Cases from cite.case.law:

SECRETARY OF STATE, B. v. F. MILLIGAN,, 704 So. 2d 152 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . of the annual salary transferred to the Trust Fund and the remainder distributed pursuant to section 99.103 . . .

LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF FLORIDA, v. SMITH,, 687 So. 2d 1292 (Fla. 1996)

. . . The First District rejected petitioners’ claims and upheld section 99.103(1) as valid under both the . . . We agree with the First District that section 99.103(1) is subject to a sliding scale of constitutional . . . As the district court concludes, section 99.103(1) is not a ballot access provision and, rather than . . . Rather, § 99.103 is merely an appropriation of some portion of the filing fees that both sides concede . . . As the district court correctly explains, even though the section 99.103(1) rebate provision may not . . .

LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF FLORIDA, v. SMITH,, 665 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . their complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief which challenged the constitutionality of section 99.103 . . . Rather, § 99.103 is merely an appropriation of some portion of the filing fees that both sides concede . . . As to whether § 99.103 is reasonably related to the state’s interest, the appellants argue that once . . . fees to their respective parties’ executive committees “for the purpose of meeting ... expenses.” § 99.103 . . . Constitution, § 99.103 also passes muster under the Florida Constitution.” . . . . I am persuaded by Appellants’ arguments and authorities cited that Florida Statutes section 99.103 is . . .

BOUDREAU, v. WINCHESTER,, 642 So. 2d 1 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . See §§ 99.092(1) and 99.103(1) and (2), Fla. Stat. (1993). . . .

A. McNAMEE v. SMITH,, 647 So. 2d 162 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . filing fee, election assessment and party assessment scheme found in sections 99.061(1), 99.092 and 99.103 . . .

STATE A. BUTTERWORTH v. REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA, STATE v. NRA POLITICAL VICTORY FUND,, 604 So. 2d 477 (Fla. 1992)

. . . As acknowledged in the majority opinion, the Republican Party, under sections 99.103 and 99.061(2), Florida . . . Therefore, because the Republican Party’s executive committee receives public funding, under sections 99.103 . . .

ABRAMS v. RENO,, 649 F.2d 342 (5th Cir. 1981)

. . . . § 99.103. . . .

GEORGIA SOCIALIST WORKERS PARTY, D. v. W. FORTSON, Jr., 315 F. Supp. 1035 (N.D. Ga. 1970)

. . . . § 99.103 (1967), F.S.A. . . .

WETHERINGTON, v. O. ADAMS,, 309 F. Supp. 318 (N.D. Fla. 1970)

. . . . § 99.103 (1967), F.S.A. . . .

DIFFENDERFER, v. HOMER,, 408 F.2d 1344 (5th Cir. 1969)

. . . . §§ 99.092, 99.103, F.S.A., which provide: “99.092 Filing fee of candidate; notification of secretary . . . returned to the candidate unless he withdraws his candidacy before the last date to qualify. * * * 99.103 . . .

H. MANESS R. v. UNITED STATES, 237 F. Supp. 918 (M.D. Fla. 1965)

. . . Sec. 99.103, F.S.A. (1957) authorized the Secretary of State to pay these fees over to the executive . . .