The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH

Chapter 28
CLERKS OF THE CIRCUIT COURTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 28.02

28.02 Bond of circuit court clerks; large counties.—In each county of the state having a population in excess of 150,000 according to the last state census, the clerk of the circuit court shall give bond as required by the board of county commissioners of the county, to be filed with the clerk of the circuit court and be conditioned upon the faithful discharge of the duties of office.

History.—ss. 1, 3, ch. 3724, 1887; RS 1381; GS 1821; RGS 3066; CGL 4847; s. 1, ch. 17754, 1937; s. 1, ch. 20719, 1941; ss. 10, 12, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 153, ch. 95-147; s. 13, ch. 95-312; s. 8, ch. 98-34.

F.S. 28.02 on Google Scholar

F.S. 28.02 on Casetext

Amendments to 28.02

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 28.02

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 28.02.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

UNITED STATES v. FURLOW,, 928 F.3d 311 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . . § 28.02(a)(1) ). . . .

RUBENSTEIN, v. INTERNATIONAL VALUE ADVISERS, LLC, IVA f k a, 363 F. Supp. 3d 379 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . 92,305 $27.93 November 14, 2016 35,046 $27.91 November 15, 2016 19,467 $27.84 November 16, 2016 22,053 $28.02 . . .

UNITED STATES v. P. NAYLOR, II,, 887 F.3d 397 (8th Cir. 2018)

. . . R. 28.02(c). . . . R. 28.02(f). . . .

JENNINGS v. RODRIGUEZ, 138 S. Ct. 830 (U.S. 2018)

. . . Proc. 6, 28.02 (2016) Mississippi Miss. Const., Art. 32, §29; Miss. . . .

UNITED STATES v. MITCHELL,, 218 F. Supp. 3d 360 (M.D. Pa. 2016)

. . . . § 28.02 ("with intent to destroy or damage”); Utah Code Ann. § 76-6-102 ("intentionally damages”); . . .

E. MASCIANTONIO, v. SWEPI LP,, 195 F. Supp. 3d 667 (M.D. Pa. 2016)

. . . See Pierce, supra, at §§ 28.02[2], 28.03[1]. . . . See Pierce, supra, at §§ 28.02[2], 28.03[1]; Williams & Meyers, Oil and Gas Law § 666. . . . See Pierce, supra, at §§ 28.02-03; see also Williams & MeyeRS, Oil and Gas Law § 666. . . . *8; Kaufman, 2012 WL 4442799, at *4; Kuhn, 2012 WL 4442798, at *3-4; see also Pierce, supra, at §§ 28.02 . . . See Pierce, supra, at § 28.02[2] (collecting cases). . . . .

MCLAUGHLIN, v. STEELE,, 173 F. Supp. 3d 855 (E.D. Mo. 2016)

. . . R. 28.02(c), 28.02 (f). The MAI-CR are. promulgated by the Missouri Supreme Court. Blackmon v. . . . Missouri Supreme Court Rule 28.02(c), (f). . . .

UNITED STATES v. HERNANDEZ, A. T- A. A. A. H. H,, 537 F. App'x 470 (5th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 28.02. The term “aggravated felony” in § 1326(b)(2) is defined by 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43). . . . Penal Code Ann. § 28.02(d) and § 15.01(d). . . .

HARRIS, v. HAMMON,, 914 F. Supp. 2d 1026 (D. Minn. 2012)

. . . P. 28.02.” (Doc. No. 1, Compl. 12.) . . .

DRACUT SCHOOL COMMITTEE, v. BUREAU OF SPECIAL EDUCATION APPEALS OF THE MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, P. A. C. A., 737 F. Supp. 2d 35 (D. Mass. 2010)

. . . .”); 603 Mass.Code Regs. 28.02 (“Eligible student shall mean a person aged three through 21 who has not . . .

J. O MEARA, v. FENEIS,, 617 F.3d 998 (8th Cir. 2010)

. . . P. 28.02, subdiv. 4(3)”). . . .

UNITED STATES v. KNIGHT,, 606 F.3d 171 (4th Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 28.02. . . . Penal Code Ann. § 28.02(a)(1), is broader than the generic definition of arson. . . .

LOSH, v. FABIAN,, 592 F.3d 820 (8th Cir. 2010)

. . . P. 28.02, subdiv. 4(3), without Losh having filed an appeal. . . . P. 28.02, subdiv. 4(3). See Losh, 721 N.W.2d at 894-95. . . .

UNITED STATES v. RODRIGUEZ, Jr., 349 F. App'x 895 (5th Cir. 2009)

. . . motion after finding that the arson statute under which Rodriguez was convicted, Texas Penal Code § 28.02 . . .

UNITED STATES v. PULLIRO,, 344 F. App'x 943 (5th Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 28.02 (Vernon 2003)) does not require intended harm to a person for a conviction, it is broader than . . .

UNITED STATES v. VELEZ- ALDERETE, E., 569 F.3d 541 (5th Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 28.02 (1993). . . . to whether the burning would endanger the life of a person or the safety of another’s property per § 28.02 . . .

TEAMSTERS LOCAL PENSION AND WELFARE FUNDS, v. APOLLO GROUP, INC. G. S. B. E. R. III E. J., 633 F. Supp. 2d 763 (D. Ariz. 2009)

. . . To support that assertion, the FAC further alleges that Apollo’s “stock traded as high as $28.02 per . . .

RIEHM v. ENGELKING, a a a De- a a a a, 538 F.3d 952 (8th Cir. 2008)

. . . P. 28.02, subd. 1(b). . . .

PARENTS OF DANIELLE, v. MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, 430 F. Supp. 2d 3 (D. Mass. 2006)

. . . was convened to create an Individualized Educational Plan (“IEP”) for her, see 603 Mass.Code Regs. 28.02 . . .

UNITED STATES v. VELASQUEZ- REYES, a. k. a., 427 F.3d 1227 (9th Cir. 2005)

. . . . § 28.02 (Vernon 2005); Utah Code Ann. § 76-6-102 (West 2005); Vt. Stat. . . .

In HOFFINGER INDUSTRIES, INC. v., 308 B.R. 362 (Bankr. E.D. Ark. 2004)

. . . DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 28.02 (Pl.’s Ex. 28) 05/07/99 Disneyland vjrv 670.60 (Dunn Dep. . . .

B. GUNNELLS A. W W AAA B. E. F. E. N. L. J. HH B. Of v. HEALTHPLAN SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Of R. T. D. G. S. E. R. A. K. Jr. R. H. M. H. M. L. L. E. A A. O. L. E. D. B. A. B. E. F. E. H. L. J. B. W W AAA HH v. R. H. H. R. T. D. G. S. E. A. K. Jr. R. M. M. L. L. E. A A. O. L. E. D., 348 F.3d 417 (4th Cir. 2003)

. . . and therefore protects the defendant from inconsistent adjudications.” 5 Moore’s Federal Practice § 28.02 . . .

UNITED STATES v. MACK,, 343 F.3d 929 (8th Cir. 2003)

. . . inconsistent verdict when it found a defendant guilty merely of possession for two incidents involving 28.02 . . .

WILLIAMS, D. v. H. BRUTON,, 299 F.3d 981 (8th Cir. 2002)

. . . See Minn.R.Crim.P. 28.02 subd. 4(3). Although Mr. . . .

R. NELSON, v. HVASS,, 280 F.3d 872 (8th Cir. 2002)

. . . P. 28.02, subd. 4(3). . . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. ARMSTRONG,, 253 F.3d 335 (8th Cir. 2001)

. . . 1998, Armstrong was arrested with 35.35 grams of methamphetamine (count I), on September 7, 1998, with 28.02 . . .

In C. BENTON,, 237 B.R. 353 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1999)

. . . Upon termination of membership, §§ 28.02 and 28.03 provide for the refund of accumulated employee contributions . . .

HOGUE, v. L. JOHNSON,, 131 F.3d 466 (5th Cir. 1997)

. . . Arson is defined in Texas Penal Code § 28.02(a) as being committed by a person "if he starts a fire or . . .

In EXTRADITION OF LAHORIA, 932 F. Supp. 802 (N.D. Tex. 1996)

. . . (“arson”) IPC 436 844(i) 28.02 Punishment for attempt to cause explosion or for making or keeping explosive . . . with intent to endanger life or property ESA 4 844(i) 15.01, 28.02 Punishment for making or possessing . . .

HOGUE, v. SCOTT,, 874 F. Supp. 1486 (N.D. Tex. 1994)

. . . V.T.C.A., Penal Code, Section 28.02(a) defined arson as follows: “(a) A person commits an offense if . . . Obviously, no evidence was introduced at trial regarding Section 28.02(a)(2), so for the purpose of our . . . discussion, we consider the offense as defined in Section 28.02(a)(1). . . . In their commentary to Section 28.02, supra, Searcy and Patterson write the following: “Arson is graded . . .

ACHILLI, v. JOHN J. NISSEN BAKING CO. No. ACHILLI, v. JOHN J. NISSEN BAKING CO. ACHILLI, v. J. J. NISSEN BAKING CO. ACHILLI, v. J. J. NISSEN BAKING CO., 989 F.2d 561 (1st Cir. 1993)

. . . Id. at 196, 87 S.Ct. at 920; Kheel, Labor Law § 28.02[2][iii] at 28-22. . . .

FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, INC. v. DIXON, St., 603 So. 2d 562 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . Support for the finding of a specific duty on the clerk’s part may further be found in sections 28.01 and 28.02 . . .

F. KENNEDY, v. K. DELO,, 959 F.2d 112 (8th Cir. 1992)

. . . Rule 28.02(c) provides that “[w]henever there is an MAI-CR instruction or verdict form applicable under . . . Rule 28.02 [Missouri Rules of Court (15th ed. 1984)]. . . .

In D. LAWSON, II,, 93 B.R. 979 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1988)

. . . unsecured debts must be dealt with, and they must be dealt with in the same way.” 9 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 28.02 . . .

BUNDY, Jr. v. A. WILSON, COLPITT, v. CUNNINGHAM,, 815 F.2d 125 (1st Cir. 1987)

. . . MINN.CRIM.PROC.R. 28.02 (subd.2) (West 1987). . . .

GOLDEN v. CIRCLE T. V. AND APPLIANCE, INC., 14 Fla. Supp. 2d 157 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1985)

. . . request a written estimate for labor and parts and the charges therefor in violation of Sections 2-28.02 . . . defendants fail or refuse to give a written estimate to customers upon request in violation of Section 2-28.02 . . . The testimony of Jim Trent establishes violations of Sections 2-28.02(2) and (3); 2-28.06(1); 2-28.06 . . . The testimony of Cass Phillips establishes violations of Sections 2-28.02(4) and (5); 2-28.06(1) and . . . The testimony of Dennis Moxley establishes violations of Sections 2-28.02(1); 2-28.06(2); 2-28.07(6) . . .

A. BRONGER, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, E. KACPROWICZ, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, J. VEVERKA, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT,, 769 F.2d 756 (Fed. Cir. 1985)

. . . S9-3 at 28.02 (September 30, 1975), the following explanation was given with respect to crediting military . . .

M. R. FERGUSON, v. W. J. ESTELLE, Jr. FAULK, v. W. J. ESTELLE, Jr., 718 F.2d 730 (5th Cir. 1983)

. . . V.T.C.A., Penal Code §§ 12.33, 28.02 (1974). . . .

PARKER, Jr. v. BALTIMORE AND OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY,, 555 F. Supp. 1182 (D.D.C. 1983)

. . . Kheel, Labor Law § 28.02. . ' Plaintiff’s memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to defendant . . .

K. KIMBRELL, v. GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY,, 420 So. 2d 1086 (Fla. 1982)

. . . sources of authority for construing the statute petitioner relies on Florida Administrative Code, Rule 4-28.02 . . .

In WOLFF, AMFAC DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION, v. WOLFF,, 22 B.R. 510 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 1982)

. . . Vol. 10, ¶ 28.02. Chapter 13 departs from that standard. . . .

PETERSON a v. LEHIGH VALLEY DISTRICT COUNCIL, UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS, No. D. No. Co-, 676 F.2d 81 (3d Cir. 1982)

. . . Kheel, Labor Law § 28.02. . . .

SHAYER, v. C. KIRKPATRICK, St. C. Jr. St. M. O H. OVERSCHMIDT, v. C. KIRKPATRICK, MISSOURI STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, INC. St. NAACP, St. NAACP, NAACP, NAACP, NAACP, NAACP, NAACP, NAACP, St. NAACP, v. BOND, C. MISSOURI STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, INC. NAACP, St. NAACP, NAACP, NAACP, NAACP, NAACP, NAACP, NAACP, Dr. Mr. L. v. BOND, C., 541 F. Supp. 922 (W.D. Mo. 1982)

. . . 1,399 Census Tract 25 1,777 Census Tract 26 28 Census Tract 27 10 Census Tract 28.01 80 Census Tract 28.02 . . .

In CITIZENS LOAN AND SAVINGS COMPANY, V. AYLWARD, Jr. v. GARVEY,, 15 B.R. 919 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 1981)

. . . matters which the Act or the Bankruptcy Rules reserve to the judge alone.” 2A Collier on Bankruptcy para. 28.02 . . .

GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDA, v. SUTTON, 396 So. 2d 855 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . Fla.Admin.Code Rule 4-28.02 (repealed 1979). . . .

E. SCOTT v. MOORE No. AFL- CIO,, 640 F.2d 708 (5th Cir. 1981)

. . . . §§ 22.01 (assault); 22.02 (aggravated assault); 28.02 (arson); 28.04 (reckless damage or destruction . . .

DECKER v. GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY,, 392 So. 2d 965 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . There is a division, however, as to whether Florida Administrative Code rule 4-28.02, required that rejection . . .

MAURER, A. W. v. INTERNATIONAL UNION UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA,, 487 F. Supp. 731 (M.D. Pa. 1979)

. . . Coeber, Cyclopedia of Federal Procedure § 28.02 (1967). . . .

WINCAMP PARTNERSHIP, OTC v. ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND, D. B., 458 F. Supp. 1009 (D. Md. 1978)

. . . .-28.02 and .03; (2) Permits for such interim systems shall bear a notice regarding the interim nature . . .

GLOVER, v. AETNA INSURANCE COMPANY,, 363 So. 2d 12 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . Code Rule 4-28.02 requires that evidence must be maintained by an insurance carrier that uninsured motorist . . . This complied with the State Insurance Department’s Rule 4-28.02. Although the courts in Davis v. . . .

KING, v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CO., 48 Fla. Supp. 58 (Broward Cty. Cir. Ct. 1978)

. . . Stat. 627.727(1) (1971) nor compliance with Insurance Commission Rule 4-28.02 of the Rules of the Department . . . Stat. 627.727 or Rule 4-28.02, but rely, instead, upon the testimony of the agent (Todd Johnson deposition . . . Stat. 627.727(1), the Department of Insurance promulgated Rule 4-28.02 which reads as follows — 4-28.02 . . .

RUMMEL, v. W. J. ESTELLE, Jr., 568 F.2d 1193 (5th Cir. 1978)

. . . . § 28.02, are among the crimes treated as first-degree felonies. . Aggravated kidnapping, Tex. . . .

LUMBERMEN S MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, a v. BEAVER,, 355 So. 2d 441 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . This is the interpretation relied on by the Department of Insurance in promulgating Rule 4-28.02 set . . . .-02, which provides as follows: “4r-28.02 Increased limits — uninsured motorist. . . .

MILDNER, v. A. GULOTTA, LEVIN, v. A. GULOTTA GERZOF, v. A. GULOTTA, 405 F. Supp. 182 (E.D.N.Y. 1975)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Text § 28.02 (presumption of reviewability of administrative action), § 16.03 . . .

R. WREN, Jr. v. UNITED STATES BOARD OF PAROLE, 389 F. Supp. 938 (N.D. Ga. 1975)

. . . Supp. 354 (E.D.Pa.1973): see generally Davis, Administrative Law § 28.02. . . .

GARRETT, No. v. R. SWENSON,, 331 F. Supp. 1197 (E.D. Mo. 1971)

. . . We consider these complaints seriatim. (1) We note that under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 28.02, the . . .

WILWORDING, v. R. SWENSON,, 326 F. Supp. 1145 (W.D. Mo. 1970)

. . . petitioner’s direct appeal from his conviction, considered yet another issue under Missouri Criminal Rule 28.02 . . . This, however, is a matter upon which we would be required to rule under Rule 28.02. . . .

W. WIRTZ, v. AIRE FRIO, S. A. a, 304 F. Supp. 693 (D.C.Z. 1968)

. . . Bonilla 57.95 Luis Castillo 8.40 Carlos Contreras Pinel 49.22 Jose Pablo de Gracia 5.22 Ricardo de Leon 28.02 . . .

W. SMITH, v. R. SWENSON,, 274 F. Supp. 515 (W.D. Mo. 1967)

. . . Rules 27.20, 28.01 and 28.02. . . .

R. BOSLER, v. R. SWENSON,, 363 F.2d 154 (8th Cir. 1966)

. . . to the justification for such refusal by the Missouri Supreme Court * * * on the basis of its Rules 28.02 . . . The District Court, in response to our directive, explored the question in light of Rules 28.02 and 27.20 . . . Under Rule 28.02, assignments of error respecting the sufficiency of information or indictment, verdict . . .

In BELKIN, UNITED STATES v. BELKIN,, 358 F.2d 378 (6th Cir. 1966)

. . . Citing 10 Collier on Bankruptcy, Section 28.02 which says that all unsecured debts must be dealt with . . .

L. ALTMAN v. CENTRAL OF GEORGIA RAILWAY COMPANY, 254 F. Supp. 167 (D.D.C. 1965)

. . . mainline mileage of approximately 1,745 miles of which 1,253 or 71.8% is located in Georgia, 489 miles or 28.02% . . .

JACKSONVILLE EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY v. BENNETT, No., 20 Fla. Supp. 86 (Duval Cty. Cir. Ct. 1962)

. . . relation to an appraisal of the property are (1) that the land taken was actually 25.84 acres instead of 28.02 . . .

In E. BAILEY,, 188 F. Supp. 47 (N.D. Ala. 1960)

. . . . * * * ” Collier on Bankrupty, 14 Ed., Vol. 9, § 28.02. . . . .

PACIFIC WHOLESALERS, a v. L. MANGERICH,, 147 F. Supp. 867 (D. Guam 1957)

. . . Mertons Law of Federal Income Taxation Vol. 5, Section 28.02. . . .

In MOHICAN PENCIL CO., 38 F. Supp. 80 (E.D. Pa. 1941)

. . . Krekstein, allowance of expenses of $5.20; Jenkins, Bennett & Libby, allowance of expenses of $28.02; . . . Krekstein........... 5.20 Jenkins, Bennett & Libby......... 28.02 Harry G. . . .

In STANDARD GAS ELECTRIC CO., 26 F. Supp. 636 (D. Del. 1939)

. . . will be allowed one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) and twenty-eight dollars and two cents ($28.02 . . .