The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . . §§ 60.01(3), 70.15, 265.01-265.04, 265.20(a)(3) (West Cum. Supp. 2020). . . .
. . . Powell, Powell on Real Property, § 60.01 (2015). . 53 Rocky Mt. Min. L. . . . Powell, Powell on Real Property, § 60.01 (2015) (citing Edward Rabin,-Roberta Kwall, Jeffrey Kwall, and . . .
. . . Powell, Powell on Real Property, § 60.01 (2015). . 53 Rocky Mt. Min. L. . . . Powell, Powell on Real Property, § 60.01 (2015) (citing Edward Rabin, Roberta Kwall, Jeffrey Kwall, and . . .
. . . Penal Law §§ 265.01, 60.01(3), 70.15. . . .
. . . Law § 60.01 (McKinney 2014) (defining a sports collectibles dealer as “a person who is in the business . . .
. . . Committee Note of 1946 to Subdivision (b) of Rule 60, as reprinted in 6A Moore’s Federal Practice § 60.01 . . .
. . . parties, as well as maintaining an open mind in considering issues that may come before the judge,” SCR 60.01 . . .
. . . Code § DWD 60.01. B. . . .
. . . SingeR, SutheRland STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION § 60.01 (1986)); see also Samara Development Corp. v. . . .
. . . No-Parking Zone Defendants argue that the Court should have given Illinois Pattern Civil Instruction (“IPI”) 60.01 . . . The notes to IPI 60.01 state: This instruction should be given only where the evidence would support . . . Illinois Pattern Instruction — Civil 60.01, Notes on Use (2006); see also First Springfield Bank & Trust . . . Defendants failed to show that the no-parking regulation was intended to protect human life or property, IPI 60.01 . . .
. . . Penal Law § 60.01(2)(b). . . .
. . . . §§ 65.05, 60.01). . . .
. . . Penal Law § 60.01(4) (“In any case where a person has been sentenced to a period of probation imposed . . . Penal Law § 60.01(2)(d) ].”). . . .
. . . state court’s refusal to give Shah’s tendered jury instruction, Illinois Pattern Jury Instruction N. 60.01 . . .
. . . Penal Law § 60.01; see generally Daniel E. . . .
. . . Penal Law § 60.01; see generally Daniel E. . . .
. . . CCA Partnership, 70 B.R. 696, 698 (Bankr.D.Del.1987) (citing 3 Sutherland, Statutory Construction, §§ 60.01 . . .
. . . CCA Partnership, 70 B.R. 696, 698 (Bankr.D.Del.1987) (citing 3 Sutherland, Statutory Construction, §§ 60.01 . . .
. . . Penal §§ 60.01(2)(b); (3); 65.00(2). . . . Penal Law § 60.01 (1997). It does not authorize the imposition of a suspended sentence. . . .
. . . . §§ 60.01, 60.02, 65.00. . . .
. . . Singer, Sutherland Statutory Construction § 60.01 (5th ed.1992). . . .
. . . Sand et al., 3 Modem Federal Jury Instructions ¶ 60.01, at 60-29 (1999) (Instruction 60-10). . . .
. . . Singer, Sutherland Statutory Construction § 60.01 (5th ed.1992). . . .
. . . . § 60.01 (4th ed. 1986 & Supp.1991). . . .
. . . Penal Law §§ 60.01(4), 65.00(2) (McKinney 1987); N.Y. Veh. & Traf. . . .
. . . Singer, 3 Southerland Statutory Construction § 60.01 (5th ed.1992) (the rule that remedial statutes should . . .
. . . two heavily majority white districts were drawn: BTP BVAP H-lll 62.67 57.88 H-116 36.83 33.73 H-120 60.01 . . .
. . . Singer, Sutherland, Statutory Construction, § 60.01 (5th ed. 1992)). . . .
. . . Singer, 3 Sutherland Statutory Construction § 60.01 (5th ed. 1992) (the rule that remedial statutes should . . .
. . . t of Corrections, Policy Directive 04.05.120, § II(N)(18) (1991) (emphasis added) (replacing PD-BCF-60.01 . . . Finally, Policy Directive PD-DWA-60.01, § IV (1990), explains that [i]f a prisoner is serving a sanction . . .
. . . Singer, Sutherland on Statutory Construction § 60.01 (5th ed. 1992) [hereinafter Sutherland ]. . . .
. . . taxpayer and government); Jacob Mertens, Jr., Mertens Law of Federal Income Taxation §§ 50.67, 58A.64, 60.01 . . .
. . . Singer, Sutherland, Statutory Construction § 60.01 (5th ed. 1992)). . . .
. . . Sand et al., Modern Federal Jury Instructions ¶ 60.01, at 60-35 (1993) (footnote omitted). . . .
. . . therefore falls on the state’s courts and legislature. .Key violations are defined in Wis.Admin.Code § Ag 60.01 . . .
. . . Singer, Sutherland, Statutory Construction, § 60.01 (5th ed. 1992). . . .
. . . Finally, Policy Directive PD-DWA-60.01 (8-31-87) provides at page 13: “Eeclas-sification to administrative . . .
. . . is not subject to “punishment” under Michigan Department of Corrections (“MDOC”) regulation PD-DWA-60.01 . . . "Either the prisoner or the visitor may request a rehearing on the matter per PD-DWA-60.01.” . . .
. . . Arruda, 715 F.2d at 681; Coran, 589 F.2d at 72; Sand & Siefert, Modern Federal Jury Instructions, II 60.01 . . .
. . . Policy Directive BCF-60.01 states that “A prisoner may not be confined in temporary segregation without . . .
. . . Trial Second Trial 5,332.68 584.60 519.78 Xerox 836.80 290.20 12.17 131.02 Telephone 96.49 180.26 2.55 60.01 . . .
. . . claim that this treatment was in accordance with Department of Corrections policy directive PD-DWA-60.01 . . .
. . . Singer, Sutherland Statutory Construction § 60.01 (Sands 4th ed. 1986); De Luz Ranchos Inv., Ltd. v. . . .
. . . i.e., pro rata) shares of the available assets or their proceeds, 3 (Pt. 2) Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 60.01 . . .
. . . the bankruptcy law should be liberally construed (citing 3 Sutherland, Statutory Construction, Secs. 60.01 . . .
. . . liberally construed, CCA Partnership, 70 B.R. at 698 (citing 3 Sutherland, Statutory Construction, §§ 60.01 . . .
. . . . § 60.01 (4th rev. ed. 1986) and cases cited therein. . . .
. . . . § 60.01 (4th rev. ed. 1986) and cases cited therein. . . .
. . . Michigan Department of Corrections Policy Directive PD-DWA-60.01. . . . The Michigan Supreme Court has invalidated policy directive 60.01. Martin v. . . . Administrative Procedures Act, M.C.L. § 24.201 et seq., but failed to do so when it adopted PD-DWA-60.01 . . . Because Sanders’ charges were not pending on March 28, 1986, the invalidation by Martin of PD-DWA-60.01 . . . At the time of Sanders’ charges and convictions, PD-DWA-60.01 validly defined major misconduct. C.. . . .
. . . (quoting 3 Collier on Bankruptcy § 60.01 (14th ed. 1977)). . . .
. . . There may be more than one proximate cause of an event. 3 Texas Pattern Jury Charges 60.01 (1982), citing . . .
. . . See generally Singer, Sutherland Statutory Construction, §§ 60.01 et seq. (4th ed.). . . .
. . . instructions read is probably the best, or probably as good a statement as any, and in Pattern Instruction 60.01 . . .
. . . (Citing 3 Sutherland, Statutory Construction, §§ 60.01, 60.02, 66.09 (4th Ed.1974)). . . .
. . . . § 60.01 (3d ed. 1974) (remedial statutes are liberally construed to suppress the evil and advance the . . .
. . . such as the bankruptcy law should be liberally construed. 3 Sutherland, Statutory Construction, §§ 60.01 . . .
. . . See also 3 Collier, Bankruptcy § 60.01 at 743 (14th ed. 1977); Sampsell v. . . .
. . . Mich.Admin.Code R. 791.4405; Policy Directive PD BCF-60.01. . . .
. . . . §§ 60.01-5(a), 62.25-1, that the Coast Guard, by placing the temporary buoys, undertook to facilitate . . .
. . . major misconduct of Incite to Riot or Strike, Rioting or Striking, code 022, which is defined in PD-DWA 60.01 . . .
. . . . § 60.01-1. . Id. at § 3.01-1. . Id. at § 3.65-1. . . . . See 14 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 81; 33 C.F.R. §§ 60.01-5(a), and 62.25-1 to 62.25-60. . . . See 33 C.F.R. § 60.01-1. . . . .
. . . . §§ 60.01-1 through 72.05-10. . . .
. . . Sands, Sutherland’s Statutes and Statutory Construction §§ 60.01-60.05 (4th ed. 1973). . . .
. . . Sands, Statutes and Statutory Construction ¶ 60.01 (4th ed. 1974) (remedial statutes are liberally construed . . .
. . . From Federal Judgments: A Morass Unrelieved By A Rule, 30 Hastings L.J. 41 (1978); 7 Moore’s, supra ¶ 60.01 . . . See Committee Note of 1946 to Subdivision (b), 7 Moore’s, supra ¶ 60.01[8] at 4013-16. . . . limitation, and from relief by independent action, which is limited only by laches.” 7 Moore’s, supra ¶ 60.01 . . .
. . . Pro., reprinted in 6A Moore’s Federal Practice § 60.01[8]. . Bankers Mortgage Company v. . . .
. . . reenlistments that postdated our mandate in that case. . 3 Sutherland, Statutes and Statutory Construction § 60.01 . . .
. . . Clair 29,965 87.36 4,335 12.64 34.300 Sumter 7,079 39.99 10,621 60.01 17.700 Talladega 47,161 69.46 20,739 . . .
. . . Michigan Department of Corrections, Policy Directive DWA-60.01, effective September 28, 1981. . . . . The current departmental policy directive on prisoner disciplinary proceedings, DWA-60.01, indicates . . .
. . . invalidate certain transactions that have occurred prior to bankruptcy. 3 Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 60.01 . . .
. . . in census tracts 20, 41, 42,43, 44, 45, 46,47, 48, 49, 50,51, 52,53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 59.01, 59.02, 60.01 . . .
. . . of the bankruptcy law are based on the policy of equality of distribution. 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 60.01 . . .
. . . See also 3 Sutherland on Statutory Construction § 60.01 at 29 (1974); In re Carlson, 292 F.Supp. 778, . . .
. . . See generally 3 Collier, supra n. 2, ¶ 60.01, pp. 743-746. . . .
. . . Sutherland, Statutory Construction, 4th Ed., Vol. 3, § 60.01. . . .
. . . .) § 60.01. . . .
. . . included in census tracts 42.02, 54.01, 54.02, 55.01, 55.02, 55.03, 55.04, 56, 57.01, 57.02, 58, 59, 60.01 . . .
. . . further discussion of the fundamental policy of the Bankruptcy Act, see 3 Collier on Bankruptcy, § 60.01 . . .
. . . Smith, 83 U.S. (16 Wall.) 277, 301, 21 L.Ed. 280 (1873); 3 Collier on Bankruptcy jl 60.01, at 743; see . . .
. . . .) ¶ 60.01. . . .
. . . Hahn, 36 F.Supp. 952 (S.D.N.Y.1941); 3 Moore’s Federal Practice, § 60.01, et seq. . . .
. . . share from 15.61% in 1961 to 29.09% in 1969, while the share of savings banks decreased from 67.32% to 60.01% . . .
. . . For more complete background information on Rule 60(b), see 6A Moore’s Federal Practice ¶¶ 60.01-60.08 . . .
. . . See generally 3 Collier on Bankruptcy, 1Í1Í 60.01, 60.57, 60.59 (14th ed. 1964). . . . .
. . . 18, 1969, in the City of Hollywood and charged with the violation of the Hollywood Municipal Code § 60.01 . . . Hollywood Municipal Ordinance § 60.01, under which appellant stands charged, adopts Chapter 186, Florida . . .
. . . Moore, Federal Practice & Procedure § 60.01[8] (2d ed.) . . . Advisory Committee Note of 1946 to Subdivision (b) of Rule 60, reprinted in 6A Moore’s Federal Practice § 60.01 . . . Advisory Committee Note of 1946 to Subdivision (b) of Rule 60 reprinted 6A Moore’s Federal Practice § 60.01 . . .
. . . Color Corp., 1941, 313 U.S. 215, 61 S.Ct. 904, 85 L.Ed. 1293; 3 Collier, Bankruptcy, 14tli ed., IF 60.01 . . .
. . . During the years in question the percentage of cash dividends paid to net income were 1956, 60.01 per . . .
. . . Collier, Bankruptcy, Sec. 60.01, supra. . . . Collier, Sec. 60.01, pp. 759-760, supra. . . .
. . . See 3 WiUiston, Contracts §§ 678-79 (rev. ed. 1936); 10 Mertens, Taxation § 60.01 (rev. ed. 1958). . . .
. . . Collier Bankruptcy Manual 2d, f[ 60.01, p. 619. . . .
. . . Id., ¶ 60.01. Lienholders need no Bankruptcy Act. . . .
. . . . §§ 60.01-5 and 62.25-1 (1960 Supp.). . . . .
. . . Paid in per share Profit (“previously credited dividends”) per share Book value per share $132.00 $60.01 . . .
. . . See Mertens, supra, §§ 60.01-60.11. Respondent relies upon the decision of this court in Crane v. . . .
. . . . 5 $30.01 to $40.00 ........... 5y2 $40.01 to $50.00 ........... 7 $50.01 to $60.00 ........... 8 $60.01 . . .
. . . C., 2 F.R.D. 526; Moore’s Federal Practice, Vol. 3, Sec. 60.01 et seq.; Rule 6(b) and Rule 60(b) of the . . .
. . . See Moore’s Federal Practice, Vol. 3 § 60.01 et seq. . . .