Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 14.35 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 14.35 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 14.35

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH
Chapter 14
GOVERNOR
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 14.35
14.35 Governor’s Medal of Freedom.
(1) The Governor may present, in the name of the State of Florida, a medal to be known as the “Governor’s Medal of Freedom,” which shall bear a suitable inscription and ribbon of appropriate design, to any person who has made an especially meritorious contribution to the interests and residents of this state, its culture, or other significant public or private endeavor.
(2)(a) In the event of the death of an individual chosen to receive the Governor’s Medal of Freedom, the medal may be presented to a designated representative of the chosen recipient.
(b) The Governor’s Medal of Freedom may only be presented to an individual once.
History.s. 107, ch. 2020-114; s. 74, ch. 2021-37; s. 1, ch. 2022-66.

F.S. 14.35 on Google Scholar

F.S. 14.35 on Casetext

Amendments to 14.35


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 14.35
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 14.35.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

MARTIN HILTI FAMILY TRUST, v. KNOEDLER GALLERY, LLC d b a v., 386 F. Supp. 3d 319 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . The Gallery's profit on the purported Pollock sold to Lagrange was $ 14.35 million. (Pltf. . . .

OASIS INTERNATIONAL WATERS, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 135 Fed. Cl. 230 (Fed. Cl. 2017)

. . . Modification P00006 also required the production of 14.35 million cases of water during the base period . . .

ITG VOMA CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, AFL- CIO- CLC,, 253 F. Supp. 3d 1339 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2017)

. . . or were likely to be, sold at less than fair value and calculated final dumping margins ranging from 14.35 . . .

OASIS INTERNATIONAL WATERS, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 134 Fed. Cl. 155 (Fed. Cl. 2017)

. . . Modification P00006 also required the production of 14.35 million cases of water during the base period . . .

COOPER TIRE RUBBER COMPANY, Co. Co. v. UNITED STATES, AFL- CIO, CLC,, 217 F. Supp. 3d 1373 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2017)

. . . individual weighted average dumping margins in the Amended Final Determination were 30.74% for GITI and 14.35% . . .

UNITED STATES v. PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY,, 178 F. Supp. 3d 927 (N.D. Cal. 2016)

. . . The CPUC subsequently fined PG&E $14.35 million for not more promptly correcting what it perceived to . . .

IN RE AMES DEPARTMENT STORES, INC. v. Co., 542 B.R. 121 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2015)

. . . contract (the “Bond Agreement”) under which Lumbermens provided a surety bond for payment of up to $14.35 . . . That Proof of Claim asserted, in relevant part, an unsecured contingent claim for $14.35 million based . . . In May 2003, Travelers made a demand on Lumbermens for payment of $14.35 million under the Bond Agreement . . . Ames then makes the same $14.35 million claim for damages. . . . And once again, Ames seeks damages for that, in the amount of $14.35 million. . . .

CONSTRUCTION WORKERS PENSION FUND- LAKE COUNTY AND VICINITY, v. NAVISTAR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION,, 114 F. Supp. 3d 633 (N.D. Ill. 2015)

. . . This news caused Navistar’s stock price to drop by $4.04 per share (14.35%) that day. . . .

In AMES DEPARTMENT STORES INC. v., 512 B.R. 736 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company (“Lumbermens” or “Defendant”), an Illinois insurance company, issued a $14.35 . . .

LOCAL INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN S ASSOCIATION, v. MIDWEST TERMINALS OF TOLEDO, INTERNATIONAL, INC., 560 F. App'x 529 (6th Cir. 2014)

. . . allocated according to the table listed below 1/1/2011-12/31/2011 an increase of $.35@ hour for a total of $14.35 . . .

SMITH, Jr. v. CITY OF NILES,, 505 F. App'x 482 (6th Cir. 2012)

. . . attendance,” noting that “[h]e has been employed by the City for over 17 yrs. and has ... averaged 14.35 . . .

In JACKSON v., 456 B.R. 478 (Bankr. D. Mont. 2011)

. . . 19 is a “Summary Appraisal Report” dated October 30, 2009, of the abandoned property consisting of 14.35 . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. LOMAS,, 392 F. App'x 122 (4th Cir. 2010)

. . . their enterprise the “National Payphone Corporation” and reworked the terms of their scam, promising a 14.35% . . .

TRANSWESTERN PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC, a v. ACRES, MORE OR LESS, OF PERMANENT EASEMENT LOCATED IN MARICOPA COUNTY, LLC, a v. LLC, a v. LLC, a v. LLC, a v. LLC, a v. LLC, a v. LLC, a v. LLC, a v. LLC, a v. LLC, a v. LLC, a v. LLC, a v. LLC, a v. LLC, a v. LLC, a v. LLC, a v. LLC, a v. LLC, a v. LLC, a v. LLC, a v. LLC, a v. LLC, a v. LLC, a v. LLC, a v. LLC, a v. LLC, a v. LLC, a v. LLC, a v. LLC, a v., 544 F. Supp. 2d 939 (D. Ariz. 2008)

. . . Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. 14.35 acres, . . .

v., 31 Ct. Int'l Trade 1999 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2007)

. . . 12-ounce containers (a standard beverage container size), 12 ounces of MetaBerry would cost almost $14.35 . . .

MAXCELL BIOSCIENCE, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 533 F. Supp. 2d 1261 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2007)

. . . 12-ounce containers (a standard beverage container size), 12 ounces of MetaBerry would cost almost $14.35 . . .

COLINDRES, v. QUIETFLEX MANUFACTURING,, 235 F.R.D. 347 (S.D. Tex. 2006)

. . . The five highest-paid baggers in Department 911 earned, per hour, $16.69, $15.03, $14.35, $13,70, and . . .

SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM OF FLORIDA, INC. v. CLEAR CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC., 376 F.3d 1065 (11th Cir. 2004)

. . . Page, II Kintner’s Federal Antitrust Law ¶ 14.35 (2002) (noting that “practices that harm other firms . . .

E. BUCHANAN, v. CONSOLIDATED STORES CORP., 217 F.R.D. 178 (D. Md. 2003)

. . . check usage as a percentage of total sales ("check usage rate") at these 25 stores ranged from 0.93% to 14.35% . . .

JOSEPHSON, v. KIMCO CORP., 240 F. Supp. 2d 1000 (S.D. Iowa 2003)

. . . Her starting salary was $14.35 an hour. In 2001 she made $37,000 and in 2000 she made $32,000. . . .

PICKENS, v. MILLER,, 216 F. Supp. 2d 1011 (N.D. Cal. 2002)

. . . . — Crim. (6th ed.) 14.35. . . .

In DMR FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., 274 B.R. 465 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2002)

. . . cemetery, paying $40 as a down payment and promising to pay the balance of $688.80 in installments of $14.35 . . .

WHIPPLE, WHIPPLE, v. WARREN COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT a, 133 F. Supp. 2d 381 (W.D. Pa. 2000)

. . . The state regulations referred to are 22 Pa.Code §§ 12.6-12.8 and 14.35. (See Complaint ¶¶ 11-15). . . .

v., 24 Ct. Int'l Trade 1148 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2000)

. . . average prime rate figures, as reported by Bormioli, were as follows for the years 1992-1996: 1992-14.35% . . .

LUIGI BORMIOLI CORP. INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 118 F. Supp. 2d 1345 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2000)

. . . average prime rate figures, as reported by Bormioli, were as follows for the years 1992-1996: 1992 14.35% . . .

v., 108 T.C. 265 (T.C. 1997)

. . . Leading Up to the Conversion On February 24, 1987, nbm sent to Banco Bozano a proposal to purchase 14.35 . . .

D. SAMUELSON, v. MID- ATLANTIC REALTY CO. INC., 947 F. Supp. 756 (D. Del. 1996)

. . . Parts to renovate unit 14.35 TOTAL: $4,307.35 D.I. 2 at 5, ¶27. . . . .

Dr. F. GREEN v. DAIMLER BENZ, AG, AG,, 157 F.R.D. 340 (E.D. Pa. 1994)

. . . insurer in the eyes of a jury in actions for reimbursement”); see also 3 Standard Pennsylvania Practice § 14.35 . . .

GEISINGER HEALTH PLAN, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,, 30 F.3d 494 (3d Cir. 1994)

. . . was first submitted to the Tax Court, projections indicated that by June 30, 1991, GHP would generate 14.35 . . .

UNITED STATES v. McMURRAY, a k a N. a k a a k a, 833 F. Supp. 1454 (D. Neb. 1993)

. . . In conclusion, I find that McMurray is responsible for 468 grams of “crack” — 14.35 grams in his possession . . .

v., 100 T.C. 394 (T.C. 1993)

. . . the Geisinger system, and estimates as of that date projected that that percentage would increase to 14.35 . . .

UNITED STATES v. L. JONES, UNITED STATES v. W. HOOKS, UNITED STATES v. TRAVIS, UNITED STATES v. E. ROULETTE, III,, 965 F.2d 1507 (8th Cir. 1992)

. . . When Tisinger paid with police funds for the 14.35 grams of crack he received from Roulette, Jones provided . . .

THOMPSON, v. MISSISSIPPI STATE PERSONNEL BOARD,, 674 F. Supp. 198 (N.D. Miss. 1987)

. . . of this applicant pool: _Number_% Female 149 64.5 Male_82_35J_ Total 231 100.0 40 years and over 33 14.35 . . .

AMICO, v. NEW CASTLE COUNTY, a, 654 F. Supp. 982 (D. Del. 1987)

. . . Lindh 14.35 1.435.00 100.00 John S. Malik 1.7 170.00 100.00 Lewis H. . . . is: FINAL LODESTAR HOURS HOURLY RATE TOTAL FEE Gondolpho 10.6 65 $ 689.00 Rodgers .9 25 25.50 Lindh 14.35 . . .

J. VAUGHNS, Jr. v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY,, 627 F. Supp. 837 (D. Md. 1985)

. . . 278.83 Cohen 54.82 -5.48 49.34 Farquhar 18.50 -1.85 16.65 Hassett 279.93 -27.99 251.94 Hollman 143.50 -14.35 . . .

ROWE, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORP., 586 F. Supp. 372 (N.D. Ga. 1984)

. . . The relevant percentages in each year were as follows: 1972 — 20.35% 14.35%; 1975 — 12.46% 25.51%: 1978 . . .

TAYLOR, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,, 552 F. Supp. 728 (E.D. Pa. 1982)

. . . (See N.T. 10.20-10.40; 10.136-137; 12.13-12.20; 12.127-12.131; 12.76; 14.35). . . .

BURY, v. MARIETTA DODGE,, 692 F.2d 1335 (11th Cir. 1982)

. . . In the contract, the annual percentage rate revealed to the borrower on the face of the contract is 14.35% . . . contract rate for the post-maturity interest, 10.5%, is below the annual contract percentage rate of 14.35% . . .

In L. NOWELL, WATERWAYS MARINE, INC. v. L. NOWELL,, 29 B.R. 59 (Bankr. N.D. Miss. 1982)

. . . (Emphasis supplied). 1(A) Collier on Bankruptcy, para. 14.35 at 1380.1. . . .

In B. MILLER, FORD MOTOR CREDIT, v. B. MILLER, W., 4 B.R. 392 (Bankr. S.D. Cal. 1980)

. . . The total amount financed by Ford was $4,938.70 and the interest rate was 14.35% per annum. 3. . . .

OCTAVIO CARRASCO, JR. ET AL. v. THE UNITED STATES, 219 Ct. Cl. 717 (Ct. Cl. 1979)

. . . Mangerich, the sum of $7,415.60 with $14.35 to be credited as premiums on Federal Employees’ Group Life . . .

In N. JOLLY, CHATTANOOGA MEMORIAL PARK, v. C. STILL, XIII, 574 F.2d 349 (6th Cir. 1978)

. . . $688.80 (including interest), by executing a negotiable instrument promising to pay 48 installments of $14.35 . . .

DAVIS CATTLE CO. INC. v. GREAT WESTERN SUGAR COMPANY,, 544 F.2d 436 (10th Cir. 1976)

. . . computation of the amount due the growers as an initial payment, used as a starting point the figure of $14.35 . . . anticipated return on the sale of sugar should have been approximately $28 per hundredweight, instead of $14.35 . . .

REED, III, v. A. RHODES, 422 F. Supp. 708 (N.D. Ohio 1976)

. . . Directly to the north of the Carver attendance area were Case (’58: 17.19%, 413/525) and Waring (’58: 14.35% . . .

DAVIS CATTLE CO. INC. v. GREAT WESTERN SUGAR COMPANY, 393 F. Supp. 1165 (D. Colo. 1975)

. . . only $26.25 per ton, which, under the agreed schedule in the contract, is equivalent to only about $14.35 . . . Fisher met with the growers and announced a price of $14.35 per cwt. and $26.25 per ton as “the highest . . . An initial payment was made to the growers of $26.25 per ton which equates to a sugar price of $14.35 . . . on whose ox was being gored, Great Western forecast “anticipated returns from the sale of sugar” as $14.35 . . . On the day the growers were paid at the rate of $14.35 per cwt., Great Western was selling the sugar . . .

CONCERNED RESIDENTS OF BUCK HILL FALLS, By v. GRANT, U. S., 388 F. Supp. 394 (M.D. Pa. 1975)

. . . Negative Declaration 12.01- 12.12 Environmental Impact Statement 13.01- 13.07 Conclusions of Law 14.01- 14.35 . . . requiring more frequent inspections and maintenance, such as would be the case after a severe flood. 14.35 . . .

HIGGINS v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF CITY OF GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN, 395 F. Supp. 444 (W.D. Mich. 1973)

. . . 2,880 25,334 11.37% 1957-■58 3,260 25,826 12.62% 1958-■59 3,576 26,496 13.50% 1959-•60 3,833 26,708 14.35% . . .

In P. GIBSON, 409 F. Supp. 399 (S.D. Miss. 1971)

. . . Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 14.35, p. 1380, fn. 2, and ¶ 14.42, pp. 1404 — 1405. . . .

GEORGIA- PACIFIC CORPORATION, v. U. S. PLYWOOD- CHAMPION PAPERS INC., 446 F.2d 295 (2d Cir. 1971)

. . . GP’s “average realization” on those sales was $159.41, 318 F.Supp. at 1143, such a profit would be $14.35 . . . arithmetic: $ per thousand square feet GP's expected profit on the item: $50.00 —9% profit on sales: -14.35 . . .

DAVID MYERS, v. ROBERT CANTON MARIA CANTON, ADINA KEAN OSMOND KEAN THE WEST INDIAN COMPANY, LTD. No. s St., 7 V.I. 500 (3d Cir. 1970)

. . . as were paid by plaintiff on Lot No. 11A were for a superficiary house, including the 1966 bill for $14.35 . . .

MYERS, v. CANTON No. s St., 426 F.2d 462 (3d Cir. 1970)

. . . as were paid by plaintiff on Lot No. 11A were for a superficiary house, including the 1966 bill for $14.35 . . .

SHAINMAN, v. SHEAR S OF AFFTON, INC., 387 F.2d 33 (8th Cir. 1967)

. . . Cal.1929), Collier, Bankruptcy §§ 14.35, 14.42. . . .

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF STATE OF NEW YORK, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, W. S. H. L. H. L. Jr. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF STATE OF NEW YORK, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, R. W. A. M. H. D. MPS LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, R. W. A. M. CONTINENTAL OIL COMPANY, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, SUPERIOR OIL COMPANY, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION,, 373 F.2d 816 (D.C. Cir. 1967)

. . . numerically weighted average price is 14.24 cents and the volumetrically weighted average price is 14.35 . . .

UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN WARREN COUNTY, STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN WARREN COUNTY, STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, G. UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN WARREN COUNTY, STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA,, 251 F. Supp. 858 (W.D. Pa. 1966)

. . . The point is that on these tracts — Tract 2321 (8.55 acres), Tract 2321-E (.47 acres), Tract 3304 (14.35 . . .

JOSEPHINE C. RUMLEY, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF GEORGE S. RUMLEY D B A GEORGE S. RUMLEY SHOE MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES, 152 Ct. Cl. 166 (Ct. Cl. 1961)

. . . 17.55 ounces per square yard, No. 10 cotton duck for all other canvas parts with a minimum weight of 14.35 . . .

STATE FINANCE COMPANY, a v. MORROW,, 216 F.2d 676 (10th Cir. 1954)

. . . two sections are not mutually exclusive or pari materia; see 1 Collier on Bankruptcy, 14th Ed., Parg. 14.35 . . .

HAMRICK v. BRYAN, 21 F. Supp. 392 (N.D. Okla. 1937)

. . . The Series B Common Stock will be offered for a cash price of '$14.35 per share, in an amount of shares . . . purpose of raising the additional cash funds necessary to complete the purchase price, at a price of $14.35 . . . as herein provided, then Buyer may offer same to the public at a price to net Buyer not less than $14.35 . . .

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. PARAMOUNT FAMOUS- LASKY CORPORATION, 57 F.2d 152 (2d Cir. 1932)

. . . Artists..................... ..... 3 .3(5 11 2.08 +477.7 Miscellaneous state rights companies . .....117 14.35 . . .

In WRIGHT- DANA HARDWARE CO., 212 F. 397 (2d Cir. 1914)

. . . company after January 10th against its balánce on deposit in the bank, and that was one in the sum of $14.35 . . .

In WRIGHT- DANA HARDWARE CO., 207 F. 636 (N.D.N.Y. 1913)

. . . No checks were paid by the bank during this period with the exception of one for $14.35 for new goods . . . deposits, so far as the evidence shows, and thereafter only one check was drawn against it, viz., one for $14.35 . . .

In SMITH, 176 F. 426 (N.D.N.Y. 1910)

. . . provable in bankruptcy and that his claim is not valid; (3) that the claim of Hompe, a judgment of $14.35 . . . It is conceded that Alnutt had another judgment against Smith for $14.35, perfected January 11,, 1907 . . .

ATCHISON, T. S. F. RY. CO. v. UNITED STATES, 170 F. 250 (9th Cir. 1909)

. . . the point of shipment, and that the carrier had accepted in settlement sums varying from 35 cents to $14.35 . . . claimed by the shipper to have been lost therefrom in transit, amounting in value to from 35 cents to $14.35 . . . deductions made from the original freight bills by the defendant’s agent, varying from 35 cents to $14.35 . . .

, 97 U.S. 323 (U.S. 1877)

. . . $18.60 interest thereon, together with one-half of the general costs of the Circuit Court, taxed at $14.35 . . .

BANK OF WASHINGTON v. ELIOT, 2 F. Cas. 747 (C.C.D.C. 1824)

. . . Goz-ler, Case No. 14.35S. Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.]' . . .