The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . not fall within any of the limited and enumerated grounds for non-recognition specified in section 55.605 . . .
. . . Under Florida law, Except as provided in [§ ]55.605 [outlining grounds for nonrecognition], an out-of-country . . .
. . . to appeal,” and provided the Florida court does not find grounds for nonrecognition under sections 55.605 . . .
. . . . § 55.605 (presenting the various grounds for nonrecognition under the Act). . . . Stat. § 55.605(l)(b)-(c) (“(1) An out-of-country foreign judgment is not conclusive if: (b) The foreign . . . Id. § 55.605(l)(a). . . . See id. § 55.605(2)(c) (“(2) An out-of-country foreign judgment need not be recognized if: (c) The cause . . . Id. § 55.605(l)(a). The plaintiffs appealed. . . .
. . . . § 55.605(l)(b), Fla. Stat.; see Chabert, 694 So.2d at 811-12. . . . See §§ 55.605-.606, Fla. Stat. No Florida state court has squarely addressed the issue. . . .
. . . Stat. § 55.605. . . . Stat. 55.605 § (1)(a). . . . Stat. § 55.605(1)(a). . . . Stat. § 55.605. . . . Stat. § 55.605(2)(c). . . .
. . . is also “conclusive between the parties” and enforceable in this state “[e]x-cept as provided in s. 55.605 . . . Section 55.605 provides only ten grounds on which recognition of an out-of-country foreign money-judgment . . . personal jurisdiction over the defendant; or (3) did not have jurisdiction over the subject matter. § 55.605 . . . Rather, section 55.605(2)(a) — -the only provision of the Act potentially authorizing an attack on a . . . defendant received “notice of the proceedings in sufficient time to enable him or her to defend.” § 55.605 . . .
. . . Section 55.604(l)(a), Florida Statutes (2006), provides: Except as provided in s. 55.605, an out-of-country . . .
. . . Contrary to Parties’ Agreement The Uniform Act provides, in relevant part, “[ejxcept as provided in s. 55.605 . . . Pursuant to section 55.605, a foreign judgment need not be recognized under the Uniform Act if, among . . . under which the dispute in question was to be settled otherwise than by proceedings in that court.” § 55.605 . . . federal policy in favor of enforcing agreements to arbitrate disputes, this Court refuses, under § 55.605 . . .
. . . . — Except as provided in s. 55.605, a foreign judgment meeting the requirements of s. 55.603 is conclusive . . . the foreign judgment shall be enforced in the same manner as the judgment of a court of this state. 55.605 . . . criteria, it is entitled to recognition unless one of the grounds for nonrecognition enumerated in section 55.605 . . . See § 55.605. . . . Important for its absence from section 55.605 is any provision that the forum state’s statute of limitations . . .
. . . Nadd did not attack the recording on the basis of the statutory grounds set forth in section 55.605, . . .
. . . . §§ 55.605(1)(b), 55,606 (West 1998); see also Chabert v. . . .
. . . Based upon our careful review of the record, we conclude that none of the grounds listed in section 55.605 . . .
. . . This ground is based on section 55.605(l)(b) of the Act, which provides that “[a] foreign judgment is . . . Preliminarily, we note that subsection (1) of section 55.605 of the Act is phrased in mandatory terms . . . This contrasts with subsection (2) of section 55.605 which is phrased in permissive terms. . . . Unlike the grounds in subsection (l)(b) of section 55.605, this is not a mandatory basis for refusing . . . See § 55.605(2) (b), Fla. . . .