The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH

Chapter 14
GOVERNOR

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 14.23

14.23 State-Federal relations.—

(1) LEGISLATIVE INTENT.—It is the intent of the Legislature to establish mechanisms through which the legislative and executive branches of state government can work together in a cooperative alliance, to strengthen the state’s relationship with our Congressional Delegation and with federal executive branch agencies, to improve our position in relation to federal legislative initiatives which have a fiscal impact or substantive policy impact on the state, and to establish and maintain a viable network and communications structure to facilitate the transmittal of essential information between state and federal officials, and to take all necessary steps to maximize the receipt of various federal funds by the State of Florida. Florida’s Congressional Delegation is, in this regard, the most important linkage in representing Florida’s interests in the nation’s capital. Therefore, the mechanisms and resources created herein, for the furtherance of the state’s intergovernmental efforts, shall include the Congressional Delegation and be available to meet its needs.

(2) CREATION OF THE OFFICE OF STATE-FEDERAL RELATIONS.—

(a) There is created, within the Executive Office of the Governor, the Office of State-Federal Relations for the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as the “office,” to be located in Washington, D.C. The office shall represent both the legislative and executive branches of state government. The Legislature shall have direct access to the staff of the office.

(b) The duties of the office shall be determined by the Governor, in consultation with the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and shall include, but not be limited to, the following:

1. To provide legislative and administrative liaison between state and federal officials and agencies and with Congress.

2. To provide grants assistance and advice to state agencies.

3. To assist in the development and implementation of strategies for the evaluation and management of the state’s federal legislative program and intergovernmental efforts.

4. To facilitate the activities of Florida officials traveling to Washington, D.C., in the performance of their official duties.

(3) COOPERATION.—For the purpose of centralizing the state-federal relations efforts of the state, state agencies and their representatives shall cooperate and coordinate their state-federal efforts and activities with the office. State agencies which have representatives headquartered in Washington, D.C., are encouraged to station their representatives in the office.

(4) ANNUAL REPORT.—By January 1 of each year, the office shall submit a report to the Governor, the President of the Senate, and the Speaker of the House of Representatives detailing the office’s budget, personnel, and activities.

(5)(a) NOMINATIONS TO FEDERAL REGIONAL FISHERIES MANAGEMENT COUNCILS.—The Governor is prohibited from nominating for appointment to any one of the federal fisheries management councils established under 16 U.S.C. ss. 1801 et seq., as amended, the name of any person who is, or who has been at any time during the 24 months preceding such nomination, a lobbyist for any entity of any kind whatsoever whose interests are or could be affected by actions or decisions of such fisheries management councils.

(b) For purposes of this section, the term “lobbyist” means any natural person who is required to register pursuant to s. 11.045 or the equivalent federal statute and who, for compensation, seeks, or sought during the preceding 24 months, to influence the governmental decisionmaking of a reporting individual or procurement employee, as those terms are defined under s. 112.3148, or his or her agency, to encourage the passage, defeat, or modification of any proposal or recommendation by such reporting individual or procurement employee or his or her agency.

History.—ss. 5, 6, ch. 77-419; s. 9, ch. 79-190; s. 1, ch. 95-303; s. 1, ch. 98-188; s. 2, ch. 2011-155.

F.S. 14.23 on Google Scholar

F.S. 14.23 on Casetext

Amendments to 14.23

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 14.23

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 14.23.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE ESSAR STEEL MINNESOTA LLC ESML E. SC v., 602 B.R. 600 (Bankr. Del. 2019)

. . . agreement between ESML and Essar Project Management to perform all the project management work for $ 14.23 . . .

IN RE BETTEROADS ASPHALT, LLC In, 594 B.R. 516 (Bankr. P.R. 2018)

. . . Stepan, Esq., Bankruptcy Law Manual, § 14.23 (5th ed.2018). . . .

DAYE, On v. COMMUNITY FINANCIAL LOAN SERVICE CENTERS, LLC, d b a, 280 F. Supp. 3d 1222 (D.N.M. 2017)

. . . Speedy Loan Policy and Procedure Manual 14.23 (updated November 12, 2014)(CFSC_DayeJDiscovery000277)( . . .

LE, D. Le, RJK, v. REGENCY CORPORATION d b a J., 957 F. Supp. 2d 1079 (D. Minn. 2013)

. . . reported and was compensated for 35.06 hours of overtime, Kallenbach reported and was compensated for 14.23 . . .

W. FREDERICK, v. SOUTHERN STAR CENTRAL GAS PIPELINE, INC., 944 F. Supp. 2d 1083 (D. Kan. 2013)

. . . to as high as $13.89 per Mcf in 2008 and the EIA’s most current (June 2012) rate is approximately $14.23 . . .

RED ROOF FRANCHISING LLC, INC. v. AA HOSPITALITY NORTHSHORE, LLC, 937 F. Supp. 2d 537 (D.N.J. 2013)

. . . . [$6.31 (credit 17743) + $14.23 (credit 17800) + $20.54 (credit 17860) + $6.71 (credit 17919) = $47.79 . . .

In SUPERIOR BOAT WORKS, INC., 438 B.R. 878 (Bankr. N.D. Miss. 2010)

. . . . § 79-4-14.23. . . .

H CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, v. SUPERIOR BOAT WORKS, INC. d b a PB- PB-, 659 F. Supp. 2d 774 (N.D. Miss. 2009)

. . . proceeding____” While the court does not doubt that many of these steps are indeed routine, § 79-4-14.23 . . .

MORGAN, v. GUARDIANSHIP OF TURGEON,, 724 So. 2d 175 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Responsibilities, and Liabilities, in Florida Guardianship PRACTICE (The Florida Bar 3d ed.1998) § 14.23 . . .

RODRIGUEZ, a v. GLOCK, INC. m. b. H., 28 F. Supp. 2d 1064 (N.D. Ill. 1998)

. . . involves the causal connection between a defendant’s conduct and an injury. 1 Polelle & Ottley, supra § 14.23 . . .

UNITED STATES v. AMERICAN SOCIETY OF COMPOSERS, AUTHORS AND PUBLISHERS, In APPLICATIONS OF SALEM MEDIA OF CALIFORNIA, INC., 981 F. Supp. 199 (S.D.N.Y. 1997)

. . . In 1994, these per-program stations generated 14.23% of the total reported gross revenues of all licensed . . .

M. HALVAJIAN, v. BANK OF NEW YORK, N. A. a R., 191 B.R. 56 (D.N.J. 1995)

. . . Halvajian, a general partner of Group, guaranteed the loan, which was secured by a mortgage on 14.23 . . . The fair market value is a function of the number of upland, 1.e. developable acres, within the 14.23 . . . Nelson estimated, and the state eventually confirmed by LOI, that 5.57 acres of the 14.23 acre tract . . .

TRANSPORTATION LEASING COMPANY v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 861 F. Supp. 931 (C.D. Cal. 1993)

. . . granted certain waste disposal companies the exclusive right to collect residential waste in the city. [14.23 . . .

Co. v. Co., 16 Ct. Int'l Trade 864 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1992)

. . . final results of the administrative review which assigned NTN a weighted-average dumping margin of 14.23% . . .

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES,, 802 F. Supp. 474 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1992)

. . . final results of the administrative review which assigned NTN a weighted-average dumping margin of 14.23% . . .

WESCH, v. HUNT,, 785 F. Supp. 1491 (S.D. Ala. 1992)

. . . 1,221 12.63% 17 0.18% 138 1.43% .15 0.16% Total Tuscaloosa County 81,339 100.00% 68,501 84.22% II,574 14.23% . . .

F. KNIGHT, Jr. S. T. D. S. S. Jr. L. Dr. W. Y. N. S. Dr. Jr. v. STATE ALABAMA M. Jr. S. Jr. B. H. J. P. Dr. D. III, F. A. A. Sr. A. G. A M W. Dr. A M Jr. W. M. H. B. L. A. R. C. Dr. V. Dr. E. B. F. W. Jr. W. T. Jr. R. R. E. W. A. C. J. D. Jr. T. B. Jr. O. H. Jr. T. Jr. E. G. Jr. S. H. Jr. B. Dr. A. UNITED STATES v. STATE OF ALABAMA A M a a a a a a a a a a, 787 F. Supp. 1030 (N.D. Ala. 1991)

. . . K2 438 627 179 8,752 2,221 3,941 102,060 28,676 3,559 13,698 4,452 3.077 40,887 9.991 4,092 47.475 14.23S . . .

INTERNATIONAL ORE FERTILIZER CORP. v. SGS CONTROL SERVICES INC., 743 F. Supp. 250 (S.D.N.Y. 1990)

. . . Holds two, three, four and five each measure 26.4 meters long, 24.6 meters wide, and 14.23 meters high . . .

A. ANDERSON, v. PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY,, 722 F. Supp. 668 (D. Kan. 1989)

. . . Currently, plaintiff is receiving $14.23 per hour as a pipeliner. . . .

In SIMONE, MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER SMITH, INC. v. SIMONE,, 68 B.R. 475 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 1983)

. . . ... is not necessarily ‘knowingly and fraudulently' concealing it.” 1A Collier on Bankruptcy para. 14.23 . . . little or no value is ordinarily not accompanied by a fraudulent intent.” 1A Collier on Bankruptcy para. 14.23 . . .

BISCAYNE FEDERAL SAVINGS LOAN ASSOCIATION v. FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK BOARD, T. P. D. H. T. Jr. R. M., 572 F. Supp. 997 (S.D. Fla. 1983)

. . . December 21, 1982, the appropriate interest rate on the proposed mortgage-backed bond would be 13.73% to 14.23% . . .

GREENWALD, J. v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF COUNTY OF SULLIVAN HAAS, S. v. COUNTY OF SULLIVAN,, 567 F. Supp. 200 (S.D.N.Y. 1983)

. . . 5.17 102 5.25 Callicoon 4.65 93 4.59 Cochecton 2.06 42 2.04 Delaware 4.32 87 4.28 Fallsburg 14.21 293 14.23 . . .

In YACKLEY, A. WOOD L. v. YACKLEY, 37 B.R. 253 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 1983)

. . . ... is not necessarily “knowingly and fraudulently” concealing it.’ 1A Collier on Bankruptcy para. 14.23 . . . little or no value is ordinarily not accompanied by a fraudulent intent.’ 1A Collier on Bankruptcy para. 14.23 . . .

P. ARROW, v. L. DOW,, 554 F. Supp. 1086 (D.N.M. 1983)

. . . Levitan 14.23 Helen Lopez 10.45 Tony Lopez, Jr. 32.06 Peggy Nelson 32.06 Jacquelyn Robins 26.60 Melvin . . .

In AYERS, d b a EVERWED CO. D. v. AYERS, d b a, 25 B.R. 762 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 1982)

. . . See also 1 Collier, Bankruptcy, Sec. 14.23 (14th ed. 1940). . . .

In K. NAZARIAN, AETNA INSURANCE COMPANY C. Jr. v. K. NAZARIAN,, 18 B.R. 143 (Bankr. D. Md. 1982)

. . . Mulder, Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 14.23 n.10 (King ed. 1974). . . .

D. THOMPSON, v. TUALATIN HILLS PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT,, 496 F. Supp. 530 (D. Or. 1980)

. . . when a landowner is claiming a partial rather than a complete taking. 4A Nichols on Eminent Domain § 14.23 . . . the difference between the market value before and after the taking. 4A Nichols on Eminent Domain § 14.23 . . .

UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN MONTGOMERY, WASHINGTON AND ALLEGHANY COUNTIES, MARYLAND, E., 582 F.2d 878 (4th Cir. 1978)

. . . equals the value of the land taken plus the diminution in the value of the remaining land. 4A Nichols § 14.23 . . .

TENNECO OIL COMPANY v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION,, 571 F.2d 834 (5th Cir. 1978)

. . . If it had, the exploration and development cost component would have been 14.23 cents/mcf, not 6.26 cents . . .

M. L. STOCKTON AND MARY STOCKTON v. THE UNITED STATES, 214 Ct. Cl. 506 (Ct. Cl. 1977)

. . . This is elementary eminent domain law. 4A Nichols, Eminent domain, Rev. 3d Ed. 1976 § 14.23. . . .

UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN BEE COUNTY, TEXAS, R. J. Jr., 515 F.2d 230 (5th Cir. 1975)

. . . Use of the before-and-after test is appropriate. 4A Nichols § 14.23. . . .

CONCERNED RESIDENTS OF BUCK HILL FALLS, By v. GRANT, U. S., 388 F. Supp. 394 (M.D. Pa. 1975)

. . . evidence presented, cannot be determined to meet N.E.P.A.’s requirement that it protect the environment. 14.23 . . .

In A. MASCOLO,, 505 F.2d 274 (1st Cir. 1974)

. . . Mulder, Collier on Bankruptcy U 14.23, n. 10 (King ed. 1974). . . . .

In IMPERIAL NATIONAL INC., 374 F. Supp. 949 (D.N.J. 1974)

. . . The Imperial interests are being offered a package of $1.5 million in cash plus 14.23% of the equity . . . The total offer, therefore, is: Cash $ 1,500,000 Stock (14.23% of $70,500,000) 10,030,000 Total Offer . . .

SIMPSON, v. JEFFERSON STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 465 F.2d 1320 (6th Cir. 1972)

. . . This policy provided that in consideration of the payment of a quarterly premium of $14.23 for a period . . . The day following receipt, June 4, plaintiff paid the $14.23 pursuant to this offer by money order. . . .

DILLON, v. ANTLER LAND COMPANY a, 341 F. Supp. 734 (D. Mont. 1972)

. . . When plaintiff was declared to be competent she undertook the leasing and increased the rental from 14.23 . . .

OHIO VALLEY ELECTRIC CORPORATION, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,, 244 F. Supp. 914 (S.D.N.Y. 1965)

. . . This is a total claim of only 14.23 or 13.36 per cent of the book price of the units sold. . . .

AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK OF DENVER, v. W. RAINGUET, In W. RAINGUET,, 323 F.2d 881 (10th Cir. 1963)

. . . Affirmed. . 1 Collier on Bankruptcy jf 14.23, pp. 1327-1328. . . . .

In TOPPER,, 229 F.2d 691 (3d Cir. 1956)

. . . See also 1 Collier, Bankruptcy, Sec. 14.23 (14th ed. 1940). As observed in Dilworth v. . . .

v., 10 T.C. 724 (T.C. 1948)

. . . See Nelson, Divorce and Annulment (2d Ed.), sec. 14.23, vol. 2, pp. 30,31. . . .

MARSHALL v. PLETZ, 127 F.2d 104 (9th Cir. 1942)

. . . ascertained the workman’s average earnings and that he was entitled to compensation at the rate of $14.23 . . .

FRIEDMAN v. STERLING REFRIGERATOR CO., 104 F.2d 837 (4th Cir. 1939)

. . . February 22, 1938, of which, however, there was only one delivery (February- 12, 1938, in the amount of $14.23 . . . It was argued that the decree appealed from should be affirmed on the theory that the item of $14.23 . . . applied thereto and other payments are applied, as they must be, to older items of the account, the $14.23 . . .

In WILHELM, 25 F. Supp. 440 (D. Md. 1938)

. . . February 22, 1938, of which, however, there was only one delivery (February 12, 1938 in the amount of $14.23 . . .

PLEASANT v. MISSOURI- KANSAS- TEXAS R. CO., 66 F.2d 842 (10th Cir. 1933)

. . . excluding 40.6 miles of Frisco lines over which its trains run into Kansas City, arrives at a figure of 14.23 . . .

BIRD v. UNITED STATES,, 24 F.2d 933 (9th Cir. 1928)

. . . (for example, in cases Nos. 5080 and 5075) that during 1890 the net value was $11.24, and in 1891 $14.23 . . .

FARRAND v. LAND RIVER IMP. CO., 86 F. 393 (7th Cir. 1898)

. . . pieces of land, including that in controversy, paying therefor tlie total sum of $40.80, of which $14.23 . . .