Cases from cite.case.law:

J. TRUMP, v. R. VANCE, Jr., 140 S. Ct. 2412 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . § 30.10(4)(a) (West 2010) (statute tolled when defendant outside the jurisdiction); see also People . . .

IN RE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, In, 366 F. Supp. 3d 256 (D. P.R. 2019)

. . . Releases...359 30.7 Exculpation...359 30.8 Appointments Related Litigation...361 30.9 Bar Order...361 30.10 . . . Released Parties (whether arising under federal, state or foreign law, and regardless of where asserted). 30.10 . . .

IN RE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, In, 363 F. Supp. 3d 220 (D. P.R. 2019)

. . . Releases...322 30.7 Exculpation...321 30.8 Appointments Related Litigation...324 30.9 Bar Order...324 30.10 . . . Released Parties (whether arising under federal, state or foreign law, and regardless of where asserted). 30.10 . . .

QUINIO, v. AALA,, 344 F. Supp. 3d 464 (E.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . See NY Criminal Procedure Law § 30.10. . . .

GUERRERO, v. LAMANNA,, 325 F. Supp. 3d 476 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . statute of limitations, the New York courts have held that "[t]he statute of limitations under CPL 30.10 . . . CPL § 190.65.(1) (sufficiency of indictments); CPL § 200.70(2)(b) (amendments to indictments); CPL § 30.10 . . .

PRESIDENTIAL HOSPITALITY, LLC, a a v. WYNDHAM HOTEL GROUP, LLC, a a a, 333 F. Supp. 3d 1179 (D.N.M. 2018)

. . . O'Connor on Construction Law § 21:30.10, n.2 (collecting statutes). . . . O'Connor on Construction Law § 21:30.10. See Deborah J. . . .

J L FAMILY, L. L. C. v. BHP BILLITON PETROLEUM PROPERTIES N. A. L. P,, 293 F. Supp. 3d 615 (W.D. La. 2018)

. . . . §§ 30.10, 103.1 (2017). B. . . .

T D X ENERGY, L. L. C. v. CHESAPEAKE OPERATING, INCORPORATED,, 857 F.3d 253 (5th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 30.10(A)(2)(e). . . .

MERCK SHARP DOHME B. V. v. WARNER CHILCOTT COMPANY, LLC US LLC,, 212 F. Supp. 3d 531 (D. Del. 2016)

. . . (JTX-30.10.) . . . (JTX-30.10.) This falls within the claimed ranges. . . . (Compare JTX-30.6-7 and JTX-30.10 with JTX-1.5-6, Exs. 1, 2, 4, and 5). . . . (JTX-30.10.) Dr. . . .

SIMPSON, v. TOWN OF WARWICK POLICE DEPARTMENT,, 159 F. Supp. 3d 419 (S.D.N.Y. 2016)

. . . Law § 30.10 sets forth the relevant limitations periods. . . . Law § 30.10(2)(b)-(c). . . . Law § 30.10(4)(a). . . . Law § 30.10(4)(a). . . . Law § 30.10, not § 30.30, that sets forth the applicable limitations periods: five years for third-degree . . .

LERNER NEW YORK, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 908 F. Supp. 2d 1313 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2013)

. . . The Bodyshaper Is Properly Classified in Subheading 61U.30.10, HTSUS Because the court concludes, for . . .

DICKMAN, v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., 876 F. Supp. 2d 166 (E.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . Account Summary” shows “Previous Charges” in the amount of $178.64 and “New Charges” in the amount of $30.10 . . .

RACK ROOM SHOES, SKIZ LLC, v. UNITED STATES,, 856 F. Supp. 2d 1291 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2012)

. . . knitted or crocheted, other than er than those of heading 6104 those of heading 6103 12 Subheading: 30.10 . . . windbreakers, and similar articles, knitted or crocheted, other than those of heading 6103 Subheading: 30.10 . . . Heading: 6209: Babies’ garments and Heading: 6205: Men’s or boy’s shirts clothing accessories Subheading: 30.10 . . . 30.30: Of cotton, Other, Other Heading: 6209: Babies’ garments and clothing accessories Subheading: 30.10 . . .

UNITED STATES v. SANFORD, LTD., 859 F. Supp. 2d 102 (D.D.C. 2012)

. . . . § 30.10-42, provides: The term machinery space means any space that contains machinery and related . . .

AHLQUIST, a v. CITY OF CRANSTON, F. STROM,, 840 F. Supp. 2d 507 (D.R.I. 2012)

. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Manual-Federal Practice and Procedure § 30.10[1] (2006)), see also Payne v. . . .

CROSS, v. PEREZ,, 823 F. Supp. 2d 142 (E.D.N.Y. 2011)

. . . was aware of the potential statute of limitations defense and the possible application of the CPL § 30.10 . . .

UNITED STATES v. EGAN MARINE CORPORATION, E, EMC- v., 808 F. Supp. 2d 1065 (N.D. Ill. 2011)

. . . Id. at § 30.10-22. . . . Id. at § 30.10-15. The EMC-423 was certified to carry Grade B cargo. . . . matter of law Exxon loaded a Grade E cargo of CSO onto the barge prior to the accident. 46 C.F.R. § 30.10 . . .

IGART A, v. UNITED STATES, 626 F.3d 592 (1st Cir. 2010)

. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Manual: Federal Practice and Procedure § 30.10[1] (2006)) (internal quotation marks . . .

PORTALATIN, v. GRAHAM, v. M. v. M., 624 F.3d 69 (2d Cir. 2010)

. . . reprinted in proposed New York Penal Law (Study Bill, 1964 Senate Int. 3918, Assembly Int. 5376), § 30.10 . . .

EOG RESOURCES, INC. v. CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORP. LP,, 605 F.3d 260 (5th Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 30.10(A)(2)(b) (hereinafter the “Risk-Fee Statute”). . . .

CITIZENS BANKING CORPORATION, v. CITIZENS FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. PLC,, 320 F. App'x 341 (6th Cir. 2009)

. . . Thomas McCarthy, 5 McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition § 30.10 (2008); see also Audi AG v. . . .

KASSEM, v. WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER,, 513 F.3d 251 (D.C. Cir. 2008)

. . . . § 30.10(a)(2). The public policy exception was itself limited in Nolting v. . . .

YETIV v. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT,, 503 F.3d 1087 (9th Cir. 2007)

. . . . § 30.10. . . .

UNITED STATES v. RODRIGUEZ- PACHECO,, 475 F.3d 434 (1st Cir. 2007)

. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Manual—Federal Practice and Procedure § 30.10[1] (2006) (footnotes omitted). . . .

BURNS, v. CITARELLA, J., 443 F. Supp. 2d 464 (S.D.N.Y. 2006)

. . . . § 30.10(2)(c) (a prosecution for a misdemeanor must be commenced within two years of the commission . . .

HORNBECK OFFSHORE TRANSPORTATION, LLC, v. UNITED STATES COAST GUARD,, 424 F. Supp. 2d 37 (D.D.C. 2006)

. . . . § 30.10-65, 151.03-51. Constructed in 1976, see Admin. R. at 4; First Am. . . .

ABUSAID, Jr. a. k. a. v. HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, s a s, 405 F.3d 1298 (11th Cir. 2005)

. . . . §§ 30.10, 80.11. . . .

TURNER A- v. H. SABOURIN,, 217 F.R.D. 136 (E.D.N.Y. 2003)

. . . Law § 30.10(2)(a). . . . Law § 30.10(2)(b). . . . Law § 30.10(4) (emphasis added). . . . It is not self-evident that the tolling provision of section 30.10(4) should apply in the instant case . . . (2)(b), with a maximum extension of five additional years pursuant to section 30.10(4). . . .

NATIONAL SATELLITE SPORTS, INC. v. TIME WARNER ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY, L. P. v. L. P., 255 F. Supp. 2d 307 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)

. . . . § 30.10(2)(c). . . .

KINESOFT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, v. SOFTBANK HOLDINGS INC. D., 139 F. Supp. 2d 869 (N.D. Ill. 2001)

. . . McCauliff, Corbin on Contracts, § 30.10, at 19 (Rev. ed.1999) (conditions made by agreement of the parties . . .

MURPHY, v. UNITED STATES, 199 F.3d 599 (2d Cir. 1999)

. . . Law § 30.10(2)(b), (3)(f) (establishing a five-year limitation period for certain felonies, but noting . . .

GRIFFIN, Jr. v. F. MANN,, 156 F.3d 288 (2d Cir. 1998)

. . . repeated exposure to penal sanctions_” Commission Staff Notes on the Proposed New York Penal Law, § 30.10 . . .

MARITRANS INC. L. P. v. UNITED STATES, 40 Fed. Cl. 790 (Fed. Cl. 1998)

. . . . § 30.10-69 (identical definition). 46 C.F.R. § 30.10-65 states that "[t]he term tank barge means a . . .

A. RUSSELL, v. SMITH, 68 F.3d 33 (2d Cir. 1995)

. . . See N.Y.Penal Law § 125.25 (defining second degree murder as a class A felony); N.Y.Crim.Proc.Law § 30.10 . . .

CULLENS, v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,, 29 F.3d 1489 (11th Cir. 1994)

. . . Pleadings, Filings 181.955 Trial Preparation 93.12 Trial 44.80 Post-Trial (other than fee petition) 30.10 . . .

BERMAN ENTERPRISES, INC. M. v. C. JORLING,, 3 F.3d 602 (2d Cir. 1993)

. . . . § 30.10(b). . . . N.Y.C.R.R. § 622.14(a), as are revocations of the vessel licenses, see N.Y.Nav.Law § 174; 17 N.Y.C.R.R. § 30.10 . . .

CULLENS, v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, D. E., 827 F. Supp. 756 (M.D. Ga. 1993)

. . . Research, Drafting of Court Pleadings, Filings 93.12 93.12 TPX Trial Preparation 44.80 44.80 TXX Trial 30.10 . . . 30.10 XXX Post-Trial (other than fee petition) 25.10 21.00 FXX Fee Petition 573.045 TOTAL CALCULATED . . .

NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. RESSEGUIE C., 980 F.2d 226 (3d Cir. 1992)

. . . generally considered reasonable for his own protection.” 3 No-Fault and Uninsured Motorist Coverage § 30.10 . . .

MEEK, v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA,, 805 F. Supp. 967 (S.D. Fla. 1992)

. . . there were 7,449 Non-Hispanic Whites (33.90%), 7,458 Non-Hispanic Blacks (34.50%), and 6,622 Hispanics (30.10% . . .

UNITED STATES v. E. MILLS UNITED STATES v. B. WONSON, 964 F.2d 1186 (D.C. Cir. 1992)

. . . N.Y.Crim.Proc.Law § 30.10 (McKinney 1981). N.C.Gen.Stat. § 15A-701 (1991). . . .

BERMAN ENTERPRISES, INC. M. v. C. JORLING,, 793 F. Supp. 408 (E.D.N.Y. 1992)

. . . the Commissioner intended to revoke the licenses altogether pursuant to powers provided in 17 NYCRR § 30.10 . . . appear to explicitly authorize the Commissioner to revoke licenses as implicitly claimed in 17 NYCRR § 30.10 . . .

SCHMIDT, v. P. BISHOP, USA, 779 F. Supp. 321 (S.D.N.Y. 1991)

. . . N.Y.Penal Law § 130.60 (McKinney 1987); N.Y.Crim.Proc.Law § 30.10(2)(c) (McKinney 1981). . . .

CHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION, v. U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,, 885 F.2d 1276 (5th Cir. 1989)

. . . $22,990.50 Category A: 100% * 121.00 121.00 Category B: 100% * 23.25 23.25 Category E: 25% * 120.40 30.10 . . .

KRAUSE, v. R. O. BENNETT, Jr., 887 F.2d 362 (2d Cir. 1989)

. . . Criminal Procedure Law § 30.10(2)(c)(McKinney 1981). . . .

PROFFITT v. MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY OF BOROUGH OF MORRISVILLE,, 716 F. Supp. 845 (E.D. Pa. 1989)

. . . Gelbaum, Esq.136.70 Charles Elliott, Esq.30.10 Kenneth Cooper, Esq.6.70 Total Attorney Hours. 1378.20 . . . Oswald concerning the issues of attorneys’ fees: Claimed Reduced by 20% Charles Elliott 30.10 24.10 Beth . . .

In ENDRES, Jr. f d b a MARINE MIDLAND BANK, N. A. v. ENDRES, Jr., 103 B.R. 49 (Bankr. N.D.N.Y. 1989)

. . . McKinney 1988); id. at § 190.65 (scheme to defraud in the first degree, Class E felony); CRIM.PROC.LAW § 30.10 . . . PROC.LAW, supra, at § 30.10(4). . . .

KARL KOCH ERECTING CO. INC. v. NEW YORK CONVENTION CENTER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, NEW YORK CONVENTION CENTER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, v. KARL KOCH ERECTING CO. INC., 838 F.2d 656 (2d Cir. 1988)

. . . Article 30.10 of the contract, entitled “Limitations on Actions,” provided in part that: “No action or . . .

KARL KOCH ERECTING CO. INC. v. NEW YORK CONVENTION CENTER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, NEW YORK CONVENTION CENTER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, v. KARL KOCH ERECTING CO. INC., 656 F. Supp. 464 (S.D.N.Y. 1987)

. . . Article 30.10 of the contract, entitled “Limitations on Actions,” provides in relevant part that “[n] . . .

WHITE, v. JONES,, 636 F. Supp. 772 (S.D.N.Y. 1986)

. . . Moreover, at the time of trial, the applicable five-year statute of limitations, see CPL § 30.10(2)(b . . .

ACLI INTERNATIONAL COMMODITY SERVICES, INC. A. C. v. BANQUE POPULAIRE SUISSE, S. A., 110 F.R.D. 278 (S.D.N.Y. 1986)

. . . Law § 30.10(4)(a)(i) (McKinney 1981). . . .

CROCKETT, v. UNIROYAL, INC. Co. Co. CROCKETT, v. UNIROYAL, INC. Co. Co., 772 F.2d 1524 (11th Cir. 1985)

. . . under Parts 261-265, or Part 270 or 124 of this chapter or to the notification requirements of section 30.10 . . . Parts 261-265, and Part 270 and 124 of the chapter and to the notification requirements of section 30.10 . . .

UNITED STATES v. CASTELLANO,, 610 F. Supp. 1359 (S.D.N.Y. 1985)

. . . . § 30.10(2)(a) (McKinney 1981). . . .

A. BIECHELE, J. A. v. CEDAR POINT, INC. S. Co. A. A. Jr. L. Jr. S. Jr. A. S. C., 747 F.2d 209 (6th Cir. 1984)

. . . announced that it would make a tender offer for an additional 11 per cent of the Cedar Point shares at $30.10 . . .

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, AFL- CIO, v. SOUTHWEST SECURITY EQUIPMENT CORPORATION,, 736 F.2d 1332 (9th Cir. 1984)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 30.10 (1958) (reviewing court may overturn agency’s application . . .

CRAIK, v. MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY BOARD St. J. R. A. G. C. B. P. W. G. J. v. V. L. J. A. A. C. A. H. G. E. C. J. L. R. J. B. D., 731 F.2d 465 (8th Cir. 1984)

. . . general faculty members prefer to and do retain courses they have once taught, V. 2.54-55; V. 14.58; V. 30.10 . . .

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. D. McCARTHY,, 578 F. Supp. 45 (D. Mass. 1983)

. . . applicability of the fourth exception contained in the Act. 1 Larson & Larson, Employment Discrimination: Sex § 30.10 . . .

HULSH v. R. HULSH,, 431 So. 2d 658 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . Page On Wills, supra § 30.10. . . .

JOHNSON, v. J. SMITH,, 548 F. Supp. 134 (S.D.N.Y. 1982)

. . . N.Y.Crim.Proc.Law § 30.10(2)(b) (McKinney 1981). . . . N.Y.Crim.Proc.Law § 30.10(2)(a) (McKinney 1981). . United States v. . . .

CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, a J. J. M. H. III, a a F. a v. M. KLUTZNICK, P. S., 503 F. Supp. 663 (E.D. Pa. 1980)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, §§ 30.08, 30.10 (1958). . . .

MARSHALL, v. GEORGIA SOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE, Jr. R. A. A. Jr. O. Jr. D. W. T. R. H. III, P., 489 F. Supp. 1322 (M.D. Ga. 1980)

. . . Larson, Employment Discrimination: Sex § 30.10; Peltier v. . . .

PRECIOUS METALS ASSOCIATES, INC. v. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION,, 620 F.2d 900 (1st Cir. 1980)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law § 30.10, pp. 250-251 (1958). Id. at 185-86. . . .

AMERICAN DIVERSIFIED CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES, 609 F.2d 442 (Ct. Cl. 1979)

. . . 15.92 18.95 DSA-0921 2,250 476,485 311,145 165,068 34.64 53.05 DSA-1119* 484 101,843 71,130 30,655 30.10 . . .

AMERICAN DIVERSIFIED CORPORATION AND JON- DELL, INC. v. THE UNITED STATES, 221 Ct. Cl. 364 (Ct. Cl. 1979)

. . . 17,756 15.92 18.95 DSA-0921 2,250 476,485 311,145 165,068 34.64 53.05 DSA-1119 484 101,843 71,130 30,655 30.10 . . .

UNIROYAL, INC. AFL- CIO- CLC, v. MARSHALL, J., 482 F. Supp. 364 (D.D.C. 1979)

. . . . §§ 60-30.9, 30.10, 30.11, 30.15. . . .

GOODRICH v. GONZALEZ, P., 451 F. Supp. 747 (E.D.N.Y. 1978)

. . . CPL § 30.10(2)(c), (4)(b). . . . .

BANGOR AND AROOSTOOK RAILROAD COMPANY, v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION, MAINE CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES W. MESERVE H. v. UNITED STATES, 574 F.2d 1096 (1st Cir. 1978)

. . . See generally 4 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 30.10 (1958). . . .

F. KLEIN, v. SMITH,, 559 F.2d 189 (2d Cir. 1977)

. . . Criminal Procedure Law § 30.10(2)(b) (5 years). . . .

ARTHUR LIPPER CORPORATION III, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,, 551 F.2d 915 (2d Cir. 1977)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 30.10, at 250-52 (1958). . . .

UNITED VAN LINES, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 545 F.2d 613 (8th Cir. 1976)

. . . Davis, Treatise on Administrative Law § 30.10, at 250-51 (1958). . . .

F. H. Co. v., 66 T.C. 729 (T.C. 1976)

. . . .)_ 2,495.19 1,564,433.32 (69.68%) Other securities and cash 675,760.19 (30.10%) 2.240.193.51 Note transferred . . .

ALLIED TOWING CORPORATION, TANKBARGE ATC, 409 F. Supp. 180 (E.D. Va. 1976)

. . . testified that the grades of oil have various flash points. 46 Code of Federal Regulations, Sections 30.10 . . .

UNITED STATES v. TAVOULARIS, 515 F.2d 1070 (2d Cir. 1975)

. . . Consol.Laws, c. 40, 1967), a class D felony with a limitation period of five years, Crim.Proc.Law § 30.10 . . . degree, Penal Law § 105.05, a class A misdemeanor with a limitation period of two years, Crim.Proc.Law § 30.10 . . . On the record before us we cannot determine whether the fugitive provisions of Crim.Proc.Law § 30.10, . . . to speculate on whether the New York courts might imaginatively construe the tolling provision of § 30.10 . . .

In ESTATE H. CAMPBELL,, 288 So. 2d 528 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . provision of the will, in whole or in part, full effect must be given to such intention. 4 Page on Wills § 30.10 . . .

BUTZ, SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE, v. GLOVER LIVESTOCK COMMISSION CO. INC., 411 U.S. 182 (U.S. 1973)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law §30.10, pp. 250-251 (1958). . . .

SHAPIRO, v. E. FERRANDINA,, 355 F. Supp. 563 (S.D.N.Y. 1973)

. . . Penal Law § 30.10. . . .

OPELIKA NURSING HOME, INC. a v. L. RICHARDSON, L., 356 F. Supp. 1338 (M.D. Ala. 1973)

. . . broadly if it is determined to be in the nature of adjudication.” 4 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 30.10 . . .

TRANS OCEAN VAN SERVICE v. THE UNITED STATES, 200 Ct. Cl. 122 (Ct. Cl. 1972)

. . . plaintiff claims that, in lieu of the line-haul charge paid of $484.01 (based on the single-factor rate of $30.10 . . . performed from origin to Bochester, New York, in the amount of $246.82, based on the single-factor rate of $30.10 . . .

BOUCHER v. A. MINTER,, 349 F. Supp. 1240 (D. Mass. 1972)

. . . 217.60 247.70 277.70 II 84.70 133.00 163.00 193.10 223.10 III 100.30 148.60 178.60 208.70 238.70 IV 30.10 . . .

FEDERAL COMMERCE AND NAVIGATION COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES, 305 F. Supp. 1025 (S.D.N.Y. 1969)

. . . Although about twice a year ships drawing v. to 30.10 feet can transit the channel, no vessel is known . . .

UNITED STATES v. KENYON FARMS, INC., 397 F.2d 792 (9th Cir. 1968)

. . . clause relied upon by appellant appears on the first page of a standard printed form denominated FHA 30.10 . . .

D. MEEHAN, v. W. MACY, Jr., 392 F.2d 822 (D.C. Cir. 1968)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise §, 30.10 (1958). . . . .

E. D IPPOLITO, A. D C. D B. D D D a v. AMERICAN OIL COMPANY, a a a a a a a a a a, 272 F. Supp. 310 (S.D.N.Y. 1967)

. . . See 4 Moore, Federal Practice ¶ 30.10, at 2033 n. 1 (2d ed. 1966). . . .

McGOWAN v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA,, 372 F.2d 39 (3d Cir. 1967)

. . . the insured’s written request, the premium payments were changed to a monthly basis, which came to $30.10 . . .

RPTZ- PATCO, INC. v. PACIFIC INLAND NAVIGATION COMPANY, a, 253 F. Supp. 796 (D. Or. 1966)

. . . It would seem that he should be deserving of more than applause for a job well done. . 46 C.F.R. 30.10 . . .

UNITED STATES v. RUSSELL ELECTRIC CO., 250 F. Supp. 2 (S.D.N.Y. 1965)

. . . See 5 Wachtel and McBride, Government Contracts, §§ 30.10, 30.20, 33.60, 33.60 [2], 33.60 [3]. . . .

UNITED STATES NERSESIAN, v. M. FAY,, 239 F. Supp. 142 (S.D.N.Y. 1965)

. . . Proposed Penal Law § 30.10 & pp. 284-86 (1964). . Cf. Wright v. . . .

M. v., 35 T.C. 720 (T.C. 1961)

. . . represented the total number of medical contracts terminated (2,293) during that period multiplied by $30.10 . . .

ABBOTT v. UNITED STATES, 175 F. Supp. 917 (Ct. Cl. 1959)

. . . . $ 30.10 1949 ....................... 11.90 1950 ....................... 71.40 1951 ................ . . .

PAN AMERICAN FINANCE CO. v. TUCKER,, 11 Fla. Supp. 95 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1957)

. . . adjudged and decreed that the defendants shall have and recover from the plaintiff costs in the amount of $30.10 . . .

ATLANTIC CRUSHED COKE COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES, 138 Ct. Cl. 505 (Ct. Cl. 1957)

. . . between Seger and Breniser, with water standing at approximately 1,000 feet in the Millwood area, was 30.10 . . .

NEW YORK, N. H. H. R. CO. v. ZERMANI, 200 F.2d 240 (1st Cir. 1952)

. . . Zermani’s life expectancy was 30.10 years. . . .

CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CO. v. ROGERS, 194 F.2d 582 (5th Cir. 1952)

. . . Section 30.10, LSA-R.S. 22:1410, provides for deviations from the regular casualty insurance rates upon . . . legislature did not restrict the context of each section to a single subject (See Sections 30.04 and 30.10 . . .

ROGERS v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CO., 95 F. Supp. 342 (W.D. La. 1951)

. . . Section 30.10, LSA-RS 22:1410, provides for the method of deviation from the rates which were in existence . . .

THE BRILLIANT, 64 F. Supp. 612 (E.D. Pa. 1945)

. . . weather was calm with light to medium fog prevailing, and the barometer on the tug remained steady at 30.10 . . .

SHAW v. EASTERN TRANSP. CO. THE RUTH SHAW, 52 F. Supp. 202 (E.D.N.Y. 1943)

. . . stipulated as follows: “ 8 a.m. 30.34 11 a.m. 30.26 Noon 30.22 1 p.m. 30.18 2 o’clock 30.15 3 " 30.12 4 “ 30.10 . . . 5 “ 30.11 6 « 30.10 7 “ 30.06 8 « 30.04 9 “ 30.01 10 o’clock 29.99” Wind directions and velocities as . . .

v., 43 B.T.A. 1181 (B.T.A. 1941)

. . . Supp., sec. 30.10; I. T. 1618, C. B. II-1, p. 123. . . . Supp., sec. 30.10; I. T. 1618, supra. . . .

THE WYOMING, 58 F.2d 789 (D. Mass. 1932)

. . . On the evening of November 11, as the tug came up Long Island Sound, the barometer had remained at 30.10 . . .

THE A. L. WALKER. THE TOMPKINSVILLE. THAMES TOWBOAT CO. v. EASTERN TRANSP. CO., 45 F.2d 621 (D. Md. 1930)

. . . Light Vessel at 8:10 a. rn., barometer 30.23; Fenwick Island Light Vessel at 2:08 p. m., barometer 30.10 . . .

OUR HOME LIFE INS. CO. v. MARTIN, 41 F.2d 351 (6th Cir. 1930)

. . . There is also a notation on its b.aek of premium rates of $113.50 annually, $59.10 semiannually, and $30.10 . . .

BRONX BARGE CORPORATION v. CONNELLY TRANSP. CORPORATION, 35 F.2d 294 (4th Cir. 1929)

. . . At Atlantic City the barometer had risen from 30.10 to 30.38; at Cape May from 30.16 to 30.31; and at . . .

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)