The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH

Chapter 30
SHERIFFS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 30.21

30.21 Failure to pay over money.—If any sheriff fails to collect or pay over fines, fees, costs, or other moneys adjudged to the state which he or she has been by proper process directed to collect, the sheriff forfeits his or her commissions and also is liable for a fine of $50, to be recovered by motion before the circuit court, after 10 days’ notice, and the sheriff’s sureties, if any, are also liable for the amount of such moneys upon his or her bond as sheriff.

History.—s. 9, ch. 217, 1849; RS 1252; GS 1680; RGS 2888; CGL 4585; s. 182, ch. 95-147; s. 14, ch. 98-34.

F.S. 30.21 on Google Scholar

F.S. 30.21 on Casetext

Amendments to 30.21

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 30.21

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 30.21.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, In, 366 F. Supp. 3d 256 (D. P.R. 2019)

. . . Case...363 30.18 Section Headings...364 30.19 Inconsistencies...364 30.20 Document Retention...364 30.21 . . . standard document retention policy, as may be altered, amended, modified, or supplemented by COFINA. 30.21 . . .

IN RE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, In, 363 F. Supp. 3d 220 (D. P.R. 2019)

. . . Case...326 30.18 Section Headings...326 30.19 Inconsistencies...326 30.20 Document Retention...326 30.21 . . . standard document retention policy, as may be altered, amended, modified, or supplemented by COFINA. 30.21 . . .

SALI, LLP, v. CORONA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER UHS, 884 F.3d 1218 (9th Cir. 2018)

. . . Moore et al., Moore's Federal Practice § 30.21 (3d ed. 2017); see also Jules Jordan Video, Inc. v. 144942 . . . See Moore et al., supra § 30.21. . . .

SALAZAR, v. B. KING, Jr., 822 F.3d 61 (2d Cir. 2016)

. . . . §§ 30.1, 30.21, 30.33, 30.35, 34.1. . . .

UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL- CIO, CLC G, v. PPG INDUSTRIES, INC., 751 F.3d 580 (7th Cir. 2014)

. . . that, without concessions from current employees, the company’s total labor costs per hour would be $30.21 . . .

In JACOBS, v., 324 B.R. 402 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2005)

. . . Investigator 550.00 Copy Expense .20 _Total_$1.158.70 Post-Bankruptcy $ 980.00 Pacer 25.00 Courier 30.21 . . .

In WARFARIN SODIUM ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 212 F.R.D. 231 (D. Del. 2002)

. . . 23(e) and follow the procedures recommended by the Manual for Complex Litigation (“MCL”), 3d ed., § 30.21 . . .

REED, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY,, 185 F.3d 712 (7th Cir. 1999)

. . . In addition, Reed tendered IPI 30.21 which states: If you decide for the plaintiff on the question of . . . IPI. 30.21. The district court refused to give these instructions. . . . The case law in Illinois overwhelmingly supports Reed’s position that IPI 30.03 and 30.21 should have . . . Given the case law in Illinois, we hold that IPI 30.03 and 30.21 correctly state the law in Illinois. . . . pre-exist-ing condition, it is apparent that the district court should have tendered IPI 30.03 and 30.21 . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. BROWN, UNITED STATES v. BUCKHANAN,, 91 F.3d 1109 (8th Cir. 1996)

. . . trial court failed to make a specific finding, as required by Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(e)(1), with respect to 30.21 . . . sentencing hearing, the trial court stated that it credited the trial testimony with respect to those 30.21 . . .

In POTASH ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 161 F.R.D. 411 (D. Minn. 1995)

. . . Manual for Complex Litigation (Second) § 30.21 at page 210; Phillips Petroleum Co. v. . . .

In AUTO- TRAIN CORPORATION, INC. a a k a DRABKIN, a k a v. MIDLAND- ROSS CORPORATION, 810 F.2d 270 (D.C. Cir. 1987)

. . . recital of the subject matter and proposed terms____”); see Manual for Complex Litigation, Second, § 30.21 . . .

In AUTO- TRAIN CORPORATION, INC. a a k a DRABKIN, a k a v. MIDLAND- ROSS CORPORATION, 258 U.S. App. D.C. 151 (D.C. Cir. 1987)

. . . recital of the subject matter and proposed terms____”); see Manual for Complex Litigation, Second, § 30.21 . . .

In AUTO- TRAIN CORPORATION, INC. a a k a DRABKIN, a k a v. MIDLAND- ROSS CORPORATION, 810 F.2d 270 (D.C. Cir. 1987)

. . . .”); see Manual for Complex Litigation, Second, § 30.21 at 220-21 (1985) (“The notice [of class certification . . .

CRAIK, v. MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY BOARD St. J. R. A. G. C. B. P. W. G. J. v. V. L. J. A. A. C. A. H. G. E. C. J. L. R. J. B. D., 731 F.2d 465 (8th Cir. 1984)

. . . Craik lower than Peterson originally ranked another woman candidate, who later withdrew, first, V. 30.21 . . .

TRUST OF THREE, a v. CITY OF EMERYVILLE M., 430 F. Supp. 833 (N.D. Cal. 1977)

. . . Under Section 30.21, commercial, business, industrial, manufacturing, and residential uses are permitted . . . In accord with Section 30.21 of the City Code, a permit could not be issued if the “use [might] become . . . Section 30.21 Uses Permitted (a) All uses permitted in any residential district. . . .

OLD KENT BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, M. R. Jr. H. v. UNITED STATES, 362 F.2d 444 (6th Cir. 1966)

. . . Sutton, 233 Mich. 249, 256, 206 N.W. 366; Page on Wills, supra, Vol. 4, § 30.21. . . .

D. WOOD, M. v. UNITED STATES, 132 F. Supp. 586 (S.D.N.Y. 1955)

. . . They averaged $30.21 per share for the period of 1948 to 1952. In 1952 they were $32.41 per share. . . .

LAURENT v. ANDERSON, 70 F.2d 819 (6th Cir. 1934)

. . . As ultimately issued, each certificate represented 69.79 per cent, of Na*ional Bank stock and 30.21 per . . .

v., 6 B.T.A. 1179 (B.T.A. 1927)

. . . The average price received per pound for the waste was 22.65 cents, 30.21 cents, and 30.38 cents in each . . .