The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH

Chapter 30
SHERIFFS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 30.56

30.56 Release of traffic violator on recognizance or bond; penalty for failure to appear.—In all cases of arrest for traffic violations, by a sheriff or a deputy sheriff, the person arrested may in the discretion of such officer be released upon his or her own recognizance or upon bond provided said officer shall obtain from such person arrested a recognizance or, if deemed necessary, a cash bond or other sufficient security conditioned for his or her appearance before the proper tribunal of such county to answer the charge for which he or she has been arrested. Any person who is so arrested and released on his or her own recognizance by an officer and given a written summons to appear before the proper tribunal of such county to answer the charge for which arrested and who shall fail to appear or respond to such summons shall, in addition to the traffic violation charge, be guilty of a noncriminal traffic infraction subject to the penalty provided in s. 318.18(2).

History.—s. 1, ch. 59-97; s. 14, ch. 71-136; s. 1, ch. 72-244; s. 2, ch. 87-288; s. 193, ch. 95-147.

Note.—Former s. 146.08.

F.S. 30.56 on Google Scholar

F.S. 30.56 on Casetext

Amendments to 30.56

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 30.56

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S30.56 - BAIL-SECURED BOND - REMOVED - M: S

S30.56 - BAIL-PERSONAL RECOG - REMOVED - I: N

S30.56 - FAILURE TO APPEAR - FTA ON BOND. HISTORIC RECORDS ONLY - N: N

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

UNITED STATES v. REDMON,, 702 F. App'x 472 (8th Cir. 2017)

. . . Officers purchased a total of 36.98 grams of cocaine from Redmon in controlled buys, 30.56 grams of which . . .

TMK IPSCO, v. UNITED STATES,, 222 F. Supp. 3d 1306 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2017)

. . . respondents the following subsidy rates: (1) Changbao a subsidy rate of 28.70%; (2) Jianli a subsidy rate of 30.56% . . .

In WILLIAMS, v., 492 B.R. 79 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 2013)

. . . Fifteen percent of discretionary income is $366.75 per year, or $30.56 per month. . . . .

ROTHE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, v. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE U. S., 499 F. Supp. 2d 775 (W.D. Tex. 2007)

. . . that Minority Business Enterprises constituted 37.64% of available construction prime contractors, 30.56% . . .

HOMANS, v. CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE, a, 217 F. Supp. 2d 1197 (D.N.M. 2002)

. . . Chavez was elected May- or in the October 2, 2001 mayoral election for the City with 30.56% of the vote . . .

L. GLOVER, v. HEART OF AMERICA MANAGEMENT COMPANY,, 38 F. Supp. 2d 881 (D. Kan. 1999)

. . . August 16-31, 1997-8 days, 53.18 hours total, 6.64 hours per day worked; September 1-8,1997-6 days, 30.56 . . .

WESCH, v. HUNT,, 785 F. Supp. 1491 (S.D. Ala. 1992)

. . . 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 150 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 151 0,0 0 0 0 0 Block 152 36 11 25 100.00% 30.56% . . .

STATE OF FLORIDA v. HENRY, 42 Fla. Supp. 2d 42 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1990)

. . . Section 30.56 Fla. . . .

RANKIN, v. G. COLMAN,, 476 So. 2d 234 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . See, e.g., Sections 30.56, 316.650 and 322.-15(2), Florida Statutes (1983) (prohibiting prosecution for . . .

K R SERVICE CO. INC. S. M- K v. UNITED STATES, 568 F. Supp. 38 (D. Mass. 1983)

. . . however, “furnishes the primary test of worthlessness,” 5 Mertens Law of Federal Income Taxation § 30.56 . . .

In WHOLESALE FURNITURE MART, INC. HILL, v. I. I. OZAR, v. GRAY, 24 B.R. 240 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 1982)

. . . 50.00 7218 E. 87th Terr., Apt. 302 September 14,1980 Kansas City, Mo. 64138 Mary Reed Claim incurred 30.56 . . .

KAY MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. UNITED STATES, 676 F.2d 555 (Ct. Cl. 1982)

. . . $1,202,125 $1,069,150 $1,382,833 Profits 248,351 242,242 331,096- 158,652 207,233 % Profits to Sales 38.14% 30.56% . . .

BUGHER v. SOUTHLAND FABRICATORS AND ERECTORS, INC., 452 F. Supp. 870 (W.D. La. 1978)

. . . 6.26 Donald Combs (T) 112 53.76 28.00 5.60 Tommy Jenkins 79 37.92 19.75 3.95 611.25 0 293.40 152.81 30.56 . . .

M. HASSO N. v. RETAIL CREDIT COMPANY,, 326 F. Supp. 1179 (D. Del. 1971)

. . . present situation was one of the reasons for the statement in 4 Moore, Federal Practice (2 ed. 1970) If 30.56 . . .

MERCANTILE NATIONAL BANK AT DALLAS, v. FRANKLIN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, 248 F.2d 57 (5th Cir. 1957)

. . . question December 2, 1953, when the insured paid it $5,600.00 in cash to be repaid to her at the rate of $30.56 . . .

UNITED STATES v. HEINE, 149 F.2d 485 (2d Cir. 1945)

. . . Supp., 30.56(n) (14), which, after requiring the listing in the application of “the dubs, organizations . . .

UNITED STATES v. ONE FORD COACH AUTOMOBILE, MOTOR NO., 43 F. Supp. 593 (W.D. Ky. 1942)

. . . The unpaid balance was secured by a conditional sales contract calling for monthly payments of $30.56 . . .

INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL CORPORATION v. STADLER, 212 F. 378 (6th Cir. 1914)

. . . fertilizing use, not to contain over 10 per cent, moisture, “analysis guaranteed 5.60 per cent, ammonia and 30.56 . . . condition, containing not over 10 per cent, moisture, “analysis guaranteed, 5.00 per cent, ammonia and 30.56 . . . than 10 per cent, moisture, and that the analysis should be guaranteed 5.60 per cent, ammonia, and 30.56 . . . not over 10 per cent, moisture, and that analysis should be guaranteed 5.60 per cent, ammonia, and 30.56 . . . a specified price per .ton, guaranteed not over 10 per cent, moisture, and 5.60 per cent, ammonia, 30.56 . . .

SOUTHERN PAC. CO. v. BARTINE, 170 F. 725 (C.C.D. Nev. 1909)

. . . were $52,313,267.39, and the total expense for conducting freight transportation $15,989,410.43, or 30.56 . . . conducting all transportation is to the cost per unit of conducting all freight transportation as 30.85-to 30.56 . . .