The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . ." § 7.04 cmt. b (2006). . . .
. . . J.A. 570 (citing Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.04 ). . . .
. . . Lens.com. , 722 F.3d 1229, 1251 (10th Cir. 2013) (quoting Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.04 ). . . .
. . . But as one can see from his citation to section 7.04[3] of the treatise, which discusses only the written-description . . .
. . . After deductions for moisture, damage, and hauling, the Debtors received an average net price of $7.04 . . .
. . . . ¶ 71 (citing PSA § 7.04(b) ).) . . .
. . . . § 1692(e)(6), 940 CMR 7.04 (1)(A) and 209 CMR 18.16(2) (Unfair debt collection) Plaintiff alleges that . . .
. . . See Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.04 (agent acts with actual authority or the principal ratifies . . .
. . . the basis that, applying the lodestar cross-check, the award would amount to a lodestar multiplier of 7.04 . . .
. . . See Cohen’s Handbook of Federal Indian Law, § 7.04[l][c] at n.65 (collecting cases). 2. . . . Cohen’s Handbook of Federal Indian Laio, § 7.04[l][a] (footnotes omitted). . . .
. . . read the Operating Agreement connected with the Asset before signing it, and did not notice Section 7.04 . . . in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Cumberland County, Chancery Division, seeking to have Section 7.04 . . . opportunity to sue Parker Benjamin “for his failure to account for the devastating impact of Section 7.04 . . . appraisal, as he is charged with having known the terms of the Operating Agreement, including Section 7.04 . . .
. . . Plaintiff first argues that Local Civil Rules 7.04 and 7.07 bar the Court from considering the documents . . . Local Civil Rule 7.04 provides, in pertinent part, “motions shall be accompanied by affidavits or other . . . Plaintiff’s motion cites Local Rule 7.03, but quotes Local Rule 7.04. . . .
. . . Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.04 (2006) (emphasis added). . . .
. . . Green, Apprehending and Prosecuting the Drunk Driver § 7.04[7] (LexisNexis 2015). . . .
. . . . § 7.04[l][e] at 7-309-7-310.1 ("In Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. . . .
. . . Cohen’s Handbook of Federal Indian Law § 7.04(l)(a), p. 613 & n. 11 (Nell Jessup Newton ed., 2012) (citing . . .
. . . Cohen’s Handbook of Federal Indian Law § 7.04(1)(a), p. 613 & n. 11 (Nell Jessup Newton ed., 2012) (citing . . .
. . . 3.92 ppm (t, J-=-6.3 Hz, 2B), 6.43 ppm (d, J-2.4 Hz, HI); 6.49 ppm (dd, J-8.4 Hz, J-2.4 Hz, 11.1), 7.04 . . .
. . . Smith, Florida Estates Practice Guide, § 7.04(5) (2015). . . .
. . . ECF 17-2 § 7.03 at 7, Deed of Trust for HFB Terra Loan; ECF 17-7 § 7.04 at 7, Deed of Trust for HFB Revolving . . . ECF 17-2 § 7.03 at 7, Deed of Trust for HFB Term Loan; ECF 17-7 § 7.04 at 7-8, Deed of Trust for HFB . . . ECF 17-2 § 7.03 at 7, Deed of Trust for HFB Term Loan; ECF 17-7 § 7.04 at 7, Deed of Trust for HFB Revolving . . .
. . . is subject to direct liability to a third party harmed by an agent’s conduct when (a) as stated in § 7.04 . . .
. . . Section 7.04 Waivers. . . . Sección 7.04 Renuncias. . . .
. . . Section 7.04(a) appears under the heading “Electricity” and provides: (a) During the Term, [WeCare] shall . . . Section 7.04(a) obligates WeCare to meter its electricity and specifies that the City will reimburse . . .
. . . Ala.Code § 10A-5-7.04(a). . . . Id. § 10A-5-7.04(b)(2). . . . See Ala.Code § 10A-5-7.04(b)(2). . . .
. . . (Settlement Agreement § 7.04(e).) . . . (Settlement Agreement § 7.04(f).) . . .
. . . location of the program’s apprentice activities, see id. 7.03(8)(e); training and instruction, see id. 7.04 . . . (l)(b)(l)-(4); wage rates, see id. 7.04(l)(b)(5); recordkeeping, see id. 7.04(l)(b)(23), 7.13; instructor . . . qualifications, see id. 7.04(2); apprentice enrollment, see id. 7.07(1); reporting, see id. 7.07(2); . . .
. . . See Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.04 (2006) (“A principal is subject to liability to a third party . . .
. . . Kirkwood, 999 F.2d 86 (4th Cir.1993); Local Rules 7.04, 7.05, D.S.C. IV. DISCUSSION A. . . .
. . . filing with the EEOC, and attempting to complain to the City Council about her illegal termination. 7.04 . . .
. . . The provision Wells Fargo refers to at bar is entitled Section 7.04 Limitation on Suits by Holders of . . .
. . . .); Restatement (Third) of Agency §§ 7.03(l)(a), 7.04 (principal liable for torts of agent committed . . .
. . . no basis in tort law or agency law for Khan’s argument, see, e.g., Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.04 . . .
. . . Kirkwood, 999 F.2d 86 (4th Cir.1993); Local Rules 7.04, 7.05, D.S.C. IV. DISCUSSION A. . . .
. . . Kirkwood, 999 F.2d 86 (4th Cir.1993); Local Rules 7.04, 7.05, D.S.C. IV. DISCUSSION A. . . .
. . . Kirkwood, 999 F.2d 86 (4th Cir.1993); Local Rules 7.04, 7.05, D.S.C. IY. DISCUSSION A. . . .
. . . Lys then creates two tables in which he attributes a 6.81% borrowing cost and a 7.04% borrowing cost . . . End of sublease term At 6.81% At 7.04% Net cash to John Hancock Equity investment Transaction fees $168.8M . . .
. . . . § 7.04 (principal incurs tort liability vicariously where agent acts with actual authority). . . .
. . . . § 7.04 (principal incurs tort liability vicariously where agent acts with actual authority). . . .
. . . . § 7.04. 1-800 does not contend that Lens, com ratified McCoy’s allegedly infringing ad. . . .
. . . (ESOP § 7.04(d)(i).) . . .
. . . 11.40%_ 2009 20.67% - 16.02% = 4.65%_4.65 / 20,67 = 22.50%_ 2010 21.01% - 19.53% = 1.48%_1,48 / 21,01 = 7.04% . . .
. . . Cohen’s Handbook at § 7.04[3] at 632, citing Comstock Oil & Gas, Inc. v. . . .
. . . See Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.04 cmt. b (“If the agent’s conduct is not tortious, the principal . . .
. . . GE relies on Section 7.04 of the Consummation Order, which sets forth the Reorganization Court’s “Reservation . . .
. . . Section 7.04 Obligations of U.S. Fi-delis. . . .
. . . Consummation Order, § 7.04. . . . Consummation Order, § 7.04(c). . . . Consummation Order, § 7.04(h), (i). . . . In § 7.04(i) of the August 17, 1978 Consummation Order, the court reserved jurisdiction To take such . . . Consummation Order, § 7.04(i). . . .
. . . See Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.04 (“A principal is subject to liability to a third party harmed . . .
. . . Chisum, Chisum on Patents § 7.04 (Matthew Bender 2012). . . .
. . . Section 7.04 Landlord Consent. . . .
. . . (footnote omitted); see also Cohen, supra, at § 7.04[l][c] (“A tribe that incorporates as an entity under . . .
. . . Prince George’s County is comprised of two Parcels: (1) Parcel 28 is the front parcel that consists of 7.04 . . .
. . . fund the solé source of which is the owner's payment to the subcontractor.” 2-7 Construction Law P 7.04 . . .
. . . .”); Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.04 (2006) (“A principal is subject to liability to a third party . . .
. . . on a theory of deliberate ignorance consistent with Eighth Circuit Model Criminal Jury Instruction 7.04 . . .
. . . This opinion is "unpublished” for purposes of Kansas Supreme Court Rule 7.04(f) and is "not favored for . . .
. . . Cohen’s Handbook of Federal Indian Law, § 7.04[2] (citing Kansas v. . . .
. . . Attend Sanctions Motion hearing— 3.0 hours ($675.00) TOTAL TIME — 7.04 hours ($1,584) This fact is not . . .
. . . See Dolan, The Law of Letters of Credit at § 7.04[4][d], 7-112. 4. . . .
. . . Restatement (3d) of Agency §§ 2. 02 (Scope of Actual Authority); 7. 03 (Principal’s Liability-In General); 7.04 . . .
. . . District Court Judges § 7.04 (4th ed.2000); see also United States v. . . . District Court Judges § 7.04, at 222 n. 1 (5th ed.2007). . . . . . § 7.04. . 408 F.3d at 1206-07. . . . .
. . . Chisum, 3 Chisum on Patents § 7.04[l][e] (2009). . . .
. . . Other provisions of the Regulations that are relevant to this dispute include §§ 5.07, 7.04, 7.05 and . . . Sections 7.04 and 7.05 provides as follows: 7.04 Removal and Resignation. . . . These actions were consistent with §§ 7.04 and 7.05 of the Regulations. . . . Ghany suggests that his appointment of Lisa Kuhn as Acting Corporate Secretary was proper under § 7.04 . . . Section 7.04 of the Regulations provides that an officer may be removed only by majority vote of the . . .
. . . Cohen, Handbook of Federal Indian Law § 7.04 (citing Iowa Mut. Ins. Co. v. . . .
. . . Cohen, Handbook of Federal Indian Law § 7.04 (citing Iowa Mut. Ins. Co. v. . . .
. . . Cohen, Handbook of Federal Indian Law § 7.04 (citing Iowa Mid. Ins. Co. v. . . .
. . . Finally, defendant argues that the district court failed to give Sixth Circuit Pattern Instruction 7.04 . . . He argues that the district court’s failure to give Sixth Circuit Pattern Instruction 7.04 caused the . . . instruction substantially fulfilled the purpose for which defendant claims Sixth Circuit Pattern Instruction 7.04 . . . It is also worth noting that the purpose of Sixth Circuit Pattern Instruction 7.04 is not, as defendant . . . Thus, failing to give Sixth Circuit Pattern Instruction 7.04 in this case also did not substantially . . .
. . . Kirkwood, 999 F.2d 86 (4th Cir.1993); Local Rules 7.04, 7.05, D.S.C. IV. DISCUSSION A. Standing 1. . . .
. . . . & Inst.Code § 601; Cal.Penal Code § 272(a)(1); Ontario Municipal Code §§ 5-7.04, 5-7.05. . . .
. . . Davis, Federal Standards of Review § 7.04 (3d ed.1999) (“The standard to determine whether there is plain . . .
. . . its decision, shall afford no deference to the initial adverse benefit determination.... ” (Plan ¶ 7.04 . . . (Plan ¶ 7.04, AR 235.) . . .
. . . Id RHI’s property was comprised of two parcels: the front parcel (Parcel 28) of 7.04 acres and the rear . . .
. . . required by Rule 26(a); no written objection to Artemis’s accounting statements was made as required by ¶ 7.04 . . . Paragraph 7.04 of the distribution agreement provides in part as follows: All statements rendered by . . . past due or were improperly charged should have been specifically objected to in writing pursuant to ¶ 7.04 . . .
. . . the 2,513 Native American students; 129 or 7.99% of the 1,614 Asian American students, and 1,625 or 7.04% . . .
. . . From Kodak’s data, the average aspect ratio of this subset of grains was 7.04 for those grains having . . .
. . . Section 7.04 of the Ward I provides as follows: Post-Petition Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases . . . Dika-Ward asserts that Section 7.04 of the Ward I Plan alters Debtors’ discharge. . . . Section 7.04 does not impact the scope of the discharge granted to Debtors by the Bankruptcy Code and . . . Instead, Section 7.04 clarified that entry of the Confirmation Order did not change any of a non-debtor . . . If the Court accepted Dika-Ward’s construction of Section 7.04, it would mean that Debtors disclaimed . . .
. . . Gertzman, supra, ¶ 7.04[1] at 7-30. . . . Gertzman, supra, ¶ 7.04[3][b], at 7-45. . . . See Gertzman, supra,. ¶ 7.04, at 7-30; LaRue, supra, at 23-25 n. 54 ("Indexes developed using the double-extension . . .
. . . Prof'l Conduct 7.04; Utah R. Prof'l Conduct 7.4; Vt. R. Prof'l Conduct 7.4; Va. R. Prof! . . .
. . . Kirkwood, 999 F.2d 86 (4th Cir.1993); Local Rules 7.04, 7.05, D.S.C. B. . . .
. . . Other adverse wetland impacts caused by the unauthorized road are also substantial — approximately 7.04 . . .
. . . See, e.g., 3 Chisum on Patents § 7.04; Invitrogen Corp. v. Clontech Labs. . . .
. . . Ex. 2 ¶ 7.04). . . .
. . . Section 7.04 of the Transfer Agreement provides: Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary . . . (Transfer Agreement § 7.04 (emphasis added).) . . .
. . . Kirkwood, 999 F.2d 86 (4th Cir.1993); Local Rules 7.04, 7.05, D.S.C. . . . Kirkwood, 999 F.2d 86 (4th Cir.1993); Local Rules 7.04, 7.05, D.S.C. . . .
. . . Debtors, aware that the Plan prevents payment of interest on TSI’s Allowed Claim (see Plan ¶ 1.10, 7.04 . . . {See Plan 7.04.) . . . (See Plan ¶¶ 1.10, 7.04.) . . .
. . . See M.G.L. ch. 93, § 49(b); M.G.L. ch. 93A, § 2; 940 CMR 7.04(2). . . . .
. . . Id. par. 7.04[1], at 7-30. . . . Gertzman par. 7.04[1], at 7-30. We are here concerned with the dollar-value method. . . . [Id. par. 7.04[3], at 7-36 (fn. ref. omitted).] . . . See Gertzman par. 7.04[3][b], at 7-44. . . . Gertzman par. 7.04[3][b], at 7-45. . . .
. . . . § 7.04(a), pp. 74-75 (DAL 000947-948). . . . Id. § 7.04(a), p. 74 (DAL 000947). . . .
. . . as an unpublished opinion, the Supreme Court of Kansas granted a motion to publish pursuant to Rule 7.04 . . .
. . . VII, sec. 7.04(a)-(b)). . . . VII, Sec. 7.04(c)). . In prior reports, Dr. . . .
. . . Sections 7.04 and 7.14 of the Fund Plan outline its administrative appeal procedure. Albert E. . . .
. . . District Court Judges § 7.04 204 n.l (4th ed.2000 rev.). . . . District Court Judges § 7.04 (4th ed.2000 rev.). . . . .
. . . Chisum, Chi-sum on Patents § 7.04 (2003). . . .
. . . II, tab 3 (“1997 Plan Doc.”), § 7.04(b) [EK00116].) . . . alive when the Participant die[d], no further payments [were] made” under the Plan. (1997 Plan Doc. § 7.04 . . . annuitant did not survive him, “no further payments [would be] made” after his death. (1997 Plan Doc. § 7.04 . . .
. . . See Sixth Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions § 7.04. . . . .
. . . Wolf, Court Awarded Attorney Fees ¶ 7.04[4], at 7-74 & n.89 (2004) (citing the Hill court’s inclusion . . .
. . . Weinberg, Federal Bail and Detention Handbook, § 7.04, at 7-12 (PLI, Rel. No. 16, 2004). . . .
. . . recordation that Congress intended that the lien would be a statutory lien.” 4 Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 7.04 . . .
. . . The powers and responsibilities of the Trustee are outlined in 7.04 of the Plan. . . .
. . . Section 7.04 Bank Credit Decision Each Bank acknowledges that it has, independently and without reliance . . . B to Gertzman Deck at 31-32, 34-35; and 2001 L/C Facility Agreement §§ 7.02-7.04, 8.02-8.04, Ex. . . . transactions with Enron “with no duty to account therefor” to the participating banks, and section 7.04 . . . (Id. §§ 7.03-7.04, Ex. C to Gertzman Deck at 31.) . . . See 2000 Credit Facility § 7.04 and parallel provisions of other operative documents. . . .
. . . Our inquiry, therefore, focuses on Section 7.04. . . . As the defendants argue, because Gary was entitled to a fee for his services under Section 7.04, that . . . The plaintiff makes other claims under Section 7.04 that have no basis in the contract. . . . Section 7.04 states precisely that “[a]ny contract of dealing referred to [in this Section] shall be . . . 7.04 necessarily must be deducted from gross proceeds. . . .