The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH

Chapter 30
SHERIFFS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 30.01

30.01 Bond of sheriffs; small counties.—In each county of the state having a population of 150,000 or less according to the last state census, the sheriff shall give bond as required by the board of county commissioners of the county, to be filed with the clerk of the circuit court and be conditioned upon the faithful discharge of the duties of his or her office. When a sheriff is appointed to fill a vacancy, a bond may not be a prerequisite to succession in office; however, if the county commission requires a bond for the office of sheriff, the commission shall allow a period of 10 days after the effective date of the appointment in which the bond may be provided.

History.—ss. 1, 4, ch. 3724, 1887; RS 1237; GS 1666; RGS 2871; CGL 4568; s. 1, ch. 17754, 1937; s. 1, ch. 20719, 1941; ss. 10, 12, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 171, ch. 95-147; s. 14, ch. 95-312; s. 10, ch. 98-34.

F.S. 30.01 on Google Scholar

F.S. 30.01 on Casetext

Amendments to 30.01

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 30.01

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 30.01.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

L. KISOR, v. WILKIE,, 139 S. Ct. 2400 (U.S. 2019)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law § 30.01, pp. 190-191 (1958). 545 U.S. 967, 125 S.Ct. 2688, 162 L.Ed.2d 820 . . .

UNITED STATES, v. J. STITT, II. v., 139 S. Ct. 399 (U.S. 2018)

. . . . §§ 30.01, 30.02 (West 1989) (effective 1974); Utah Code Ann. §§ 76-6-201(1), 76-6-202 (1978) ; W. . . .

UNITED STATES v. HERROLD,, 883 F.3d 517 (5th Cir. 2018)

. . . PENAL CODE § 30.01(1). . . . PENAL CODE §§ 30.01(3), 30.02, 30.04. . . . PENAL CODE § 30.01(3) (emphasis added). . . . PENAL CODE ANN . § 30.01. . . . Penal Code § 30.01(1) (emphasis added). See Tex. . . .

UNITED STATES v. J. STITT, II,, 860 F.3d 854 (6th Cir. 2017)

. . . example of a statute that punishes burglary of “other places” rather than buildings or structures: § 30.01 . . . Penal Code §§ 30.01, 30.02 (1986) (emphasis added). . . . Texas burglary statute incorporates the very same definition of “habitation” in Texas Penal Code § 30.01 . . .

UNITED STATES v. LINARES- BRICENO,, 687 F. App'x 385 (5th Cir. 2017)

. . . Government failed to show that he was convicted of a crime of violence because the judgment references § 30.01 . . .

UNITED STATES v. HERROLD,, 685 F. App'x 302 (5th Cir. 2017)

. . . Penal Code § 30.01(1). . 838 F.3d 667, 671 (5th Cir. 2016). . . . .

UNITED STATES v. DAVIS, 677 F. App'x 933 (5th Cir. 2017)

. . . violence” for purposes of the ACCA because the statutes under which he was convicted, Texas Penal Code § 30.01 . . .

UNITED STATES v. CASTRO- ALFONSO,, 841 F.3d 292 (5th Cir. 2016)

. . . Garcia-Mendez’s “burglary of a habitation” conviction fell under §§ 30.01(1) and 30.02(a)(1) of the Texas . . . Penal Code Ann. § 30.01(1) (West 2015). . . .

B. J. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 190 So. 3d 191 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . . § 30.01(15)(f): "Child who is found to be dependent” means a child who, pursuant to this chapter, is . . .

LUCIANI, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA R. Co- Co-, 643 F. App'x 109 (3d Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 30.01. . . . .

M. M. a v. STATE, 187 So. 3d 300 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Texas Penal Code -Ann, § 30.01(2) (West 1974).. . . .

UNITED STATES v. HERROLD,, 813 F.3d 595 (5th Cir. 2016)

. . . Penal Code § 30.01(1). . . .

JORDAN, v. DOMINICK S FINER FOODS,, 115 F. Supp. 3d 950 (N.D. Ill. 2015)

. . . Instruction. 30.01 concerns the measure of damages to property and reads as follows: If you decide for . . . IPI 30.01. . . .

UNITED STATES v. LARA,, 590 F. App'x 574 (6th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 30.01(1) (Vernon 1974). . . . ) (applying the modified-categorical approach without deciding whether Texas Penal Code Annotated § 30.01 . . . enumerated offense “burglary of a dwelling,” but the court did not thoroughly analyze the scope of § 30.01 . . . Penal Code Ann. § 30.01 (West 2013). . . . .

In ELLETT, III, 519 B.R. 525 (Bankr. S.D. Ind. 2014)

. . . statements dated June 24, 2013, July 29, 2013 and September 5, 2013 to Tona, each in the amount of $30.01 . . . Preliminarily, the Court will address the issue raised at the Hearing that the $30.01 billing statements . . . Both the $30.01 and $19.35 billing statements are owed to the same legal entity, Dermatology, Inc. c. . . . under the two different names. .In the Trial Brief, Mid America disclosed that Tona voluntarily paid $30.01 . . .

UNITED STATES v. CHAPMAN,, 21 F. Supp. 3d 839 (S.D. Tex. 2014)

. . . . § 30.01(2). . . . Penal Code § 30.01(3) (“Vehicle” includes any device in, on, or by which any person or property is or . . .

UNITED STATES v. ARMENDARIZ- PEREZ,, 543 F. App'x 876 (10th Cir. 2013)

. . . , this Court applied a modified categorical analysis to the definition of “habitation” as used in § 30.01 . . . It divided “habitation” into two parts, reasoning that even if the second part (§ 30.01(B)) included . . . government to show that a defendant’s prior conviction” was for a burglary under the first part (§ 30.01 . . . See Texas Penal Code § 30.01(1)(B). . . . See Texas Penal Code § 30.01(1), (2). .The grand jury indictment in the Texas state court charged Armendariz . . . . § 30.01(1)(B). . . . . Texas Penal Code Ann. §§ 30.01 (1 )(B) and 30.02(a)(1). . . . .

UNITED STATES v. APPLE INC. v. USA, 952 F. Supp. 2d 638 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . Cue also added two additional price caps at $16.99 and $19.99 for books listed between $30.01-$35 and . . .

SLAVEN C. S. A. S. J. S. v. ENGSTROM, a R. a L., 710 F.3d 772 (8th Cir. 2013)

. . . P. 30.01 emergency protective hearing. In this respect, the statute is unconstitutional. 46. . . .

H. McKOWN, IV, v. UNITED STATES, 908 F. Supp. 2d 1122 (E.D. Cal. 2012)

. . . L. of Mining § 30.01 (2d ed.). . . .

UNITED STATES v. PORRAS- RUBI,, 468 F. App'x 892 (10th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 30.01(1) & (1)(B). . . .

SLAVEN C. S. A. S. J. S. v. ENGSTROM, a R. a L., 848 F. Supp. 2d 994 (D. Minn. 2012)

. . . Juvenile Protection P. 30.01, subd. 2. The Slavens did not seek a continuance. . . .

UNITED STATES v. VENTURA- PEREZ, a k a, 666 F.3d 670 (10th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 30.01(1) (emphasis added). . . . of a “vehicle that is adapted for the overnight accommodation of persons,” Texas Penal Code Ann. § 30.01 . . . Texas Penal Code Ann. § 30.01(1). . . . Texas Penal Code § 30.01(1)(B). . . .

ROSE ACRE FARMS, INC. v. COLUMBIA CASUALTY CO. Co., 662 F.3d 765 (7th Cir. 2011)

. . . Gauntlett, New Appleman on Insurance Law §§ 30.01(4)(a)(ii)(B)(3)-(C) (2011); State Farm Fire & Casualty . . .

OSAGE TRIBE OF INDIANS OF OKLAHOMA, v. UNITED STATES, 96 Fed. Cl. 390 (Fed. Cl. 2010)

. . . Martin originally argued that the [$30.01] price supposedly paid by TIPCO to the producer is the only . . . Martin agreed that he had originally stated that $30.01 represented the market value. . . . agreed that, later in his deposition, he had stated that he was "not asking the [c]ourt to rely on the $30.01 . . . a royalty owner in [DX 2717] ..., [he] would want to know why the producer who was selling for the $30.01 . . . Martin's email reflects a concern that "the $30.01 price would be suspect” “if the transactions involved . . .

M. GONZALEZ, M. La v. ARIZONA La La F. M. La M. v. La La F., 624 F.3d 1162 (9th Cir. 2010)

. . . Moore et al., Moore's Manual: Federal Practice & Procedure, § 30.01. . . .

BIG O TIRES, LLC, a f k a O a v. FELIX BROS. INC. a, 724 F. Supp. 2d 1107 (D. Colo. 2010)

. . . Cf Docket No. 1-2 at 39, § 30.01 (severability clause). . . .

W. MATHENA, v. UNITED STATES, 577 F.3d 943 (8th Cir. 2009)

. . . R. 30.01(d), and Mathena’s habeas petition filed on December 1, 2006, was not filed within a year of . . .

SPRINGFIELD SCHOOL COMMITTEE, v. DOE,, 623 F. Supp. 2d 150 (D. Mass. 2009)

. . . . § 30.01), which required a referral for a special education evaluation, that was no longer in effect . . .

UNITED STATES v. CARDENAS- CARDENAS,, 543 F.3d 731 (5th Cir. 2008)

. . . See § 30.01(1); St. Julian v. State, 874 S.W.2d 669, 671 (Tex.Crim.App.1994). . . .

LIN, v. INTERACTIVE BROKERS GROUP, INC., 574 F. Supp. 2d 408 (S.D.N.Y. 2008)

. . . According to her certification, named plaintiff Seow Lin paid $30.01 per share for 8,500 shares of IB . . .

UNITED STATES v. MARIN- SOTO,, 278 F. App'x 302 (5th Cir. 2008)

. . . See § 30.01(1); St. Julian v. State, 874 S.W.2d 669, 671 (Tex.Crim.App.1994). . . .

P. McCOOL, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA,, 494 F. Supp. 2d 307 (E.D. Pa. 2007)

. . . McCool that, pursuant to City of Philadelphia Civil Service Regulation 30.01 (“Regulation 30.01”), he . . . City of Philadelphia Civil Service Regulation 30.01 provides: 30.01 REQUIREMENTS. . . . Under the plain language of Regulation 30.01, Mr. . . . The Amended Complaint alleges simply that Regulation 30.01 “violated [Mr. . . . Regulation 30.01 excludes candidates like Mr. . . .

UNITED STATES v. GRISEL,, 488 F.3d 844 (9th Cir. 2007)

. . . . § 30.01 (Vernon 1974)). . . .

NAVALMAR U. K. LTD. v. WELSPUN GUJARAT STAHL ROHREN, LTD., 485 F. Supp. 2d 399 (S.D.N.Y. 2007)

. . . Bailer et al„ The Law op Electronic Fund Transfer Systems (hereinafter “Law of EFTs”) ¶ 30.01[2], A foreign . . .

UNITED STATES v. GOMEZ- GUERRA,, 485 F.3d 301 (5th Cir. 2007)

. . . Penal Code § 30.01(1); see also St. Julian v. . . .

E. K. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES,, 948 So. 2d 54 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . its post-trial written submission, that the father abandoned the child within the meaning of section 30.01 . . .

UNITED STATES v. MENDOZA- SANCHEZ,, 456 F.3d 479 (5th Cir. 2006)

. . . . § 30.01(2) (Vernon’s 1974). . . .

NOEL, v. GRAHAM, 192 F. App'x 538 (7th Cir. 2006)

. . . Code §§ HSS 30.01-30.07 (effective May 1, 1981). . . .

UNITED STATES v. MURILLO- LOPEZ,, 444 F.3d 337 (5th Cir. 2006)

. . . . § 30.01 (Vernon 1974))). . See United States v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. GARCIA- MENDEZ,, 420 F.3d 454 (5th Cir. 2005)

. . . Penal Code § 30.01(1)(2000). . . .

ABUSAID, Jr. a. k. a. v. HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, s a s, 405 F.3d 1298 (11th Cir. 2005)

. . . . §§ 30.01, 30.02, 30.09. . . . In addition, a county may require its sheriff to give bond, id. §§ 30.01, 30.02, and the “sureties, if . . .

In REED, R. v., 405 F.3d 338 (5th Cir. 2005)

. . . Specifically, the Trustee's Final Report claimed interest in the amount of $295.55 on the Trustee's fees, $30.01 . . .

In REED, R. v., 405 F.3d 338 (5th Cir. 2005)

. . . Specifically, the Trustee's Final Report claimed interest in the amount of $295.55 on the Trustee's fees, $30.01 . . .

BELL, v. DUPERRAULT,, 367 F.3d 703 (7th Cir. 2004)

. . . . § 30.01(6b). . . .

UNITED STATES v. VALLEJO- SALAS, 279 F. Supp. 2d 838 (S.D. Tex. 2003)

. . . Code § 30.01. . . . Section 30.01 defines both “habitation” and “building” in such a way that the former is a subset of the . . . Pen Code § 30.01(2) (“‘Building’ means any enclosed structure intended for use or occupation as a habitation . . . Code § 30.01 does create a definitional overlap between “buildings” and “habitations” (ie., all habitations . . . citation would be peculiar, because subsection (d) only makes sense when read in its entirety; sections 30.01 . . .

In REED,, 293 B.R. 698 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2003)

. . . Namely, the Trustee proposes to make the following interest payments: $295.55 on the Trustee’s fees; $30.01 . . .

In TREX COMPANY, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, 212 F. Supp. 2d 596 (W.D. Va. 2002)

. . . $166,600, while the market value of their stock holdings at that time (assuming the closing price of $30.01 . . .

In ABRASS, v. K., 268 B.R. 665 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2001)

. . . Norton, Bankruptcy Law and Practice §§ 29.01 and 30.01 (1982)). . Id. . . .

UNITED STATES v. SPARKS,, 265 F.3d 825 (9th Cir. 2001)

. . . . §§ 30.01, 30.02 (applies to habitation — "a structure or vehicle that is adapted for the overnight . . .

ANALYTIC RECRUITING, INC. v. ANALYTIC RESOURCES, LLC,, 156 F. Supp. 2d 499 (E.D. Pa. 2001)

. . . Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition §§ 30.01-30.03 (3d ed.1996)). . . .

VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY, v. VILLANOVA ALUMNI EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION, INC., 123 F. Supp. 2d 293 (E.D. Pa. 2000)

. . . Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition, §§ 30.01-30.03 (3d.ed.1996). . . .

R. SHANDS, Jr. v. PURKETT,, 211 F.3d 1077 (8th Cir. 2000)

. . . notice of appeal within the ten-day period for seeking a direct appeal (see Missouri Supreme Court Rule 30.01 . . .

STATE v. D. S. a, 760 So. 2d 957 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . entered a nolo plea to possessing spray paint cans, in violation of Miami Dade County Code, section 21-30.01 . . . Miami-Dade County Code, Section 21-30.01(g)(4)(1997), provides: Any person violating ibis subsection . . . Section 21-30.01(g), Miami-Dade County Code (1997). . . .

L. FULLER, v. BOWERSOX, 202 F.3d 1053 (8th Cir. 2000)

. . . See Mo.S.Ct.R.Crim.P. 30.01(e), Mo.S.Ct.R.Crim.P. 30.06(a), Mo. S.Ct.R.Crim.P. 30.06(d). . . . R.Crim.P. 30.01(d), Mo.S.CtR.Civ.P. 81.04(c). . . . See Mo.S.Ct.R.Crim.P. 30.01(d), Mo.S.CtR.Civ.P. 81.04(a). . . .

REED, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY,, 185 F.3d 712 (7th Cir. 1999)

. . . IPI 30.01, 30.03. . . .

A. V. a v. STATE, 706 So. 2d 945 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . appellant in a community control program based upon my belief that Dade County Ordinance 88-113, Section 21-30.01 . . . Florida Supreme Court as one of great public importance: IS DADE COUNTY ORDINANCE 88-113, SECTION ■ 21-30.01 . . .

D. P. a v. STATE, 705 So. 2d 593 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . See id.- § 21-30.01(f)(l). . . . See id. § 21-30.01(f)(2)(III). . . . See id. § 21-30.01(e)(1). . . . Id. § 21-30.01(e)(2)-(3). . . . See id. § 21-30.01(e). . . . Respectfully, I believe that sections 21-30.01(e)(2) and (3) of the Dade County Graffiti Ordinance are . . . Section 21-30.01(e)(2) of the graffiti ordinance criminalizes a minor’s mere possession of spray paint . . . Metropolitan Dade County, Code § 21-30.01(e)(2) (1994). . . . See id. at § 21-30.01(e)(4). . . . See Metropolitan Dade County Code § 21-30.01(e)(l). . . .

In CALDOR, INC. NY, CT, CALDOR, INC. NY, v. NEWBURGH MALL LTD. PARTNERSHIP,, 204 B.R. 855 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1997)

. . . Section 30.01 designates which parties are to be given written notice. . . .

ELVIS PRESLEY ENTERPRISES, INC. v. CAPECE a a, 950 F. Supp. 783 (S.D. Tex. 1996)

. . . . § 1116; see also McCarthy, supra, § 30.01. . . .

LERMER GERMANY USA, v. LERMER CORPORATION,, 94 F.3d 1575 (Fed. Cir. 1996)

. . . Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition § 30.01, at 30-5 (3d ed. 1994). . . .

GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA v. AMERICAN GUARDIAN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY, 943 F. Supp. 509 (E.D. Pa. 1996)

. . . Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition §§'30.01-30.03 (3d ed. 1996) (hereinafter . . .

UNITED STATES v. SPRING, 80 F.3d 1450 (10th Cir. 1996)

. . . Penal Code § 30.01(1). The Texas Code defines burglary as follows: § 30.02. . . . Penal Code § 30.01(1). . . .

NICHOLS, v. SCOTT,, 69 F.3d 1255 (5th Cir. 1995)

. . . Art. 30.01 ("No judge ... shall sit in any case ... where he has been of counsel for the State or the . . .

ESTATE OF L. BRYANT, Jr. BRYANT, v. J. BUCHANAN, C. S., 883 F. Supp. 1222 (S.D. Ind. 1995)

. . . IPD’s written policy regarding the use of CS gas was established October 22,1986, in General Order 30.01 . . . Moreover, General Order 30.01 requires that “[a]ny arrested person on whom the CS Repellent was used . . . (General Order 30.01, Defendants’ Ex. A). . . . Finally, General Orders 30.01 and 18.05 dictate that officers should only utilize CS gas when reasonably . . .

UNITED STATES v. GUADARDO,, 40 F.3d 102 (5th Cir. 1994)

. . . Section 30.01(1) and (2) separately define "habitation" and "building.” . . .

SULTENFUSS, v. SNOW, Jr. T. H. O. J., 35 F.3d 1494 (11th Cir. 1994)

. . . Parole Decision Guidelines System ¶¶ 8-4.01, 8-8.01(c), 8-30.01 through 8-32.01. . . . .

BRANCH, v. R. TURNER,, 37 F.3d 371 (8th Cir. 1994)

. . . See Mo.S.Ct.R. 30.01(d) (notice of appeal must be filed within ten days of final judgment). . . .

UNITED STATES v. JACKSON,, 22 F.3d 583 (5th Cir. 1994)

. . . . § 30.01(1) (1989) (emphasis added). . . . Id. at § 30.01(2) (emphasis added). . . .

C. PATEL, B. v. C. GAYES, M. D. M. D., 984 F.2d 214 (7th Cir. 1993)

. . . words “wrongful conduct” for “negligence” in the damage instruction, which was modeled after IPI No. 30.01 . . .

SLONE, v. D. HERMAN, 983 F.2d 107 (8th Cir. 1993)

. . . Judge Ely’s order thus became final, and although it apparently was appealable under Missouri Rule 30.01 . . .

CONTINENTAL GRAIN COMPANY, v. PUERTO RICO MARITIME SHIPPING AUTHORITY,, 972 F.2d 426 (1st Cir. 1992)

. . . (b) For details regarding application of ■ Convention requirements to tankships, see § 30.01-6 of this . . .

BERMAN ENTERPRISES, INC. M. v. C. JORLING,, 793 F. Supp. 408 (E.D.N.Y. 1992)

. . . . § 30.01-30.30. Further regulations specific to oil tankers are found in 46 U.S.C. § 3703a. . . .

UNITED STATES v. SWEETEN,, 933 F.2d 765 (9th Cir. 1991)

. . . . § 30.01 (Vernon 1974) (emphasis added). . . .

In n HERN NDEZ ARVELO v. STUBBE, v. RIVERA ROURA, U. S. A., 125 B.R. 693 (Bankr. D.P.R. 1991)

. . . basis for the trustee’s avoiding power are explained in 2 Norton Bankruptcy Law and Practice, Sections 30.01 . . .

AZUL PACIFICO, INC. a v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a, 740 F. Supp. 772 (C.D. Cal. 1990)

. . . . § 30.01 (4th Ed.). . . .

TAYLOR v. UNITED STATES, 495 U.S. 575 (U.S. 1990)

. . . . §§30.01-30.05 (1989 and Supp. 1990) (defining burglary to include theft from coin-operated vending . . .

L. MORRIS, v. AMERICAN NATIONAL CAN CORPORATION,, 730 F. Supp. 1489 (E.D. Mo. 1989)

. . . through 9/8/89) 274.74 ($1,099.07 divided by 12 months/year = $91.58 X 3 for (9/8/89 through 12/8/89) 30.01 . . .

In HUNTER, HUNTER, v. MIXON, J. T. J., 101 B.R. 294 (Bankr. S.D. Ala. 1989)

. . . County Road No. 80; thence run south 64 degrees 15 minutes east along the right of way of said Road for 30.01 . . . County Road No. 80; thence run south 64 degrees 15 minutes east along the right of way of said Road for 30.01 . . .

UNITED STATES v. FLORES,, 875 F.2d 1110 (5th Cir. 1989)

. . . The different types of burglary under Texas law are now defined at §§ 30.01-30.05 of the Texas Penal . . .

UNITED STATES v. LEONARD,, 868 F.2d 1393 (5th Cir. 1989)

. . . . §§ 30.01 — 30.05 (Vernon 1989). . . . .

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, a v. W. R. GRACE COMPANY,, 691 F. Supp. 87 (N.D. Ill. 1988)

. . . to the one given in this case to the extent that each embodied Illinois Pattern Instruction (I.P.I.) 30.01 . . .

GWC RESTAURANTS, INC. v. HAWAIIAN FLOUR MILLS, INC. HFM In, 691 F. Supp. 247 (D. Haw. 1988)

. . . available to competing disfavored customers. 5 Von Kalinowski, ANTITRUST LAWS AND TRADE REGULATION § 30.01 . . .

In GENERAL COFFEE CORPORATION, CITY NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI v. GENERAL COFFEE CORPORATION,, 828 F.2d 699 (11th Cir. 1987)

. . . Norton, Bankruptcy Law and Practice §§ 29.01 and 30.01 (1982). . . .

In GENERAL COFFEE CORPORATION, CITY NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI v. GENERAL COFFEE CORPORATION,, 828 F.2d 699 (11th Cir. 1987)

. . . Norton, Bankruptcy Law and Practice §§ 29.01 and 30.01 (1982).‘ Section 544(a) in fact contemplates that . . .

UNITED STATES v. DOBY,, 665 F. Supp. 705 (N.D. Ind. 1987)

. . . 675 F.2d 905 (7th Cir. 1982); 1 Sand, Siffert, Longhlin & Pees, Modem Federal Criminal Instructions ¶ 30.01 . . .

UNITED STATES v. S. SHAKER, 665 F. Supp. 698 (N.D. Ind. 1987)

. . . Siffert, Longhlin & Pees, Modem Federal Criminal Instmctions ¶ 30.01 (1984). . . .

K. WESEMAN, v. MEEKER COUNTY,, 659 F. Supp. 1571 (D. Minn. 1987)

. . . See Minn.R.Juv.Ct.P. 30.01, et seq. . . .

TAMACHI, INC. v. CHRYSLER PLYMOUTH PONCE, INC., 651 F. Supp. 1359 (D.P.R. 1987)

. . . Von Kalmowski, Antitrust Laws and Regulations sec. 30.01; 80 Cong.Rec. 8111, 9419 (1936); see also, e.g . . .

VON NEUMANN, v. UNITED STATES, 786 F.2d 370 (9th Cir. 1986)

. . . Treasury; Commissioner of Customs; and District Director of Customs for the Port of Seattle, District 30.01 . . .

SWARTS, v. JOHNSON,, 628 F. Supp. 549 (W.D. Mich. 1986)

. . . See, e.g., PD-DWA 30.01; PD-DWA 30.06. . . .

UNITED STATES v. NASSAU MARINE CORP., 778 F.2d 1111 (5th Cir. 1985)

. . . . § 30.01-10 provides, in part: "When minor alterations or minor repairs of tank vessels become necessary . . .

W. BROWN, v. J. McGARR,, 774 F.2d 777 (7th Cir. 1985)

. . . See, e.g., Wis.S.C.R. 30.01 et seq. . . . See, e.g., Wis.S.C.R. 30.01 et seq. . . .

NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR WOMEN, WASHINGTON, D. C. CHAPTER v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION OF DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 736 F.2d 727 (D.C. Cir. 1984)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise §§ 30.01-30.04 (1958 & Supp.1970, 1982); id. § 30.00 (Supp.1970, 1982 . . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise §§ 30.01-30.04 (1958 & Supp.1970, 1982); id. § 30.00, 30.02 (1976) . . .

VON NEUMANN, v. UNITED STATES, 729 F.2d 657 (9th Cir. 1984)

. . . Treasury; Commissioner of Customs; and District Director of Customs for the Port of Seattle, District 30.01 . . .

UNITED STATES v. EDRINGTON,, 726 F.2d 1029 (5th Cir. 1984)

. . . See Devitt & Blackmar, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions, § 30.01 (3d Ed.1977 and Supp.1983). . . .

UNITED STATES v. NASSAU MARINE CORP., 577 F. Supp. 1475 (E.D. La. 1984)

. . . They contend that Section 30.01-10 of 46 C.F.R. is applicable and that any repairs to the barge, whether . . . Section 30.01-10, a navigation safety regulation, by the owners and operators of CBC-21 gives rise to . . .

In DLOTT, W. CLARK, v. C. KAHN,, 43 B.R. 789 (Bankr. D. Mass. 1983)

. . . Norton, Bankruptcy Law and Practice §§ 29.01 and 30.01 (1982). . . .

In R. LAMBDIN In BRATCHER Jo In L. DAVIS In R. WHITE, H. WALDSCHMIDT, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Jo F. L. R., 33 B.R. 11 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 1983)

. . . NORTON, BANKRUPTCY LAW AND PRACTICE § 29.01 and 30.01 (1982). . . .

In ANDERSON, J. McALLESTER, III, v. L. ALDRIDGE,, 30 B.R. 995 (M.D. Tenn. 1983)

. . . Norton, Bankruptcy Law and Practice §§ 29.01 and 30.01 (1982). . . .