The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH

Chapter 14
GOVERNOR

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 14.03

14.03 Governor’s private secretary.—The Governor of this state may appoint and commission a fit and proper person to hold office during the pleasure of the Governor, as private secretary of the Governor, and as clerk for the executive department, and who shall attend daily, during office hours, at the capitol, and perform such duties in the office of the Governor as she or he may be directed by the Governor to perform.

History.—s. 3, ch. 3, 1845; RS 71; GS 72; RGS 86; CGL 107; s. 35, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 14.03 on Google Scholar

F.S. 14.03 on Casetext

Amendments to 14.03

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 14.03

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 14.03.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

RAMOS, v. LOUISIANA, 140 S. Ct. 1390 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Thomas, 3 Criminal Constitutional Law § 14.03[3] (2019); W. LaFave, J. Israel, N. King, & O. . . .

UNITED STATES v. CANO,, 934 F.3d 1002 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . tire from the undercarriage of the truck and discovered 14 vacuum-sealed packages inside, containing 14.03 . . .

NCO FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED, EGS v. MONTGOMERY PARK, LLC,, 918 F.3d 388 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Montgomery Park had used "reasonable commercial efforts" to mitigate its damages, as required in § 14.03 . . .

I. BERNARDI ORTIZ, v. CYBEX INTERNATIONAL, INC., 345 F. Supp. 3d 107 (D. P.R. 2018)

. . . Id. at § 14.03 [1], p. 14-10. . . .

ANDERSON NEWS, L. L. C. T. L. L. C. v. AMERICAN MEDIA, INC. Co. LP. U. S. LLC, LP, v. Jr., 899 F.3d 87 (2nd Cir. 2018)

. . . Areeda & Herbert Hovenkamp, Fundamentals of Antitrust Law § 14.03(b), at 14-25 (4th ed. 2011) (Areeda . . .

M. REYES, v. BAKERY AND CONFECTIONERY UNION AND INDUSTRY INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND,, 281 F. Supp. 3d 833 (N.D. Cal. 2017)

. . . (quoting 3 Newberg § 14.03 at 14-15))). . . .

IN RE ACTOS PIOGLITAZONE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION., 274 F. Supp. 3d 485 (W.D. La. 2017)

. . . Art, XIII. .See MSA Secs. 3,01, 3.05, 4.02, 6.02, 7.02, 9.01, 9.03, and 14.03. . MSA, at 35-36. . . . .

ALVAREZ, v. LOPEZ,, 835 F.3d 1024 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . Cohen, Cohen’s Handbook of Federal Indian Law § 14.03[1], at 944 (2012 ed.) [hereinafter Cohen’s]. . . .

HOSPITALITY FRANCHISING LLC, v. HI HOTEL GROUP, LLC,, 171 F. Supp. 3d 340 (M.D. Pa. 2016)

. . . Securacom Inc., 224 F.3d 273, 279-80 (3d Cir.2000); 3-14 Gilson on Trademarks § 14.03 (2015). . . . Techsplosion, Inc., 261 F.3d 1188, 1205 (11th Cir.2001); 3-14 Gilson on Trademarks § 14.03 (2015) ("Under . . .

IN RE DOMESTIC DRYWALL ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 163 F. Supp. 3d 175 (E.D. Pa. 2016)

. . . Areeda & Herbert Hovenkamp, Fundamentals of Antitrust Law § 14.03 (Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 4th . . . Ar-eeda & Hovenkamp, supra, § 14.03. . . .

WORKING AMERICA, INC. v. CITY OF BLOOMINGTON,, 142 F. Supp. 3d 823 (D. Minn. 2015)

. . . . §§ 14.358,, 14.03. . . .

MARTINEZ, v. CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,, 125 F. Supp. 3d 397 (D. Conn. 2015)

. . . of 63, or 7.93 percent) was 55.52 percent of the comparable rate for white candidates (70 of 499, or 14.03 . . .

UNITED STATES v. WILSON,, 622 F. App'x 393 (5th Cir. 2015)

. . . only Cornelius — up to an ounce of cocaine a day from the end of 2011 until May 2013, resulting in 14.03 . . .

UNITED STATES v. FAUST,, 795 F.3d 1243 (10th Cir. 2015)

. . . s proposed instruction was taken from 1 Devitt & Blackmar, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions § 14.03 . . .

UNITED STATES v. APPLE, INC. LLC, DBA L. L. C. a PLC, USA, 791 F.3d 290 (2d Cir. 2015)

. . . Areeda & Herbert Hovenkamp, Fundamentals of Antitrust Law § 14.03(b), at 14-25 (4th ed.2011)); accord . . .

TRIBE, O Sr. v. M. ASHE,, 92 F. Supp. 3d 1160 (D. Wyo. 2015)

. . . .” § 14.03. . . .

In PONCE DE LEON INC., 523 B.R. 349 (Bankr. D.P.R. 2014)

. . . Parties Positions as to Valuation of Collateral Ponce de León 14.03, Inc. . . .

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v. PEABODY WESTERN COAL COMPANY v. K., 773 F.3d 977 (9th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 14.03[2][b], at 954 (“[T]he very concept of enrollment and maintenance of citizenship lists is largely . . .

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v. PEABODY WESTERN COAL COMPANY v. K., 773 F.3d 977 (9th Cir. 2014)

. . . Cohen, Handbook of Federal Indian Law § 3.02[3], at 133 (Nell Jessup Newton ed., 2012); see also id, § 14.03 . . .

SCHUETTE, v. COALITION TO DEFEND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, INTEGRATION AND IMMIGRANT RIGHTS AND FIGHT FOR EQUALITY BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY BAMN, 134 S. Ct. 1623 (U.S. 2014)

. . . Bylaws § 14.03. . . .

SCHUETTE, v. COALITION TO DEFEND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, INTEGRATION AND IMMIGRANT RIGHTS AND FIGHT FOR EQUALITY BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY BAMN, 572 U.S. 291 (U.S. 2014)

. . . Bylaws § 14.03. . . .

In R. E. LOANS LLC, R. E. LLC, a LLC, v. C., 519 B.R. 499 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2014)

. . . by the plaintiff.” 1 Marsh & Volk, Practice Under the California Securities Laws (rev. ed. 2006) § 14.03 . . .

UNITED STATES v. LYKINS,, 544 F. App'x 642 (6th Cir. 2013)

. . . Pattern Jury Instruct. 14.03(1) (manufacturing), with 6 Cir. . . .

UNITED STATES v. APPLE INC. v. USA, 952 F. Supp. 2d 638 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . Areeda and Herbert Hovenkamp, Fundamentals of Antitrust Law, § 14.03(b), at 14-25 (4th ed. 2011)). . . .

GULF POWER COMPANY, v. COALSALES II, LLC, f. k. a., 522 F. App'x 699 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . This argument is clearly foreclosed by section 14.03, which provides that “economic conditions which . . .

CAPITAL CONCEPTS, INC. v. MOUNTAIN CORPORATION,, 936 F. Supp. 2d 661 (W.D. Va. 2013)

. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 14.03[B] (1993). . . .

LEE VALLEY TOOLS, LTD. v. INDUSTRIAL BLADE COMPANY,, 288 F.R.D. 254 (W.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . Nimmer and David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 14.03[B], at 14-39 (1996)). . . .

J. BACHORZ A. v. MILLER- FORSLUND, L., 703 F.3d 27 (1st Cir. 2012)

. . . Subsection 14.03 required any amendment to the agreement to be in writing. . . .

COALITION TO DEFEND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, INTEGRATION AND IMMIGRANT RIGHTS AND FIGHT FOR EQUALITY BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY BAMN v. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, D. K. By BAMN v. D. K. By BAMN v. D. K., 701 F.3d 466 (6th Cir. 2012)

. . . . §§ 14.03, 14.04. . . . Bylaws §§ 1.01, 14.03. . . . Bylaws § 14.03. . . . Bylaws § 14.03, and change their university’s admissions policies — either by entirely revoking the delegation . . .

In PUBLICATION PAPER ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 690 F.3d 51 (2d Cir. 2012)

. . . Areeda and Herbert Hovenkamp, Fundamentals of Antitrust Law, § 14.03(b), at 14-25 (4th ed.2011) (footnotes . . .

DWYER INSTRUMENTS, INC. v. SENSOCON, INC. E., 873 F. Supp. 2d 1015 (N.D. Ind. 2012)

. . . No. 94-1476, at 161, 1976 U.S.C.C.A.N. 5659, 5777 (1976)); see also 4 Nimmer on Copyright § 14.03 (same . . . Id. § 14.03. . . . ingredients of remoteness and speculation tend to interact in actual eases. 4 Nimmer on Copyright § 14.03 . . .

GESTON, v. K. OLSON,, 857 F. Supp. 2d 863 (D.N.D. 2012)

. . . Frolick and Brown, Advising the Elderly or Disabled Client, ¶ 14.03[4] (2nd ed.2011). . . .

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, v. WILLETTS, III,, 882 F. Supp. 2d 859 (E.D.N.C. 2012)

. . . Russell M, Robinson II, Robinson on North Carolina Corporation Law § 14.03 (7th ed. 2009). . . .

D. OSORIO, v. STATE FARM BANK, F. S. B., 278 F.R.D. 671 (S.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . to the plaintiff on the underlying claim.” 3 James William Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 14.03 . . .

FAHMY v. JAY- Z, 835 F. Supp. 2d 783 (C.D. Cal. 2011)

. . . Polar Bear, 384 F.3d at 711 (quoting 4 Nimmer on Copyright § 14.03[B]). . . . See 4 Nimmer on Copyright § 14.03 (“The first inquiry looks to defining the permissible scope of gross . . .

J. BACHORZ A. v. MILLER- FORSLUND, L., 812 F. Supp. 2d 83 (D. Mass. 2011)

. . . No. 29, Ex. 1, Art XVII, § 14.03 (“[N]o subsequent alteration, amendment, change or addition to this . . .

REAL VIEW, LLC. v. TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v., 811 F. Supp. 2d 553 (D. Mass. 2011)

. . . Polar Bear, 384 F.3d at 711; see also 4 Nimmer § 14.03, 14-34 (“When an infringer’s profits are only . . .

FLYNN, v. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA, 809 F. Supp. 2d 1175 (C.D. Cal. 2011)

. . . insurance beginning with his June 4, 2008 paycheck, and $15.95 for the $50,000 in optional life insurance, $14.03 . . .

H. COHEN, Ed. D. v. UNITED STATES,, 100 Fed. Cl. 461 (Fed. Cl. 2011)

. . . See Nimmer § 14.03[B][2][d] n. 120. . Mr. . . .

UNITED STATES v. WILGUS,, 638 F.3d 1274 (10th Cir. 2011)

. . . See generally Cohen’s Handbook of Federal Indian Law § 14.03[2][b] (Nell Jessup Newton et al. eds., 2005 . . . See Cohen § 14.03[2][c][iii] (noting that equal protection-based claims by non-Indians challenging religious . . .

UNITED STATES v. WILGUS,, 638 F.3d 1274 (10th Cir. 2011)

. . . See generally Cohen’s Handbook of Federal Indian Law § 14.03[2][b] (Nell Jessup Newton et al. eds., 2005 . . . See Cohen § 14.03[2][e][iii] (noting that equal protection-based claims by non-Indians challenging religious . . .

L. BARTLETT v. MUTUAL PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, INC., 760 F. Supp. 2d 220 (D.N.H. 2011)

. . . LEXIS 96711, at *38 (citing 2 Frumer & Friedman, supra, § 14.03[1][b], at 14-35, and Racer v. . . .

ALL- STAR MARKETING GROUP, LLC, LLC LLC, v. MEDIA BRANDS CO. LTD., 775 F. Supp. 2d 613 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)

. . . .”); 3 Anne Gilson Lalonde & Jerome Gilson, Gilson on Trademarks § 14.03(9)(a)(ii)(G) (2009 ed.) . . .

THOMAS M. GILBERT ARCHITECTS, P. C. v. ACCENT BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS, LLC, a a, 377 F. App'x 303 (4th Cir. 2010)

. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 14.03[B] (1993)). . . .

UNITED STATES v. AMBROSE,, 792 F. Supp. 2d 968 (N.D. Ill. 2010)

. . . Blackmar, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions § 14.03 (3d ed.1977). . . .

L. BARTLETT v. MUTUAL PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, INC., 759 F. Supp. 2d 171 (D.N.H. 2010)

. . . LEXIS 96711, at *38 (citing 2 Frumer & Friedman, supra, § 14.03[l][b], at 14-35, and Racer v. . . .

JACKSON, v. THALER,, 358 F. App'x 585 (5th Cir. 2009)

. . . Proc.Code Ann. art. 14.03(d); Adams v. . . .

GULF POWER COMPANY, v. COALSALES II, L. L. C. f k a, 661 F. Supp. 2d 1270 (N.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . Sections 2.06, 2.07, 2.10, 2.12, 2.16, 2.20, 2.27, 2.28, 2.34, 5.03, 8.01, 8.02, 9.04, 9.06, 11.01, 14.02, 14.03 . . .

HUHTAMAKI COMPANY MANUFACTURING, v. CKF, INC., 648 F. Supp. 2d 167 (D. Me. 2009)

. . . notice of application under Rule 14.05 whereas ‘action’ is commenced by statement of claim under Rule 14.03 . . .

FENDI ADELE S. R. L. S. R. L. v. BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY WAREHOUSE CORP., 642 F. Supp. 2d 276 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)

. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 14.03[B], at 14-39 (1996)). . . .

BRACCO DIAGNOSTICS, INC. v. AMERSHAM HEALTH, INC., 627 F. Supp. 2d 384 (D.N.J. 2009)

. . . Renosky, 399 F.3d 168, 176 (3d Cir.2005); Gilson § 14.03[2]; see also Calmann § 23:56. . . . specifically targeted, a plaintiff is also entitled to a presumption of money-damages”); Gilson, § 14.03 . . . Broan, 923 F.2d at 1236; see also Gilson § 14.03[3][a] (“recovery is not precluded merely because the . . .

FORTUNATO, v. COOLEY DICKINSON HOSPITAL, INC., 597 F. Supp. 2d 206 (D. Mass. 2009)

. . . the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in both intrastate and interstate commerce.” 540 Mass.Code Regs. 14.03 . . .

WOOD, v. HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT PUBLISHING COMPANY, R. R., 589 F. Supp. 2d 1230 (D. Colo. 2008)

. . . See 4-14 Nimmer on Copyright § 14.03[B] (2008) (“ *[A]11 gross revenue is presumed to be profit “attributable . . . percentage of his gross revenue than he could have absent the infringement.’ ” 4-14 Nimmer on Copyright § 14.03 . . . See 4-14 Nimmer on Copyright § 14.03. . . . Speculative profits HMH points to Nimmer on Copyright, 4-14 § 14.03[B][2], for the proposition that “ . . .

In ENRON CORPORATION SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE ERISA LITIGATION. v., 586 F. Supp. 2d 732 (S.D. Tex. 2008)

. . . Prudential, 148 F.3d at 341, quoting in turn 3 Herbert Newberg & Alba Conte, Newberg on Class Actions, § 14.03 . . .

MILANO, v. NBC UNIVERSAL, INC., 584 F. Supp. 2d 1288 (C.D. Cal. 2008)

. . . Cir.2002) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted) (emphasis in original); see also Nimmer § 14.03 . . .

RECORDS, INC. v. SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, INC. LLC d b a, 566 F. Supp. 2d 305 (S.D.N.Y. 2008)

. . . Paragraph 9.01(a) requires that notice be given, and ¶ 14.03, the notice and cure provision, provides . . . proffered to support these claims; no notice and an opportunity to cure was provided as required by ¶ 14.03 . . .

UNITED STATES v. LOPEZ,, 284 F. App'x 156 (5th Cir. 2008)

. . . Proc. art. 14.01 & 14.03; Drago v. State, 553 S.W.2d 375, 377 (Tex.Crim. App.1977). . . .

PHILIP MORRIS USA INC. v. W. LEE,, 547 F. Supp. 2d 685 (W.D. Tex. 2008)

. . . applying its experience, wisdom and judicial acumen to the facts at hand.” 3-14 Gilson on Teademaeks § 14.03 . . .

N. SPERLING, v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, v., 498 F. Supp. 2d 288 (D.D.C. 2007)

. . . Practice § 14.03. . . .

In IMMUNE RESPONSE SECURITIES LITIGATION, 497 F. Supp. 2d 1166 (S.D. Cal. 2007)

. . . are frequently awarded in common fund cases when the lodestar method is applied” (quoting 3 Newberg § 14.03 . . .

ORION IP, LLC, v. MERCEDES- BENZ USA, LLC,, 485 F. Supp. 2d 745 (E.D. Tex. 2007)

. . . 21 as an alternate basis for its holding); 2-6 Chisum on Patents § 6.02; 4A-14 Chisum on Patents § 14.03 . . .

D. STRAUS, Jr. v. DVC WORLDWIDE, INC. d b a DVC, d b a, 484 F. Supp. 2d 620 (S.D. Tex. 2007)

. . . speculatively attributable to the infringement, courts will deny recovery to the copyright owner.” 4 Nimmer § 14.03 . . .

DEBARY v. HARRAH S OPERATING COMPANY, INC. LLC v., 465 F. Supp. 2d 250 (S.D.N.Y. 2006)

. . . (Id. at § 14.03.) . . . H at § 14.03.) . . .

WEDGEWOOD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I. v. TOWNSHIP OF LIBERTY, OHIO,, 456 F. Supp. 2d 904 (S.D. Ohio 2006)

. . . See Liberty Township Zoning Resolution § 14.03(a). . . . .

TECHNOLOGIES, S. A. S. A. v. CYRANO, INC., 460 F. Supp. 2d 197 (D. Mass. 2006)

. . . on Copyright § 14.02[A][1] (2006); 3 -14 Jerome Gilson, et al., Trademark Protection and Practice § 14.03 . . .

In NEW ORLEANS PADDLEWHEELS, INC., 350 B.R. 667 (Bankr. E.D. La. 2006)

. . . Holmes, Louisiana Civil Law Treatise, Business Organizations § 14.03 (West 1999). . . . .

In SUNSHINE JR. STORES, INC. d. b. a. d. b. a. Jr. v. Jr., 456 F.3d 1291 (11th Cir. 2006)

. . . if the Company is acting as its own Paying Agent, segregate and hold in trust as provided in Section 14.03 . . .

In SUNSHINE JR. STORES, INC. d. b. a. d. b. a. Jr. v. Jr., 456 F.3d 1291 (11th Cir. 2006)

. . . if the Company is acting as its own Paying Agent, segregate and hold in trust as provided in Section 14.03 . . .

J. CAFFEY v. COOK,, 409 F. Supp. 2d 484 (S.D.N.Y. 2006)

. . . Nimmer § 14.03[A] at 14-42; On Davis, 246 F.3d at 160. . . . But see Nimmer § 14.03(B)(3) at 14-56 n. 81-6 (noting possibility that standards may differ). . . . .

AMTEC CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES,, 69 Fed. Cl. 79 (Fed. Cl. 2005)

. . . follows: Estimated Option I — Total Labor Cost/per hour Fixed Fee/per hour (154,800 manhours) $2,172,019/$14.03 . . . ESTIMATED FIXED FEE/ Option I — Total LABOR COST/PER HOUR PER HOUR (154,800 man hours) $2,172,019/$14.03 . . .

RECORDS, INC. v. SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, INC. LLC,, 429 F.3d 39 (2d Cir. 2005)

. . . an opportunity to cure its failure to secure a license for the Ketchup Song, as required by section 14.03 . . .

VARACALLO, E. K. B. A. Jr. M. I II, A. v. MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, C. M. MML, 226 F.R.D. 207 (D.N.J. 2005)

. . . Prudential II, 148 F.3d at 341 (quoting 3 Newberg § 14.03 at 14-5). . . .

In WORLDCOM, INC. ERISA LITIGATION ALL ACTIONS, 354 F. Supp. 2d 423 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . Plan § 14.03(j). . . .

INDUSTRIAL RISK INSURERS, v. PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY,, 387 F. Supp. 2d 299 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . Lease § 14.03(c)®. . . . for alterations were to be reviewed by Silverstein’s “architects, engineers or other consultants” § 14.03 . . . Lease § 14.03(c)(i). . . . disapprove the system for its potential to “jeopardize the structural integrity of the building,” Lease, § 14.03 . . . insured under a policy or policies containing ... permission to release liability,” Lease, § 12.06(d), § 14.03 . . .

In SELHEIMER CO. v. P. III, P. III, v. F., 319 B.R. 384 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2005)

. . . federal court, must be supported by federal subject matter jurisdiction.... 3 Moore’s Federal Practice, § 14.03 . . .

POLAR BEAR PRODUCTIONS, INC. a v. TIMEX CORPORATION a v., 384 F.3d 700 (9th Cir. 2004)

. . . evidence of gross revenue duly apportioned to relate to the infringement.” 4 Nimmer On Copyright § 14.03 . . . in claiming profits beyond what might be attributable to the infringement, 4 Nimmer On Copyright § 14.03 . . .

SUNBEAM PRODUCTS, INC. v. WING SHING PRODUCTS BVI LTD., 311 B.R. 378 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)

. . . Nimmer and David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 14.03[B], at 14-39 (1996)). . . .

HOMESTAKE LEAD COMPANY OF MISSOURI, v. DOE RUN RESOURCES CORPORATION,, 282 F. Supp. 2d 1131 (N.D. Cal. 2003)

. . . Section 14.03 provides that each partner shall pay its share of arbitration fees. . . . Section 14.03 of the Partnership Agreement indicates that no matter listed in Annex A shall constitute . . .

IN RE WORLDCOM, INC., 263 F. Supp. 2d 745 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)

. . . .” § 14.03(j). . . .

In AI REALTY MARKETING OF NEW YORK, INC. DDG I, v. BVI, 293 B.R. 586 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2003)

. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 14.03[B], at 14-39 (1996)). . . .

JOHN G. DANIELSON, INC. v. WINCHESTER- CONANT PROPERTIES, INC. LLC,, 322 F.3d 26 (1st Cir. 2003)

. . . See 4 Nimmer, supra, § 14.03(D), at 14^41 (parties may consent to bench trial). . . .

HEALTH INSURANCE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, v. GODDARD CLAUSSEN PORTER NOVELLI,, 213 F.R.D. 63 (D.C. Cir. 2003)

. . . See 3 Moore’s Federal Practice, § 14.03[1], at 14-12 (Matthew Bender 3d ed. 2002) (“Third-party practice . . . See, e.g., 3 Moore’s Federal Practice, § 14.03[1], at 14— 12 (Matthew Bender 3d ed. 2002) ("Because the . . .

ROSEN B. B. Di a a v. TENNESSEE COMMISSIONER OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION,, 280 F. Supp. 2d 743 (M.D. Tenn. 2002)

. . . , Plaintiffs' Notice of Filing Documents; Plaintiffs' Exhibit No. 27, Tenn-Care Rules, Rule 1200-13-14.03 . . .

O CONNOR, d b a v. CINDY GERKE ASSOCIATES, INC., 300 F. Supp. 2d 759 (W.D. Wis. 2002)

. . . Id. at 914 (quoting Frank Music, 772 F.2d at 517); see also 4 Nimmer on Copyright, § 14.03[A]; On Davis . . .

ASSOCIATED RESIDENTIAL DESIGN, LLC, a v. MOLOTKY,, 226 F. Supp. 2d 1251 (D. Nev. 2002)

. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 14.03[A] (2002) (explaining that, “[i]t does not suffice . . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 14.03[A] (2002) (citing Business Trends Analysts, Inc. v . . .

LEBER, v. UNIVERSAL MUSIC AND VIDEO DISTRIBUTION, INC., 225 F. Supp. 2d 928 (S.D. Ill. 2002)

. . . follow the proper grievance procedure regarding the aforementioned breaches, and (5) violated §§ 12.02, 14.03 . . .

MARKEL INSURANCE COMPANY, v. DUNCAN COMPANY, INC. v., 209 F.R.D. 489 (N.D. Ala. 2002)

. . . Moore, et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 14.03[1] (3d ed.2001) (emphasis supplied). . . .

MACKIE, v. RIESER a, 296 F.3d 909 (9th Cir. 2002)

. . . Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright, § 14.03[A], at 14-15 (1985)). . . . Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright, § 14.03[A], at 14-29 (2001) (“When an infringer’s profits are only remotely . . .

TSE No. v. VENTANA MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. a W. L. P. II, L. P. MVP II L. P. W. No., 297 F.3d 210 (3d Cir. 2002)

. . . Volk, Practice Under the California Securities Laws § 14.03[2][a] (2001) (stating that § 25401 does not . . . Volk, Practice Under the California Securities Laws § 14.03[2][a] (2001) (stating that § 25401 does not . . .

VIZCAINO R. v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, R. v., 290 F.3d 1043 (9th Cir. 2002)

. . . (quoting 3 Newberg § 14.03 at 14-5)). . . . .

ANDREAS, v. VOLKSWAGEN OF AMERICA, INC. d b a a a, 210 F. Supp. 2d 1078 (N.D. Iowa 2002)

. . . the infringer, such claims are difficult to prove and are often unsuccessful. 1 Nimmer on Copyright § 14.03 . . . Nimmer, On Copyright, § 14.03[A]; Roy Export Co. v. . . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer On Copyright § 14.03[A] at 14-29 (1998) (when an infringer’s profits are . . .

In GENERAL INSTRUMENT SECURITIES LITIGATION, 209 F. Supp. 2d 423 (E.D. Pa. 2001)

. . . 148 F.3d 283, 341 (3d Cir.1998) (quoting 3 Herbert New-berg & Alba Conte, Newberg on Class Actions, § 14.03 . . .

In SUNBEAM SECURITIES LITIGATION, 176 F. Supp. 2d 1323 (S.D. Fla. 2001)

. . . Newberg & Alba Conte, Newberg on Class Actions § 14.03 (3d ed.1992). . . .

THE CAYUGA INDIAN NATION OF NEW YORK, v. E. PATAKI,, 165 F. Supp. 2d 266 (N.D.N.Y. 2001)

. . . This resulted in interest rates ranging from a low in 1940 of 0/01% to a high of 14.03% in 1981. . . .

UNITED STATES v. COLEMAN,, 162 F. Supp. 2d 582 (N.D. Tex. 2001)

. . . Ann. art. 14.03 (Vernon Supp.2001). . . . Article 14.03(g) provides: A peace officer listed in Subdivision (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5), Article . . . Art. 14.03(g)(emphasis added). . . . Article 14.03(g) affirmatively authorizes only “rangers and officers commissioned by the Public Safety . . . Ann. art. 14.03(g) (Vernon Supp.2001). . . .

M. BRUCE v. WEEKLY WORLD NEWS, INC., 150 F. Supp. 2d 313 (D. Mass. 2001)

. . . Minner & David Minner, Minner on Copyright § 14.03 (1993) (footnotes omitted). Walker v. . . .

VIZCAINO, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, v., 142 F. Supp. 2d 1299 (W.D. Wash. 2001)

. . . Conte, Attorney Fee Awards § 2.06 (1993), p. 39 (multiplier of 5-10); 3 Newberg on Class Actions § 14.03 . . .

LANTEC, INC. a a v. NOVELL, INC. a, 146 F. Supp. 2d 1140 (D. Utah 2001)

. . . foreclosed in the market for the tied product. 3 J. von Kalinowski, [Antitrust Laws and Trade Regulation] § 14.03 . . . commerce affected in the tied product is measured in terms of dollar volume. 3 J. von Kalinowski, supra § 14.03 . . .

TOKIO MARINE FIRE INSURANCE GROUP, v. J. J. PHOENIX EXPRESS, LTD. v. J. J. v. U. S. A., 156 F. Supp. 2d 889 (N.D. Ill. 2001)

. . . indemnified by the carrier ‘over whose line or route the loss or injury occurred .... ’ ”); Sorkin, § 14.03 . . .

In CENDANT CORPORATION PRIDES LITIGATION. v. Co. R. A. A., 243 F.3d 722 (3d Cir. 2001)

. . . 148 F.3d 283, 341 (3d Cir.1998) (quoting 3 Herbert Newberg & Alba Conte, Newberg on Class Actions, S 14.03 . . .