The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH

Chapter 14
GOVERNOR

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 14.29

14.29 Florida Commission on Community Service.—

(1) It is the intent of the Legislature to provide a means by which the state may develop a coordinated, unified plan in response to the National and Community Service Trust Act of 1993. Toward this end, the state may establish policies and procedures relating to the expenditure of funds to develop and facilitate community outreach initiatives. Such efforts shall be geared towards promoting community service in conjunction with any existing programs in an effort to address the state’s human, educational, environmental, and public safety needs by fostering greater civic responsibility.

(2) There is established the Florida Commission on Community Service, which is assigned to the Executive Office of the Governor. The commission shall be administratively housed within the Executive Office of the Governor, but it shall independently exercise the responsibilities assigned herein or as required to comply with the terms and conditions of the National and Community Service Trust Act of 1993. The commission shall serve as an advisory board to the Governor and Cabinet, the Legislature, and appropriate state agencies and entities on matters relating to volunteerism and community service.

(3)(a) The commission shall consist of no less than 15 and no more than 25 voting members to be appointed on a bipartisan basis by the Governor and confirmed by the Senate. Any number of nonvoting members may be appointed by the Governor. Voting members may represent one, or any combination of the following categories, so long as each of the respective categories is represented:

1. A representative of a community-based agency or organization.

2. The Commissioner of Education or designee thereof.

3. A representative of local labor organizations.

4. A representative of local government.

5. A representative of business.

6. An individual between the ages of 16 and 25, inclusive, who is a participant in or a supervisor of a service program for school-age youth, or of a campus-based or national service program.

7. A representative of a national service program.

8. An individual with expertise in the educational, training, and developmental needs of youth, particularly disadvantaged youth.

9. An individual with experience in promoting service and volunteerism among older adults.

Other voting members may include educators; experts in the delivery of human educational, environmental, or public safety services; representatives of Indian tribes; out-of-school or at-risk youth; and representatives of programs that are administered by or receive assistance under the Domestic Volunteer Service Act of 1973, as amended. However, the preceding list shall not be construed as an exhaustive one.

(b) Not more than 50 percent plus one of the voting members of the commission may be aligned with the same political party. In addition, the number of voting members of the commission who are officers or employees of the state may not exceed 25 percent, reduced to the nearest whole number, of the total membership of the commission.

(4) Members of the commission shall serve for terms of 3 years. Members may be reappointed for successive terms. A vacancy shall be filled for the remainder of the unexpired term in the same manner as the original appointment.

(5) The commission shall meet at the call of its chair or at the request of a majority of its total voting membership, but shall meet at least biannually. A majority of the total voting membership shall constitute a quorum, and the affirmative vote of a majority of a quorum is necessary to take official action.

(6) Members of the commission shall serve without compensation, but voting members shall be reimbursed for per diem and travel expenses in accordance with s. 112.061.

(7) The commission shall:

(a) Annually elect a chair and a vice chair. To be eligible to serve as chair, an individual must be a voting member of the commission.

(b) Employ an executive director, who shall be initially designated by the Governor, to carry out the provisions of this section. The executive director shall report directly to the commission. The executive director shall be the chief administrative officer of the commission and shall be responsible for appointing all employees and staff members of the commission, who shall serve under the executive director’s direction and control.

(c) Prepare an annual report detailing its activities during the preceding year and, to the extent possible, compile and synthesize any reports that it accepted on behalf of the Governor. The commission’s report shall be presented to the Governor no later than January 15, with copies to the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives. The report shall also include specific recommendations for any necessary legislative, administrative, or regulatory reform, and the commission’s assessment of the state of volunteerism in Florida.

(8) The commission may:

(a) Secure assistance from all state departments and agencies in order for the commission to avail itself of expertise at minimal cost.

(b) Procure information and assistance from the state or any political subdivision, municipal corporation, public officer, or governmental department or agency thereof.

(c) Apply for and accept funds, grants, gifts, and services from local, state, or federal government, or from any of their agencies, or any other public or private source and is authorized to use funds derived from these sources to defray administrative costs, implement programs as may be necessary to carry out the commission’s charge, and assist agencies, institutions, and individuals in the implementation of programs pursuant to the Florida Volunteer and Community Service Act of 2001. The commission may also authorize Volunteer Florida, Inc., the commission’s nonprofit direct-support organization, to assist in securing training, technical assistance, and other support needed to accomplish the intent and purposes of the Florida Volunteer and Community Service Act of 2001.

(d) Contract for necessary goods and services.

(9)(a) The commission may establish a direct-support organization which is:

1. A Florida corporation, not for profit, incorporated under the provisions of chapter 617 and approved by the Secretary of State.

2. Organized and operated exclusively to receive, hold, invest, and administer property and funds and to make expenditures to or for the benefit of the program.

3. An organization which the commission, after review, has certified to be operating in a manner consistent with the goals of the program and in the best interests of the state.

(b) The direct-support organization shall operate under written contract with the commission. The contract must provide for:

1. Approval of the articles of incorporation and bylaws of the direct-support organization by the commission.

2. Submission of an annual budget for the approval of the commission. The budget must comply with rules adopted by the commission.

3. Certification by the commission that the direct-support organization is complying with the terms of the contract and in a manner consistent with the goals and purposes of the commission and in the best interest of the state. Such certification must be made annually and reported in the official minutes of a meeting of the commission.

4. The reversion to the commission, or the state if the commission ceases to exist, of moneys and property held in trust by the direct-support organization if the direct-support organization is no longer approved to operate for the commission or the commission ceases to exist.

5. The fiscal year of the direct-support organization, to begin July 1 of each year and end June 30 of the following year.

6. The disclosure of material provisions of the contract and the distinction between the board of directors and the direct-support organization to donors of gifts, contributions, or bequests, as well as on all promotional and fundraising publications.

(d) The commission may authorize a direct-support organization to use its personal services, facilities, and property, except money, subject to the provisions of this section. A direct-support organization that does not provide equal employment opportunities to all persons regardless of race, color, religion, sex, age, or national origin may not use the property, facilities, or personal services of the commission. For the purposes of this subsection, the term “personal services” includes full-time personnel and part-time personnel as well as payroll processing.

(e) The commission shall adopt rules prescribing the procedures by which the direct-support organization is governed and any conditions with which the direct-support organization must comply to use property, facilities, or personal services of the commission.

(f) Moneys of the direct-support organization may be held in a separate depository account in the name of the direct-support organization and subject to the provisions of the contract with the commission. Such moneys may include membership fees, private donations, income derived from fundraising activities, and grants applied for and received by the direct-support organization.

(g) The direct-support organization shall provide for an annual financial audit in accordance with s. 215.981.

History.—s. 1, ch. 94-221; s. 1311, ch. 95-147; s. 2, ch. 95-196; s. 2, ch. 2001-84; s. 20, ch. 2001-266; s. 3, ch. 2002-1; s. 1, ch. 2014-96; s. 1, ch. 2018-73.

F.S. 14.29 on Google Scholar

F.S. 14.29 on Casetext

Amendments to 14.29

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 14.29

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 14.29.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

DOE, v. K. MCALEENAN,, 929 F.3d 478 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 14.29 at 128 (2d ed. 1980). Saylor v. . . .

A. FIGUEROA, v. TILLERSON, U. S., 289 F. Supp. 3d 212 (D.D.C. 2018)

. . . had a 23.73% promotion rate through that time period, and ultimately Native American employees had a 14.29% . . .

IN RE C. THOMPSON, v. C., 585 B.R. 890 (Bankr. W.D. Okla. 2017)

. . . At the time, Thompson owned 14.29% of Bellecare, Inc. Thompson testimony; Exhibits 16 & 17. 5. . . .

UNITED STATES v. BELTRAMEA,, 160 F. Supp. 3d 1119 (N.D. Iowa 2016)

. . . Consistent with this interpretation, Defendant suggests that only Castlerock’s 14.29 developed acres . . . remanded “the forfeiture order,” and not just the portion of the forfeiture order associated with the 14.29 . . .

In A. MAY, v. A., 518 B.R. 99 (Bankr. S.D. Ga. 2014)

. . . Post -11/7 Income) Balance on 11/7 $370,079.33 73.87% 71.83% Accounts Payable ($283,840.45) 14.70% 14.29% . . .

WALTERS, s- v. AMERICAN COACH LINES OF MIAMI, INC. a, 575 F.3d 1221 (11th Cir. 2009)

. . . Nine of the 63 Appellants (14.29%) made out-of-state trips for ACLM, and Appellants spent less than 286 . . .

In COMMERCE, INC., 405 B.R. 34 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2009)

. . . common stock; Pinchanski holds 71.42% of the non-voting common stock, while Asbaty and LaHaye each owned 14.29% . . .

GREATER NEW ORLEANS FAIR HOUSING ACTION CENTER, v. ST. BERNARD PARISH,, 641 F. Supp. 2d 563 (E.D. La. 2009)

. . . Focusing on families as opposed to households, 14.29% of African-American families fall within the lowest . . .

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, v. U. S. POSTAL SERVICE,, 526 F.3d 729 (11th Cir. 2008)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 14.29 (2d ed.1980). . . .

CORAL IMAGING SERVICES, a o a v. GEICO INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY,, 955 So. 2d 11 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . . § 11.062(2)(a); § 11.066(4); § 11.70(3)(d); § 14.29(3)(b), (12); § 20.04(7)(a); § 20.19(6)(f); § 20.23 . . .

C. v., 125 T.C. 7 (T.C. 2005)

. . . of the partnership agreement, reduced the partnership interests of each of the Rathbun children from 14.29 . . .

NORMAN, v. UNITED STATES,, 63 Fed. Cl. 231 (Fed. Cl. 2004)

. . . Plaintiffs achieve the 220.85-acre number in the following way: plaintiffs omitted from their takings claim 14.29 . . . These 14.29 acres constitute a reduction of 10.38 acres of land from WL 16, a reduction of 1.21 acres . . .

In TAMA BEEF PACKING INC., 312 B.R. 192 (Bankr. N.D. Iowa 2004)

. . . June 2003) (14.29% break-up fee of $5 million for a $35 million purchase price is reasonable). . . .

E. BODDIE Jr. v. CITY OF CLEVELAND, MISSISSIPPI, 297 F. Supp. 2d 901 (N.D. Miss. 2004)

. . . the three majority-minority wards: he received 29.56% of the vote in Ward 1, 24.68% in Ward 2, and 14.29% . . .

S. COLLIN, v. SECURI INTERNATIONAL, 322 F. Supp. 2d 170 (D. Conn. 2004)

. . . Co., 276 F.Supp. 972, 981 (S.D.N.Y.1967), 3 Moore’s Federal Practice § 14.29 (3d ed.2003), Scharrer v . . .

CARSON HARBOR VILLAGE, LTD. a v. CITY OF CARSON, a, 353 F.3d 824 (9th Cir. 2004)

. . . home space, but the City’s Mobilehome Park Rental Review Board (“Board”) approved an increase of only $14.29 . . . proposed increases on February 29, 2001, and subsequently approved a monthly rent increase of only $14.29 . . . application for $295,657 in regulatory lag rents, attorney's fees and costs incurred in obtaining the $14.29 . . .

MALACO LEAF, AB, v. PROMOTION IN MOTION, INC. In v. AB,, 287 F. Supp. 2d 355 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)

. . . Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition, §§ 3.1, 11:1, 14:6.1, 14.29 (4th ed.2003 . . . Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition, §§ 3.1, 11:1, 14:6.1, 14.29 (4th ed.2003 . . .

LIGGETT GROUP INCORPORATED USA, R. J. v. A. ENGLE, M. D., 853 So. 2d 434 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Devanesan, 484 So.2d 603 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986) (14.29%); Smith v. . . .

In TUTU WATER WELLS CERCLA LITIGATION C. v. S. A. D. Co. By L d b a O Co. D., 326 F.3d 201 (3d Cir. 2003)

. . . The remaining share of 14.29% was attributed to lesser contributors. . . . .

BEVERLY HEALTH REHABILITATION SERVICES, INC. v. G. THOMPSON,, 223 F. Supp. 2d 73 (D.D.C. 2002)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 14.29, at 130 (2d ed.1980). . . .

UNITED STATES v. FIOR D ITALIA, INC., 536 U.S. 238 (U.S. 2002)

. . . years in question, finding that customers had tipped, on average, 14.49% of their bills in 1991 and 14.29% . . . indisputably sound, the assumption that every patron is not only tipping, but tipping 14.49% in 1991 and 14.29% . . .

A. PICCONE v. I. MOATZ,, 136 F. Supp. 2d 525 (E.D. Va. 2001)

. . . . § 14.29(a)). . . .

FIOR D ITALIA, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 242 F.3d 844 (9th Cir. 2001)

. . . tips charged on credit cards by total credit card receipts, yielding an average tip rate of 14.49% and 14.29% . . .

ENERGY CAPITAL CORP. v. UNITED STATES,, 47 Fed. Cl. 382 (Fed. Cl. 2000)

. . . The Court’s method produced a result of $14.29 million. . . .

CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND v. NITEHAWK EXPRESS, INC., 223 F.3d 483 (7th Cir. 2000)

. . . See Angelí & Polk, Multi-Employer Plans, in II Employee Benefits Law § 14.29(5) (Illinois Institute of . . .

MIELE, v. PENSION PLAN OF NEW YORK STATE TEAMSTERS CONFERENCE PENSION RETIREMENT FUND, 72 F. Supp. 2d 88 (E.D.N.Y. 1999)

. . . Agreement, the Teamsters Fund calculated the plaintiffs pension as amounting to $171.22 per month, a $14.29 . . .

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v. JOINT APPRENTICESHIP COMMITTEE OF THE JOINT INDUSTRY BOARD OF THE ELECTRICAL INDUSTRY,, 186 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 1999)

. . . In programs 11 and 12, the percentages were, respectively, 14.29% for women and 1.80% for men, and 5.43% . . .

INGRAM, a a v. J. JONES, a T. a a a S. a F. a a, 46 F. Supp. 2d 795 (N.D. Ill. 1999)

. . . seek $197.55 for messenger service, $79.78 for postage, $113 for faxes, $1,120.10 for photocopies, $14.29 . . .

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v. JOINT APPRENTICESHIP COMMITTEE OF THE JOINT INDUSTRY BOARD OF THE ELECTRICAL INDUSTRY, 164 F.3d 89 (2d Cir. 1998)

. . . In programs 11 and 12, the percentages were, respectively, 14.29% for women and 1.80% for men, and 5.43% . . .

J. ABATE, v. ROCKLAND COUNTY LEGISLATURE, T., 964 F. Supp. 817 (S.D.N.Y. 1997)

. . . 12.32% of the representatives of the Legislature; instead, it has three representatives out of 21, or 14.29% . . . , resulting in a deviation (under this method) of +1.97% (i.e., 14.29% minus 12.32%). . . .

SMITH, v. M. BEASLEY, C. ABLE, v. H. WILKINS, H. Jr., 946 F. Supp. 1174 (D.S.C. 1996)

. . . majority-white district, includes all of one predominantly white VTD: Greenwood No. 3 (15.88% BPOP and 14.29% . . . District 121 contains 82.85% BPOP and 79.50% BVAP, while the portion in District 124 contains only 14.29% . . .

A. REED, v. A. RHODES,, 934 F. Supp. 1492 (N.D. Ohio 1996)

. . . Hardiman requests the Court to approve a rate of $200.00 for 1994, which represents a 14.29% increase . . .

COATS, v. PENROD DRILLING CORPORATION, M. E., 61 F.3d 1113 (5th Cir. 1995)

. . . fault,” with the result that plaintiff was to be granted judgment against the defendant for l/7th (14.29% . . .

G. HOLBROOK, v. BROWN,, 8 Vet. App. 91 (Vet. App. 1995)

. . . See 3 Kenneth Culp Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 14.29 (2d ed. 1980), quoting Bowman Transp., . . .

HUMPHREY, v. KLEINHARDT,, 157 F.R.D. 404 (W.D. Mich. 1994)

. . . This authority is vested in the Attorney General by both statute, see, e.g., MCL §§ 14.28, 14.29 and . . .

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, v. KERSHAW COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA,, 838 F. Supp. 237 (D.S.C. 1993)

. . . argue that this violates Section 2 because African-Americans’ candidates of choice will comprise only 14.29% . . .

TRUSTEES OF FLINT MICHIGAN LABORERS PENSION FUND, v. IN- PULS CONSTRUCTION CO. a, 835 F. Supp. 972 (E.D. Mich. 1993)

. . . Porter, that were submitted to the City of Lansing, paid the Local 998 CBA rate, $14.29 per hour, to . . .

WESCH, v. HUNT,, 785 F. Supp. 1491 (S.D. Ala. 1992)

. . . Block 304 47 47 100.00% 100.00% 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 0.00% Block 305 56 48 100.00% 85.71% 8 0 14.29% . . . 702 12 100.00% 98.32% • 1.68% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block Group 2 Block 201 7-6 1 100.00% 85.71% 14.29% . . . 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% WEST BLOCKTON-WEST Tract 9513 Block Group 3 Block 306B 77 66 11 100.00% 85.71% 14.29% . . . 0.00% Block 305 18 100.00% 18 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Block 306 7 100.00% 6 85.71% 1 14.29% . . . 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block Group 3 Block 310 0 0 0 6 o o Block 311 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 312 - 7 1 6 100.00% 14.29% . . .

F. KNIGHT, Jr. S. T. D. S. S. Jr. L. Dr. W. Y. N. S. Dr. Jr. v. STATE ALABAMA M. Jr. S. Jr. B. H. J. P. Dr. D. III, F. A. A. Sr. A. G. A M W. Dr. A M Jr. W. M. H. B. L. A. R. C. Dr. V. Dr. E. B. F. W. Jr. W. T. Jr. R. R. E. W. A. C. J. D. Jr. T. B. Jr. O. H. Jr. T. Jr. E. G. Jr. S. H. Jr. B. Dr. A. UNITED STATES v. STATE OF ALABAMA A M a a a a a a a a a a, 787 F. Supp. 1030 (N.D. Ala. 1991)

. . . Institution Black White Race Other Missing All Alabama A & M 12.15 17.15 12.12 14.29 12.44 U of Montevallo . . .

CARTER v. UNIT RIG EQUIPMENT COMPANY, a, 908 F.2d 1483 (10th Cir. 1990)

. . . MILLER, COLORADO PERSONAL INJURY PRACTICE, §§ 14.28-14.29 (1989) (in cases “commenced on or after July . . .

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,, 893 F.2d 1319 (11th Cir. 1990)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, § 14.29 (2d ed. 1980)). . . .

DAVIS, v. COMMERCIAL UNION INSURANCE COMPANY, v. CONTINENTAL GIN COMPANY, Co., 892 F.2d 378 (5th Cir. 1990)

. . . Thus, Continental Gin is responsible for a total of 14.29 percent of Davis’ damages. VII. . . . Continental Gin is liable to Davis for 14.29 percent of Davis' $125,000 damages, which equals $17,862.50 . . .

J. SLAUGHTER, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, E. I., 794 F.2d 120 (3d Cir. 1986)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 14.29 (2d ed. 1980). . . .

OLYMPUS CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES, K, 792 F.2d 315 (2d Cir. 1986)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 14.29 at 128-31 (2d ed. 1980), as opposed to administrative rulemaking . . .

ISLA PETROLEUM CORPORATION De v. DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS PHILLIPS PUERTO RICO CORE, INC. v. ORTIZ ALVAREZ, TEXACO PUERTO RICO, INC. v. ORTIZ ALVAREZ, H Mr. CIA. PETROLERA CARIBE, INC. v. ORTIZ ALVAREZ, SHELL COMPANY PUERTO RICO LIMITED v. ORTIZ ALVAREZ, ESSO STANDARD OIL CO. P. R. v. ORTIZ ALVAREZ, CARIBBEAN GULF REFINING CORPORATION, v. ORTIZ ALVAREZ, TENOCO OIL CO. INC. De El v. DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, 640 F. Supp. 474 (D.P.R. 1986)

. . . marketing division had to pay 16 cents per gallon corresponding to a previously-enacted excise tax, plus 14.29 . . . The new tax, as of May 1986, added an additional 14.29 cents per gallon, for a total tax of 30.29 cents . . . As will be seen, the 14.29-cent tax is subject to DACO’s antipass-through provision as per regulatory . . .

SMYSER, L. R. s S. E. E. v. BLOCK, R. Co- Op, s L. SMYSER, R. S. E. E., 760 F.2d 514 (3d Cir. 1985)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 14.29 (2d ed. 1980). . . .

In CERRO COPPER PRODUCTS COMPANY, 752 F.2d 280 (7th Cir. 1985)

. . . of this motion, the Secretary cited an OSHA review of Cerro’s safety record showing an LWDI rate of 14.29 . . .

NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE,, 592 F. Supp. 931 (D. Or. 1984)

. . . These slides scoured 14.29 miles of streams. . . .

DAVID NURSING HOME, v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES,, 579 F. Supp. 285 (E.D. Mich. 1984)

. . . . § 14.29. . . .

W. SAYLOR, Jr. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,, 723 F.2d 581 (7th Cir. 1983)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 14.29 at 128 (2d ed. 1980). . . .

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, v. AMERICAN GERI- CARE, INC., 697 F.2d 56 (2d Cir. 1982)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 14.29, at 130 (2d ed. 1980). . . .

O. TESCH, v. UNITED STATES, 546 F. Supp. 526 (E.D. Pa. 1982)

. . . Moore, Federal Practice ¶ 14.29. . . . Moore, supra at ¶ 14.29. . . .

In LAKE, Jr., 11 B.R. 202 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1981)

. . . A check to Drug Emporium was dated April 15, 1980, and was for the amount of $14.29. . . .

EUBANKS, v. PICKENS- BOND CONSTRUCTION CO. EUBANKS, v. PICKENS- BOND CONSTRUCTION CO., 635 F.2d 1341 (8th Cir. 1980)

. . . Little Rock, one of whom was black; therefore, the percentage of black cement finisher foremen was 14.29% . . . The court noted that blacks comprised only 14.29% (one of seven) of the cement finisher foremen in 1974 . . . The 14.29% figure corresponds to the percentage of black cement finisher foremen employed by Pickens-Bond . . .

NELSON v. A. GAMMON, 478 F. Supp. 630 (W.D. Ky. 1979)

. . . The six individual defendants sold a total of 959,179 shares to Fuqua, representing approximately 14.29% . . .

D. DRIVER v. HELMS, 577 F.2d 147 (1st Cir. 1978)

. . . ; Hart & Wechsler, The Federal Courts and the Federal System 1388 (1973); 2 Moore, Federal Practice 14.29 . . .

COLTON, v. B. SWAIN v. PACIFIC INDEMNITY CO. a, 527 F.2d 296 (7th Cir. 1975)

. . . Moore, Federal Practice H 14.29. . . .

CONCERNED RESIDENTS OF BUCK HILL FALLS, By v. GRANT, U. S., 388 F. Supp. 394 (M.D. Pa. 1975)

. . . Falls Company at minimal cost increased the benefits to costs ratio as computed by the Defendants. 14.29 . . .

M. CHANCE C. v. BOARD OF EXAMINERS AND BOARD OF EDUCATION OF CITY OF NEW YORK, 330 F. Supp. 203 (S.D.N.Y. 1971)

. . . million Assistant Principal, Junior High Schools, 1968 Examination (PF-43) 1319 48.82% 236 26.27% 14 14.29% . . .

HIPP, v. UNITED STATES P., 313 F. Supp. 1152 (E.D.N.Y. 1970)

. . . the Federal Tort Claims Act presents a federal question. 3 Moore’s Federal Practice (2d ed. 1968) ¶ 14.29 . . .

W. WIRTZ, v. AIRE FRIO, S. A. a, 304 F. Supp. 693 (D.C.Z. 1968)

. . . names, in the total sum of $4,442.44, to wit: NAME TOTAL AMOUNT FOUND DUE Alfredo Almanza Barrios $ 14.29 . . .

S. WILLIAMS, v. UNITED STATES v. STATE OF NEW YORK,, 42 F.R.D. 609 (S.D.N.Y. 1967)

. . . See 3 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 14.29 n. 5 at 762 (1964). . . .

KANTLEHNER, v. UNITED STATES v. BOEING COMPANY, 279 F. Supp. 122 (E.D.N.Y. 1967)

. . . Moore, supra, at ¶ 14.29. . . .

CENTRAL TRUST COMPANY E. Jr. Co- E. v. UNITED STATES HERRLINGER, R. Jr. J. v. UNITED STATES CENTRAL TRUST COMPANY, R. v. UNITED STATES, 305 F.2d 393 (Ct. Cl. 1962)

. . . Thus, on the basis only of dividend yield, Heekin’s stock would similarly sell for $14.29 and $14.05 . . . Heekin’s stock on August 3, 1954, would, on the basis of Heekin’s 50-cent annual dividend payment, be $14.29 . . . Dividend yield (finding 65): 4.29 ($14.29 X 30%).............. ($14.05 X 30%).............. . . .

THE CENTRAL TRUST COMPANY AND ALBERT E. HEEKIN, JR. CO- EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF ALBERT E. HEEKIN, DECEASED v. THE UNITED STATES KATHARINE HEEKIN HERRLINGER, JAMES R. HEEKIN, JR. AND THE CENTRAL TRUST COMPANY, EXECUTORS UNDER THE WILL OF JAMES J. HEEKIN, DECEASED v. THE UNITED STATES THE CENTRAL TRUST COMPANY, SUCCESSOR EXECUTOR AND TRUSTEE UNDER THE WILL OF ALMA R. HEEKIN, DECEASED v. THE UNITED STATES, 158 Ct. Cl. 504 (Ct. Cl. 1962)

SUNKIST GROWERS, INC. a a v. WINCKLER SMITH CITRUS PRODUCTS CO. a, 284 F.2d 1 (9th Cir. 1960)

. . . Exchange Orange for the 24,148 tons without the peel and oil by-products, or at the rate of almost $14.29 . . . received for the byproduct oranges processed under the TreeSweet contract was $25.10 per ton, namely, $14.29 . . .

C. O. DEMPSEY, v. UNITED STATES, 176 F. Supp. 75 (W.D. Ark. 1959)

. . . See 3 Moore’s Federal Practice, Sec. 14.29, 2d Ed. 1955. . . .

HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION, v. DUNBAR, In DUNBAR,, 262 F.2d 112 (10th Cir. 1958)

. . . date at the rate of * * * per cent per annum and costs of this suit herein taxed at $9.38, Sub Costs $14.29 . . .

FONG, v. UNITED STATES Co. a KING v. UNITED STATES Co. a HICKOK v. UNITED STATES Co. a, 21 F.R.D. 385 (N.D. Cal. 1957)

. . . United States, D.C., 120 F.Supp. 217, 218; and 3 Moore, Federal Practice, § 14.29). II. . . .

UNITED STATES v. RIDLEY, Sr. Jr. E., 127 F. Supp. 3 (N.D. Ga. 1954)

. . . 686.24 624.47 150.81 1,461.52 1949 4.00 3.64 .64 8.28 1950 69.82 63.54 6.97 140.33 1951 359.34 314.03 14.29 . . .

BURKS v. UNITED STATES BEADLEY,, 116 F. Supp. 337 (S.D. Tex. 1953)

. . . for example, as when there is serious doubt as to course of employment. . 3 Moore’s Fed.Practice, § 14.29 . . .

v., 31 B.T.A. 329 (B.T.A. 1934)

. . . 14.29 during the joint lives of Howard and Helen, and $4,285.72 during the life of the survivor. . . .

KANSAS CITY TERMINAL RY. CO. v. CENTRAL UNION TRUST CO. OF NEW YORK, 28 F.2d 177 (8th Cir. 1928)

. . . $20 per share required to be paid by him were as follows: High, $17.64; low, $2.55; date of offer, $14.29 . . .

CHICAGO GREAT WESTERN R. CO. v. DAVIS, 1 F.2d 729 (N.D. Iowa 1924)

. . . of stored property, after due notice to the defendant; that the expense attendant on said sale was $14.29 . . . of stored property for charges, sold the posts for $112, and paid therefrom expenses in the sum of $14.29 . . .

NEW YORK QUEENS GAS CO. v. NEWTON,, 269 F. 277 (S.D.N.Y. 1920)

. . . books and records, was 99.51 cents per 1,000 cubic feet, showing a deficiency below actual cost of 14.29 . . .