The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . letter in an envelope disclosing the same information on November 11, 2013, attempting to recover $60.06 . . .
. . . For instance, House District 48 includes 60.06% of the city of Ellerbe, but captures 96.24% of that city . . .
. . . Conduct, R. 60.06(4); Wyo.Code of Jud. Conduct, Canon 4, R. 4.2(B)(4). . . . .
. . . School District (95.11%) exceeded the percentage of white students in the Malvern School District (60.06% . . .
. . . alternative Assembly District 8 with a Latino voting age population of 70.07%, which he estimates amounts to 60.06% . . .
. . . Wisconsin Supreme Court Rule 60.06(4). . . . (The language we have quoted is from the version effective when Siefert was decided; Rule 60.06(4) has . . .
. . . rights provided for under the Wisconsin Constitution, are being violated by Wisconsin Supreme Court Rule 60.06 . . . Stat. § 11.502(2) unless SCR 60.06(4) is found to be unconstitutional as applied to him. . . . .# 9) preventing SCR 60.06(4) from applying to him, because (1) the period in which he can qualify for . . . Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit determined that the direct solicitation ban found under SCR 60.06 . . . Under Siefert, 60.06(4) is constitutional as applied to judicial candidates, like Winnig, even if they . . .
. . . The challenged provisions are all contained in Wisconsin Supreme Court Rule 60.06: SCR 60.06 A judge . . . in SCR 60.06(2)(b)4, and the ban on personal solicitation of campaign contributions in SCR 60.06(4). . . . )(a) or the balance of SCR 60.06(2)(b). . . . SCR 60.06(2)(b)l: Party Membership SCR 60.06(2)(b)l states that “No judge or candidate for judicial office . . . (2)(b)4 and SCR 60.06(4). . . . . speech regarding qualifications for office than the one at issue here: Wisconsin Supreme Court Rule 60.06 . . . SCR 60.06(2)(b)4. . . .
. . . sentence and to remit his case to [the trial court] ... for resentencing in accordance with Penal Law §§ 60.06 . . . Penal Law §§ 60.06, 70.00(5). . . .
. . . . §§30.00, 60.06 (West 2009); §490.55 (West 2008) North Carolina N. C. Gen. Stat. . . .
. . . . §§ 30.00, 60.06 (West 2009); § 490.55 (West 2008) North Carolina N. C. Gen. Stat. . . .
. . . SCR 60.06(2)(c). . . . SCR 60.06(2)(a). . . . SCR 60.06(2)(a) and (c). . . . 60.06(2)(b)l. . . . Because the effect of SCR 60.06(2)(b)1, 60.06(2)(b)4 and 60.06(4) is to limit the discussion without . . .
. . . Moore and Jo Deshap Lucas, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 60.06[1] (2d ed.1993); see also United States v . . . See Moore, supra, ¶ 60.06[4]. Patton v. . . .
. . . The individual dumping margins were 39.63, 60.06, and 63.36 percent. . . .
. . . The individual dumping margins were 39.63, 60.06, and 63.36 percent. Id. at 1236. . . .
. . . . * * * SCR 60.06. . . . on the survey and by reference adopting the statement that they were precluded from answering by SCR 60.06 . . . One 2006 respondent wrote after each question: “Pursuant to SCR 60.06(3)(b).” . . . The quoted phrase being a reference to, inter alia, Rule SCR 60.06(3) regulating campaign rhetoric. . . . SCR 60.06(3)(b). . . .
. . . Penal Law §§ 60.06 & 70.00(1-3). . . .
. . . Rule 60.06(2)(b) (judicial candidates shall not be a member of any political party). . . . Rule 60.06(4). States that'permit personal solicitation are: California, Cal.Code of Jud. . . .
. . . The 2.7 grams of cocaine he sold converted to .54 kg of THC, for a total of 60.06 kg of THC. . . .
. . . The Wright plan proposes a District 4 with a total black population of 7, 716 people or 60.06%. . . .
. . . . §§ 60.06 (setting alternative dispositions for first-degree murder); 70.00(2)(a) (setting maximum term . . . Penal L. § 60.06, without the need for any additional fact-finding by the judge. . . .
. . . R. 60.06(3) (prohibiting "suggestions of conduct in office which appeal to the cupidity or partisanship . . .
. . . Id. at 303 (quoting 6A Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 60.06(1), p. 4042 (2d ed.1966)). . . .
. . . Penal Law § 60.06 (McKinney’s Supp.1996)). . . .
. . . emphasis also appears in the treatment of equitable recoupment in Mertens Law of Federal Income Taxation § 60.06 . . .
. . . emphasis also appears in the treatment of equitable recoupment in Mertens Law of Federal Income Taxation § 60.06 . . .
. . . and government); Jacob Mertens, Jr., Mertens Law of Federal Income Taxation §§ 50.67, 58A.64, 60.01, 60.06 . . .
. . . Moore and Jo Desha Lucas, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 60.06[1] (2d ed. 1993); see also United States v . . .
. . . Moore and Jo Desha Lucas, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 60.06[1] (2d ed. 1993); see also United States v . . .
. . . Prior to the focus center, African-American enrollment at" Haskell was 60.06% in the 1976-77 school year . . .
. . . 1987, for which, after a disciplinary hearing, he was assessed restitution costs in the amount of $60.06 . . .
. . . See 6A Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶¶ 58.02.1, 60.06[4]; Aviles v. . . . Grotheer, Jr., Moore's Federal Practice, ¶ 60.06[4]; see abo Hegger v. . . .
. . . interest in a judgment may be corrected by means of Rule 60(a). 6 A Moore’s Federal Practice, Paragraph 60.06 . . .
. . . Wicker, Moore's Federal Practice ¶ 60.06[3] pg. 60-44 (2d ed. 1987). . . .
. . . Grotheer, Jr., 6A Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 60.06[4] (1987). . . .
. . . Grotheer, Jr., 6A Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 60.06[4] (1987). . . .
. . . documents to record). . 194 F.2d 887 (D.C.Cir.1952). . 6A Moore’s Federal Practice, supra note 9, ¶ 60.06 . . .
. . . documents to record). . 194 F.2d 887 (D.C.Cir.1952). . 6A Moore’s Federal Practice, supra note 9, ¶ 60.06 . . .
. . . Penal Law §60.06 (McKinney 1987),, providing for death penalty for first-degree murder); North Dakota . . .
. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice If 60.06[1] pp. 60-41 to -42, 60-52 (1983). . . .
. . . Balesh, 704 F.2d 774, 776 (5th Cir.1983), quoting Moore’s Federal Practice, fl 60.06[3] at 4057 (2d Ed . . .
. . . N.Y.Penal Law § 60.06 (McKinney Supp.1975). . . . .
. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 60.06[4] at 60-49 (2d ed. 1983). . . . Moore, supra, ¶ 60.06[4] at 60-52. . . .
. . . See 6A Moore's Federal Practice ¶ 60.06[3]. . International Controls Corp. v. . . .
. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 60.06[4], at 4068 (1971) (“where ... the failure to include interest . . .
. . . be had from the clerical mistakes of the court, clerk, jury or party.” 6A Moore Federal Practice ¶ 60.06 . . .
. . . clerical, and exercise it only on a clear showing of mistake.” 6A Moore’s Federal Practice, supra, ¶ 60.06 . . .
. . . See 3 part 2 Collier on Bankruptcy (14th Ed. 1964) ¶ 60.05 and 60.06, pp. 771-85, and Glessner v. . . .
. . . prejudice to the state to institute an appropriate action in accordance with sections 823.05, 60.05, and 60.06 . . .
. . . cause to believe that the debtor was insolvent at the time of the transfer. 3 Collier, Bankruptcy *'60.06 . . .
. . . For December, 1975 and November, 1976, mathematical error resulted in a deficiency of $60.06, including . . .
. . . N.Y.Penal Law § 60.06. However, in People v. . . . . - (July 3, 1978) the New York Court of Appeals struck down the death penalty as provided for in § 60.06 . . .
. . . Moore, Federal Practice H 60.06[4], at 4067-68 (2d ed. 1974). . . . Moore, Federal Practice ¶ 60.06[4], at 4067-68 (2d ed. 1974). . . .
. . . public nuisance alleging that the trial court had jurisdiction pursuant to Sections 823.05, 60.05, 60.06 . . . All such places or persons shall be abated or enjoined as provided in §§ 60.05 and 60.06. . . . Section 60.06, Florida Statutes (1975), further provides: “Abatement of nuisances; enforcement. . . .
. . . Penal Law § 60.06 (1975); N. C. Gen. Stat. § 14-17 (Supp. 1975); Ohio Rev. . . .
. . . See, history of §§ 60.06 and 823.05, F.S. 1973, F.S.A. . See, e. g., Dept. of Administration v. . . .
. . . Breece Lumber Co., 213 F.2d 702 (5th Cir. 1954), 6A Moore’s Federal Practice § 60.06 [3] at 4057-58 ( . . .
. . . Byrne, 191 F.2d 667 (CA9 1951); 6 Moore’s, supra, ¶ 60.06 [3] and [4]. . . .
. . . All such places or persons shall be abated or enjoined as provided in §§ 60.05 and 60.06.” . . . (which was enacted in 1969), could be enjoined or abated through Fla.Stat. §§ 60.05 and 60.06, F.S.A. . . .
. . . further provides; “[a] 11 such places or persons shall be abated or enjoined as provided in §§ 60.05 and 60.06 . . . All such places or persons shall be abated or enjoined as provided in §§ 60.05 and 60.06.” . . .
. . . All such places or persons shall be abated or enjoined as provided in §§. 60.05 and 60.06.” . “16. . . .
. . . See 3 Collier, Bankruptcy § 60.06, n.7 (14th ed. 1967). . . . transferred superior to the rights of the transferee therein. * * * ” See 3 Collier, Bankruptcy, supra, § 60.06 . . .
. . . misprisions, oversights and omissions, unintended acts or failures to act”. 6A Moore’s Federal Practice, par. 60.06 . . . had from the clerical mistakes of the court, clerk, jury or party”. 6A Moore’s Federal Practice, par. 60.06 . . .
. . . other words, to all things of which there is a record in the action.” 6 Moore, Federal Practice para. 60.06 . . . Id., paras. 60.06 [1], 60.06 [4] The cases, however, are not in harmony as to what constitutes substantial . . . Id., 60.06[4]; First Nat’l Bank In Greenwich v. . . . been treated as oversights which may be corrected under Rule 60(a). 6 Moore, Federal Practice para. 60.06 . . .
. . . Lines, 133 F.2d 470 (9 Cir. 1943) ; 7 Moore Federal Practice If 60.06 at p. 4054. . . .
. . . Divide this sum by 35.5, the number of weeks involved, and the result is $60.06. . . .
. . . September 10, 1954, that a deficiency had been assessed in plaintiff’s 1952 income tax in the amount of $60.06 . . .
. . . were incurred and paid for by claimant’s decedent, namely: For coal_$1,110.68 For donkeyman’s wages- 60.06 . . .
. . . as follows: (1) June 2, 1900, from the steamship Ponce outward bound from New York to Porto Rico, $60.06 . . .