Cases from cite.case.law:

GARDNER, v. STANDARD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, 231 So. 3d 1 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . However, when the defendant is a corporation, section 47.051 controls: Actions against domestic corporations . . . we also noted that “[o]f the several venue selections authorized by either section 47.011 or section 47.051 . . . representative, where the cause of action accrued, or where the property in litigation is located.” § 47.051 . . . Therefore, pursuant to sections 47.021 and 47.051, Florida Statutes, venue is proper in any county where . . .

HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, a v. SMITH LLP D., 203 So. 3d 1013 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Finally, section 47.051, Florida Statutes (2015) provides that actions against foreign corporations doing . . .

M. HALL, v. ANIMALS. COM, L. L. C., 171 So. 3d 216 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . first time, that its motion to transfer venue was based on forum non conveniens and sections 47.122 and 47.051 . . . business; where the cause of action accrued; or where the property in litigation is located. §§ 47.011, 47.051 . . .

C. KING AKCA, v. RABORG, Jr., 165 So. 3d 764 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . . § 47.051, Fla. . . . See § 47.051, Fla. . . . DCA 1990) (recognizing that “agent” and “representative” are not synonymous for purposes of section 47.051 . . .

R. J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO CO. USA v. MOONEY,, 147 So. 3d 42 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . See §§ 47.011, 47.021, 47.051, Fla. . . .

SUNSHINE STATE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. MUNOZ- UPTON, 127 So. 3d 822 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . to bring their suit, that selection does not fall within one of the alternatives provided by section 47.051 . . . Section 47.051, governing venue in actions against corporations, provides that a domestic corporation . . . As our sister court in Florida Gamco, Inc., 68 So.3d at 929, more recently stated: Section 47.051 provides . . . See also § 47.051, Fla. . . .

GINO VITIELLO, M. D. P. A. v. GENOVESE JOBLOVE BATTISTA, P. A., 123 So. 3d 1185 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . . §§ 47.011 & 47.051, Fla. Stat. (2012). . . .

AMERICAN K- DETECTION SERVICES, INC. v. CICERO,, 100 So. 3d 236 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . ."); § 47.051, Fla. . . .

E. BROWN v. J. NAGELHOUT, Co. a CSX a, 126 So. 3d 1093 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . on the Supreme Court’s holding in Brown, applying the plain language of sections 47.011, 47.021, and 47.051 . . .

RIFE As L. v. A. W. A. CONTRACTING CO. INC., 87 So. 3d 69 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . See § 47.051, Fla. Stat. (2010). . . .

BROWN, v. J. NAGELHOUT,, 84 So. 3d 304 (Fla. 2012)

. . . With respect to corporations, section 47.051, Florida Statutes (2011), provides: Actions against domestic . . . previously numbered as sections 46.02 and 46.04, respectively, the substance of sections 47.021 and 47.051 . . . for transaction of its customary business” or “an agent or other representative” in Pasco County. § 47.051 . . . venue selection, the Florida courts should apply the plain language of sections 47.011, 47.021, and 47.051 . . . corporation doing business in Florida could be sued, is substantively equivalent to today's section 47.051 . . .

I- NET TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. SALAZAR,, 82 So. 3d 1007 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . Section 47.051, Florida Statutes, provides that “[ajctions against domestic corporations shall be brought . . .

FLORIDA GAMCO, INC. v. FONTAINE, a, 68 So. 3d 923 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . With respect to a suit filed against a corporation, section 47.051, Florida Statutes (2010), provides . . . Section 47.051 provides, with regard to a domestic Florida corporation, that venue is proper “in the . . . Under section 47.051, Leon is the only proper place for venue. . . .

RESIDENTIAL SAVINGS MORTAGE, INC. a v. KEESLING a, 73 So. 3d 280 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . transfer venue, alleging that Broward County was the only proper venue for Keesling’s suit under section 47.051 . . . See § 47.051. . . . ,” (2) “where the cause of action accrued,” or (3) “where the property in litigation is located.” § 47.051 . . . determine whether a tort action accrued in Pinellas County for purposes of venue under sections 47.011 or 47.051 . . .

M. DRUCKER, P. A. a k a M. P. A. P. L. v. DUVALL,, 61 So. 3d 468 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . . § 47.051, Fla. Stat. (2010). . . .

HIGHTOWER, v. ESTATE OF LYMAN, 58 So. 3d 377 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . See § 47.051 (“Actions against domestic corporations shall be brought only in the county where such corporation . . .

VRCHOTA CORPORATION, v. KELLY, J. Jr., 42 So. 3d 319 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Plaintiff placed venue in Palm Beach County pursuant to section 47.051, Florida Statutes, which governs . . .

SHAHNASARIAN, v. D. TEJEDOR, 41 So. 3d 348 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . . § 47.051, Fla. Stat. (2008). . . .

AMERICAN VEHICLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a v. GOHEAGAN,, 35 So. 3d 1001 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . AVIC filed its motion to dismiss or transfer venue pursuant to section 47.051, Florida Statutes (2008 . . .

CARDELLES, v. CATHOLIC HEALTH SERVICES, INC. a k a a k a St. s d b a St. s M. D., 14 So. 3d 1025 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Anne’s is located there, see section 47.051, Florida Statutes (2008). . . .

X. McCARROLL, v. VAN DYK, d b a, 8 So. 3d 1256 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . . §§ 47.011, 47.051, Fla. Stat. (2008). . . .

TREASURE COAST TRACTOR SERVICE, INC. v. JAC GENERAL CONSTRUCTION, INC. a, 8 So. 3d 461 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Florida Statutes section 47.051 (2008), provides in pertinent part that “[a]ctions against domestic corporations . . .

STRATUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. PHARMACEUTICAL DEVELOPMENT, INC., 994 So. 2d 1241 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . See §§ 47.051, 47.011, Fla. Stat.; Knowles, Inc. v. . . .

PADIN, v. J. TRAVIS, L. a, 990 So. 2d 1255 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . .” § 47.051, Fla. Stat. (2007). Geico’s co-defendants, residents of St. . . . Johns County, sought to transfer venue, relying on section 47.051. See Enfinger v. . . . service center and parts distributor were “representatives” of Piper within the meaning of section 47.051 . . .

OCEAN YACHTS, INC. v. TANTILLO, 988 So. 2d 722 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Section 47.051, Florida Statutes (2007), which addresses venue provides in part: Actions against foreign . . .

J. TOBIN, v. A F ENGINEERING, a, 979 So. 2d 967 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . defendant, A & F, has its sole corporate office in Palm Beach County, not Miami-Dade County, see § 47.051 . . . including the conversion claim, accrued in Palm Beach County, not Miami-Dade County, see §§ 47.011, 47.051 . . . and the property in litigation is located in Palm Beach County, not Miami-Dade County, see §§ 47.011, 47.051 . . . Section 47.051, Florida Statutes (2006), provides, in part, as follows: "Actions against corporations . . .

SOFTWARE TECHNIQUES, INC. v. L. KENT,, 959 So. 2d 347 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . See § 47.051, Fla. . . .

WYNN DRYWALL, INC. a k a v. AEQUICAP PROGRAM ADMINISTRATORS, INC. f k a, 953 So. 2d 28 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . This court then proceeded to examine whether venue was proper under section 47.051 rather than forum . . .

BLACKHAWK QUARRY COMPANY OF FLORIDA, INC. v. HEWITT CONTRACTING CO. INC., 931 So. 2d 197 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Additionally, since Blackhawk, the named defendant, is a domestic corporation, section 47.051, Florida . . . Under section 47.051, actions against Florida corporations “shall be brought only in the county where . . .

A- RYAN STAFFING SOLUTIONS INC. v. ACE STAFFING MANAGEMENT UNLIMITED, INC., 917 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . for A-Ryan argued that the action had to be brought in Orange or Seminole Counties based on section 47.051 . . . In Florida, venue against a corporate defendant is generally controlled by section 47.051, Florida Statutes . . . This statute limits the rights afforded to corporate defendants by section 47.051, in that it subjects . . .

JOHN HALL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTING, INC. M. v. ALLSTATE CONSTRUCTION, INC., 917 So. 2d 310 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . Similarly, under section 47.051, Florida Statutes (2004), actions against Florida corporations “shall . . .

RMR ENTERPRISES, INC OF S. W. F. a v. T. B. LANDMARK CONSTRUCTION, INC. a, 894 So. 2d 1073 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . No exception, to the general venue rule provided by section 47.051, Florida Statutes (2004), applies . . .

MORRILL, III KCCS, a v. LYTLE, II S., 893 So. 2d 671 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . While the trial court below was correct in concluding that under section 47.051, Florida Statutes (2002 . . .

BREED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. ALLIEDSIGNAL INC., 861 So. 2d 1227 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . AlliedSignal filed a motion to transfer venue to Hillsborough County pursuant to section 47.051, Florida . . . representative, where the cause of action accrued, or where the property in litigation is located.” § 47.051 . . . contended that AlliedSig-nal had agents or other representatives in Polk County and, pursuant to section 47.051 . . .

PDM BRIDGE CORP. v. JC INDUSTRIAL MANUFACTURING,, 851 So. 2d 289 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Venue here is controlled by § 47.051, Florida Statutes (2002), which, in pertinent part provides: “Actions . . .

GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. a v. GRACI,, 849 So. 2d 1196 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Of the several venue selections authorized by either section 47.011 or section 47.051, Fla. . . .

SYMBOL MATTRESS OF FLORIDA, INC. v. ROYAL SLEEP PRODUCTS, INC., 832 So. 2d 233 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . , since the named party-defendant in this lawsuit was a domestic corporation (Royal Sleep), section 47.051 . . . considered since the statute specifically defines the scope of venue for actions against corporations: 47.051 . . . See §§ 47.011, 47.051, Fla. Stat (2001). . . .

CHINIGO, v. MARINE DYNAMICS, INC. a, 832 So. 2d 198 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . See Section 47.051, Fla. Stat. (2000); Contractor’s Mgmt. Sys. of NH, Inc. v. . . .

LOIACONI, v. GULF STREAM SEAFOOD, INC., 830 So. 2d 908 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Section 47.051, Florida Statutes (2000), addresses actions against domestic corporations and provides . . . County and that payment was not made were sufficient to support venue in Sarasota County under section 47.051 . . .

MAGICAL CRUISE COMPANY LIMITED, d b a v. LOHINSKI,, 829 So. 2d 925 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Disney Cruises can only be sued in a county where one of the following provisions listed under section 47.051 . . .

BLAND, v. FREIGHTLINER LLC, a, 206 F. Supp. 2d 1202 (M.D. Fla. 2002)

. . . case be transferred to a different forum, because it claims a lack of jurisdiction pursuant tó Section 47.051 . . . In pertinent part, it argues that Section 47.051, Florida Statutes (2001), mandates an action involving . . .

HOST MARRIOTT TOLLROADS, INC. v. PETROL ENTERPRISES, INC., 810 So. 2d 1086 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Section 47.051, Florida Statutes (2000), provides, “Actions against foreign corporations doing business . . . This factual allegation is irrelevant to a venue determination pursuant to section 47.051. . . .

M. YEE, v. NEW COMMODORE CRUISE LINES, LIMITED, INC. v. MOODIE,, 807 So. 2d 178 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . the Defendant has agents or other representatives in Miami-Dade County within the meaning of Section 47.051 . . . Accordingly, venue is proper in Miami-Dade County according to Section 47.051, Florida Statutes. . . .

NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC. v. J. VITALE,, 802 So. 2d 465 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . Vitale’s choice of venue is limited by section 47.051, Florida Statutes (1999), which provides: 47.051 . . .

CONTRACTOR S MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS OF NH, INC. a v. ACREE AIR CONDITIONING, INC. a, 799 So. 2d 320 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . See § 47.051, Fla. Stat. (2000); Ashemimry v. Ba Nafa, 778 So.2d 495, 497 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). . . .

POZO, v. ROADHOUSE GRILL, INC., 790 So. 2d 1255 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . ) the primary defendant, Humana, resides in Orange County; thus venue is proper under §§ 47.011 and 47.051 . . . residence is defined as the “county where such corporation has an agent or other representative.” § 47.051 . . .

KINETIKS. COM, INC. a a v. SWEENEY,, 789 So. 2d 1221 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . amendment, which sought to establish that the cause of actions accrued in Duval County, see section 47.051 . . .

M. ASHEMIMRY, v. BA NAFA,, 778 So. 2d 495 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . The applicable venue statutes are sections 47.011 and 47.051: 47.011. . . . This section shall not apply to actions against nonresidents. 47.051. . . .

DIVE BIMINI, INC. C. v. E. ROBERTS, A. A. B. E., 745 So. 2d 482 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . involved in this litigation;” and that Broward County is the only proper venue pursuant to section 47.051 . . . of its customary business” in Duval County for the purpose of establishing venue pursuant to section 47.051 . . . Section 47.051, Florida Statutes (1997), provides, in pertinent part, as follows: Actions against domestic . . .

RAYMAN, v. LANGDON ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC., 745 So. 2d 426 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . . §§ 47.011, 47.051 (1999). . . .

LANGAN ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. v. HARRIS CONSTRUCTORS, INC., 743 So. 2d 1177 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Section 47.051, Florida Statutes (1997), allows plaintiffs to bring actions against foreign corporations . . .

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP v. CEDAR RESOURCES, INC., 761 So. 2d 1131 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . See § 47.051, Fla. Stat. (1997). . . . determine whether a tort action accrued in Pinellas County for purposes of venue under sections 47.011 or 47.051 . . . considering whether a corporation transacts business in a particular county for venue purposes under section 47.051 . . .

LIFEMARK HOSPITALS OF FLORIDA, INC. d b a M. D. M. D. P. A. v. ROQUE M. D. v., 727 So. 2d 1077 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Section 47.051, Florida Statutes (1997), provides that actions against domestic corporations shall be . . .

NEW COMMODORE CRUISE LINES, LIMITED, v. SABIO,, 724 So. 2d 149 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . . § 47.051, Fla.Stat. (1997) NCCL argued that the cause of action accrued in Alaska, that there was no . . . Further, this Court has subsequently held that for purposes of section 47.051, independent travel agents . . . because Dade County is not one of the statutory venue choices available to Sabio pursuant to section 47.051 . . .

ST. AUGUSTINE BEACH INVESTORS, LTD. a H. I. a v. McGLINCHY, Jr., 717 So. 2d 556 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . Section 47.051, Florida Statutes (1997), provides that actions against foreign corporations doing business . . . the hotel suffices to establish the existence of a representative for venue purposes under Section 47.051 . . .

SAGAZ INDUSTRIES, INC. v. G. MARTIN,, 706 So. 2d 374 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . Section 47.051 provides: Actions against corporations. — Actions against domestic corporations shall . . .

STUART SUPPLY, INC. a d b a v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., 699 So. 2d 814 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . for change of venue on the grounds that there was no basis for venue in Duval County under section 47.051 . . . See § 47.051, Fla. Stat. . . .

HANSON- MURPHY, INC. v. FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN,, 698 So. 2d 1378 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . civil action accrued for venue purposes in Orange County where that action was filed, see §§ 47.011, 47.051 . . . This section shall not apply to actions against nonresidents, [emphasis supplied]. 47.051 Actions against . . .

I. WINCOR, v. CEDARS HEALTHCARE GROUP, LTD. d b a, 695 So. 2d 924 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . dismiss the amended complaint alleging, inter alia, improper venue pursuant to sections 47.011 and 47.051 . . .

CAPITAL HOTEL GROUP, INC. OF TALLAHASSEE, a v. KASTAMA, 694 So. 2d 888 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . travel agent “an agent or other representative” of Capital pursuant to the venue provisions of section 47.051 . . . where the reservation is booked do not become an agent of the facility for the purposes of section 47.051 . . .

KUMAR, d b a v. EMBASSY KOSHER TOURS, INC., 696 So. 2d 393 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . This section shall not apply to actions against nonresidents, [e.s.] 47.051 Actions against corporations . . .

WALT DISNEY WORLD CO. v. DIAZ, 691 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . further concluding) Gail Diaz and Peter Diaz properly brought suit in Monroe County pursuant to section 47.051 . . . We conclude, however, that, for the purposes of section 47.051, independent travel agents who make reservations . . .

BROWN WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION, v. YOUNG,, 690 So. 2d 1377 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . Young selected venue in Duval County pursuant to section 47.051, Florida Statutes (1995). . . . The parties agree, however, that venue would be proper under section 47.051 in either Duval County or . . . Section 47.051 provides: Actions against domestic corporations shall be brought only in the county where . . .

ALADDIN INSURANCE AGENCY, INC. v. W. JONES,, 687 So. 2d 937 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . See § 47.051, Fla. Stat. (1995). The motion was denied and this appeal followed. . . . Section 47.051, Florida Statutes (1995), provides: 47.051 Actions against corporations.— Actions against . . . Insofar as corporate residence is concerned, section 47.051 distinguishes between Florida and foreign . . . foreign corporation doing business in Florida resides where it has an agent or other representative. § 47.051 . . . The problem, however, is that under section 47.051, a Florida corporation resides where it has an office . . .

ALGERNON BLAIR CONTRACTORS, v. HUGHES SUPPLY, INC., 684 So. 2d 223 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . . § 47.051, Fla. Stat. (1993). . . .

BOCA RESEARCH, INC. v. KROLL ASSOCIATES, INC., 677 So. 2d 419 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . Section 47.051, Florida Statutes (1995) provides, in pertinent part, that actions against domestic corporations . . .

RUIZ, v. WALT DISNEY WORLD COMPANY,, 677 So. 2d 421 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . See § 47.051, Fla. Stat. (1995); Walt Disney World Co. v. . . .

LATHAN CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, v. McDANIEL GRADING, INC., 695 So. 2d 354 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . See §§ 47.011, 47.051, Fla.Stat. (1993). . . . .

SUZANNE WALKER ASSOCIATES, INC. v. QUALTEC QUALITY SERVICES, INC., 660 So. 2d 384 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . Section 47.051, Florida Statutes (1998), provides in part: Actions against domestic corporations shall . . . Although section 47.051, Florida Statutes (1993), recognizes that venue would also be proper in the county . . .

GOODYEAR TIRE RUBBER COMPANY, v. McCRONE,, 655 So. 2d 1319 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . However, section 47.051, Florida Statutes (1993), narrows the plaintiffs venue choice when it provides . . . Section 47.051 further provides that actions against domestic corporations shall be brought only in the . . . Considering the mandatory requirements of section 47.051, case law determines that where there are multiple . . . Only Broward County meets the mandatory requirements of section 47.051, because Waleen’s only place of . . . affirmatively appears from the record that the judge incorrectly refused to transfer venue pursuant to section 47.051 . . .

E. ROBERTS v. T. CASON, Sr. L., 652 So. 2d 439 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . . §§ 47.011, 47.051, Fla.Stat. (1991). . . .

PANACHE ON PARK AVENUE, v. PANACHE SALON AND BOUTIQUE OF ST. AUGUSTINE, INC. a, 645 So. 2d 582 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . Venue for actions against corporations is governed by section 47.051, Florida Statutes. . . . ERVIN and BARFIELD, JJ., concur. . § 47.051, Florida Statutes, states in part: Actions against domestic . . .

BARR, v. FLORIDA BOARD OF REGENTS,, 644 So. 2d 333 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . “which provides for venue in arbitration actions, displaces the general venue provisions of section 47.051 . . .

CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. XANDRE, INC., 641 So. 2d 497 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . Section 47.051, Florida Statutes (1993) governs venue in actions against domestic corporations. . . . Applying section 47.051, Chicago Title, plaintiff below, appropriately brought the action in Dade County . . .

GALE PORTER, TEMPORARY HELP, INC. a v. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, a, 633 So. 2d 64 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . Second, we examine the application of section 47.051, Florida Statutes (1991), to determine whether appellee . . .

AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, v. JOYNER ELECTRIC, INC., 618 So. 2d 799 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . contract and, therefore, the county in which Joyner’s cause of action accrued for purposes of section 47.051 . . .

REA, v. COMPACTOR- BALER SERVICE, INC., 627 So. 2d 488 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . Flagler Hospital, Inc., 316 So.2d 642, 644 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975)); see § 47.051, Fla.Stat. (1991). . . .

ECLECTIC SOURCE NETWORK, INC. v. VALUE RENT- A- CAR, INC. a a, 611 So. 2d 585 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . The defendants filed a motion to abate venue which merely recited Section 47.051, Florida Statutes (1991 . . .

LEVY COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, v. BOWDOIN W., 607 So. 2d 479 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . Section 47.051, Florida Statutes (1989), relating to actions against corporations, provides: “Actions . . .

PRECISION SOFTWARE, INC. v. GAUTHIER,, 605 So. 2d 592 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . Precision further asserted that Section 47.051, Florida Statutes (1991), the venue statute applicable . . . Section 47.051, Florida Statutes (1991), provides: Actions against foreign corporations doing business . . . In light of section 47.051, we have established that Precision is not authorized to do business in Hillsborough . . .

INDUSTRIAL CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, v. CONSULTANT ASSOCIATES, INC., 603 So. 2d 1355 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . Imperial Lumber Co., 238 So.2d 487 (Fla.2d DCA 1970); § 47.051, Fla.Stat. (1991). . . .

DOLPHIN CRUISE LINE, INC. v. RUBIN, 603 So. 2d 664 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . Section 47.051, Florida Statutes (1991) provides: Actions against domestic corporations shall be brought . . .

BURNUP SIMS TELCOM, INC. a v. McCRONE, 590 So. 2d 1121 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . Cournoyer, 505 So.2d 629 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); § 47.051, Fla.Stat. (1989). . . .

JACOBS GOODMAN, P. A. v. McLIN, BURNSED, MORRISON, JOHNSON ROBUCK, P. A., 582 So. 2d 98 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . Section 47.051, Fla. Stat. (1989). . . .

J. POLACKWICH, S. Sr. J. v. FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY O, 576 So. 2d 892 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . FP & L moved to transfer the case to Charlotte County for improper venue pursuant to section 47.051, . . . in Florida, did not have an “agent or other representative” in Florida within the meaning of section 47.051 . . . the foreign corporation may be sued in the county where it has an agent or other representative. § 47.051 . . .

BARRY COOK FORD, INC. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY,, 571 So. 2d 61 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . (Cook) challenges a non-final order transferring venue pursuant to section 47.051, Florida Statutes ( . . . Under section 47.051, FMC is a foreign corporation doing business in Florida, which has an “agent or . . . FMC did not meet this burden and that the trial court’s ruling was limited to the scope of section 47.051 . . .

BURGER KING CORPORATION, v. KOEPPEL, S., 564 So. 2d 209 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . Defendant moved under Section 47.051, Florida statutes (1989), to dismiss on this ground or, alternatively . . . Venue in this case was properly laid, initially, in Dade County under Section 47.051 because the defendant . . .

PIPER AIRCRAFT CORPORATION, v. SCHWENDEMANN,, 564 So. 2d 546 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . The pertinent venue statute, Section 47.051, Florida Statutes (1989) (emphasis added), provides that: . . . Clearly Section 47.051, which permits venue in a county where a foreign corporation has “an agent or . . .

VALJEAN CORPORATION, INC. v. HEININGER d b a, 559 So. 2d 677 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . .-021, 47.051, Fla.Stat. (1987). . . .

PREMIER CRUISE LINES, LTD. INC. v. GAVRILIS,, 554 So. 2d 659 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . Section 47.051, Florida Statutes (1987), states: Actions against foreign corporations doing business . . .

AIR SOUTH, INC. v. A. SPAZIANO,, 547 So. 2d 314 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . Section 47.051, Florida Statutes (1987) states: Actions against domestic corporations shall be brought . . .

T. CASON, Sr. T. Jr. W. v. FLORIDA FAVORITE FERTILIZER, INC., 547 So. 2d 703 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . Venue in actions against domestic corporations is governed by section 47.051, Florida Statutes (1987) . . .

POLACKWICH, v. FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY,, 36 Fla. Supp. 2d 169 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1989)

. . . Section 47.051 of the Florida Statutes provides: “Actions against domestic corporations shall be brought . . .

BERDOS, v. DOWLING, a a, 544 So. 2d 1129 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . Section 47.051, Florida Statutes (1987) provides that an action against a foreign corporation may be . . . It is therefore clear that venue was properly laid in Dade County under the portion of section 47.051 . . .

LAPUMA, v. KING BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC., 541 So. 2d 1366 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . Allied General Contractors, Inc., 365 So. 2d 442 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Section 47.051 Florida Statutes . . .

CARLSON- SOUTHEAST CORPORATION v. GEOLITHIC, INC., 530 So. 2d 1069 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . the course of conduct between the parties in this case overcame the general presumption of section 47.051 . . . Section 47.051, Florida Statutes (1985), which sets forth the venue provisions for actions against corporations . . .

AMERICAN THERMOPLASTIC EXTRUSION COMPANY, v. TACKETT PLASTICS, INC., 527 So. 2d 953 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . transaction of its customary business and could, therefore, have been sued in Polk County under Section 47.051 . . .

WILLIAMS, v. UNION NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY,, 528 So. 2d 454 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . The applicable venue statute is section 47.051, Florida Statutes (1987), which provides that actions . . .

SCHECTER, v. FISHMAN,, 525 So. 2d 502 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . Section 47.051, Florida Statutes (1985) provides that actions against domestic corporations shall be . . .

HARR a v. WEST FLORIDA SEAFOOD, INC. a, 521 So. 2d 349 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . .” § 47.051, Fla.Stat. (1985). . . .