The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . installments, when necessary in the interests of equity”); see also Model Business Corporation Act § 14.34 . . .
. . . On remand Commerce ultimately settled on a total AFA rate of 14.34%. . . .
. . . The maximum payout to these executives compared to other employees will be a significant sum — 14.34% . . .
. . . On this news, ADPI’s stock fell from a closing price of $19.70 on December 11, 2007 to $14.34 at the . . .
. . . . § 14.34. . . . La.Rev.Stat. § 14.34 ("§ 14.34”). . La.Rev.Stat. 40:967(C)(2). . United States v. . . . La.Rev.Stat. § 14.34. . La.Rev.Stat. § 14.33. . La.Rev.Stat.§ 14.2(A)(3). . . . .
. . . lack-of-marketability discounts of 12.5% for each tax year and minority-interest discounts of 4.63-14.34% . . .
. . . . § 2D1.1 because Thompson was responsible for 14.34 grams of cocaine base. . . .
. . . discounts to be applied in valuing the gifts as follows: Table 12 1999 Gift 2000 Gift 2001 Gift 11.32% 14.34% . . . portion of net asset value 401,241 1,970,453 157,615 157,634 Discount for lack of control (11.32, 11.32, 14.34 . . .
. . . the financing agreement, which was signed by both Michael and Dorothea, Plaintiffs agreed to pay a 14.34% . . . finance the truck at an interest rate of 6% or less, and that it fraudulently inflated this rate to 14.34% . . .
. . . Act Ann., § 14.34(a). . . . Act Ann., § 14.34(f). . . . Act Ann., § 14.34(d). . . .
. . . out if they are dissatisfied with current management.... 3 Model Business Corporation Act Annotated § 14.34 . . . Section 14.34 of the Model Act, which was not adopted in Maine, permits a private corporation to avoid . . .
. . . Thus for an average overtime hour He-der’s compensation was $14.34, about 128% of his regular rate rather . . .
. . . Moore, Federal Practice 14.34 (2d ed.1980). . . .
. . . Moore, Federal Practice and Procedure, p. 14.34 (2d ed.1980). . . .
. . . Only $14.34 in deductions were taken. . . .
. . . Teacher 12.36 14.34 Experience (Years) Range of All Schools 7.61 — 17.17 8.68 — 17.34 1995-1996 Elementary . . .
. . . Final Results established NSK’s rates for ball bearings and cylindrical roller bearings at 7.22% and 14.34% . . .
. . . Meal and travel expenses. 12/20/91 Not a response cost: work related to survey on 2067.50 14.34 11/1/ . . .
. . . jointly with the original defendant or instead of the original defendant.” 3 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 14.34 . . .
. . . Cases are many—for a partial listing, see 1A Collier on Bankruptcy (14th ed. 1978) ¶ 14.34 pp. 1378-1379 . . . actual reliance as an element of both §§ 14c(3) and 17a(2), 1A Collier on Bankruptcy (14th ed. 1978) ¶¶ 14.34 . . . scruple equalled or exceeded that of dishonest debtors, 1A Collier on Bankruptcy (14th ed. 1978) ¶ 14.34 . . .
. . . He used all of his pension money to buy 14.34 acres on the Umpqua River and, for $3,000, built a house . . .
. . . Moore, Moore's Federal Practice ¶ 14.34 at 14-156 (2d ed. 1985) (footnote omitted): A third-party defendant . . .
. . . Eustice, Federal Income Taxation of Corporations and Shareholders, par. 14.34, at 14-116 to 14-119 and . . .
. . . 25.67 9.70 21.87 29.65 12.78 18.96 24.70 18.75 18.96 24.72 38.57 21.00 22.67 21.02 9.88 21.29 30.04 14.34 . . .
. . . In In Re Clements, 11 B.R. 38 (Bkrtcy.N.D.Ga.1981), an unadjusted contract rate of 14.34% was approved . . .
. . . Moore, supra, ¶¶ 14.01[10], 14.31, 14.34; C. Wright & A. . . .
. . . Eustice, Federal Income Taxation of Corporations and Shareholders par. 14.34 at 14-117, 14-118 (4th ed . . .
. . . Moore, Federal Practice ¶ 14.34 (2d ed. 1980): A third-party defendant may be brought in not only on . . .
. . . Bkrtcy.S.D.Iowa 1980) (13%), In re Anderson, supra (17.2%), In re Clements, 11 B.R. 38 (Bkrtcy.N.D.Ga.1981) (14.34% . . .
. . . interest calculated at an annual percentage rate of 24.92%, rather than the annual percentage rate of 14.34% . . .
. . . Chrysler financed approximately $6,000.00 over forty-eight (48) months, at an annual percentage rate of 14.34% . . .
. . . The original contract rate was 12.67% and at the time of trial on this issue the bank was charging 14.34% . . .
. . . See Bittker & Eustice, 1H 14.01, 14.34. . . .
. . . Black, The Law of Admiralty 36 (2d ed. 1975); 3 Moore fl 14.34, at 14-746; 6 Wright & Miller § 1465, . . .
. . . There are no individuals being relocated as a result of the project. 14.34 The project agreement of May . . .
. . . 2.7% 3 220.71 211.74 8.97 4.1% 4 203.64 192.49 11.15 5.5% 5 187.09 174.16 12.93 6.9% 6 171.08 156.74 14.34 . . .
. . . and file suit in state court to except the debt from discharge. 1A Collier on Bankruptcy, Paragraph 14.34 . . .
. . . Eustice, Federal Income Taxation of Corporations and Shareholders § 14.34 (1971) (footnote omitted) ( . . . See, e. g., Shoulson, supra; Bittker & Eustice, supra at § 14.34; Wittenstein, Boot Distributions and . . . 223, cert. denied, 301 U.S. 875, 80 S.Ct. 138, 4 L.Ed.2d 113 (1959); Bittker & Eustice, supra at § 14.34 . . .
. . . Myers, 202 F.2d 920 (9th Cir. 1953); 1A Collier on Bankruptcy 1374, ¶ 14.34 (14th ed. 1971). . . .
. . . eastern Kentucky, northern Tennessee, southwest Virginia and southern West Virginia District 8, it was 14.34 . . .
. . . Bissell, supra, note 3 at 625-626 of 219 F.2d; Collier on Bankruptcy f 14.34, p. 1378. . Johnson v. . . .
. . . Bissell, 2 Cir., 219 F.2d 624; 1 Collier, Bankruptcy, ¶ 14.34 (Moore ed. 1956). . . .
. . . See 1 Collier on Bankruptcy, Par. 14.34; Mori-mura, Arai & Co. v. . . .
. . . Oil Devices was notified that it was to be awarded a contract for 74,620 burners at a unit price of $14.34 . . .
. . . See 1 Collier on Bankruptcy, Par. 14.34; Morimura, Arai & Co. v. . . .
. . . to be awarded contract of 74,620 each Outfits, Burner, Oil, Stove, Tent, M-1941, at a unit price of $14.34 . . . The bid price was $14.34 a unit, the total quantity being 74,620 units involving a total sum of $1,070 . . . Finally, on September 25, 1943, defendant sent plaintiff an order for 74,-620 tent stoves at $14.34 each . . .
. . . to be awarded contract of 74,620 each Outfits, Burner, Oil, Stove, Tent, M-1941, at a unit price of $14.34 . . . The bid price was. $14.34 a unit, the total quantity being 74,620 units involving a total sum of $1,070,050.80 . . . Finally, on September 25, 1948, defendant sent plaintiff an order for 74,620 tent stoves at $14.34 each . . . The bid price was $14.34 a unit, the total quantity-being 74,620 units involving a total sum of $1,070,050.80 . . . to be awarded contract of 74,620 each Outfits, Burner, Oil, Stove, Tent, M-1941, at a unit price of $14.34 . . .
. . . that date the Department of Conservation of the State of Louisiana issued its order 93-1 unitizing 14.34 . . .
. . . set.12.36 “Flora — 108 pc. set.12.36 “Dorthea- — 108 pc. set.13.74 “1584-H or 1584-J — 108 pc. set.14.34 . . .
. . . 6th as follows: No. 115-A-2 108 pc. set 10.40 1608 12.36 Flora 12.36 Dorthea 13.74 1584-H or 1584-J 14.34 . . .
. . . closely held, and that the intrinsic or book value of the stock at the time of the decedent’s death was $14.34 . . .
. . . Shepard’s estimated cost of $.09732 per dozen, making $23,540.54, and added to it the profit of $14.34 . . . But the $14.34 profits admitted by defendants’ counsel omit many items of cost included by defendant . . .