The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . State , 143 So.2d 484, 488 (Fla. 1962) ; see § 90.106, Fla. . . . ."); § 90.106, Fla. Stat. . . .
. . . .” § 90.106, Fla. Stat. (2016). . . .
. . . implicitly or explicitly commented on the witness’s status as an “expert,” the court violated section 90.106 . . . on the witness’s testimony or placing the court’s imprimatur on the witness in violation of section 90.106 . . .
. . . This important prohibition has in fact been codified in section 90.106, Florida Statutes (2014), which . . .
. . . .” § 90.106, Fla. Stat. (2011). . . .
. . . This principle is codified in section 90.106, Florida Statutes (2011), which provides that “[a] judge . . .
. . . instruction was improper because it violated the prohibition against judicial comment set forth in section 90.106 . . . Section 90.106 provides that a judge may not comment to the jury upon the weight of the evidence. § 90.106 . . .
. . . Section 90.106 The application of section 90.304 to section 627.7073(l)(c), as articulated at trial, . . . was also inconsistent with section 90.106 Florida Statutes (2005), which provides that “[a] judge may . . . instruction would be in clear violation of the prohibition against such instructions articulated in section 90.106 . . .
. . . .” § 90.106, Fla. Stat. (2009). . . .
. . . constituted a statement on the evidence and the ultimate issue to be decided, in violation of section 90.106 . . .
. . . Florida’s prohibition of judicial comment on the evidence has been codified in section 90.106, Florida . . . Section 90.106 provides: “A judge may not sum up the evidence or comment to the jury upon the weight . . . Marr I and Marr II were decided after the adoption of section 90.106 and the 1983 amendment to section . . . In reaching this conclusion, the en banc majority relied on section 90.106. Id. at 711. . . .
. . . Section 90.106, Florida Statutes (2005), states that a judge “may not sum up the evidence or comment . . .
. . . See also § 90.106, Fla. Stat. (2004); Charles W. . . .
. . . See § 90.106, Fla. Stat. (2005); Brown v. State, 678 So.2d 910, 911 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). . . .
. . . This general principle has been codified in section 90.106, Florida Statutes (2003), which provides that . . .
. . . because they would likely overshadow that testimony of the witnesses themselves and of counsel, section 90.106 . . . Consistent with our judicial rule, section 90.106, Florida Statutes (2004), provides that “[a] judge . . . See § 90.106, Fla. . . .
. . . Section 90.106, Florida Statutes (1999), states that a trial “judge may not sum up the evidence or comment . . .
. . . Coates argues that section 90.106, Florida Statutes (2001), compelled the granting of a mistrial. . . .
. . . Section 90.106, Florida Statutes (2001), prohibits a trial judge from summing up the evidence or commenting . . .
. . . Section 90.106 of the Florida Evidence Code clearly dictates that in a jury trial a judge may not sum . . .
. . . See § 90.106, Fla. Stat. (1997); Fogelman v. State, 648 So.2d 214, 219 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). . . .
. . . .” § 90.106, Fla. Stat. (1997). . . .
. . . Section 90.106, Florida Statutes (1995), provides that “[a] judge may not ... comment to the jury upon . . .
. . . . § 90.106, Fla.Stat. (1993); Williams v. . . .
. . . because they would likely overshadow the testimony of the witnesses themselves and of counsel, Section 90.106 . . .
. . . Canevary, 553 So.2d 1312, 1316 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); § 90.106, Fla.Stat. (1989). . . .
. . . Section 90.106, Florida Statutes (1985), provides that a judge may not comment to the jury on the weight . . .
. . . State, 460 So.2d 489 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); § 90.106, Fla.Stat. (1985). . . .
. . . Also, section 90.106 of the Florida Evidence Code, adopted by this Court, 372 So.2d 1369; 376 So.2d 1161 . . .
. . . Section 90.106, Florida Statutes (1983) provides: A judge may not sum up the evidence or comment to the . . .
. . . quality of the evidence ... ”; (3) the adoption of the Florida Evidence Code, particularly section 90.106 . . . As to the majority’s reliance upon section 90.106 — barring comments by the trial court regarding the . . . Cases are legion in annotation under Section 90.106, supra, that the judge must avoid any expression . . .
. . . Appellant argues that the trial judge violated Section 90.106, Florida Statutes, providing: “A judge . . . because they would likely overshadow the testimony of the witnesses themselves and of counsel, Section 90.106 . . .