The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH

Chapter 17
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 17.41

17.41 Department of Financial Services Tobacco Settlement Clearing Trust Fund.—

(1) The Department of Financial Services Tobacco Settlement Clearing Trust Fund, which shall be referred to as the “Lawton Chiles Trust Fund,” is created within that department.

(2) Funds to be credited to the Tobacco Settlement Clearing Trust Fund shall consist of payments received by the state from settlement of State of Florida v. American Tobacco Co., No. 95-1466AH (Fla. 15th Cir. Ct. 1996). Moneys received from the settlement and deposited into the trust fund are exempt from the service charges imposed under s. 215.20.

(3)(a) Subject to approval of the Legislature, all or any portion of the state’s right, title, and interest in and to the tobacco settlement agreement may be sold to the Tobacco Settlement Financing Corporation created pursuant to s. 215.56005. Any such sale shall be a true sale and not a borrowing.

(b) Any moneys received by the state pursuant to any residual interest retained in the tobacco settlement agreement or the payments to be made under the tobacco settlement agreement shall be deposited into the Tobacco Settlement Clearing Trust Fund.

(4) The department shall disburse funds, by nonoperating transfer, from the Tobacco Settlement Clearing Trust Fund to the tobacco settlement trust funds of the various agencies or to the Biomedical Research Trust Fund in the Department of Health, as appropriate, in amounts equal to the annual appropriations made from those agencies’ trust funds in the General Appropriations Act.

(5) Pursuant to the provisions of s. 19(f)(3), Art. III of the State Constitution, the Tobacco Settlement Clearing Trust Fund is exempt from the termination provisions of s. 19(f)(2), Art. III of the State Constitution.

History.—s. 1, ch. 99-197; s. 3, ch. 2000-122; s. 2, ch. 2000-128; s. 1, ch. 2001-73; s. 45, ch. 2003-261; s. 1, ch. 2004-282; s. 1, ch. 2004-350; s. 2, ch. 2021-43; s. 1, ch. 2022-150.

F.S. 17.41 on Google Scholar

F.S. 17.41 on Casetext

Amendments to 17.41

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 17.41

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 17.41.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE NEXUS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION, 293 F. Supp. 3d 888 (N.D. Cal. 2018)

. . . Code § 17.41 et seq. , on behalf of the Texas subclass. CAC ¶¶ 501-17. . . .

IN RE CLEM, v., 583 B.R. 329 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2017)

. . . . §§ 17.41 et seq. (West 2017). . . .

COTTRELL Jr. v. ALCON LABORATORIES RP USA LLC Co LLC, 874 F.3d 154 (3d Cir. 2017)

. . . Code § 17.41, et seq. . . .

IN RE GENERAL MOTORS LLC IGNITION SWITCH LITIGATION. To, 257 F. Supp. 3d 372 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . Code §§ 17.41 et seq. . . .

QUIBODEAUX v. NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY,, 655 F. App'x 984 (5th Cir. 2016)

. . . Code §§ 17.41—.63, and violation of Chapter 542 of the Texas Insurance Code. . . . Code §§ 17.41-.63. . . .

NESTL PURINA PETCARE COMPANY, v. BLUE BUFFALO COMPANY LTD., 181 F. Supp. 3d 618 (E.D. Mo. 2016)

. . . Code §§ 17.41 et seq. . . .

IN RE WHOLE FOODS MARKET, INC., 163 F. Supp. 3d 385 (W.D. Tex. 2016)

. . . Code § 17.41; and Missouri Merchandising Practices Act, Mo. Rev. Stat. § 407.020.43. . . .

In RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL, LLC C. v., 628 F. App'x 63 (2d Cir. 2016)

. . . . & Com.Code §§ 17.41-17.63. . . .

In RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL, LLC C. v., 628 F. App'x 63 (2d Cir. 2016)

. . . . & Com.Code §§ 17.41-17.63. . . .

ASANTE, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES,, 155 F. Supp. 3d 1008 (N.D. Cal. 2015)

. . . B, State Plan Attachment (4.19-A at 17.41). . . . . B, State Plan Attachment (4.19-A at 17.41). . . . B, State Plan Attachment 4.19-A at 17.41. . . .

BERKSON, v. GOGO LLC,, 147 F. Supp. 3d 123 (E.D.N.Y. 2015)

. . . Code Ann, § 17.41 et seq. (Texas); Vt. Stat. Ann. Tit. 9, § 2451 et seq. (Vermont); Va. . . .

W. CAMPBELL, v. DLJ MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INCORPORATED, 628 F. App'x 232 (5th Cir. 2015)

. . . . & Com.Code § 17.41 et seq. . . .

DTND SIERRA INVESTMENTS, L. L. C. v. HSBC BANK USA, N. A. As, 627 F. App'x 285 (5th Cir. 2015)

. . . Code § 17.41, and the Texas Debt Collection Act, Tex. Fin. Code § 392.304(a). . . .

KENNEDY, v. CAIN,, 624 F. App'x 886 (5th Cir. 2015)

. . . voter-registration data for 1990-2000, females represented 54.21%, showing an absolute disparity of 17.41% . . . Therefore, the absolute disparities ranged from 13.4% to 17.41%. . . . The absolute disparities ranged from 13.4% to 17.41%. Id. at 414. . . . , in Kennedy’s case, the absolute disparities for the relevant ten-year period ranged from 13.4% to 17.41% . . . The district court reasoned that the absolute disparities here, ranging from 13.4% to 17.41%, are similar . . .

AMERITOX, LTD. a v. MILLENNIUM LABORATORIES, INC. a, 803 F.3d 517 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . Code § 17.41, et seq., (V) the New York Consumer Protection from Deceptive Acts and Practices Law, N.Y . . .

GARCIA v. CHRYSLER GROUP LLC n k a FCA U. S. LLC,, 127 F. Supp. 3d 212 (S.D.N.Y. 2015)

. . . Code §§ 17.41 et seq. . . .

GARCIA, Jr. R. v. PRIMARY FINANCIAL SERVICES T., 605 F. App'x 418 (5th Cir. 2015)

. . . . §§ 17.41-17.50. We affirm. . . .

UNITED NEUROLOGY, P. A. v. HARTFORD LLOYD S INSURANCE CO., 101 F. Supp. 3d 584 (S.D. Tex. 2015)

. . . payment of claims) of the Texas Insurance Code and of the Deceptive Trade Practices Act (“DTPA”) §§ 17.41 . . .

C. GUAJARDO JUANITA ZEPEDA, v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N. A. JP L. L. C. I TX, L. L. C., 605 F. App'x 240 (5th Cir. 2015)

. . . . §§ 17.41-.63; see also In re Frazin, 732 F.3d 313, 323 (5th Cir.2013); Doe v. . . .

In CONAGRA FOODS, INC., 90 F. Supp. 3d 919 (C.D. Cal. 2015)

. . . Texas: (1) Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act, Texas Business & Commerce Code §§ 17.41 . . .

G C LAND, v. FARMLAND MANAGEMENT SERVICES,, 587 F. App'x 99 (5th Cir. 2014)

. . . . & Com.Code § 17.41 et seq. . . .

IN RE V. GARNER, v. V., 515 B.R. 643 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2014)

. . . . § 17.41 et seq. (Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act). . Doc. No. 21, Exhibit 14. . . . .

In CONAGRA FOODS, INC., 302 F.R.D. 537 (C.D. Cal. 2014)

. . . . & Com.Code §§ 17.41, et seq.; (2) Unjust Enrichment. II. DISCUSSION A. . . .

DZIELAK, v. WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, s s s, 26 F. Supp. 3d 304 (D.N.J. 2014)

. . . Code § 17.41-17.63, has three essential elements: (1) the plaintiff is a consumer; (2) the defendant . . . Com.Code § 17.41 et seq. . . . .

GE CAPITAL COMMERCIAL, INCORPORATED GE v. WORTHINGTON NATIONAL BANK,, 754 F.3d 297 (5th Cir. 2014)

. . . . & Comm.Code §§ 17.41-63. . . .

H R BLOCK TAX SERVICES LLC, v. ACEVEDO- LOPEZ,, 742 F.3d 1074 (8th Cir. 2014)

. . . Michael Garner, Franch Distrib Law & Prac §§ 17.40-17.41 (2013). . . . Id. at § 17.41, p. 284. . . .

In HYDROXYCUT MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION. v., 299 F.R.D. 648 (S.D. Cal. 2014)

. . . . & Comm.Code §§ 17.41-63, just because the defendant is “inextricably intertwined” with another who . . .

LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION, v. DOUBLETREE PARTNERS, L. P. v. L. P. v. A., 739 F.3d 848 (5th Cir. 2014)

. . . . §§ 17.41-63 (West 2014). . Union Bankers Ins. Co. v. Shelton, 889 S.W.2d 278, 283 (Tex.1994). . . . .

TERRILL, v. ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC. d b a, 295 F.R.D. 671 (S.D. Ga. 2013)

. . . . & Com.Code § 17.41 et seq. Dkt. No. 66 ¶¶ 85-92. . . .

R. MILLER S. v. BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, L. P. L. P., 726 F.3d 717 (5th Cir. 2013)

. . . . & Com.Code § 17.41 et seq., and Texas common law. . . .

REYELTS v. CROSS, J. P. C. A- d b a, 968 F. Supp. 2d 835 (N.D. Tex. 2013)

. . . Plaintiffs for violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, Texas Business and Commerce Code § 17.41 . . .

KERSH, R. v. UNITEDHEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY, a a, 946 F. Supp. 2d 621 (W.D. Tex. 2013)

. . . . & Com.Code § 17.41 et seq., by Paychex and Walker (id. ¶¶ 34-35); and (6) intentional infliction of . . . Bus. & Com.Code § 17.41 et seq. . . .

In WILMINGTON TRUST CORP. ERISA LITIGATION, 943 F. Supp. 2d 478 (D. Del. 2013)

. . . “NAV”) of the Wilmington Stock Fund decreased overall from February 15, 2007 to Juñe 5, 2008, from $17.41 . . .

KRUSE v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON,, 936 F. Supp. 2d 790 (N.D. Tex. 2013)

. . . . §§ 17.41-17.63 (“DTPA”), to glean perspective on the applicability'of the statute of frauds to the . . .

GOSSETT v. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, 919 F. Supp. 2d 852 (S.D. Tex. 2013)

. . . . §§ 17.41 et seq., and negligent infliction of emotional distress, is a motion for summary judgment . . .

PAGAN, v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC., 287 F.R.D. 139 (E.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . . § 17.41, et seq.; (3) the Ohio Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act (“ODTPA”), Ohio Rev. . . .

BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP, v. TEXAS REALTY HOLDINGS, LLC,, 901 F. Supp. 2d 884 (S.D. Tex. 2012)

. . . . & Com.Code §§ 17.41-17.63. . . . .

KIPER, v. BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP N. A. v. LP N. A., 884 F. Supp. 2d 561 (S.D. Tex. 2012)

. . . . §§ 17.41 et seq., with Kiper seeking damages in excess of $196,000, attorney’s fees, costs, declaratory . . .

COPELAND, v. U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,, 485 F. App'x 8 (5th Cir. 2012)

. . . . & Com.Code § 17.41 et seq.; Tex. Fin.Code § 392.001 et seq. . . .

C. ADAMS, Jr. v. BANK OF AMERICA L. P. N. A., 475 F. App'x 526 (5th Cir. 2012)

. . . Collection Act, Chapter 392 of the Texas Finance Code, (2) the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, § 17.41 . . .

In PORSCHE CARS NORTH AMERICA, INC., 880 F. Supp. 2d 801 (S.D. Ohio 2012)

. . . . & CormCode § 17.41 et seq., and unjust enrichment. PCNA moves to dismiss all claims. . . .

CERES ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. v. ARCH SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,, 853 F. Supp. 2d 859 (D. Minn. 2012)

. . . Code § 17.41 et seq., based on defamatory statements allegedly made about its performance under the contract . . .

BEAUTY MANUFACTURING SOLUTIONS CORP. v. ASHLAND, INC. d b a, 848 F. Supp. 2d 663 (N.D. Tex. 2012)

. . . . & Com.Code §§ 17.41-63. . . .

PARKER, v. SMALL, G. Jr., 665 F.3d 1143 (9th Cir. 2011)

. . . CALJIC instruction 1.00 on page 1 and 1-A, CALJIC instruction 17.40 on page 40, and CALJIC instruction 17.41 . . . ‘CALJIC 17.41 is an instruction which recommends how jurors should approach them task. . . .

In HEARTLAND PAYMENT SYSTEMS, INC. CUSTOMER DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION., 834 F. Supp. 2d 566 (S.D. Tex. 2011)

. . . Code § 17.41 et seq. . . .

OSBORN, v. EKPSZ, LLC, LLC., 821 F. Supp. 2d 859 (S.D. Tex. 2011)

. . . . & Com.Code § 17.41 et seq. . . . .

DE LAGE LANDEN FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. v. RASA FLOORS, LP De v., 792 F. Supp. 2d 812 (E.D. Pa. 2011)

. . . Code §§ 17.41 et seq., are based, in part, on the fraudulent misrepresentations made by DLL’s agent to . . . Code §§ 17.41 et seq., and the Massachusetts consumer protection laws, Massachusetts Chapter 93A, Regulation . . .

OMNI USA, INC. v. PARKER- HANNIFIN CORPORATION,, 798 F. Supp. 2d 831 (S.D. Tex. 2011)

. . . . §§ 17.41-17.63 (allowing recovery for breach of warranty and misrepresentation), fraudulent inducement . . .

In HYDROXYCUT MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION v., 801 F. Supp. 2d 993 (S.D. Cal. 2011)

. . . . § 17.41 et seq.; (14) violation of West Virginia’s Consumer Credit and Protection Act, W. . . .

D. BIGGERS, v. BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP f k a LP,, 767 F. Supp. 2d 725 (N.D. Tex. 2011)

. . . . §§ 17.41-17.826 (West 2002 & Supp.2010). BAC filed a Fed. . . .

SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL HEALTH WELFARE PLAN, v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC,, 737 F. Supp. 2d 380 (E.D. Pa. 2010)

. . . . §§ 17.41-17.63), when the predicate acts supporting each claims are virtually the same. . . .

DORESTIN K. v. HOLLYWOOD IMPORTS, INC. a d b a, 45 So. 3d 819 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . . § 17.41 et seq. .Section 19.86.090, Washington Revised Code, provides that a person injured by a violation . . .

D. MERONEY, v. PHARIA, LLC,, 688 F. Supp. 2d 550 (N.D. Tex. 2009)

. . . . §§ 17.41-17.63 (Vernon 2002) (“DTPA”). II. . . .

PRISE v. ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC. L. H. P. H., 657 F. Supp. 2d 564 (W.D. Pa. 2009)

. . . Another male funeral director at Neill Funeral Home was making $17.41 per hour as of February 6, 2005 . . .

CUSHMAN, v. GC SERVICES, LP., 657 F. Supp. 2d 834 (S.D. Tex. 2009)

. . . Finally, regarding her DTPA claim, Plaintiff claims that Defendant violated § 17.41 by making material . . .

HERNANDEZ, v. IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS, INC., 306 F. App'x 180 (5th Cir. 2009)

. . . . & Com.Code § 17.41 et seq. . Herrmann Holdings Ltd. v. Lucent Techs. . . .

In PEPSICO, INC. BOTTLED WATER MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION, 588 F. Supp. 2d 527 (S.D.N.Y. 2008)

. . . .] § 17.41, et seq.; and Cal. Civ.Code § 1770, et seq. and Cal. . . .

In TERRORIST BOMBINGS OF U. S. EMBASSIES IN EAST AFRICA, v. Al El-, 552 F.3d 93 (2d Cir. 2008)

. . . . § 17.41(b) (emphasis added). . . . by regulations governing the use, handling, and protection of classified information.” 28 C.F.R. § 17.41 . . . of the United States and any doubt shall be resolved in favor of the national security. 28 C.F.R. § 17.41 . . .

In PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY AVERAGE WHOLESALE PRICE LITIGATION. Co., 252 F.R.D. 83 (D. Mass. 2008)

. . . . & Com.Code § 17.41, et seq.), Vermont (Vt. Stat. . . . Bus. & Com.Code § 17.41, et seq. . . . Bus. & Com.Code § 17.41, et seq. . . . Bus. & Com.Code § 17.41, et seq. . . .

ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY v. ASCEND ONE CORPORATION,, 570 F. Supp. 2d 789 (D. Md. 2008)

. . . was issued pursuant to § 17.61 of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Act, § 17.41 . . .

HERNANDEZ d b a v. IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS INC., 564 F. Supp. 2d 699 (W.D. Tex. 2008)

. . . . & Com.Code §§ 17.41 et seq. . . .

C. PROPHET, v. MYERS, P. C. LLC,, 645 F. Supp. 2d 614 (S.D. Tex. 2008)

. . . . & Com.Code § 17.41 et seq. . . .

TURNER v. OXFORD MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., 552 F. Supp. 2d 648 (S.D. Tex. 2008)

. . . . & Com.Code § 17.41 et seq. . . .

OWENS, v. MERCEDES- BENZ USA, LLC,, 541 F. Supp. 2d 869 (N.D. Tex. 2008)

. . . . §§ 17.41-17.826 (Vernon 2002 & Supp. 2007); the Magnuson Moss Warranty Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2301 et seq . . .

In MOTOR FUEL TEMPERATURE SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION, 534 F. Supp. 2d 1214 (D. Kan. 2008)

. . . . § 17.41 (Count XXXVI); the Utah Consumer Sales Practices Act, Utah Code Ann. § 13-11-1 et seq. . . .

GENERAL RETAIL SERVICES, INC. v. WIRELESS TOYZ FRANCHISE, LLC JSB, 255 F. App'x 775 (5th Cir. 2007)

. . . . § 17.41 et seq. (Vernon 2001). . . .

In DAVIS v. P., 377 B.R. 827 (Bankr. E.D. Tex. 2007)

. . . ComUode §§ 17.41 et seq., and the transactions entered into were consumer transactions. . . .

COTTMAN TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS, LLC, v. KERSHNER,, 492 F. Supp. 2d 461 (E.D. Pa. 2007)

. . . . §§ 17.41, et seq.; the Utah Consumer Sales Practices Act, Utah Code Ann. §§ 13-11-1, et seq.; and the . . .

PAZARIN, v. J. ARMES, d b a, 512 F. Supp. 2d 861 (W.D. Tex. 2007)

. . . . & Com.Code §§ 17.41-17.63. . Pl.’s Compl., Rec. No. 1, at ¶ 12. . Pl.’s Compl., Rec. . . .

MARKETIC, v. U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOC., 436 F. Supp. 2d 842 (N.D. Tex. 2006)

. . . . & Comm.Code §§ 17.41 et seq.; the Truth-in-Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601 et seq.; the Texas Debt Collection . . .

In PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY AVERAGE WHOLESALE PRICE LITIGATION, 233 F.R.D. 229 (D. Mass. 2006)

. . . . & Com.Code § 17.41, et seq.; (jj) Utah Code Ann. § 13-1 1-1, et seq.; (kk) Vt. Stat. . . .

MCCOY, v. EAST TEXAS MEDICAL CENTER REGIONAL HEALTHCARE SYSTEM,, 388 F. Supp. 2d 760 (E.D. Tex. 2005)

. . . . & Com.Code § 17.41 et seq.; (4) unjust enrichment/constructive trust; (5) civil conspiracy/concert . . .

UNITED STATES v. POLLARD,, 416 F.3d 48 (D.C. Cir. 2005)

. . . . § 17.41(a). . . .

In AFRICAN- AMERICAN SLAVE DESCENDANTS LITIGATION, 375 F. Supp. 2d 721 (N.D. Ill. 2005)

. . . Code § 17.41 et seq.; Count X alleges violations of California’s Preservation and Regulation of Competition . . . Bus. & Com.Code Ann. § 17.41 — two years. See Tex. . . .

C. FERMIN, v. UNITED HEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 138 F. App'x 638 (5th Cir. 2005)

. . . Code §§ 17.41-17.43 (“DTPA”), usury, and gross negligence and fraud, because of his failure to adduce . . .

In AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. PRIVACY LITIGATION, 370 F. Supp. 2d 552 (N.D. Tex. 2005)

. . . . §§ 17.41-17.826 (Vernon 2002 & Supp.2004-05), and similar statutes of 48 other states and the District . . .

WEBB, v. UNUMPROVIDENT CORPORATION, D., 507 F. Supp. 2d 668 (W.D. Tex. 2005)

. . . The Texas DTPA is codified at Texas Business and Commercial Code §§ 17.41 et seq. . . . .

UNITED STATES v. BURGIN,, 388 F.3d 177 (6th Cir. 2004)

. . . search of his home where they uncovered a .38 caliber Rossi revolver, 228.51 grams of powder cocaine, 17.41 . . .

VOLVO CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT NORTH AMERICA, INC. a a a v. CLM EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC. a a AIS a d b a a, 386 F.3d 581 (4th Cir. 2004)

. . . Deceptive Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Act, Vernon’s Texas Statutes and Codes Ann., Title II, § 17.41 . . . Code, § 17.41, et seq., in that FEC is a corporation or business that sought and/or acquired goods or . . . . & Com.Code § 17.41, et seq.) precluded Volvo’s termination of its Dealer Agreement. . . . Bus. & Com.Code § 17.41, et seq.; (4) violations of the Michigan Motor Vehicle Act, Mich. Comp. . . .

L ATRIUM ON THE CREEK I, L. P. v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA,, 326 F. Supp. 2d 787 (N.D. Tex. 2004)

. . . . §§ 17.41-63 (Vernon 2002) (“DTPA”). H. . . .

In AFRICAN- AMERICAN SLAVE DESCENDANTS LITIGATION, 304 F. Supp. 2d 1027 (N.D. Ill. 2004)

. . . . § 17.41 (2002). See FACC ¶¶ 244-253. . . . Bus. & Com.Code Ann. § 17.41 (2002) — two years. See Tex. . . .

HURD, v. CAREY,, 280 F. Supp. 2d 980 (N.D. Cal. 2003)

. . . basis for relief is that the trial court provided “an unconstitutional jury instruction [CALJIC No 17.41 . . .

BERLANGA v. TERRIER TRANSPORTATION, INC. a k a S. A. C. V., 269 F. Supp. 2d 821 (N.D. Tex. 2003)

. . . Code § 17.41 et seq.). . . .

VOLVO TRADEMARK HOLDING AKTIEBOLAGET, a a a v. CLM EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC. a a a v. d b a a CLM Co. a Co. a Co. v. a a, 236 F. Supp. 2d 536 (W.D.N.C. 2002)

. . . . & Com.Code, § 17.41, et seq.; (4) violations of the Michigan Motor Vehicle Act, Mich.Comp. . . . Bus. & Com.Code, § 17.41, et seq., relating to Future; and violations of the Louisiana Dealer Act, La.Rev.Stat . . .

GREAT PLAINS TRUST COMPANY v. MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER CO., 313 F.3d 305 (5th Cir. 2002)

. . . . §§ 17.41-17.826 (Vernon 1987- & Supp.2002), professional negligence, and breach of contract. . . .

O. HUNTON O. v. GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA,, 243 F. Supp. 2d 686 (S.D. Tex. 2002)

. . . Code § 17.41 et seq., (iv) violations of the Texas Insurance Code, Tex. Ins. . . .

WATSON, v. JOHNSON MOBILE HOMES P., 284 F.3d 568 (5th Cir. 2002)

. . . . § 17.41, et seq. (1987 & Supp.2002)(Texas’s Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act); id. . . .

In DIET DRUGS D. Jo I., 282 F.3d 220 (3d Cir. 2002)

. . . . & Comm.Code, § 17.41 et seq. . . .

BLOXOM v. LANDMARK PUBLISHING CORPORATION,, 184 F. Supp. 2d 578 (E.D. Tex. 2002)

. . . The Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act is codified at section 17.41, et seq., of . . .

E. ELBAOR, MD PA, E. MD PA E. s v. TRIPATH IMAGING, INC. a a LP, a a F. LP, 279 F.3d 314 (5th Cir. 2002)

. . . . & Com.Code § 17.41 et seq.] . . .

BRITTAN COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION v. SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, 177 F. Supp. 2d 580 (S.D. Tex. 2001)

. . . . & Com.Code § 17.41 et seq. (“DTPA”). . . .

ST. LUKE S EPISCOPAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION, v. STEVENS TRANSPORT, INC., 172 F. Supp. 2d 837 (S.D. Tex. 2001)

. . . Code, art. 17.41 et seq.; 28 Tex. Admin. . . .

TEXAS v. AMERICAN BLASTFAX, INC., 164 F. Supp. 2d 892 (W.D. Tex. 2001)

. . . Code § 17.41 (“DTPA”). . . .

P. HOWERY, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 243 F.3d 912 (5th Cir. 2001)

. . . . & Com.Code § 17.41 et seq. (2001). . Tex. Bus. & Com.Code § 17.46(a). . Tex. . . .

TEXAS, v. AMERICAN BLAST FAX, INC., 159 F. Supp. 2d 936 (W.D. Tex. 2001)

. . . . & Comm.Code § 17.41 (“DTPA”). . . .

ALCAN ALUMINUM CORP. v. BASF CORP. d b a, 133 F. Supp. 2d 482 (N.D. Tex. 2001)

. . . . & Comm.Code Ann, § 17.41 et seq. (West 1987 & Supp.2001); and 6) professional negligence. . . .

TEXAS v. AMERICAN BLASTFAX, INC., 121 F. Supp. 2d 1085 (W.D. Tex. 2000)

. . . CODE § 17.41 (“DTPA”). . . .

KELLEY v. GALVESTON AUTOPLEX d b a, 196 F.R.D. 471 (S.D. Tex. 2000)

. . . Code § 17.41, et seq. (“DTPA”), and common law fraud. . . .

L. DYER v. DANEK MEDICAL, INC., 115 F. Supp. 2d 732 (N.D. Tex. 2000)

. . . . §§ 17.41 et seq. (West 1999). Defendants removed the case to federal court in May 1995. . . .

HENRY v. CASH TODAY, INC. v. a., 199 F.R.D. 566 (S.D. Tex. 2000)

. . . . §§ 17.41 et seq., and civil conspiracy, is Plaintiffs’ amended motion for class certification (instrument . . .