The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH

Chapter 30
SHERIFFS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 30.51

30.51 Fees and commissions.—

(1) No bills shall be rendered to the county for any services, nor shall any fees, commissions, or other remuneration for official services as sheriff be paid by the board of county commissioners of any county to the sheriff of the county except as provided by this section. All fees, commissions and other remuneration provided by law for services other than criminal shall be charged by the said sheriff to other authorities and parties doing business with their offices, and shall be paid over to the county as provided in this section.

(2) The fees authorized, or a deposit sufficient to cover them, shall be collected in advance from the party who requests the service; provided, that services may be performed for any governmental agency or unit without advance payment, and the officer shall bill and collect the fees earned from such agency after the service is performed or when the amount due is determined.

(3) Deposits for fees shall be placed in a depository trust account. The officer who receives the deposit shall keep an account with the depositor, and shall withdraw monthly from the deposits the fees earned and shall remit them to the county fund or funds as provided by this section.

(4) Fees or commissions commingled when received with other official collections may be deposited with such other collections in the trust account or accounts and distributed to the county fund or funds at the time that the other collections, with which they were received, are distributed.

(5) All fees, commissions, or other funds collected by the sheriff for services rendered or performed by his or her office shall be remitted monthly to the county.

(6) No sheriff shall render to another county a bill for service of process in any criminal matter.

History.—s. 5, ch. 57-368; s. 1, ch. 59-365; s. 8, ch. 69-82; s. 190, ch. 95-147; s. 26, ch. 2001-266.

F.S. 30.51 on Google Scholar

F.S. 30.51 on Casetext

Amendments to 30.51

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 30.51

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 30.51.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

CITIZENS COAL COUNCIL, v. MATT CANESTRALE CONTRACTING, INC., 51 F. Supp. 3d 593 (W.D. Pa. 2014)

. . . . § 30.51 et seq., and the implementing regulations promulgated under those two statutes. . . . used under Chapter 290 and coal refuse as defined in the Coal Refuse Disposal Control Act, 52 P.S. § 30.51 . . .

COACH, INC. v. HUBERT KELLER, INC. d b a s, 911 F. Supp. 2d 1303 (S.D. Ga. 2012)

. . . Stempel, Moore’s Federal Practice-Civil § 30.51 (2009). . . .

ABUSAID, Jr. a. k. a. v. HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, s a s, 405 F.3d 1298 (11th Cir. 2005)

. . . . § 30.51(5). . . . Id. §§ 30.231(5); 30.51(5). . . . Stat. § 30.51(5), again suggesting that he is financially accountable to the.county. See Weaver v. . . .

PALM BEACH ISLES ASSOCIATES, a v. UNITED STATES,, 58 Fed. Cl. 657 (Fed. Cl. 2003)

. . . United States, 444 U.S. 164, 177, 100 S.Ct. 383, 62 L.Ed.2d 332 (1979)); United States v. 30.51 Acres . . .

GEORGIA v. ASHCROFT, ATTORNEY GENERAL,, 539 U.S. 461 (U.S. 2003)

. . . The one exception is proposed District 4, with a black voting age population of 30.51% and an overall . . .

NEICK, v. CITY OF BEAVERCREEK,, 255 F. Supp. 2d 773 (S.D. Ohio 2003)

. . . (“Midwest”) is the owner of three parcels of land, approximately 30.51 acres, located in Beavercreek . . .

UNITED STATES v. AFRAM LINES USA LTD. El, 159 F.R.D. 408 (S.D.N.Y. 1994)

. . . Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2103, at 376 (1970); see also 4A Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 30.51 . . .

PINE PRODUCTS CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES,, 24 Cl. Ct. 1555 (Fed. Cir. 1991)

. . . , the Service held that the buy-out rate was 15 percent of the contract overbid, which amounted to $30.51 . . .

PINE PRODUCTS CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES,, 945 F.2d 1555 (Fed. Cir. 1991)

. . . , the Service held that the buy-out rate was 15 percent of the contract overbid, which amounted to $30.51 . . .

In R. JONES M. NORTH SHORE SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, a v. R. JONES M., 88 B.R. 899 (Bankr. E.D. Wis. 1988)

. . . . § 30.51 requires the issuance of a number by the Department of Natural Resources for identification . . .

NORTHERN INDIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY, v. COLORADO WESTMORELAND, INC., 667 F. Supp. 613 (N.D. Ind. 1987)

. . . 30.51 Mitchell 5 125 ? 30.54 Mitchell 11 110 ? . . .

FOUNDING CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY OF WASHINGTON, D. C. INC. v. H. WEBSTER,, 802 F.2d 1448 (D.C. Cir. 1986)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice If 30.51, at 30-41 (2d ed. 1984). . . .

HILL TOP DEVELOPERS, v. HOLIDAY PINES SERVICE CORPORATION,, 478 So. 2d 368 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . Fla.Admin.Code Rule 25-30.51. . . .

FLORIDA WATERWORKS ASSOCIATION, v. FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION,, 473 So. 2d 237 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . It should further be realized that under proposed rule 25-30.51, the challenged rules would become applicable . . . Rule 25-30.51 (applicability of the rules). 2. Rule 25-30.57 (imputation of CIAC). 3. . . .

M. DOWD, CALABRESE, M. KRAMER, v. CALABRESE, M. KRAMER, v. A. DRINKHALL, M. DOWD, v. A. DRINKHALL, A. DRINKHALL, v. M. KRAMER,, 101 F.R.D. 427 (D.D.C. 1984)

. . . Moore, Federal Practice § 30.51 at 30-43 (1982); In re Penn Central Litigation, 61 F.R.D. 453, 463 (S.D.N.Y . . .

H. GREENE v. TOWN OF BLOOMING GROVE, M. C. B. N. A., 483 F. Supp. 804 (S.D.N.Y. 1980)

. . . . §§ 30.51, 30.54(B)(3), and 30.2 (1976). . See, e. g., Euclid v. . . .

P. DANIELS, v. HADLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, 68 F.R.D. 583 (D.D.C. 1975)

. . . Moore, Federal Practice § 30.51 at 30-40 (1974); see also Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure . . .

In PENN CENTRAL COMMERCIAL PAPER LITIGATION, 61 F.R.D. 453 (S.D.N.Y. 1973)

. . . Moore, Federal Practice if 30.51 & n.11 (2d ed. 1970). . . .

E. TERRY v. MODERN WOODMEN OF AMERICA,, 57 F.R.D. 141 (W.D. Mo. 1972)

. . . See 4A Moore’s Federal Practice fí 30.51 (and cases cited therein). . . .

J. DOUGLAS, a v. BENEFICIAL FINANCE CO. OF ANCHORAGE, 334 F. Supp. 1166 (D. Alaska 1971)

. . . trial they will be considered on the cross-motions for summary judgment. 4 Moore’s Federal Practice, If 30.51 . . .

UNITED STATES v. PABST BREWING COMPANY,, 296 F. Supp. 994 (E.D. Wis. 1969)

. . . In 1957, approximately 30.51% of Pabst sales and 66.7% of Blatz sales were in that area being approximately . . .

In ATLAS SEWING CENTERS, INC. JONES FINANCIAL CORPORATION, v. RAY, CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, v. RAY, UNITED STATES v. RAY, RAY, v. JONES FINANCIAL CORPORATION, J. BURDEN, Jr. v. RAY,, 384 F.2d 66 (5th Cir. 1967)

. . . collections which were made by the Group credited to the non-participators’ accounts, but a collection fee of 30.51 . . . district court raised the collection fee deducted from remittances to non-participating institutions from 30.51 . . .

UNITED STATES v. HEINE, 149 F.2d 485 (2d Cir. 1945)

. . . in accordance with detailed regulations of the Attorney General, Jan. 22, 1942, 28 CFR, Cum.Supp., 30.51 . . .

UNITED STATES v. BARRA, 149 F.2d 489 (2d Cir. 1945)

. . . the Attorney Geperal to make for the acquiring of certificates of identification, 28 CFR, Cum.Supp., 30.51 . . .