The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . Lucas, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 68.02, at 68-4 (1979). . . .
. . . their class action complaint on June 12, 2009, following a drop in the price of McGraw-Hill stock from $68.02 . . .
. . . . ¶ 2) — the price of McGraw-Hill common stock dedined from $68.02 per share at the outset to $24.23 . . .
. . . See 13 Moore’s Federal Practice § 68.02[2], at 68-7 (3d ed.2004) (“The primary purpose of Rule 68 is . . .
. . . International Inn, Inc. 16 B.R. 308, 313 (Bankr.D.Alaska 1981) (citing 4 Collier on Bankruptcy, P. 68.02 . . .
. . . . § 68.02 provides that final determinations are reviewable; Wis. . . . Stat. § 68.02(1). . . . First, § 68.03 excepts § 68.02 from its reach: “Except as provided in § 68.02, the following determinations . . . and the exception of § 68.02 included at the beginning of § 68.03. . . . Stat. § 68.02(1). . . .
. . . White Minority * WARDS 41-66 White Minority YEAR: 1985 49.40% 50.60% 68.24% 31.76% 1986 49.31 50.69 68.02 . . .
. . . supra, §§ 7, 14, 16, 18, 21, 24, 25, 36, 61, 64, 74, 75; 4 Collier on Bankruptcy (14th ed. 1978) ¶ 68.02 . . .
. . . See 7 Moore’s Federal Practice, par. 68.02 on page 68-4 (West 1990) (hereinafter “Moore’s”). . . .
. . . 3-3-84,” and that Deaton needed “the down-payment of $126.78 plus the first payment due 4-18-84 of $68.02 . . .
. . . Sinclair, Moore’s Federal Practice para. 68.02 (2d ed. 1987); Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. . . .
. . . Rule 10D-68.02(19), Florida Administrative Code. . . . Rule 10D-68.02(20), Florida Administrative Code. . . .
. . . in custody pursuant to a writ of ne exeat, entered pursuant to Florida Statutes sections 61.11 and 68.02 . . .
. . . which exercised such discretion under the general principles of equity." 4 Collier on Bankruptcy para. 68.02 . . .
. . . See 4 Collier On Bankruptcy ¶ 68.02[1] (14th ed.1978). . . . thereon and at the same time pay in full his indebtedness to the estate. 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 68.02 . . .
. . . Wicker, Moore's Federal Practice ¶ 68.02 (2d ed. 1981). . . .
. . . .- (1981); Rules 10-5.02(15)(16) and (17), 10-5.04(7), and 100-68.02(18), Florida Administrative Code . . .
. . . See generally, 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 68.02 (14th Ed. 1975). . . .
. . . which exercises such discretion under the general principles of equity.” 4 Collier on Bankruptcy para. 68.02 . . .
. . . See, 4 Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 68.02 at pp. 852-854, (14th ed. 1978). . . .
. . . thereon and at the same time pay in full his indebtedness to the estate.” 4 Collier on Bankruptcy § 68.02 . . .
. . . Lucas, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 68.02, p. 68-4 (1979). . . .
. . . See generally, Von Kalinowski, 9 Antitrust Laws and Trade Regulation, § 68.02. . . . Von Kalinowski, supra, § 68.02[4], n. 34; Federal Trade Comm’n v. A. E. . . .
. . . 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1010, 91 S.Ct. 564, 27 L.Ed.2d 627 (1971); 4 Collier on Bankruptcy § 68.02 . . .
. . . 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1010, 91 S.Ct. 564, 27 L.Ed.2d 627 (1971); 4 Collier on Bankruptcy § 68.02 . . .
. . . encourage settlements and avoid protracted litigation.” 7 Moore’s Federal Practice, Second Edition ¶ 68.02 . . .
. . . thereon and at the same time pay in full his indebtedness to the estate.” 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 68.02 . . .
. . . See generally, 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶68.02 (14th Ed. 1975). . . .
. . . however, neither is “[a] set-off under § 68 . automatic or self-executing.” 4 Collier, Bankruptcy ¶ 68.02 . . . Logan, supra); accord, 4 Collier, Bankruptcy ¶ 68.02[1], at 851-52, & cases cited at nn.14-16. . . .
. . . which exercises such discretion under the general principles of equity.” 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 68.02 . . .
. . . receiving only partial, if any, dividends on any claim he might establish. 4 Collier on Bankruptcy, § 68.02 . . .
. . . Phelps, 283 F.2d 261, 264-65 (9th Cir. 1960); see generally 4 Collier, supra, ¶¶ 68.02, 68.03, 68.08, . . .
. . . E.D.La.1975); 3 Barron & Holtzoff, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1471; 7 Moore's Federal Practice ¶ 68.02 . . .
. . . See 4 Collier on Bankruptcy §§ 68.02 and 68.03 (14th Ed. 1975). . . .
. . . See 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 68.02. . . .
. . . See 4 Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 68.02[1]. . . .
. . . See 4 Collier on Bankruptcy §§ 68.02[1] and 68.03. . . . suit by the trustee against a third party on a debt owed to the bankrupt. 4 Collier on Bankruptcy § 68.02 . . . The statute is misquoted in § 68.02[1] of Collier, text at n. 2 where it reads “allowed and paid” instead . . .
. . . See generally 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 68.02. . . .
. . . rights as to setoff unless there is something in the Act specifically so doing.” 4 Collier, supra, |f 68.02 . . .
. . . Practice, Paragraph 68.02. . . .
. . . Pract., ¶68.02. . . .
. . . Andrews, supra; Collier on Bankruptcy, 14th Edition, Vol. 4, Sec. 68.02, page 719-734 Inch Also, Collier . . . on Bankruptcy, 14th Edition, Vol. 4, Sec. 68.02, pages 711-712, states: “Despite the seemingly mandatory . . .
. . . re Progressive Wallpaper Corp., D.C.N.D.N.Y., 240 E. 807; Collier on Bankruptcy, 14 Ed., Vol. 4, § 68.02 . . .
. . . than import the time-honored doctrine of equitable setoff into the bankruptcy law. 4 Collier §§ 68.01-68.02 . . .
. . . January 1952 February 20, 1952 139.04 February 1952 March 25, 1952 84.90 March 1952 April 22, 1952 68.02 . . .
. . . Bank, 1913, 229 U.S. 523, 33 S.Ct. 806, 57 L.Ed. 1313; 4 Collier on Bankruptcy § 68.02 (14 ed.1942). . . .