The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH

Chapter 30
SHERIFFS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 30.14

30.14 Succession of office.—

(1) Upon the expiration of the term of office, the sheriff shall deliver to his or her successor in office, taking a receipt for the same, the following:

(a) All such writs and processes as shall remain in his or her hands unexecuted; and

(b) All persons who are held in confinement by legal process, with the warrants, indictments, or causes of such confinement.

(2)(a) Upon the death of any sheriff, the executors, administrators, or other representatives shall deliver by hand, taking a receipt for the same, all papers and documents which relate to official duties and which were in the possession of and belonging to such decedent as sheriff.

(b) If the successor as sheriff should not be qualified in due time to serve or execute the process of the court, the chief deputy of such deceased sheriff shall be appointed by an order from the judge of the circuit court to fulfill the responsibilities and requirements of subsection (1) until such time as a successor is qualified.

(3) The succeeding sheriff, or the chief deputy pursuant to paragraph (2)(b), shall sell and carry into effect any levy made by a predecessor in office in like manner as the former sheriff could have done had he or she continued therein, and shall make titles to the purchaser for all the property sold under execution or other process and not conveyed by any predecessor.

(4) In any case in which an incumbent sheriff neglects or refuses to turn over such process in the manner aforesaid, such person shall be liable to make such satisfaction by damage and costs to the party aggrieved as he or she shall sustain by reason of such neglect or refusal.

History.—s. 16, Nov. 23, 1828; RS 1254; GS 1682; RGS 2890; CGL 4587; s. 7, ch. 22858, 1945; s. 1, ch. 87-288; s. 178, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 30.14 on Google Scholar

F.S. 30.14 on Casetext

Amendments to 30.14

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 30.14

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 30.14.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, In, 366 F. Supp. 3d 256 (D. P.R. 2019)

. . . Preservation of Certain Claims and Causes of Action...363 30.13 Post-Effective Date Fees and Expenses...363 30.14 . . . related to implementation and consummation of the Plan without further approval from Title III Court. 30.14 . . .

IN RE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, In, 363 F. Supp. 3d 220 (D. P.R. 2019)

. . . Preservation of Certain Claims and Causes of Action...325 30.13 Post-Effective Date Fees and Expenses...325 30.14 . . . related to implementation and consummation of the Plan without further approval from Title III Court. 30.14 . . .

IN RE H. TITUS, H. v. H., 566 B.R. 755 (Bankr. W.D. Pa. 2017)

. . . Up next is an entry for Scholastic Book Fairs for $30.14 that was only described as “something offered . . .

COVINGTON, v. NORTH CAROLINA,, 316 F.R.D. 117 (M.D.N.C. 2016)

. . . The benchmark version of Senate District 5 had a BVAP of 30.14% under the 2000 census and 30.99% under . . .

UNKNOWN PARTIES, v. JOHNSON,, 163 F. Supp. 3d 630 (D. Ariz. 2016)

. . . Am., Inc., 184 F.R.D. 311, 319 (C.D.Cal.1988) (quoting Manual for Complex Litigation, Third § 30.14, . . .

In TOYS R US- DELAWARE, INC. FAIR AND ACCURATE CREDIT TRANSACTIONS ACT FACTA LITIGATION, 295 F.R.D. 438 (C.D. Cal. 2014)

. . . (“NRTC”), 221 F.R.D. 523, 525 (C.D.Cal.2004) (citing Manual for Complex Litigation, Third, § 30.14, at . . .

J. MONTOYA L. L. L. v. FINANCIAL FEDERAL CREDIT, INC., 872 F. Supp. 2d 1251 (D.N.M. 2012)

. . . Cauliff, Corbin on Contracts § 30.14, at 29-30 (Revised ed. 1999)(“If the non-occurrence of a condition . . .

JACKSON, v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY,, 260 F.R.D. 168 (E.D. Pa. 2009)

. . . Antitrust Litig., 203 F.R.D. 197, 221 (E.D.Pa.2001) (quoting Manual for Complex Litigation (Third) § 30.14 . . . Linerboard, 203 F.R.D. at 221 (quoting Manual for Complex Litigation (Third) § 30.14). . . .

In FLEETBOSTON FINANCIAL CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION, 253 F.R.D. 315 (D.N.J. 2008)

. . . . § 30.14, at 217-18 (3d Matthew Bender 1995)) Docket Entry No. 104, at 16-17 (emphasis in original). . . .

In MINTER- HIGGINS,, 366 B.R. 880 (Bankr. N.D. Ind. 2007)

. . . Shabach Pentecostal Church Debits $2.17 and $3.17 to Speedway on 7/1/05 $4.77 to Ulra Foods on 7/2/05 $30.14 . . .

GUSTAFSON, v. POLK COUNTY, WISCONSIN, 226 F.R.D. 601 (W.D. Wis. 2005)

. . . Manual for Complex Litigation § 30.14 (3d ed.1999) (emphasis added). . . .

ANDERSON D. v. CAPITAL ONE BANK,, 224 F.R.D. 444 (W.D. Wis. 2004)

. . . Manual for Complex Litigation § 30.14 (3d ed.1999). . . .

JOHNSON, E. L. v. KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN, L. P. U. S., 224 F.R.D. 382 (S.D. Miss. 2004)

. . . (quoting Manual for Complex Litigation 2d § 30.14, at 213 (1985)). . . .

GAIL WATSON CHIANG LYNDA ALEXANDER MUHAMMAD JACQUELINE CARR DENISE PITTMAN CARMEN MCALPINCLARKE KAREN HUNT THERESA COLLINGWOOD- MORRIS DAVID C. NICHOLAS PRECIOUS YEARWOOD FREDERICK FREEMAN BEVERLY RAWLINS ANDREA CARROLL RONALD J. MITCHELL JACK DANIEL CHRISTINE DANIEL ANESTA E. GORE VANETA MARTIN CARMEN GONZALEZ M. NARTEL GREEN SHIRLEY WILLIAMS MARIA BLYDEN GONZALO RIVERA BLANCHE R. RAWLINS RHEA L. JOHNSON MARILYN RIVERA KEITH R. WILLIAMS AL BRUNN EMERYL CHRISTOPHER CHARLES G. JOHNSON VELSINA L. GEORGE KALEEN CLOUDEN EUNICE GOMES RUTH DUBLIN KIMBERLEY L. OLIVER ELENA HERBERT LAWRENCE CHRISTIAN MARJORIE JOHN LAVERNE WILLIAMS REVEREND JAMES CHRISTIAN, v. ANN M. VENEMAN, In, 46 V.I. 679 (3d Cir. 2004)

. . . claiming injury or seeking damages from some stated practice),” Manual for Complex Litigation (Second) § 30.14 . . .

CHIANG C. J. E. M. R. L. R. Al G. L. L. v. M. VENEMAN, In, 385 F.3d 256 (3d Cir. 2004)

. . . claiming injury or seeking damages from some stated practice),” Manual for Complex Litigation (Second) § 30.14 . . .

SHIRT v. HAZELTINE,, 336 F. Supp. 2d 976 (D.S.D. 2004)

. . . Under the dual-race method, they constitute 30.14 percent of the total population and 23.20 percent of . . .

F. GEER, v. D. COX,, 216 F.R.D. 677 (D. Kan. 2003)

. . . IBP, Inc., 167 F.R.D. at 156) (quoting Manual for Complex Litigation § 30.14 (3d ed.1995)). . . . .

PEOPLE UNITED FOR CHILDREN, INC. v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK,, 214 F.R.D. 252 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)

. . . Williams, 205 F.R.D. 92, 97 (E.D.N.Y.2001) (quoting Manual for Complex Litigation § 30.14 (3d ed.1995 . . .

D. BROWN, v. G. THOMPSON,, 252 F. Supp. 2d 312 (E.D. Va. 2003)

. . . . § 30.14. . . .

BLIHOVDE, v. ST. CROIX COUNTY, WISCONSIN, D. St. St. a St. St. a St. a St. St., 219 F.R.D. 607 (W.D. Wis. 2003)

. . . Manual for Complex Litigation § 30.14 (3d ed.1999). 1. . . .

O NEILL v. GOURMET SYSTEMS OF MINNESOTA, INC. d b a s s, 219 F.R.D. 445 (W.D. Wis. 2002)

. . . Copper Antitrust Litigation, 196 F.R.D. 348, 353 (W.D.Wis.2000) (citing Manual for Complex Litigation § 30.14 . . .

D. NICODEMUS, D. v. UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION, a a N. B. H. v. a a, 204 F.R.D. 479 (D. Wyo. 2001)

. . . See Manual for Complex Litigation § 30.14 (3d ed.1999). . . .

D. VICKERS S. a v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, d b a GMC LLC,, 204 F.R.D. 476 (D. Kan. 2001)

. . . notice in a Rule 23(b)(3) action.’ ” Zapata, 167 F.R.D. at 156 (quoting Manual for Complex Litigation § 30.14 . . .

In LINERBOARD ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 203 F.R.D. 197 (E.D. Pa. 2001)

. . . Manual for Complex Litigation (Third) § 30.14. . . .

NICHOLSON, J. A. G. A. v. WILLIAMS, J. A. G. A. v. J. A. G. A. v., 205 F.R.D. 92 (E.D.N.Y. 2001)

. . . Manual for Complex Litigation 30.14 (3d ed.1995). . . .

NICHOLSON, J. A. G. A. v. WILLIAMS, J. A. G. A. v. J. A. G. A. v., 202 F.R.D. 377 (E.D.N.Y. 2001)

. . . Manual for Complex Litigation 30.14 (3d ed.1995). . . .

In F. POWE, F. v. L. L. C., 280 B.R. 728 (Bankr. S.D. Ala. 2001)

. . . Manual for Complex Litigation (3d) (Federal Judicial Center, ed., 1995), 30.14 (“[G]reater precision . . .

In D. SLICK, D. v., 280 B.R. 722 (Bankr. S.D. Ala. 2001)

. . . Judicial Center, ed., 1995) at 30.14. The definition chosen will accomplish the goals stated above. . . .

In SHEFFIELD, v., 281 B.R. 35 (Bankr. S.D. Ala. 2001)

. . . Judicial Center, ed., 1995) at 30.14. The definition chosen will accomplish the goals stated above. . . .

O CONNOR, v. BOEING NORTH AMERICAN, INC., 197 F.R.D. 404 (C.D. Cal. 2000)

. . . (quoting Manual for Complex Litigation Third § 30.14 at 217 (1995)). . . .

In COPPER ANTITRUST LITIGATION v. Co. v. Co., 196 F.R.D. 348 (W.D. Wis. 2000)

. . . precise, objective and presently ascertainable,” id. at 431 (citing Manual for Complex Litigation § 30.14 . . .

SHAW, D. On v. TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. NEC NEC, 91 F. Supp. 2d 942 (E.D. Tex. 2000)

. . . Manual FOR Complex Litigation (ThiRd) § 30.14 (1995). . . .

INSOLIA Sr. a v. PHILIP MORRIS INCORPORATED R. J. U. S. A., 186 F.R.D. 535 (W.D. Wis. 1998)

. . . See Manual for Complex Litigation § 30.14 (3d ed.1995); Simer v. . . . proposed class must be precise, objective and presently ascertainable, see Manual for Complex Litigation § 30.14 . . .

In NEW ENGLAND MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION, 183 F.R.D. 33 (D. Mass. 1998)

. . . See Manual for Complex Litigation, Third, § 30.14 (1995). . . .

O CONNOR, v. BOEING NORTH AMERICAN, INC., 184 F.R.D. 311 (C.D. Cal. 1998)

. . . Manual for Complex Litigation, Third § 30.14, at 217 (1995). . . . Manual for Complex Litigation, Third § 30.14, at 217. . . .

SINGER, v. AT T CORPORATION, a, 185 F.R.D. 681 (S.D. Fla. 1998)

. . . MANUAL FOR COMPLEX LITIGATION, THIRD § 30.14 (1995). . . .

O CONNOR, v. BOEING NORTH AMERICAN, INC., 180 F.R.D. 359 (C.D. Cal. 1997)

. . . Manual for Complex Litigation, Third § 30.14, at 217 (1995). . . . Manual for Complex Litigation, Third § 30.14, at 217. . . .

THROPE, v. STATE OF OHIO,, 173 F.R.D. 483 (S.D. Ohio 1997)

. . . See Manual for Complex Litigation, Second § 30.14 (2d ed.1985). . . .

ROZEMA, v. THE MARSHFIELD CLINIC V. MALEK, v. THE MARSHFIELD CLINIC, S. C. HALIDA, a v. THE MARSHFIELD CLINIC, S. C., 174 F.R.D. 425 (W.D. Wis. 1997)

. . . Manual for Complex Litigation § 30.14 (3d ed.1995). . . . See Complex Litigation § 30.14 (noting class may be defined as persons who purchased specified products . . .

In THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION, 962 F. Supp. 450 (D.N.J. 1997)

. . . See 2 Newberg, § 6.14, at 6-61; Manual for Complex litigation § 30.14 (3d ed. 1995). 25. . . .

BUFORD v. H R BLOCK, INC. H R DE, 168 F.R.D. 340 (S.D. Ga. 1996)

. . . Manual For Complex Litigation, Third § 30.14 (1995). . . .

ZAPATA, v. IBP, INC., 167 F.R.D. 147 (D. Kan. 1996)

. . . Manual for Complex Litigation, Third § 30.14 (1995); see also McHan v. . . .

COMMANDER PROPERTIES CORP. v. BEECH AIRCRAFT CORP., 164 F.R.D. 529 (D. Kan. 1995)

. . . Manual for Complex Litigation, Third § 30.14 (1995); see also McHan v. . . .

CASTANO, v. AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY,, 160 F.R.D. 544 (E.D. La. 1995)

. . . Manual for Complex Litigation 2d § 30.14 at 213 (1985). McGuire v. . . .

DAY, v. NLO,, 851 F. Supp. 869 (S.D. Ohio 1994)

. . . Manual for Complex Litigation, Second, § 30.14; Penson v. . . . Manual for Complex Litigation, Second, § 30.14. . . .

TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC. a v. REICH,, 901 F. Supp. 282 (E.D. Ark. 1993)

. . . . §§ 60-30.14—60.30.19; 41 C.F.R. § 60-250.29(b); 41 C.F.R. 60-741.29(b). . . .

E. PATTERSON, v. NEWSPAPER AND MAIL DELIVERERS UNION OF NEW YORK AND VICINITY, EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v. NEWSPAPER AND MAIL DELIVERERS UNION OF NEW YORK AND VICINITY, In III THE NEW YORK TIMES, U. S. D. C. S. D. N. Y., 772 F. Supp. 833 (S.D.N.Y. 1991)

. . . Group III list was issued in August 1985, the Times had reached a minority employment percentage of 30.14% . . .

SEWELL PLASTICS, INC. v. COCA- COLA COMPANY USA Co. Co. N. C. Co. Co. Co. Co., 720 F. Supp. 1196 (W.D.N.C. 1989)

. . . Sewell 185.42 183.51 PSP 70.20 70.20 Carolina Packaging 74.19 74.19 Owens-Illinois 29.75 32.44 Amoco 30.14 . . . 30.14 Total 567.12 567.90 NA = not applicable. . . .

EVERHART, S. v. R. BOWEN, M. D., 694 F. Supp. 1518 (D. Colo. 1988)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise §§ 30.09, 30.14 (1958) (emphasis in original). . . .

In J. PEARSON,, 90 B.R. 638 (Bankr. D.N.J. 1988)

. . . monthly payments to the Standing Trustee of $78.00 for a period of thirty-six (36) months, of which $30.14 . . .

In R. KLAPP, 80 B.R. 540 (Bankr. W.D. Okla. 1987)

. . . such is not the holding of the case, this court notes that under 20 O.S. 1981, Ch. 1A, §§ 30.5 and 30.14 . . .

B. WEINSTEIN, v. R. BOWEN, M. D., 666 F. Supp. 1131 (N.D. Ill. 1987)

. . . Heckler, 789 F.2d 176, 179 (3rd Cir.1986); 4 K Davis, Administrative Law Treatise §§ 30.09, 30.14 (1958 . . .

McCUIN, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 817 F.2d 161 (1st Cir. 1987)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise §§ 30.09, 30.14 (1958)). . . .

POWELL, v. M. HECKLER,, 789 F.2d 176 (3d Cir. 1986)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, §§ 30.09, 30.14 (1958). . . .

KUEHNER, Jr. Mc v. M. HECKLER, U. S. A. M. HECKLER, HHS, 778 F.2d 152 (3d Cir. 1985)

. . . Procedure: Civil § 1785 at 137-38 & Supp. at 169 n. 81; Manual for Complex Litigation, Second §§ 30.11-30.14 . . .

HIMMLER v. UNITED STATES, 474 F. Supp. 914 (E.D. Pa. 1979)

. . . light rain showers and fog; temperature 72 °; dew point 70 °; wind 120 at 10 knots; altimeter setting 30.14 . . .

RAYMOND MOTOR TRANSPORTATION, INC. v. RICE, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OF WISCONSIN,, 434 U.S. 429 (U.S. 1978)

. . . Code § Hy 30.14 (3) (a) (July 1975). . . .

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO., 548 F.2d 704 (7th Cir. 1977)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise §§ 30.07-30.14. We believe this to be such a case. . . .

RAYMOND MOTOR TRANSPORTATION, INC. a a v. S. RICE, 417 F. Supp. 1352 (W.D. Wis. 1976)

. . . administrative board or commission acting under state statutes, said administrative regulation being § Hy 30.14 . . . are described at paragraph (3), and include the restrictions that are challenged in this action: “Hy 30.14 . . . has precluded issuance thereof in all but a limited class of cases by virtue of promulgation of § Hy 30.14 . . . Simply stated, § Hy 30.14(3)(a) and its companion statutes and regulations have not been shown to be . . . Each seeks a permit through § 348.27(6) Wis.Stats. and § Hy 30.14 Wis.Admin.Code. . . .

SEIFREID V. MON RIVER TOWING, INC., 388 F. Supp. 233 (W.D. Pa. 1974)

. . . .-44, a thrift fund loan of $30.14, $6.65 towards an annuity contract. . . .

Dr. BAKER v. J. R. STRODE, 348 F. Supp. 1257 (W.D. Ky. 1971)

. . . Ranging from 20.02% at the bottom to 45.62% at the top, with a statewide average of 30.14%. . . . for education, as well as many other purposes, would be more than tripled, i. e., from the average of 30.14% . . .

THOMAS, v. HUMBLE OIL REFINING COMPANY,, 420 F.2d 793 (4th Cir. 1970)

. . . under the plan deducted for a biweekly period a thrift contribution of $27.44, a thrift fund loan of $30.14 . . .

ARMCO STEEL CORPORATION, v. H. STANS, M. R. H., 303 F. Supp. 262 (S.D.N.Y. 1969)

. . . . §§ 30.1, 30.14(g).) . . .

T. BERNER S. v. BRITISH COMMONWEALTH PACIFIC AIRLINES, LTD. a a, 219 F. Supp. 289 (S.D.N.Y. 1963)

. . . five hundred on top, report when inbound; ceiling one thousand two hundred, visibility nine, altimeter 30.14 . . . recovered with a barometric setting of approximately 30.12; the latest setting given the flight was 30.14 . . .

GANEM, v. A. GREENE, Jr. SHAHEEN,, 31 F.R.D. 175 (W.D. Pa. 1962)

. . . Moore’s Federal Practice, vol. 4, ¶ 30.14, p. 2037. . . .

MOUNT VERNON COMPANY, d b a v. ROWE TRANSFER STORAGE COMPANY, 36 F.R.D. 263 (E.D. Tenn. 1962)

. . . Arabian Oil Co., supra; 4 Moore, Federal Practice, Pars. 30.14; 26.36. . . .

MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, v. CONNER, Jr. J. O. J. O. M. J., 200 F. Supp. 647 (E.D.S.C. 1961)

. . . this installment to Palmetto until June 8, 1959, when he mailed his check No. 837 in the amount of $30.14 . . . On the paper the following unexplained, circled in ink entries appear: “30.14 15.28 R.P.Ager. 22.52”. . . . it should be noted that on the paper stamped June 8, 1959, sent to Bethea by Palmetto, the figure “30.14 . . .

UNITED STATES v. E. BOWEN,, 290 F.2d 40 (5th Cir. 1961)

. . . See 4 Moore, Federal Practice § 30.14 at 2037, and 1960 supp. at 106; North Atlantic & Gulf S.S. . . .

TOWE v. SINCLAIR REFINING COMPANY, 188 F. Supp. 222 (D. Md. 1960)

. . . Moore’s Federal Practice, 2 Ed., Vol. 4, p. 2037, sec. 30.14. . . .

BANK OF AMERICA, v. LOEW S INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION,, 163 F. Supp. 924 (S.D.N.Y. 1958)

. . . Arabian Oil Co., supra; 4 Moore, Federal Practice, Pars. 30.14; 26.36. . . .

RYAN, v. ARABIAN AMERICAN OIL COMPANY,, 18 F.R.D. 206 (S.D.N.Y. 1955)

. . . Stackpole Sons, Inc., D.C., 1 F.R.D. 506; 4 Moore, Federal Practice, par. 30.14 (2d ed.). . . .

KEYES v. FIRST NAT. BANK OF ABERDEEN, S. D., 20 F.2d 678 (D.S.D. 1927)

. . . debited the Eureka bank $5,040.14 and credited “Loans and Discounts” $5,000, and credited “Interest” $30.14 . . . it credited defendant bank with $5,030.14, debited “Loans and Discounts” with $5,000 and “interest” $30.14 . . .