Cases from cite.case.law:

AHG TAX CREDIT FUND XVIII, LLC, v. BLITCHTON STATION, LTD., 200 So. 3d 117 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . litigation, they argued that Alachua County was the only proper venue for that action under sections 47.061 . . .

LOIACONI, v. GULF STREAM SEAFOOD, INC., 830 So. 2d 908 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Section 47.061, Florida Statutes (2000), provides in pertinent part that an action on an unsecured promissory . . . promissory note in Sarasota County was sufficient to support venue in Sarasota County under section 47.061 . . .

GATOR OFFICE SUPPLY FURNITURE, INC. E. v. AMSOUTH BANK OF FLORIDA, N. A. f k a, 705 So. 2d 1039 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . Florida Statutes (1995), or the special venue statute regarding unsecured promissory notes, section 47.061 . . . Having established that the promissory note was secured, it would appear that section 47.061, Florida . . . The mortgagor (debtor) responded by moving to transfer venue pursuant to section 47.061, arguing that . . . changed the litigation into an action on a promissory note which involves the provisions of section 47.061 . . . See § 47.061, Fla. Stat. (1995). Reversed and remanded. DANAHY and QUINCE, JJ., concur. . . . .

MML DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. EAGLE NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI,, 603 So. 2d 646 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . changed the litigation into an action on a promissory note which involves the provisions of section 47.061 . . .

E. POSEY, v. A. SHELDON,, 560 So. 2d 357 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . Section 47.061, Florida Statutes (1989) mandates that venue be in Okaloosa County. . . .

WORLD OMNI LEASING, INC. v. QUESINBERRY, 36 Fla. Supp. 2d 72 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1989)

. . . . § 47.061 governs and sets forth proper venue requirements. Fla. . . . . § 47.061 states in pertinent part: Actions on unsecured negotiable or non-negotiable promissory notes . . .

FINE, v. CARNEY BANK OF BROWARD COUNTY, a, 508 So. 2d 558 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . Appellant is correct that section 47.061, Florida Statutes (1985), requires actions on unsecured negotiable . . . 409 So.2d 216 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982), an agreement between the parties as to venue, rather than section 47.061 . . .

J. SEARLE, v. FORTUNE FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, a, 480 So. 2d 187 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . Section 47.061, Florida Statutes (1983), provides that suits on unsecured promissory notes shall be brought . . .

OLMO, v. MURO,, 446 So. 2d 233 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . of Puerto Rico, was not entitled to have the action below dismissed for improper venue under Section 47.061 . . .

M. BAKER, M. D. v. HUEVEL, B. V., 420 So. 2d 335 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . Appellee concedes that venue in this case is governed by Section 47.061, Florida Statutes (1979), but . . . So.2d 43 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975), we likewise conclude that in the absence of any other proofs, Section 47.061 . . . See Trawick, Florida Practice and Procedures § 5 7. . § 47.061, Fla.Stat. (1979), provides: Actions on . . .

HALLMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. J. v. SCARBOROUGH CHEMICALS, INC., 409 So. 2d 216 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . suit should have been brought by the payee in the County where the note was signed pursuant to Section 47.061 . . . Such an admixture is more than sufficient to take this cause of action out of the purview of Section 47.061 . . .

S. SCHWARTZ, v. CAPITAL CITY FIRST NATIONAL BANK,, 365 So. 2d 181 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . Appellant first contends that the provisions of § 47.061, Florida Statutes, relating to venue in suits . . .

PERRY BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC. v. HAYES BATES, INC., 361 So. 2d 443 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . We are not here concerned with F.S. 47.122 relating to convenience of the parties, nor F.S. 47.061 relating . . .

CENTRAL BANK OF NORTH DADE, a v. PRIME LAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a, 335 So. 2d 581 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . Clifford, Fla.App.1971, 251 So.2d 40; and §§ 47.061, 47.122, and 47.163, Fla.Stat., 2 F.S.A. . . .

COUSINS MORTGAGE AND EQUITY INVESTMENTS, a v. FLORIDA FIRST NATIONAL BANK AT PENSACOLA,, 324 So. 2d 139 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . It is upon the foregoing facts that Cousins relies upon the following special venue statute, viz: “47.061 . . . The interpretation of Florida Statute 47.061, as urged by Cousins, smacks of establishing jurisdiction . . . was not executed in Florida, it is clear that for determining venue of this action Florida Statute 47.061 . . .

H. FOSTER, v. GRECO D., 320 So. 2d 43 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . unsecured promissory note so that the question of venue is controlled not by § 47.011, supra, but by § 47.061 . . .

GORMAN, v. ROYAL AMERICAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a, 247 So. 2d 66 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

. . . . § 47.061, F.S.A. . . .

ADLER, d b a A T v. COPA CORPORATION,, 212 So. 2d 337 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

. . . . § 47.061, F.S.A. . . .