the state . . . thereof and individual, partnership, association, joint stock company, trust, or corporation.” . § 934.02 . . .

P. J. a v. STATE, 453 So. 2d 470 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . . § 934.02(3), Fla.Stat. (1981). . . . parties to such communication or the existence, substance, purport or meaning of that communication. § 934.02 . . . tracing telephone numbers, provided information “concerning the identity of the parties” under section 934.02 . . . (7), it was not an “aural acquisition” under section 934.02(3) in that information was not received through . . .

DOANE v. ASSOCIATED BUREAUS, INC., 7 Fla. Supp. 2d 12 (Orange Cty. Ct. 1984)

. . . According to Florida Section 934.02(3): Intercept means to be aural acquisition of the contents of any . . .

D. BURGESS, v. F. BURGESS,, 447 So. 2d 220 (Fla. 1984)

. . . . § 934.02, Fla.Stat. (1979). . . .

INCIARRANO, v. STATE, 447 So. 2d 386 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . .” § 934.02(2), Fla.Stat. (1981). . . .

STATE v. EARLE, Sr. a k a El, 444 So. 2d 84 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 98 S.Ct. 2674, 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978); Sections 934.09(1)(a), 934.02(6), Florida . . . See Secs. 934.09(4)(d); 934.02(10), Fla.Stat. . . .

STATE v. D. WILLIAMS,, 443 So. 2d 952 (Fla. 1983)

. . . . § 934.02(1), Fla.Stat. (1979). . . . . § 934.02(2). . . . ." § 934.02(3). . . .

STATE OF FLORIDA v. QUESADA,, 3 Fla. Supp. 2d 28 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1982)

. . . See Florida Statute, Section 934.02(9). In Alderman v. . . .

M. BROWN, v. SHEARSON HAYDEN STONE, INC., 94 F.R.D. 159 (S.D. Fla. 1982)

. . . . § 934.02(5) to include a corporation: ‘Person’ means any employee or agent of the state or political . . .

CHIARENZA, v. STATE, 406 So. 2d 66 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . .” § 934.02(3), Fla.Stat. (1979). . . .

DORSEY, v. STATE BRITTEN, v. STATE, 402 So. 2d 1178 (Fla. 1981)

. . . These definitions, found in subsections (1) and (2) of section 934.02, Florida Statutes (1977), are as . . . The definition of wire communications contained in section 934.02 must be interpreted in a common sense . . .

STATE v. J. TSAVARIS,, 394 So. 2d 418 (Fla. 1981)

. . . Intercept is defined by section 934.02(3) to mean the “aural acquisition of the contents of any wire . . . the premise that the extortionary threat was an oral communication within the definition of section 934.02 . . . The issue of whether the recording was an “interception” within the definition of section 934.02(3) was . . . When section 934.02(2)(d) was amended to provide that it was lawful to intercept a wire or oral communication . . . Intercept is defined by section 934.02(3) to mean the “aural acquisition of the contents of any wire . . . Thus pursuant to section 934.02(3), “to intercept” means to gain control or possession of a communication . . .

STATE v. J. TSAVARIS,, 382 So. 2d 56 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . Section 934.02(3). . . . Section 934.02(4). Dr. Feegel answered the telephone when Dr. . . . Section 934.02(7) provides that the word “contents”, when used with respect to a wire or oral communication . . .

STATE v. KEATON,, 371 So. 2d 86 (Fla. 1979)

. . . In such a case, section 934.02(4)(a) provides that the contents of the call are exempted from the exclusion . . . In affirming the trial court’s ruling that the exclusion provided by section 934.02(4)(a) was applicable . . .

ARMSTRONG v. SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY,, 366 So. 2d 88 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . endeavor to intercept any wire or oral communication; * * * shall be guilty of a felony * * * ” F.S. 934.02 . . .

CHANDLER v. STATE, 366 So. 2d 64 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . Section 934.02(1), Florida Statutes (1977), defines “wire communication” as “. . . any communication . . .

STATE v. NOVA,, 361 So. 2d 411 (Fla. 1978)

. . . After determining that Juanita Bentley’s testimony did not fall within the exclusion of Section 934.02 . . . The word “intercept” is defined in Section 934.02(3): “Intercept” means the aural acquisition of the . . . The term “electronic, mechanical, or other device” is defined in Section 934.02(4)(a) as any device or . . . The determinative issue is whether the exclusion provided by Section 934.02(4)(a) is applicable. . . . employer and was in the ordinary course of business, and he found that the exclusion provided by Section 934.02 . . .

STATE v. WALLS, 356 So. 2d 294 (Fla. 1978)

. . . granted an interlocutory order of the trial court upholding the constitutional validity of Sections 934.02 . . . delivered personally to the victim in the victim’s home is an “oral communication” as defined in Section 934.02 . . . Granting the motion to suppress, the trial judge expressly ruled Sections 934.02(2), 934.03 and 934.06 . . . Section 934.02(2), Florida Statutes (1975), provides: “ ‘Oral communication’ means any oral communication . . . personally to the victim in the victim’s home is an “oral communication” within the definition of Section 934.02 . . .

L. BROWN, v. STATE, 349 So. 2d 1196 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . Section 934.02(2). . . .

NOVA, v. STATE, 346 So. 2d 1214 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . Section 934.02(3) defines “intercept” to mean the “aural acquisition of the contents of any wire or oral . . .

SUNBEAM TELEVISION CORPORATION, v. SHEVIN,, 45 Fla. Supp. 53 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1977)

. . . clear that the 1974 Amendment to §934.03(2) (d), particularly when considered with the amendment to §934.02 . . .

STATE v. NEWS- PRESS PUBLISHING COMPANY, a k a a, 338 So. 2d 1313 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . The following statutory definitions are pertinent to this discussion: “934.02 Definitions. — As used . . . communication uttered at a public meeting,” were added to the definition of “oral communication” in Section 934.02 . . . of all parties to the conversation, provided the conversation is not public as provided by Section 934.02 . . .

G. HORN, v. STATE, 298 So. 2d 194 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . Florida Statute 934.02, F.S.A. defines “oral communication” to mean any oral communication uttered by . . .

E. WRIGHT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, 495 F.2d 1086 (5th Cir. 1974)

. . . A., §§ 934.02(8) and 934.07 are inconsistent with Title 18 U.S.C., Ch. 119, and the Fourth, Fifth and . . .

TAYLOR, v. STATE, 292 So. 2d 375 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . Section 934.02 defines “intercept” as follows: . “ ‘Intercept’ means the aural acquisition of the contents . . .

UNITED STATES v. B. PACHECO N. Jr., 489 F.2d 554 (5th Cir. 1974)

. . . . § 934.02(8), F.S.A. . . .

In GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION. In COBO,, 287 So. 2d 43 (Fla. 1973)

. . . Court from issuing an order for the interception of wire and oral communications, pursuant to Sections 934.02 . . .

STATE KENNEDY v. E. LEE,, 274 So. 2d 881 (Fla. 1973)

. . . Section 1, Section 2, Section 3 and Section 4(2)), or Section 4(2), or under Florida Statutes Section 934.02 . . .