The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title X
PUBLIC OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, AND RECORDS

Chapter 111
PUBLIC OFFICERS: GENERAL PROVISIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 111.05

111.05 Officer reinstated after suspension; back pay.—An officer who is lawfully entitled to resume the duties of office after suspension by the Governor shall suffer no loss of salary or other compensation because of the suspension. Compensation which is unpaid because of the officer’s suspension is appropriated and shall be paid from the source and in the manner in which the compensation of the office is normally paid. If funds sufficient to pay the unpaid compensation are not available in the proper source, the deficit is appropriated and shall be paid from the general funds of the state or of the political subdivision under which the office exists, as the case may be.

History.—s. 1, ch. 57-71; s. 675, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 111.05 on Google Scholar

F.S. 111.05 on Casetext

Amendments to 111.05

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 111.05

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 111.05.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

TRAINA, v. WHITNEY NATIONAL BANK,, 109 F.3d 244 (5th Cir. 1997)

. . . account reported a balance of $1,424.30 as of the May 13, 1991, statement date; additional charges of $111.05 . . .

TRAINA, v. WHITNEY NATIONAL BANK,, 109 F.3d 244 (5th Cir. 1997)

. . . account reported a balance of $1,424.30 as of the May 13, 1991, statement date; additional charges of $111.05 . . .

In KENECO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC., 131 B.R. 90 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1991)

. . . See also Clarke On Secured Transactions 111.05[7] (in which the author observed, after referring to a . . . See also Clarke On Secured Transactions 111.05[8] (“... a security interest in chattel paper may be perfected . . .

SMITH, a A. R. E. A. v. TOWN OF DEWEY BEACH, a WHALEN, a v. TOWN OF BETHANY BEACH, a, 659 F. Supp. 752 (D. Del. 1987)

. . . joint control over the beach area where the accident complained of in this litigation occurred____ 111.05 . . .

R. FLACK, v. GRAHAM, 453 So. 2d 819 (Fla. 1984)

. . . See, e.g., § 111.05, Fla.Stat. (1981). . . .

In MALDEN MILLS, INC., 45 B.R. 408 (Bankr. D. Mass. 1984)

. . . adjudication” is not exactly the same as an “adjudicated bankruptcy”, see e.g., 8 Collier on Bankruptcy, 111.05 . . .

CALIFORNIA v. ARIZONA, 452 U.S. 431 (U.S. 1981)

. . . S 40°34'00" W 111.05 feet; 467. S 40°02/55" W 123.14 feet; 468. S 46°00'59" W 122.79 feet; 469. . . .

F. LUHRSEN, Jr. v. VANTAGE STEAMSHIP CORP., 514 F.2d 105 (5th Cir. 1975)

. . . Regulation 111.05-10(c)(5) “Rotating Electrical Machinery.” . Glapion v. . . .

POLLIN v. SALADINI, 209 F.2d 304 (D.C. Cir. 1954)

. . . reasonable cost of the substituted tile facing was $1,897.50, to which should be added the sura of $111.05 . . . Thus the trial judge disregarded his finding that Saladini was entitled to the further sum of $111.05 . . . figure is the total of the sum of $1,897.50, found as the cost of the added tile work, and the sum. of $111.05 . . .

La CROSSE TELEPHONE CORP. v. WISCONSIN EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD, 336 U.S. 18 (U.S. 1949)

. . . . § 111.05 (1). . . . . § 111.05 (3). . . . .” § 111.05 (3). . . . Section 111.05 (3), indeed, makes the certification “conclusive.” . . . See § 111.05 (4), supra, note 2; Rydahl’s Launderers & Cleaners, Wis. E. R. B. . . .