Cases from cite.case.law:

WALGREEN CO. CVS, LLC, v. L. RUBIN,, 229 So. 3d 418 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . would take Walgreens, employees 283 hours to pull and prep the 45 files at an average hourly pay of $20.34 . . .

In H. PAWLOWSKI, v. H., 428 B.R. 545 (E.D.N.Y. 2009)

. . . R. 20.34. The Bankruptcy Court further stated: .... . . .

AMERICAN FEDERAL BANK, FSB, v. UNITED STATES,, 58 Fed. Cl. 429 (Fed. Cl. 2003)

. . . The average remaining term for United's mortgage loans was 20.34 years, and five years for its "other . . .

In FORD, III, Jr. v., 276 B.R. 561 (Bankr. N.D. Miss. 2001)

. . . noted in the deed description, Ford’s property comprised approximately 59.66 acres. (80 acres less 20.34 . . .

NIZAMI, v. PFIZER INC., 107 F. Supp. 2d 791 (E.D. Mich. 2000)

. . . 1995, Plaintiff received an e-mail notice from this group indicating that he had failed to reconcile 20.34 . . .

In G. WILLIAMS, G. WILLIAMS, v. UNITED STATES, 227 B.R. 589 (D.R.I. 1998)

. . . Cowans, Cowans Bankruptcy Law and Practice § 20.34, at 176 (6th ed.1994) (stating that the three elements . . . this title apply only in a case under such chapter.” 11 U.S.C. § 103(b); see also 4 Cowans, supra, § 20.34 . . .

R. POPE v. CHRONICLE PUBLISHING COMPANY, d b a, 95 F.3d 607 (7th Cir. 1996)

. . . Nowak, Treatise on Constitutional Law: Substance and Procedure, §§ 20.34 to 20.36 (West, 2d ed.1992). . . .

RUSH v. SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES, INC., 934 F. Supp. 152 (E.D. Pa. 1996)

. . . Clerk of Court for filing 10.75 6/14/96 Federal Express 72.75 6/19/96 Westlaw Research at Law Library 20.34 . . .

TIMKEN COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES, Co. U. S. A. NSK NSK, 852 F. Supp. 1040 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1994)

. . . results of this administrative review finding a dumping margin of 54.01% for Koyo and a dumping margin of 20.34% . . .

Co. v. Co. U. S. A. NSK NSK, 18 Ct. Int'l Trade 1 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1994)

. . . results of this administrative review finding a dumping margin of 54.01% for Koyo and a dumping margin of 20.34% . . .

UNITED STATES v. VAN ENGEL, K. L. A. F. E. J. A., 809 F. Supp. 1360 (E.D. Wis. 1992)

. . . SCR 20.34(l)(c) (ethical consideration). Mr. Kravit was serving as an advocate for Mr. . . .

LISA FRANK, INC. a v. IMPACT INTERNATIONAL, INC. a a, 799 F. Supp. 980 (D. Ariz. 1992)

. . . across several products in a product line. 3A Callman, Unfair Competition Trademarks and Monopolies § 20.34 . . .

WESCH, v. HUNT,, 785 F. Supp. 1491 (S.D. Ala. 1992)

. . . 82.86% 218 9.05% 193 8.01% 0 0.00% 2 0.08% RUTHERFORD STORE PCT 25 BX 2 118 100.00% 94 79.66% 0 0.00% 24 20.34% . . .

LEAR SIEGLER INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,, 890 F.2d 1573 (10th Cir. 1989)

. . . caucus, Lear presented an alternative proposal which included a decrease in the total wage package from $20.34 . . . In June 1984, the total compensation package was $20.34. . . .

BEAM, v. IPCO CORPORATION, d b a, 838 F.2d 242 (7th Cir. 1988)

. . . We direct counsel’s attention to former Rules 20.34(e) and 20.36(l)(e) of the Wisconsin Supreme Court . . .

REYES, v. SUPERVISOR OF DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION,, 834 F.2d 1093 (1st Cir. 1987)

. . . . §§ 20.34, 20.21(g). . . .

ALEXANDER, v. UNITED STATES, 787 F.2d 1349 (9th Cir. 1986)

. . . Although an alternate system of access has been provided in 28 C.F.R. 16.30 to 34 and 28 C.F.R. 20.34 . . .

J. STEINLE, Jr. v. W. WARREN, 765 F.2d 95 (7th Cir. 1985)

. . . Wis.S.C.R. 20.34(l)(c) (1980). . . . See also, Wis.S.C.R. 20.34(2)(a) (1980) (“a lawyer is not justified in asserting a position in litigation . . .

WHITTENBERG, Mr. P. NAACP, Dr. T. H. v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF GREENVILLE COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA,, 607 F. Supp. 289 (D.S.C. 1985)

. . . 17.41 6.68 29.46 19.15 32.72 27.19 6.22 25.20 18.02 26.03 27.74 28.83 24.10 20.31 26.16 22.49 27.23 20.34 . . .

PRUETT, v. H. LEVI,, 622 F.2d 256 (6th Cir. 1980)

. . . Pruett has received a copy of his FBI file, as provided for in 28 C.F.R §§ 16.30-.34, 20.34(a)(1979). . . . Individuals are provided the right to receive copies of their criminal files. 28 C.F.R. § 20.34(a). . . . however, requests sent to the FBI will be forwarded to the proper contributing agency. 28 C.F.R. § 20.34 . . .

TARLTON, v. B. SAXBE,, 407 F. Supp. 1083 (D.D.C. 1976)

. . . . § 20.34(b) (similar National Crime Information Center regulation). See also Still Aff., ¶¶ 5-6. . . . .

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. INC. v. UNITED STATES, 524 F.2d 1343 (Ct. Cl. 1975)

. . . Bedford, Accountant’s Handbook, supra note 17, 20.34. . . .

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, INC. v. THE UNITED STATES, 208 Ct. Cl. 1 (Ct. Cl. 1975)

. . . Bedford, Accountant’s Handbook, supra note 17, 20.34. . . .

ESTATE W. STREETER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,, 491 F.2d 375 (3d Cir. 1974)

. . . . § 20.34, n.74 (1959). . . .

PIKE, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD E., 303 F.2d 353 (8th Cir. 1962)

. . . category, hours of instruction per day and per week, and the like. 14 C.F.R. 20.5, 20.16, 20.23-4, 20.34 . . .

v., 27 T.C. 330 (T.C. 1956)

. . . 582.24 Note receivable canceled_ 2,860.46 Employees’ advances canceled_ 29,476.93 Advances canceled_ 20.34 . . .

UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN CLAY COUNTY,, 212 F.2d 853 (5th Cir. 1954)

. . . it was stipulated that the property condemned contained “111.44 acres. more or less, approximately 20.34 . . .

v., 31 Cust. Ct. 381 (Cust. Ct. 1953)

. . . Japanese Federal Reserve Bank or its agent or branch, the Yokohama Specie Bank at Tientsin, received $20.34 . . .

Co. v., 26 Cust. Ct. 652 (Cust. Ct. 1951)

. . . Japanese Federal Reserve Bank or its agent or branch, the Yokohama Specie Bank at Tientsin, received $20.34 . . .

KENEIPP v. UNITED STATES, 184 F.2d 263 (D.C. Cir. 1950)

. . . Appellants owned three tracts of land, one containing 20.34 acres, the second containing 19.07 acres, . . .

Co., 7 B.T.A. 36 (B.T.A. 1927)

. . . The percentage of species being 37.60% maple, 4.21% basswood, 20.34% beech, 1.14% elm, 5.50% pine, 29.30% . . .