The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH

Chapter 14
GOVERNOR

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 14.02

14.02 Governor may preserve peace and order by military force.—The Governor may, in cases of insurrection or rebellion, violence, disorder or insecurity of life, liberty and property, support and preserve the public peace and order by the military force of the state.

History.—s. 1, ch. 1745, 1870; RS 69; GS 70; RGS 84; CGL 105.

F.S. 14.02 on Google Scholar

F.S. 14.02 on Casetext

Amendments to 14.02

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 14.02

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 14.02.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

REYNOLDS, v. A. BERRYHILL,, 387 F. Supp. 3d 642 (D.S.C. 2019)

. . . applicable listings, the ALJ summarily addresses Listing 14.06 and fails completely to mention Listing 14.02 . . . Listings 14.02 and 14.06 are identical except for the underlying diagnosis. . . . failure to acknowledge Plaintiff's diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus, which would make Listing 14.02 . . .

IN RE SUAREZ GARCIA,, 603 B.R. 640 (Bankr. E.D. Cal. 2019)

. . . existing escrow payment of $ 362.04 is slightly less, resulting in there being an annual shortfall of ($ 14.02 . . .

BILLY F. HAWK, JR. GST NON- EXEMPT MARITAL TRUST, Co- F. Co- F. Jr. GST Co- v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,, 924 F.3d 821 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Eustice, Federal Income Taxation of Corporations and Shareholders § 14.02 (7th ed. 2019). . . .

WI- LAN INC. Wi- LAN USA, Wi- LAN v. LG ELECTRONICS, INC. LG U. S. A. LG U. S. A., 382 F. Supp. 3d 1012 (S.D. Cal. 2019)

. . . Judicial notice is appropriate for records and 'reports of administrative bodies.' " United States v. 14.02 . . .

CONETTA, v. A. BERRYHILL,, 365 F. Supp. 3d 383 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . considered ample medical evidence outlined elsewhere in his opinion that supports his finding that Listing 14.02 . . .

BIMBO BAKERIES USA, INC. v. SYCAMORE, 372 F. Supp. 3d 1291 (D. Utah 2019)

. . . McCarthy, Trademarks and Unfair Competition , § 14.02). Id. at 354. See Opposition 4. . . .

RAMACHANDRAN, v. CITY OF LOS ALTOS,, 359 F. Supp. 3d 801 (N.D. Cal. 2019)

. . . United States v. 14.02 Acres , 547 F.3d 943, 955 (9th Cir. 2008). C. . . .

RAYMOND, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 357 F. Supp. 3d 232 (W.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . that Plaintiff's SLE included involvement of two or more organs/body systems, as required by Listing 14.02 . . . There is conflicting evidence in the record regarding whether Plaintiff met the criteria for Listing 14.02 . . .

I. BERNARDI ORTIZ, v. CYBEX INTERNATIONAL, INC., 345 F. Supp. 3d 107 (D. P.R. 2018)

. . . See, 3 MOORE'S FEDERAL PRACTICE, § 14.02, p. 14-9 (so noting). . . .

IN RE YOVTCHEVA,, 590 B.R. 307 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2018)

. . . Application sought reimbursement of fees in the amount of $18,625.00 and expenses in the amount of $14.02 . . . upon the foregoing, the Court will allow compensation of $7,026.00 and reimbursement of expenses of $14.02 . . . allowance of compensation in the amount of $18,625.00 and reimbursement of expenses in the amount of $14.02 . . . Compensation in the amount of $7,026.00, plus expenses in the amount of $14.02, is allowed to Fox Rothschild . . .

KHOJA, v. OREXIGEN THERAPEUTICS, INC. P. A., 899 F.3d 988 (9th Cir. 2018)

. . . United States v. 14.02 Acres of Land More or Less in Fresno Cty. , 547 F.3d 943, 955 (9th Cir. 2008) . . .

MARKETQUEST GROUP, INC. v. BIC CORPORATION BIC USA LLC,, 316 F. Supp. 3d 1234 (S.D. Cal. 2018)

. . . Gas Co. , 209 F.2d 380, 385 (9th Cir. 1953) ; see also United States v. 14.02 Acres , 547 F.3d 943, 955 . . .

VARMA v. BANK OF AMERICA, N. A. s, 713 F. App'x 692 (9th Cir. 2018)

. . . that “a court may take judicial notice of its own records in other cases”); see also United States v. 14.02 . . .

UNITED STATES v. LIBBY, Jr., 880 F.3d 1011 (8th Cir. 2018)

. . . Guides—Criminal CRIMJIG 14.02 (6th ed. 2017). . . .

MIFFLINBURG TELEGRAPH, INC. v. CRISWELL, E. LLC,, 277 F. Supp. 3d 750 (M.D. Pa. 2017)

. . . City of Santa Cruz, 629 F.3d 966, 971-72 (9th Cir. 2010) citing United States v. 14.02 Acres of Land . . .

GRAHAM, v. PRINCE,, 265 F. Supp. 3d 366 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 14.02[C][2] (2017). YI. . . .

UNITED STATES v. SIERRA PACIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC. W. M. L. As Jr. Jr. Jr. III, Jr. D. W. W. C. C. A. C. C. H. E. s, 862 F.3d 1157 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . consider matters of public record even when assuming the truth of the allegations, United States v. 14.02 . . .

COMMITTEE TO PROTECT OUR AGRICULTURAL WATER, v. OCCIDENTAL OIL AND GAS CORPORATION,, 235 F. Supp. 3d 1132 (E.D. Cal. 2017)

. . . See United States v. 14.02 Acres of Land More or Less, 547 F.3d 943, 955 (9th Cir. 2008). . . . See United States v. 14.02 Acres of Land More or Less, 547 F.3d 943, 955 (9th Cir. 2008). e.Plaintiffs . . .

ALSTOM, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,, 228 F. Supp. 3d 244 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . will be deemed cumulative with and not exclusive of any other remedy conferred hereby,” and Sections 14.02 . . .

MAUSNER, v. MARKETBYTE, LLC, a D., 669 F. App'x 865 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . See United States v. 14.02 Acres of Land More or Less in Fresno Cty., 547 F.3d 943, 955 (9th Cir. 2008 . . .

LEONARD, d b a APL No. v. STEMTECH INTERNATIONAL INC No., 834 F.3d 376 (3d Cir. 2016)

. . . (citing 3 Nimmer on Copyright § 14.02 at 14-6); Dash v. . . . not as to the fact that actual damages are attributable to the infringement,” 4 Nimmer on Copyright § 14.02 . . .

ALARM DETECTION SYSTEMS, INC. v. ORLAND FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT LLC, 194 F. Supp. 3d 706 (N.D. Ill. 2016)

. . . regarding consolidation, dissolution, growth or contraction of fire protection districts, 70 ILCS 705/14.02 . . .

MINOR, v. FEDEX OFFICE PRINT SERVICES, INC., 182 F. Supp. 3d 966 (N.D. Cal. 2016)

. . . Holder, 305 F.3d 854, 866 (9th Cir.2002)'; records of administrative agencies, see United States v. 14.02 . . . See Holder, 305 F.3d at 866 (court documents); 14.02 Acres of Land More or Less in Fresno Cty., 547 F . . .

UNITED STATES v. CERRITOS,, 180 F. Supp. 3d 432 (E.D. Va. 2016)

. . . See 8 Moore’s Federal Practice, § 14.02 [1] at 14-5 (Matthew Bender 1990). . . .

PRIME HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. v. SERVICES EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION,, 147 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (S.D. Cal. 2015)

. . . Feb. 19, 2009) (taking judicial notice of press release on website); United States v. 14.02 Acres. 547 . . .

GREENFIELD MHP ASSOCIATES, L. P. A MHP, LLC, a LLC, a LLC, a MHC, L. P. a v. AMETEK, INC. a LLC, a, 145 F. Supp. 3d 1000 (S.D. Cal. 2015)

. . . Oct. 31, 2014) (citing United States v. 14.02 Acres of Land More or Less in Fresno County, 547 F.3d 943 . . .

GONZALES, v. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC. d b a, 142 F. Supp. 3d 961 (C.D. Cal. 2015)

. . . United States v. 14.02 Acres of Land More or Less in Fresno County, 547 F.3d 943, 955 (9th Cir.2008) . . .

LUIS, v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 142 F. Supp. 3d 873 (N.D. Cal. 2015)

. . . United States v. 14.02 Acres, 547 F.3d 943, 955 (9th Cir.2008). III. . . .

AES PUERTO RICO, L. P. v. TRUJILLO- PANISSE,, 133 F. Supp. 3d 409 (D.P.R. 2015)

. . . .”); United States v. 14.02 Acres of Land More or Less in Fresno Cnty., 547 F.3d 943, 955 (9th Cir.2008 . . .

UNITED STATES EX REL. MCGRATH, v. MICROSEMI CORPORATION,, 140 F. Supp. 3d 885 (D. Ariz. 2015)

. . . U.S. v. 14.02 Acres of Land More or Less, 547 F.3d 943, 955 (9th Cir.2008); see also Warren v. . . .

BROEDERDORF v. BACHELER, 129 F. Supp. 3d 182 (E.D. Pa. 2015)

. . . See id. at Sec, 14.02. . . . Id. at Sec. 14.02(c)(4). . . . Id. at Sec. 14.02(c)(4). . . . Company Agreement in her sole and absolute discretion; except that the Sole Member may not amend Section 14.02 . . .

GRANT HEILMAN PHOTOGRAPHY, INC. v. McGRAW- HILL COMPANIES,, 115 F. Supp. 3d 518 (E.D. Pa. 2015)

. . . destroyed the market value of the copyrighted work at the time of infringement.” 5 Nimmer on Copyright § 14.02 . . . Id. § 14.02[A]. (3) Infringer’s Profits. . . . awarded as a form of punishment, whether based on industry custom ór not.”); 5 Nimmer on Copyright § 14.02 . . .

BORGOS- HANSEN, v. W. COLVIN,, 109 F. Supp. 3d 509 (D. Conn. 2015)

. . . questionnaire dated February 3, 2012, that is tailored to Listings 14.09 (inflammatory arthritis) and 14.02 . . . When we turn to the regulatory Listings, we find that section 14.02 lists the first of several “Immune . . . alternative Listings for systemic lupus erythematosus that appear in subsections (A) or (B) of Listing 14.02 . . . The next step is to determine whether Dowles meets subsections (A) or (B) of Listing 14.02.”) . . . March 2, 2004) (“On remand, the ALJ should address the criteria at both 14.00B1 and both sections of 14.02 . . .

MINOR, v. FEDEX OFFICE AND PRINT SERVICES, INC., 78 F. Supp. 3d 1021 (N.D. Cal. 2015)

. . . See 14.02 Acres of Land More or Less in Fresno Cnty., 547 F.3d at 955; Dawson v. . . .

BAKER, v. SOUTHWEST ENERGY SOLUTIONS, INC., 580 F. App'x 575 (9th Cir. 2014)

. . . United States v. 14.02 Acres of Land, 547 F.3d 943, 955 (9th Cir.2008). . . .

R. GABRIEL, v. ALASKA ELECTRICAL PENSION FUND, 755 F.3d 647 (9th Cir. 2014)

. . . Second, section 14.02 states that participants in the Plan “shall be entitled to obtain periodic reports . . . that his service hours were sufficient for vesting, the “hours shall remain as credited” under section 14.02 . . . Section 14.02 refers only to “periodic reports showing the number of hours credited” to a participant . . . Therefore, even if section 14.02’s requirement that the hours in such a report “shall remain as credited . . . Section 14.02 states in pertinent part: Participants shall be entitled to obtain periodic reports showing . . .

R. GABRIEL, v. ALASKA ELECTRICAL PENSION FUND, 773 F.3d 945 (9th Cir. 2014)

. . . Second, section 14.02 states that participants in the Plan “shall be entitled to obtain periodic reports . . . that his service hours were sufficient for vesting, the “hours shall remain as credited” under section 14.02 . . . Section 14.02 refers only to “periodic reports showing the number of hours credited” to a participant . . . Therefore, even if section 14.02’s requirement that the hours in such a report “shall remain as credited . . . with the applicable provisions of Article VII[, which sets the amount of retirement income], .Section 14.02 . . .

BIG VISION PRIVATE LTD. v. E. I. DuPONT DE NEMOURS CO., 1 F. Supp. 3d 224 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . Milgrim, MILGRIM ON TRADE SECRETS § 14.02 (2011) (“it is essentially necessary for a plaintiff to identify . . .

NATIONAL UNION OF HEALTHCARE WORKERS v. KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN, INC., 13 F. Supp. 3d 1044 (N.D. Cal. 2014)

. . . United States v. 14.02 Acres, 547 F.3d 943, 955 (9th Cir.2008). . . .

R. HANCOCK, v. KULANA PARTNERS, LLC, A, 992 F. Supp. 2d 1053 (D. Haw. 2014)

. . . See United States v. 14.02 Acres of Land More or Less in Fresno County, 547 F.3d 943, 955 (9th Cir.2008 . . .

DIAS, v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, a FNMA N. A. a FSB BAC LP,, 990 F. Supp. 2d 1042 (D. Haw. 2013)

. . . See United States v. 14.02 Acres of Land More or Less in Fresno Cnty., 547 F.3d 943, 955 (9th Cir.2008 . . .

CHILDERS, v. UNITED STATES, v., 112 Fed. Cl. 617 (Fed. Cl. 2013)

. . . the payment of just compensation for any uncured severance damages.” 4A Nichols on Eminent Domain § 14.02 . . .

CHILDERS, v. UNITED STATES, v., 116 Fed. Cl. 486 (Fed. Cl. 2013)

. . . the payment of just compensation for any uncured severance damages.” 4A Nichols on Eminent Domain § 14.02 . . .

HYDRA- PRO DUTCH HARBOR INC. v. SCANMAR AS,, 533 F. App'x 767 (9th Cir. 2013)

. . . See United States v. 14.02 Acres of Land More or Less in Fresno Cnty., 547 F.3d 943, 955 (9th Cir.2008 . . .

MCCANN HOLDINGS, LTD. v. UNITED STATES,, 111 Fed. Cl. 608 (Fed. Cl. 2013)

. . . the payment of just compensation for any uncured severance damages.” 4A Nichols on Eminent Domain § 14.02 . . .

GULF POWER COMPANY, v. COALSALES II, LLC, f. k. a., 522 F. App'x 699 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . coal from only the Galatia Mine and, once that mine closed, the CSA’s force majeure provision (Section 14.02 . . . While the CSA’s force majeure provision, section 14.02, excused Coalsales of its obligation to supply . . . Coalsales hinges its argument on language in the force majeure provision, section 14.02, which it says . . .

VELARDE, v. E. DUARTE,, 937 F. Supp. 2d 1204 (S.D. Cal. 2013)

. . . See U.S. v. 14.02 Acres of Land More or Less in Fresno County, 547 F.3d 943, 955 (9th Cir.2008). . . . See, e.g., U.S. v. 14.02 Acres of Land More or Less in Fresno County, 547 F.3d 943, 955 (9th Cir.2008 . . .

PAYNE, v. JONES,, 711 F.3d 85 (2d Cir. 2013)

. . . Coverage Disputes § 14.02(b) (16th ed. 2012) (reviewing public policy considerations). . . .

BRIGHTON COLLECTIBLES, INC. v. RK TEXAS LEATHER MFG. K L, 923 F. Supp. 2d 1245 (S.D. Cal. 2013)

. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 14.02[A][1] (2012) (cautioning -courts not to confuse defendant's . . .

M. SNYDER, a v. HSBC BANK, USA, N. A. ACE ACE a LLC, a, 913 F. Supp. 2d 755 (D. Ariz. 2012)

. . . United States v. 14.02 Acres of Land More or Less in Fres no Cnty., 547 F.3d 943, 955 (9th Cir.2008); . . .

In CONAGRA FOODS INC., 908 F. Supp. 2d 1090 (C.D. Cal. 2012)

. . . United States v. 14.02 Acres of Land More or Less in Fresno County, 547 F.3d 943, 955 (9th Cir.2008) . . .

M. MIOCIC, v. J. ASTRUE,, 890 F. Supp. 2d 1046 (N.D. Ill. 2012)

. . . . § 404.1520, Appendix 1, specifically noting that she did not meet the requirements in Listing 14.02 . . .

In TRIBUNE COMPANY,, 476 B.R. 843 (Bankr. D. Del. 2012)

. . . Section 14.02 of the PHONES Indenture provides in pertinent part: Upon any distribution of asset of the . . . As discussed in the Reconsideration Decision, the beginning of Section 14.02 lists the “triggering events . . . Section 14.02(A) of the PHONES Indenture provides that, in the event of a bankruptcy filing, holders . . . may be provided for in Section 3. 01, if any, in respect to the Securities.... ” PHONES Indenture, § 14.02 . . . Thus, the plain language of Section 14.02 provides that a payment due under the Company’s obligation . . .

FRIENDS OF THE RIVER, a a a v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, W. B., 870 F. Supp. 2d 966 (E.D. Cal. 2012)

. . . See U.S. v. 14.02 Acres or Land More or Less in Fresno Cnty., 547 F.3d 943, 955 (9th Cir.2008) (holding . . .

In TRIBUNE COMPANY,, 472 B.R. 223 (Bankr. D. Del. 2012)

. . . Litigation Proceeds based upon, among other things, the unqualified subordination language of Section 14.02 . . . (A), the application of subordination provisions to all sources of “payment” in Section 14.02(B), and . . . the catch-all language of the pay-over obligation in the paragraph following Section 14.02(B). . . .

UNITED STATES, v. STEFANIK,, 674 F.3d 71 (1st Cir. 2012)

. . . Sand et al., Modem Federal Jury Instmctions-Criminal § 14.02 (Instruction 14-16) (2011). . . .

NAJERA, v. MURPHY,, 462 F. App'x 827 (10th Cir. 2012)

. . . P. 14.02 (“The last day of the period so computed shall be included, unless it is a Saturday, a Sunday . . .

MENASHE, v. BANK OF NEW YORK, a NA, a FSB BAC LP, a a, 850 F. Supp. 2d 1120 (D. Haw. 2012)

. . . See United States v. 14.02 Acres of Land More or Less in Fresno Cnty., 547 F.3d 943, 955 (9th Cir.2008 . . .

DUTCH JACKSON IATG, LLC, v. BASKETBALL MARKETING COMPANY,, 846 F. Supp. 2d 1044 (E.D. Mo. 2012)

. . . Nimmer and David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright, § 14.02, at 4-14 (2005)). . . .

In TRIBUNE COMPANY,, 464 B.R. 208 (Bankr. D. Del. 2011)

. . . , which provides: SECTION 14.02 Payment Over of Proceeds upon Dissolution, Etc. . . . PHONES Indenture, Section 14.02(A), at 63 (emphasis added). . . . PHONES Indenture, Section 14.02(B), at 63. . . . PHONES Indenture, Section 14.02, at 63. . . . obligation in the paragraph following Section 14.02(B). . . .

ROCKY MOUNTAIN FARMERS UNION, v. N. GOLDSTENE, v. D. D R. H. O., 843 F. Supp. 2d 1042 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

. . . United States v. 14.02 Acres of Land More or Less in Fresno County, 547 F.3d 943, 955 (9th Cir. 2008) . . .

ROCKY MOUNTAIN FARMERS UNION, v. N. GOLDSTENE, v. D. D R. H. O., 843 F. Supp. 2d 1071 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

. . . United States v. 14.02 Acres of Land More or Less in Fresno County, 547 F.3d 943, 955 (9th Cir. 2008) . . .

In TRIBUNE COMPANY,, 464 B.R. 126 (Bankr. D. Del. 2011)

. . . The PHONES Indenture provides in Section 14.02 (“Payment Over of Proceeds upon Dissolution, Etc.”) that . . .

QEP ENERGY COMPANY, a v. M. SULLIVAN,, 444 F. App'x 284 (10th Cir. 2011)

. . . Hubert & Taylor, § 14.02[1] (quotation omitted). . . .

SCHELL, v. OXY USA, INC., 822 F. Supp. 2d 1125 (D. Kan. 2011)

. . . Inst. 14, § 14.02 (2005). . . .

REAL VIEW, LLC. v. TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v., 811 F. Supp. 2d 553 (D. Mass. 2011)

. . . to amount, not as to the fact that actual damages are attributable to the infringement.” 4 Nimmer § 14.02 . . .

H. COHEN, Ed. D. v. UNITED STATES,, 100 Fed. Cl. 461 (Fed. Cl. 2011)

. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright (Nimmer) § 14.02 (2011) (stating that “neither [the Act’s] . . . Muchnick, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1237, 176 L.Ed.2d 18 (2010); see Nimmer § 14.02[A][1] (“[T]he plaintiffs . . . Nim-mer § 14.02[A][3]; see Data Gen., 36 F.3d at 1171 (“[T]he plaintiff need not prove its loss of revenue . . . 104 (stating that “actual damages recoverable are only for present, not for future, harm”); Nimmer § 14.02 . . . Id.; see Nim-mer § 14.02[A][1], This method assumes that the amount of pre-infringement sales of the . . .

TATTOO ART, INC. A v. TAT INTERNATIONAL, LLC, A A., 794 F. Supp. 2d 634 (E.D. Va. 2011)

. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 14.02[C][1] (Matthew Bender, Rev. Ed.) . . .

TMTV, CORP. v. MASS PRODUCTIONS, INC. o, a k a o o-, 645 F.3d 464 (1st Cir. 2011)

. . . See generally 4 Nimmer & Nimmer, supra, § 14.02[C][1], at 14-31 to -34. . . .

VOICE OF THE ARAB WORLD, INC. v. MDTV MEDICAL NEWS NOW, INC. E., 645 F.3d 26 (1st Cir. 2011)

. . . See 3-14 Anne Gilson LaLonde, Gilson on Trademarks § 14.02[1] (2011) (“The ‘principles of equity’ mentioned . . .

H LANS v. ADDUCI MASTRIANI SCHAUMBERG L. L. P., 786 F. Supp. 2d 240 (D.C. Cir. 2011)

. . . Defendants and the Delphi Defendants to pay [the pjlaintiffs 67%” of the recovered licensing fees, “or $14.02 . . .

GLENN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC, v. BELL AEROSPACE SERVICES, INC., 785 F. Supp. 2d 1258 (M.D. Ala. 2011)

. . . . (§ 14.02(B)(2)). ii. . . . (Id. § 14.02(A)(2), 14.07(A)(1)). . James Barry Mott ("Mott”) is the Vice President of BWSC. . . . (See Doc. # 57 Ex. 1, General Conditions § 14.02(A)(2)). . . . Section 14.02(2) requires Glenn Construction to provide an affidavit stating that "all previous progress . . . (Doc. # 57 Ex. 1, General Conditions § 14.02(A)). . . .

JOHNSON, v. J. ASTRUE,, 628 F.3d 991 (8th Cir. 2011)

. . . A, § 14.02. . . .

NORSE, v. CITY OF SANTA CRUZ A. Ed, 629 F.3d 966 (9th Cir. 2010)

. . . United States v. 14.02 Acres of Land More or Less in Fresno Cnty., 547 F.3d 943, 955 (9th Cir.2008) ( . . .

HUSSAINI, v. GELITA USA, INC., 749 F. Supp. 2d 909 (N.D. Iowa 2010)

. . . SexSearch.com, 551 F.3d 412, 416 (6th Cir.2008); United States v. 14.02 Acres of Land More or Less in . . .

GRANT, v. AURORA LOAN SERVICES, INC, a a, 736 F. Supp. 2d 1257 (C.D. Cal. 2010)

. . . United States v. 14.02 Acres of Land More or Less in Fresno County, 547 F.3d 943, 955 (9th Cir.2008) . . .

ALLEN, v. J. ASTRUE, 721 F. Supp. 2d 769 (N.D. Ill. 2010)

. . . The ALJ considered sections 14.02, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, and 14.09, Inflammatory Arthritis, in . . . The ALJ concluded that the evidence was insufficient to satisfy the criteria of either section 14.02 . . . Allen's Lupus in conjunction with listing 14.02. However, Mr. . . .

CITY OF FRESNO, v. UNITED STATES, 709 F. Supp. 2d 888 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

. . . United States v. 14.02 Acres, 547 F.3d 943, 955 (9th Cir.2008). . . . .

AGERE SYSTEMS, INC. SPS LLC TI LLC v. ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION FCG Co. NRM, 602 F.3d 204 (3d Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 9606; see also 4 The Law of Hazardous Waste § 14.02[l][c] (Susan M. Cooke, ed., 2009). . . . .

WHITE, v. MARTEL,, 601 F.3d 882 (9th Cir. 2010)

. . . See United States v. 14.02 Acres of Land, 547 F.3d 943, 955 (9th Cir.2008); Dawson v. . . .

CONSOLIDATED SALMONID CASES, 688 F. Supp. 2d 1013 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

. . . See United States v. 14.02 Acres, 547 F.3d 943, 955 (9th Cir.2008) (judicial notice is proper for records . . .

GARDNER, v. AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC. T. D. L., 691 F. Supp. 2d 1192 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

. . . United States v. 14.02 Acres of Land, 547 F.3d 943, 955 (9th Cir.2008) (quotations and citations omitted . . .

LINGAD, v. INDYMAC FEDERAL BANK, 682 F. Supp. 2d 1142 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

. . . U.S. v. 14.02 Acres of Land More or Less in Fresno County, 547 F.3d 943, 955 (9th Cir.2008) (quotations . . .

COLSON, v. AVNET, INC., 687 F. Supp. 2d 914 (D. Ariz. 2010)

. . . United States v. 14.02 Acres, 530 F.3d 883, 894 (9th Cir.2008) (internal quotation marks omitted). . . .

SAN LUIS DELTA- MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY, v. SALAZAR, v. a v. v. v., 686 F. Supp. 2d 1026 (E.D. Cal. 2009)

. . . This is a judicially noticeable record or report of an administrative body, see United States v. 14.02 . . .

GULF POWER COMPANY, v. COALSALES II, L. L. C. f k a, 661 F. Supp. 2d 1270 (N.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . 2.30, 2.34, 5.02, 5.03, 5.08, 6.02, 6.04, 6.05, 7.01, 7.02, 8.01, 8.02, 9.01, 9.04, 9.06, 9.07, 11.01, 14.02 . . . Sections 2.06, 2.07, 2.10, 2.12, 2.16, 2.20, 2.27, 2.28, 2.34, 5.03, 8.01, 8.02, 9.04, 9.06, 11.01, 14.02 . . .

In ATLAS MINING COMPANY, SECURITIES LITIGATION, 670 F. Supp. 2d 1128 (D. Idaho 2009)

. . . U.S. v. 14.02 Acres of Land More or Less in Fresno County, 547 F.3d 943, 955 (9th Cir.2008). . . .

BIG DIPPER ENTERTAINMENT, LLC. v. CITY OF WARREN,, 658 F. Supp. 2d 831 (E.D. Mich. 2009)

. . . the plaintiffs filed suit under § 1983 challenging the constitutionality of Warren Zoning Ordinance 14.02 . . . At that time, Ordinance 14.02(C) “require[d]: 1) that adult businesses be located on a major thoroughfare . . .

BERGT, v. McDOUGAL LITTELL, a R. R., 661 F. Supp. 2d 916 (N.D. Ill. 2009)

. . . Hawkins, Ash, Baptie & Co., 329 F.3d 923, 931 (7th Cir.2003); 4-14 Nimmer on Copyright § 14.02[C][2] . . .

UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND,, 585 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2009)

. . . .”); 4A Nichols, The Law of Eminent Domain § 14.02, 14.31 (rev. 3d ed. 1981)(“Virtually all jurisdictions . . . See 4A Nichols, The Law of Eminent Domain § 14.02[4] (rev. 3d ed. 1981)(discussing the effectiveness . . .

THE FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION PREMIER LEAGUE LIMITED, Co. CAL IV LLC, d b a U. S. B. d b a X- F d LLC, LLC, v. INC. LLC, 633 F. Supp. 2d 159 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)

. . . , ‘punitive damages are not available under the Copyright Act of 1976.’ ”); 4 Nimmer on Copyright § 14.02 . . .

McCLEAN, v. J. ASTRUE,, 650 F. Supp. 2d 223 (E.D.N.Y. 2009)

. . . Under the regulation effective June 16, 2008, Listing 14.02 now defines SLE to include: A. . . .

TEAMSTERS LOCAL PENSION AND WELFARE FUNDS, v. APOLLO GROUP, INC. G. S. B. E. R. III E. J., 633 F. Supp. 2d 763 (D. Ariz. 2009)

. . . U.S. v. 14.02 Acres of Land More or Less, 530 F.3d 883, 894 (9th Cir.2008) (internal quotation marks . . . public record and consider them without converting a Rule 12 motion into one for summary judgment.” 14.02 . . .

FORTUNATO, v. COOLEY DICKINSON HOSPITAL, INC., 597 F. Supp. 2d 206 (D. Mass. 2009)

. . . CMV under the federal definition would not be considered a CMV by Massachusetts. 540 Mass.Code Regs. 14.02 . . . carriers of passengers are all explicitly subject to the Massachusetts regulations. 540 Mass.Code Regs. 14.02 . . .

M. COLLIER, v. NEW YORK Co., 308 F. App'x 213 (9th Cir. 2009)

. . . .”); see also United States v. 14.02 Acres of Land, 547 F.3d 943, 955-56 (9th Cir.2008) (concluding that . . .

In NOTRE DAME INVESTORS, INC. LP, v. In LP, v., 306 F. App'x 62 (5th Cir. 2009)

. . . Section 14.02 of the plan states that “[n]o attorneys’ fees will be paid with respect to any Claim .. . . .

In NOTRE DAME INVESTORS, INC. LP, v. In LP, v., 306 F. App'x 62 (5th Cir. 2009)

. . . Section 14.02 of the plan states that “[n]o attorneys’ fees will be paid with respect to any Claim .. . . .

CLOSED LOOP MARKETING, INC. a v. CLOSED LOOP MARKETING, LLC,, 589 F. Supp. 2d 1211 (E.D. Cal. 2008)

. . . L.Ed.2d 179 (2007) (citing 5B Wright & Miller § 1357 (3d ed. 2004 and Supp. 2007)), United States v. 14.02 . . .

FAULKNER, v. NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY, v., 576 F. Supp. 2d 609 (S.D.N.Y. 2008)

. . . The Gap, Inc., 246 F.3d 152, 172 (2d Cir.2001). . 4 Nimmer on Copyright § 14.02[C][2], at 14.31 (2008 . . .

HANOVICH, v. J. ASTRUE,, 579 F. Supp. 2d 1172 (D. Minn. 2008)

. . . Plaintiff claims that her medical condition of systemic lupus erythematosus meets or equals Listing 14.02 . . . Listing 14.02, systemic lupus erythema-tosus, is met when documented as described in 14.00B.1, with: . . . Plaintiff also raised the issue of meeting Listing 14.02 before she attended the hearing before the ALJ . . . did not meet or medically equal a listed impairment, the ALJ never cited to or referenced Listing 14.02 . . . Systemic lupus erythematosus (14.02)-This disease is characterized clinically by constitutional symptoms . . .