The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . case, the Third District rejected a constitutional challenge to the $50 million bond cap in section 45.045 . . .
. . . judgment debtor BDO Seidman, LLP (herein, BDO) to comply with post-judgment discovery under section 45.045 . . . We agree with Banco Espirito that the court below misinterpreted both BDO I and section 45.045(3) in . . . Here, that modification came by way of section 45.045. . . . whether assets have been or are being dissipated during a stay authorized by section 45.045(1). . . . Section 45.045(3) neither nullifies the protection provided by compliance with section 45.045(1) nor . . .
. . . of execution after BDO posted a fifty million dollar bond to stay execution as authorized by section 45.045 . . . to reflect changes in the Consumer Price Index compiled by the United States Department of Labor. ยง 45.045 . . . We agree with BDO that section 45.045 should have been applied in this case to preclude the discovery . . . Here, that modification came by way of section 45.045. . . . However we do not view section 45.045 as an intrusion into the practice and procedure of the judiciary . . .