The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . . § 55.11 (1995)). . . . (emphases added) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting 27 C.F.R. § 55.11 (1995)). . . .
. . . . § 55.11. . . . potential existence of mandatory screening procedures, 771 F.3d at 1025, here the reference in section 55.11 . . . not see how those laws foreclose the possibility that Kinard held authority pursuant to 27 C.F.R. § 55.11 . . . Kinard’s authority, to the extent it existed, could still have flowed from 27 C.F.R. § 55.11. . . .
. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice § 55.11(2)(a)(i)-(iii) (3d ed. 2012) (discussing Fed. R. Civ. . . . Moore’s Federal Practice § 55.11(2)(b)(ii); see also United States v. $23,000 in United States Currency . . .
. . . Default occurs where a party fails to respond within the time allowed. 10 Moore’s Federal Practice, § 55.11 . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 55.11[2][b] [iii]; see also Am.Jur. 2d Judgments § 263. . . .
. . . Am., 483 F.Supp.2d 400, 406-07 (D.N.J.2007); 10 Moore’s Federal Practice, supra, at § 55.11 [1]. . . . .
. . . Because Florida Statute § 55.11 expressly provides that “no money judgment or decree against a municipal . . .
. . . See The Code of Ordinances for West Branch, Chapter 55.11. . . . The Code of Ordinances for West Branch, Chapter 55.11, states in relevant part that: 1. . . .
. . . (emphasis added); see also 10 Moore’s Federal Practice, § 55.11[3][b] (Matthew Bender, 3d ed.) . . .
. . . (For example, ammonium nitrate-fuel oil and certain water gels (see also § 55.11)). Id. . . . actuated by a propellant or-which releases and directs work through a propellant charge.” 27 C.F.R. § 55.11 . . . analysis by noting that to be classified as a PAD, a device has to meet the requirements of 27 C.F.R.- § 55.11 . . .
. . . . § 55.11 (2001). . . .
. . . . § 55.11. . . .
. . . In a locked tool compartment set in the hatchback portion of the car, police discovered 55.11 grams of . . .
. . . Metropolitan Dade County, 396 So.2d 756 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), affirmed, 422 So.2d 838 (Fla.1982); § 55.11 . . .
. . . parts of the final judgments which include the language “for which let execution issue” and section 55.11 . . .
. . . See § 55.11, Fla.Stat. (1985); City of Ocoee v. State ex rel. . . .
. . . . § 55.11(b). . Id. § 55.24(a). . Id. § 55.25(b). . . . .
. . . . § 55.11 (1983) does not contain an express exclusion of “military-type ammunition containing explosive . . . defining ammunition, the ATF has indicated that the term shall include “percussion caps.” 27 C.F.R. § 55.11 . . . Indeed, he erroneously maintained that 27 C.F.R. § 55.11 was inapplicable to this case. . . . is “in the same general class” or otherwise within the scope of a “percussion cap” under 27 C.F.R. § 55.11 . . . See 27 C.F.R. § 55.11 (1983). . . .
. . . . § 55.11-1: Mandatory. . . .
. . . . § 55.11 as follows: Any material or mixture, consisting of fuel and oxidizer, that is intended for . . .
. . . . § 55.11 [formerly 27 C.F.R. § 181.11; see 46 Fed.Reg. 40382 (1981)]. . . .
. . . Smith, 61 Fla. 782, 54 So. 376 (1911); § 55.11, Fla.Stat. (1979). . . .
. . . Upon a denial of their claim for refund of one-half thereof, i. e., $55.11, this action was commenced . . .
. . . , as here, it rests on clear and convincing evidence. 10 Mertens, Law of Federal Income Taxation, § 55.11 . . .
. . . Mertens Law of Federal Income Taxation § 55.11.” . . .
. . . where, as here, it rests on clear and convincing evidence. 10 Mertens Law of Federal Income Taxation § 55.11 . . .
. . . Mertens, Law of Federal Income Taxation, § 55.11, and Lee v. . . .
. . . Mertens, Federal Income Taxation, § 55.11. . . .
. . . See cases collected and discussed at 10 Mertens, Law of Federal Income Taxation § 55.11. . . .
. . . See discussion of “What Constitutes Fraud,” Merten’s Law of Federal Income Taxation, sec. 55.11, vol. . . .
. . . Aside from the contention that Section 55.11 Fla. . . .
. . . received by the Shreveport Company in exchange for its property transferred to appellant as worth $55.11 . . .