The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title IX
ELECTORS AND ELECTIONS

Chapter 104
ELECTION CODE: VIOLATIONS; PENALTIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 104.29

104.29 Inspectors refusing to allow watchers while ballots are counted.—The inspectors or other election officials at the polling place shall, after the polls close, allow as many as three persons near to them to see whether the ballots are being reconciled correctly. Any official who denies this privilege or interferes therewith commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.

History.—s. 8, ch. 26870, 1951; s. 51, ch. 71-136; s. 35, ch. 77-175; s. 53, ch. 79-400; s. 50, ch. 2011-40.

F.S. 104.29 on Google Scholar

F.S. 104.29 on Casetext

Amendments to 104.29

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 104.29

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S104.29 - ELECTION LAWS - REFUSE TO ALLOW WATCHERS WHILE BALLOTS COUNTED - M: F

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE FIFTH THIRD EARLY ACCESS CASH ADVANCE LITIGATION. C. R. E. A. D. v., 925 F.3d 265 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . later, resulting in APR of about 104% using plaintiffs' formula: 10 ___ 100 × 365 _________ × 100 = 104.29% . . .

IN RE GGI PROPERTIES, LLC, GGI LLC, v., 568 B.R. 231 (Bankr. D.N.J. 2017)

. . . distinguished from this case because here New Jersey’s In Rem Tax Foreclosure Act (1948), N.J.S.A. 54:5—104.29 . . .

In PRINCETON OFFICE PARK, L. P., 423 B.R. 795 (Bankr. D.N.J. 2010)

. . . , 548 A.2d 521 (“Foreclosure by a municipality under the [In Rem Tax Foreclosure Act, N.J.S.A. 54:5-104.29 . . .

PROCHROMA TECHS. INC. l v. UNITED STATES,, 60 Fed. Cl. 614 (Fed. Cl. 2004)

. . . PX 104 11166, at 104.17-104.18, 104.26-104.29; Tr. at 647-48. . . .

UNITED STATES v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES, CORP. SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT DIVISION,, 51 F. Supp. 2d 167 (D. Conn. 1999)

. . . The contract contains the then applicable Defense Acquisition Regulation (DAR) standard clause 7-104.29 . . .

JJR, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 36 F. Supp. 2d 1259 (W.D. Wash. 1999)

. . . Court therefore awards the following: District Court Proceedings 1995 Attorneys Fees 126.50 hours @ $104.29 . . .

In PLAINFIELD AVENUE, INC. PLAINFIELD AVENUE, INC. v. TOWNSHIP OF SCOTCH PLAINS,, 223 B.R. 440 (Bankr. D.N.J. 1998)

. . . . §§ N.J.Stat.Ann. 54:5-104.29 et seq., the In Rem Tax Foreclosure Act. . . .

v., 110 T.C. 94 (T.C. 1998)

. . . adjusted by increases in the cost of living) and award petitioner attorney’s fees at an hourly rate of $104.29 . . . Thus, the parties’ awards were as follows: (1) Petitioner = (.25 x (95.6 x 104.29)) + (.1988 x (225.2 . . . 107.37)) + (.01 x (296.5 x 109.83)) + (.01 x 4,844.65); (2) Hon Family Ventures, Ltd. = (.2308 x (95.6 x 104.29 . . . .03 x (296.5 x 109.83)) + (.03 X 4,844.65); and (3) Hon Property Investments, Inc. = (.0052 x (95.6 x 104.29 . . .

In DECALCOMANIA MFG. CORPORATION, DECALCOMANIA MFG. CORPORATION, v. CITY OF CAMDEN,, 142 B.R. 670 (Bankr. D.N.J. 1990)

. . . Pursuant to the requirements of the In Rem Tax Foreclosure Act, N.J.S.A. 54:5-104.29, et seq., the City . . . Citing New Jersey In Rem Foreclosure Act, N.J.S.A. 54:5-104.29 et seq. and NJ.S.A. 54:5-104.30(a) ("Municipality . . .

UNISYS CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES,, 888 F.2d 841 (Fed. Cir. 1989)

. . . Regulation § 7-104.29 (1976) reprinted in 32 C.F.R. Parts 1-39, Vol. II, at 133-34 (1981). . . .

CRAIG H. v. TOWNSHIP OF EWING,, 678 F. Supp. 1106 (D.N.J. 1988)

. . . the constitutionality of the provisions of the New Jersey In Rem Tax Foreclosure Act, N.J.S.A. 54:5-104.29 . . . 1981, the Township sought to obtain an in rem foreclosure on the property pursuant to N.J.S.A. 54:5-104.29 . . .

UNIVERSAL RESTORATION, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 798 F.2d 1400 (Fed. Cir. 1986)

. . . . §§ 3-807-5, 7-104.29(b) (1970). . . .

UNIVERSAL RESTORATION, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 798 F.2d 1400 (Fed. Cir. 1986)

. . . . §§ 3-807-5, 7-104.29(b) (1970). . . .

ROSADO v. K. WYMAN, 322 F. Supp. 1173 (E.D.N.Y. 1970)

. . . Defendants allege that the basic monthly grant should be $60.55 for a one person household, $104.29 for . . .

UNITED GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, v. TYLER GAS SERVICE COMPANY,, 162 F. Supp. 496 (E.D. Tex. 1958)

. . . For that period the amount due at the contract rates was $624,821.50, the balance of $632,-104.29 being . . .

GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY CO. v. WEEKS, STATE TAX COMMISSIONER,, 297 U.S. 135 (U.S. 1936)

. . . 96.02% apportioned on tracks owned and operated and leased and operated and the three use factors, 104.29% . . .