The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH

Chapter 30
SHERIFFS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 30.04

30.04 Justification of sureties.—Each surety upon such bond shall make an affidavit that he or she is a resident of the county for which the officer is to be commissioned, and that the surety has sufficient visible property therein, unencumbered and not exempt from sale under legal process, to make good his or her bond.

History.—s. 10, ch. 3724, 1887; RS 1239; GS 1668; RGS 2873; CGL 4570; s. 3, ch. 17754, 1937; s. 1, ch. 20719, 1941; s. 174, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 30.04 on Google Scholar

F.S. 30.04 on Casetext

Amendments to 30.04

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 30.04

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 30.04.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

UNITED STATES v. HERROLD,, 883 F.3d 517 (5th Cir. 2018)

. . . PENAL CODE §§ 30.01(3), 30.02, 30.04. . . . Texas Penal Code § 30.04 criminalizes "burglary of vehicles," which a person violates when, "without . . . Texas draws a clear line between ordinary "vehicles," which are prosecuted under § 30.04 and defined . . . Penal Code § 30.04 (outlining separate "burglary of vehicles" offense). 544 U.S. at 31, 125 S.Ct. 1254 . . .

WELLIN, S. S. u a d v. J. WELLIN, S. v. J. J. v. S. u a d, 211 F. Supp. 3d 793 (D.S.C. 2016)

. . . Local Rule 30.04(C) provides that “[c]ounsel shall not direct or request that a witness not answer a . . . Though Local Civil Rule 30.04(c) provides that such motions must be filed within seven days of the suspension . . .

UNITED STATES v. MEMBRENO- DAVID,, 650 F. App'x 194 (5th Cir. 2016)

. . . Penal Code §§ 30.02, 30.04. . . .

UNITED STATES v. PINEDA- CABRERA,, 604 F. App'x 889 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . establish that he was convicted of generic theft because he was convicted under Texas Penal Code § 30.04 . . . Penal Code Ann. § 30.04 (emphasis added). . . .

GARCIA, v. H. HOLDER, Jr. U. S., 756 F.3d 839 (5th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 30.04(a) ("A person commits an offense if, without the effective consent of the owner, he breaks . . .

ESCUDERO- ARCINIEGA, v. H. HOLDER, Jr. U. S., 702 F.3d 781 (5th Cir. 2012)

. . . addressed this particular statute, we have examined the definition of burglary under Texas Penal Code § 30.04 . . . Pen.Code § 30.04(a). . . .

ESPARZA- RODRIGUEZ, v. H. HOLDER, Jr. U. S., 699 F.3d 821 (5th Cir. 2012)

. . . 2001, he was convicted of two Class A misdemeanors: burglary of a vehicle under Texas Penal Code § 30.04 . . .

UNITED STATES v. PANIAGUA, P., 481 F. App'x 162 (5th Cir. 2012)

. . . Penal Code § 30.04, from a felony to a Class A misdemeanor. See Rodriguez-Guzman, 56 F.3d at 21. . . . However, § 71.02(a)(1), not § 30.04, is at issue in this case, and engaging in organized criminal activity . . .

DRACUT SCHOOL COMMITTEE, v. BUREAU OF SPECIAL EDUCATION APPEALS OF THE MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, P. A. C. A., 737 F. Supp. 2d 35 (D. Mass. 2010)

. . . Code Regs. 30.04. . . . part of a TEAM evaluation,” as described within the special education statute. 114.3 Mass.Code Regs. 30.04 . . .

PULIDO- ALATORRE, v. H. HOLDER, Jr. U. S., 381 F. App'x 355 (5th Cir. 2010)

. . . Penal Code § 30.04 is a crime involving moral turpitude (CIMT); (2) whether his 2005 Texas state conviction . . . Penal Code 30.04(a) was a CIMT. . . . Section 30.04 of the Texas Penal Code provides: “A person commits an offense if, without the effective . . . a motor vehicle with intent to commit a theft, the BIA did not err in finding that Texas Penal Code 30.04 . . .

CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON, v. E. LAW L., 570 F.3d 574 (5th Cir. 2009)

. . . building or habitation under § 30.02 should be of the same nature as intrusion into a vehicle under § 30.04 . . .

SERNA- GUERRA, v. B. MUKASEY, U. S., 285 F. App'x 110 (5th Cir. 2008)

. . . Pen.Code § 30.04 with Tex. Pen.Code § 31.07. . . . .

UNITED STATES v. ALFARO- GRAMAJO, a. k. a., 283 F. App'x 677 (11th Cir. 2008)

. . . The Texas statute under which Alfaro-Gramajo was convicted provides: § 30.04 Burglary of Vehicles (a) . . . Penal Code § 30.04 (1993). To be convicted of burglary of a vehicle in violation of Tex. . . . Penal Code § 30.04, Alfaro-Gramajo must have had “the intent to commit any felony or theft.” . . . Penal Code § 30.04, which proscribes breaking into, or entering, a vehicle with the intent to commit . . . Penal Code § 30.04 describes a crime of violence for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 16(b). . . .

v., 31 Ct. Int'l Trade 1999 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2007)

. . . however, intended for the prevention or treatment of diseases or ailments are excluded (heading 30.03 or 30.04 . . .

MAXCELL BIOSCIENCE, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 533 F. Supp. 2d 1261 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2007)

. . . however, intended for the prevention or treatment of diseases or ailments are excluded (heading 30.03 or 30.04 . . .

TAKARA TRUST, On v. MOLEX INCORPORATED,, 429 F. Supp. 2d 960 (N.D. Ill. 2006)

. . . On November 15, 2004, Molex’s common stock opened at $30.04 and closed at $30.18, and its Class A stock . . . reasonable purchaser or seller of a seeu- Comm'on Stock Opened November 11, 2004 $28.58 November 15, 2004 $30.04 . . .

WARNER- LAMBERT COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES,, 425 F.3d 1381 (Fed. Cir. 2005)

. . . fungicidal or similar purposes, states: “the term ‘medica-ments’ within the meaning of heading 30.03 or 30.04 . . .

In KEATY, Sr. A. v. Sr., 397 F.3d 264 (5th Cir. 2005)

. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Manual, Federal Praotice and Procedure, §§ 30.04, 30.05 (1996) and Restatement . . .

In KEATY, Sr. A. v. Sr., 397 F.3d 264 (5th Cir. 2005)

. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Manual, Federal Practice and Procedure, §§ 30.04, 30.05 (1996) and Restatement . . .

VILLODAS, v. HEALTHSOUTH CORPORATION,, 338 F. Supp. 2d 1096 (D. Ariz. 2004)

. . . She received a pay increase in December 2002 and she currently earns a base pay of $30.04 per hour at . . .

WARNER- LAMBERT COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES,, 341 F. Supp. 2d 1272 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2004)

. . . Additionally, EN 30.04[ ] states ... that: This heading includes pastilles, tablets, drops, etc., of . . .

In PERKINELMER, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, 286 F. Supp. 2d 46 (D. Mass. 2003)

. . . On December 5, Summe sold 300,-000 shares at $30.04 per share, for gross proceeds of $9,012,000. . . .

ELDRED v. ASHCROFT, ATTORNEY GENERAL, 537 U.S. 186 (U.S. 2003)

. . . the work, “including without limitation, copyrights and renewals and/or extensions thereof”); 6 id., §30.04 . . .

UNITED STATES v. OJEDA- ESCOBAR,, 218 F. Supp. 2d 839 (W.D. Tex. 2002)

. . . United States for 15 years and attained permanent resident status, he was charged with violation of § 30.04 . . .

HERNANDEZ- MANCILLA, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,, 246 F.3d 1002 (7th Cir. 2001)

. . . . § 30.04(a) for burglary of a vehicle with the intent to commit theft therein did not constitute a “ . . .

DREW, v. STATE, 773 So. 2d 46 (Fla. 2000)

. . . Penal Code Ann., § 30.04(a) (Vernon Supp.2000). . . . Id. § 30.04(b)(1)-(2). . . . building or habitation under § 30.02 should be of the same nature as intrusion into a vehicle under § 30.04 . . .

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, v. H. J. HEINZ, COMPANY,, 116 F. Supp. 2d 190 (D.D.C. 2000)

. . . See generally Julian O. von Kalinowski et al., Antitrust Law and Trade Regulation, § 30.04[5] (2d ed.1999 . . .

SANTOS, v. RENO, U. S. V., 228 F.3d 591 (5th Cir. 2000)

. . . and REMAND with instructions to dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction. .Texas Penal Code § 30.04 . . . Penal Code Ann. § 30.04 (1987). . . . Penal Code Ann. § 30.04(c) (1994); see also Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 30.04(d) (2000). . . . . The 1993 act amending Texas Penal Code § 30.04 provides that: "(a) The change in law made by this article . . .

LOPEZ- ELIAS, v. RENO,, 209 F.3d 788 (5th Cir. 2000)

. . . . § 30.04(a) (West 1987), and sentenced to four years’ imprisonment, suspended. . . . Penal Code Ann. § 30.04(a) (West 1987). . . . Penal Code Ann. § 30.04(c) (West 1987). . . . Penal Code Ann. § 30.04(c) (West 1994); see also Tex Penal Code Ann. § 30.04(d) (West 1999). . . .

L. FULLER, v. BOWERSOX, 202 F.3d 1053 (8th Cir. 2000)

. . . See Mo.S.Ct.R.Crim.P. 30.04(c), Mo.S.Ct.R.Crim.P. 30.04(e), Mo.S.Ct. R.Crim.P. 30 .04(f). Mr. . . .

In STANGEL, STANGEL, v. UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,, 222 B.R. 289 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 1998)

. . . Moore, et al, Moore's Manual: Federal Practice and Procedure § 30.04[1] (1998) (citations omitted) (emphasis . . .

MILLER, v. LOCK, 108 F.3d 868 (8th Cir. 1997)

. . . shall be filed within thirty days after the filing of the transcript in the appeal pursuant to Rule 30.04 . . .

UNITED STATES v. RAMOS- GARCIA,, 95 F.3d 369 (5th Cir. 1996)

. . . . § 30.04 (Vernon 1994). . . . This Court unequivocally held that conviction for burglary of a vehicle under § 30.04 of the pre-1994 . . .

BUCHANAN Jr. v. UNITED STATES, 892 F. Supp. 1073 (N.D. Ill. 1995)

. . . See Id. at 638; 8 Mertens, Law of Federal Income Taxation, § 30.04 at p. 31 (1989). . . . recognizing a “fact and circumstances” approach to this issue); 8 Mertens, Law of Federal Income Taxation, § 30.04 . . .

UNITED STATES v. RODRIGUEZ- GUZMAN, a k a, 56 F.3d 18 (5th Cir. 1995)

. . . . § 30.04 (pre-1994 amendment) (classifying burglary of a vehicle as a third degree felony). . . . Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 30.04 (West 1994). . United States v. . . .

PAN AM CORPORATION, v. DELTA AIR LINES, INC. v. PAN AM CORPORATION, Am, 175 B.R. 438 (S.D.N.Y. 1994)

. . . Queenan, Jr. et al., 5 Chapter 11 Theory & Practice § 30.04 (1st ed. 1994) (citing In re Nelson, 84 B.R . . .

K. JOHNSEN, v. E. COLLINS, Sr., 875 F. Supp. 1571 (S.D. Ga. 1994)

. . . Rules & Reg. at 506-10-30.04. . . .

LOWE- BEY, v. GROOSE,, 28 F.3d 816 (8th Cir. 1994)

. . . shall be filed within thirty days after the filing of the transcript in the appeal pursuant to Rule 30.04 . . .

CLARK, v. GROOSE,, 16 F.3d 960 (8th Cir. 1994)

. . . shall be filed within thirty days after the filing of the transcript in the appeal pursuant to Rule 30.04 . . .

v., 17 Ct. Int'l Trade 374 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1993)

. . . For the purposes of headings Nos. 30.03 and 30.04 and of Note 3(d) to this Chapter, the following are . . .

In MILLER, 140 B.R. 499 (Bankr. E.D. Ark. 1992)

. . . Moore, et al, Moore’s Manual: Federal Practice and Procedure, § 30.04[6] (1990); 49 C.J.S. . . .

In D. SMITH, UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, v. D. SMITH, A. L., 142 B.R. 862 (Bankr. E.D. Ark. 1992)

. . . Moore, et al., Moore’s Manual: Federal Practice and Procedure § 30.04[6] (1990); 49 C.J.S. . . .

In AEG ACQUISITION CORPORATION, OFFICIAL UNSECURED CREDITORS COMMITTEE, v. ZENITH PRODUCTIONS, LTD., 127 B.R. 34 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 1991)

. . . Norton, Bankruptcy Law and Practice § 30.04 (1990). . . .

In n HERN NDEZ ARVELO v. STUBBE, v. RIVERA ROURA, U. S. A., 125 B.R. 693 (Bankr. D.P.R. 1991)

. . . Law and Practice, Sections 30.01 thru 30.06 (1988). . 2 Norton Bankruptcy Law and Practice, Section 30.04 . . .

H. KARELITZ, v. DAMSON OIL CORPORATION,, 820 F.2d 529 (1st Cir. 1987)

. . . Fox, Corporate Acquisitions and Mergers § 30.04(3) (1986) (citations omitted). . . .

In E. WLODARSKI, a k a W. E., 52 B.R. 856 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1985)

. . . . § 30.04 (1981). . . .

N. ALLEN, v. UNITED STATES,, 495 A.2d 1145 (D.C. 1985)

. . . See generally 8A Moore’s Federal Practice, supra, If 30.04[3]. . . . harmless, it might nevertheless not justify reversal as plain error. 8A MooRe’s Federal PRACTICE, supra, ¶ 30.04 . . .

WHITTENBERG, Mr. P. NAACP, Dr. T. H. v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF GREENVILLE COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA,, 607 F. Supp. 289 (D.S.C. 1985)

. . . 30.69 25.67 9.70 21.87 29.65 12.78 18.96 24.70 18.75 18.96 24.72 38.57 21.00 22.67 21.02 9.88 21.29 30.04 . . .

UNITED STATES v. PEPE UNITED STATES v. FACCHIANO,, 747 F.2d 632 (11th Cir. 1984)

. . . Moore, Moore's Federal Practice f[ 30.04, at 30-21 (2d ed. 1984). . . .

HOLT, v. DUNN, St. St., 741 F.2d 169 (8th Cir. 1984)

. . . Rules of Crim.P. 30.04(c) and (f); Special Rules of the Missouri Court of Appeals for the Eastern District . . .

NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR WOMEN, WASHINGTON, D. C. CHAPTER v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION OF DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 736 F.2d 727 (D.C. Cir. 1984)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise §§ 30.01-30.04 (1958 & Supp.1970, 1982); id. § 30.00 (Supp.1970, 1982 . . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise §§ 30.01-30.04 (1958 & Supp.1970, 1982); id. § 30.00, 30.02 (1976) . . .

DELONEY, v. W. J. ESTELLE, Jr., 713 F.2d 1080 (5th Cir. 1983)

. . . Tex.Penal Code Ann. arts. 12.34, 30.04(c) (Vernon 1974). . . . Tex.Penal Code Ann. art. 30.04(c) (Vernon 1974). . . . .

UNITED STATES v. F. LANE,, 708 F.2d 1394 (9th Cir. 1983)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 30.04[1], at 30-22 (2d ed. 1982). . . .

N. POOLE, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,, 540 F. Supp. 105 (S.D. Ohio 1982)

. . . Davis Administrative Law Treatise § 30.04 (1958)), the Supreme Court has stated that the agency’s order . . .

ENRIGHT v. BENEFICIAL FINANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC., 527 F. Supp. 1149 (N.D.N.Y. 1981)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise §§ 30.01, 30.04 (1958) (in administrative law context, Professor Davis . . .

UNITED STATES v. CLEMENTE,, 640 F.2d 1069 (2d Cir. 1981)

. . . Moore Federal Practice ¶ 30.04 (2d ed. 1980). IV. . . .

UNITED STATES v. M. SALINAS, Jr., 601 F.2d 1279 (5th Cir. 1979)

. . . Amendment Advisory Committee Notes, Title 18 U.S.C.A. at 240 (1975); 8A Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 30.04 . . .

UNITED STATES, v. WRIGHT,, 5 M.J. 106 (C.M.A. 1978)

. . . not preclude prosecution of burglary of an automobile, as conduct proscribed by Texas Penal Code § 30.04 . . .

UNITED STATES v. L. SELLARS, XXX- XX- XXXX U. S. E,, 5 M.J. 808 (A.C.M.R. 1977)

. . . [Texas Penal Code, § 30.04]. . . .

UNITED STATES v. LAMB, Jr., 529 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1975)

. . . Moore, supra, ¶ 30.04 at pp. 30-9 to 30-11; 8A id. ¶ 51.02. . . .

A. DONOVAN v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,, 520 F.2d 1316 (2d Cir. 1975)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 30.04 at 209-10. . . .

EBY, a v. REB REALTY, INC., 495 F.2d 646 (9th Cir. 1974)

. . . Davis, supra at § 30.04. . . .

HAMILTON v. LOVE,, 358 F. Supp. 338 (E.D. Ark. 1973)

. . . Plaintiffs’ November 15, 1972 “Motion to Tax Costs” in the amount of $30.04 is granted. . . .

In FLYING W AIRWAYS, INC. In a X, 332 F. Supp. 56 (E.D. Pa. 1971)

. . . See 2 Collier’s, Bankruptcy paras. 30.01-30.04 (14th Ed. 1971). . . . .

UNITED STATES v. McCLAIN,, 440 F.2d 241 (D.C. Cir. 1971)

. . . Moore, Federal Practice § 30.04. . Golden v. . . .

W. B. CLARK, v. UNITED STATES, 405 F.2d 166 (5th Cir. 1968)

. . . United States, 5 Cir., 1952, 200 F.2d 597; 8 Moore, Federal Practice ¶30.04, pp. 30-8, 30-9 and ¶52.03 . . .

RAMER, v. UNITED STATES CHURCH, v. UNITED STATES, 390 F.2d 564 (9th Cir. 1968)

. . . United States, 325 U.S. 91, 107, 65 S.Ct. 1031, 89 L.Ed. 1495 (1945); see 8 Moore’s Federal Practice § 30.04 . . .

W. WIRTZ, v. HARPER BUFFING MACHINE COMPANY, 280 F. Supp. 376 (D. Conn. 1968)

. . . Cromwell, Conn. 9/10/65 10/ 7/65 $ 30.04 Benjamin T. Lord 45 Shetucket Ave. . . .

HARDIN, MAYOR OF TAZEWELL, v. KENTUCKY UTILITIES CO., 390 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1968)

. . . See 4 Davis, supra, at § 30.04. . . .

FRIEDMAN, v. UNITED STATES, 381 F.2d 155 (8th Cir. 1967)

. . . United States, 8 Cir., 1927, 17 F.2d 12, 14; 8 Moore’s Federal Practice, § 30.04, n. 6. . . .

MOORE, v. UNITED STATES, 356 F.2d 39 (5th Cir. 1966)

. . . . ¶30.03 [2] and ¶30.04. . . . .

CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CO. v. ROGERS, 194 F.2d 582 (5th Cir. 1952)

. . . that the legislature did not restrict the context of each section to a single subject (See Sections 30.04 . . .

ROGERS v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CO., 95 F. Supp. 342 (W.D. La. 1951)

. . . Section 30.04 of the Insurance Code, LSA-RS 22:1404, dealing with making of rates, reads in part as follows . . .

SHAW v. EASTERN TRANSP. CO. THE RUTH SHAW, 52 F. Supp. 202 (E.D.N.Y. 1943)

. . . 30.26 Noon 30.22 1 p.m. 30.18 2 o’clock 30.15 3 " 30.12 4 “ 30.10 5 “ 30.11 6 « 30.10 7 “ 30.06 8 « 30.04 . . .

In STATE THREAD CO. GILMAN v. DAVIS. DAVIS v. GILMAN, 126 F.2d 296 (6th Cir. 1942)

. . . As commented in Collier on Bankruptcy, 14th Ed., Vol. 2, Sec. 30.04, page 1285: “Some courts have been . . .

THE T. J. HOOPER. THE NORTHERN NO. NO. THE MONTROSE. EASTERN TRANSP. CO. NEW ENGLAND COAL COKE CO. v. NORTHERN BARGE CORPORATION HARTWELL SON, v. SAME, 53 F.2d 107 (S.D.N.Y. 1931)

. . . From then on, there was little change in the conditions until 7:35 a. m., when the barometer fell to 30.04 . . .