Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 104.32 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 104.32 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 104.32

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title IX
ELECTORS AND ELECTIONS
Chapter 104
ELECTION CODE: VIOLATIONS; PENALTIES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 104.32
104.32 Supervisor of elections; delivery of books to successor.Any supervisor of elections who willfully fails or refuses promptly to comply with the demand of his or her successor for the delivery of registration books, papers, and blanks connected with his or her office is guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
History.s. 8, ch. 3879, 1889; RS 2779; s. 9, ch. 4328, 1895; GS 3820; RGS 5881; CGL 8144; s. 8, ch. 26870, 1951; s. 2, ch. 65-60; s. 54, ch. 71-136; s. 35, ch. 77-175; s. 629, ch. 95-147.
Note.Former s. 98.21.

F.S. 104.32 on Google Scholar

F.S. 104.32 on Casetext

Amendments to 104.32


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 104.32
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S104.32 - ELECTION LAWS - FAILURE TO DELIVER BOOKS TO SUCCESSOR - M: F



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE GGI PROPERTIES, LLC, GGI LLC, v., 568 B.R. 231 (Bankr. D.N.J. 2017)

. . . . §§ 54:5-87, 54:5-104.32 (“UFTA”). . . .

DL, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,, 312 F.R.D. 1 (D.D.C. 2015)

. . . District has a duty to “identify and locate every handicapped” child residing in the city. 34 C.F.R. 104.32 . . .

P. P. v. COMPTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT,, 135 F. Supp. 3d 1126 (C.D. Cal. 2015)

. . . . § 104.32; (3) violation of Department of Education regulations regarding “procedural safeguards,” 34 . . .

P. P. v. COMPTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT,, 135 F. Supp. 3d 1098 (C.D. Cal. 2015)

. . . . § 104.32; (3) violation of Department of Education regulations regarding “procedural safeguards,” 34 . . . implementing regulations of the Rehabilitation Act regarding “Location and'- Notification” (34 C.F.R. § 104.32 . . . , the Second Claim alleges violation of the “Location and Notification” requirements of 34 C.F.R. § 104.32 . . . handicapped persons and their parents or guardians of the'recipient’s duty under this subpart. 34'C.F.R. § 104.32 . . .

ZDROWSKI, Ad C. R. a v. RIECK, E., 119 F. Supp. 3d 643 (E.D. Mich. 2015)

. . . . §§ 104.32, 104.35. . . .

DL, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, A, 713 F.3d 120 (D.C. Cir. 2013)

. . . . §§ 104.32-104.39 as well as 5-E D.C.M.R. § 3002.1(a) (requiring the District to "make a [FAPE] available . . .

KIMBLE, B. K. a B. K. a v. DOUGLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT RE-, 925 F. Supp. 2d 1176 (D. Colo. 2013)

. . . . §§ 104.32, .35. . . .

D. L. K. L. S. L. K. L. S. L. v. BALTIMORE BOARD OF SCHOOL COMMISSIONERS,, 706 F.3d 256 (4th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 104.32(a) — (b). . . .

Ms. H. T. H. a v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION,, 784 F. Supp. 2d 1247 (M.D. Ala. 2011)

. . . Section 104.32, like the “child find” duty spelled out in IDEA, requires that federal funding recipients . . . The “duty” referred to in § 104.32 is explained by other regulations. . . .

J. W. a By J. E. W. J. A. W. v. FRESNO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT,, 570 F. Supp. 2d 1212 (E.D. Cal. 2008)

. . . . §§ 104.32-35 with 20 U.S.C. § § 1415(b)(6) and (k). . . . SAC ¶ 93 (citing 34 C.F.R. § 104.32). . . .

RUECKER, v. SOMMER a a, 567 F. Supp. 2d 1276 (D. Or. 2008)

. . . requirements with respect to the identification, evaluation and placement of disabled students. 34 USC §§ 104.32 . . .

P. P. a MICHAEL P. P. v. WEST CHESTER AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT,, 557 F. Supp. 2d 648 (E.D. Pa. 2008)

. . . . § 104.32; W.B. v. Matula, 67 F.3d 484, 500-01 (3d Cir.1995) (overruled on other grounds). . . .

In PLAINFIELD AVENUE, INC. v., 72 F. Supp. 2d 482 (D.N.J. 1999)

. . . . § 54:5-104.32 specifically states that a tax foreclosure cannot be construed as a fraudulent transfer . . . Ann. § 54:5-104.32, Judge Stripp rejected defendant’s argument that allowing an FCA claim to set aside . . . Ann. §§ 54:5-104.32 to -104.48. . . . Ann. § 54:5-104.32. . . . Ann. § 54:5-104.32. The Court finds that plaintiff may not proceed under an equity theory. . . .

In PLAINFIELD AVENUE, INC. PLAINFIELD AVENUE, INC. v. TOWNSHIP OF SCOTCH PLAINS,, 223 B.R. 440 (Bankr. D.N.J. 1998)

. . . Id. at § 54:5-104.32. . . . N.J.Stat.Ann. § 54:5-104.32 prohibits such foreclosure from being considered a fraudulent transfer. . . . N.J.Stat.Ann. § 54:5-104.32 (emphasis added). . . . Application of the plain language of N.J.Stat.Ann. § 54:5-104.32 would not lead to an absurd or futile . . . N.J.Stat.Ann. § 54:5-85 et seq. provides an in personam action while N.J.Stat.Ann § 54:5-104.32 permits . . .

In STOCKARD C. PROVIDIAN BANCORP f d b a v. STOCKARD,, 216 B.R. 237 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 1997)

. . . when her statement showed a balance (including interest and late charges) that exceeded the limit by $104.32 . . .

W. B. E. J. E. J. v. MATULA Dr. Dr., 67 F.3d 484 (3d Cir. 1995)

. . . . § 104.32(a). . . . See 34 C.F.R. § 104.32(b) (school must notify disabled children and their parents of school's duty under . . .

CRAFT MACHINE WORKS, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 20 Cl. Ct. 355 (Cl. Ct. 1990)

. . . the end items to be delivered under this con-tract____” Defense Acquisition Regulation (“DAR”) § 7-104.32 . . .

ST. LOUIS DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES TREATMENT CENTER PARENTS ASSOCIATION, v. L. MALLORY,, 591 F. Supp. 1416 (W.D. Mo. 1984)

. . . . § 104.32(a); evaluate, § 104.35(a) and (b); provide a free appropriate educational program designed . . .

W. WIRTZ, v. COMPANIA DE SERVICIOS ELECTRICOS, S. A. P. W. De S. A., 304 F. Supp. 697 (D.C.Z. 1967)

. . . 118.12 Hernandez, Manuel 277.66 Jimenez, Leoncio 22.50 Lopez, Ricardo 366.70 Lopez, Jose De Las Nieves 104.32 . . .

LIBERTY NAVIGATION TRADING CO. v. KINOSHITA CO. LTD. TOKYO,, 285 F.2d 343 (2d Cir. 1960)

. . . to the $28,649.50 figure of out-of-pocket savings already' determined, and deducting the sum, $48,-104.32 . . .

ASSOCIATED GROCERS OF ALABAMA, v. WILLINGHAM, 77 F. Supp. 990 (N.D. Ala. 1948)

. . . 115.64 327.57 340.61 117.28 357.64 187.43 9.51 241.87 389.91 119.78 356.51 128.30 33.82 100.04 5.0S 104.32 . . .