The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . Penal Law §§ 155.05, 155.40 (McKinney 1967). . . . Penal Law § 155.40. . . . Penal Law § 155.40, thus appearing to focus the statute on the threat's effect on the recipient rather . . . Penal Law § 155.40. . . .
. . . Edwards earned less per diem pay ($155.40) that week. Id. . . .
. . . Penal Law § 155.40(1). (FAC, Ex. C, at p. 2.) . . .
. . . Kirsch committed Racketeering Acts 4B and 5B, which charged attempted extortion under NY Penal Law § 155.40 . . . acts underlying Count 1 — Racketeering Acts 4B and 5B— were done in violation of New York Penal Law 155.40 . . . Court’s charge concerning the state extortion statute, § 155.40(2), instructed the jury to consider two . . . See New York Criminal Jury Instructions (CJI) 2d, NY PL 155.40(2). . . .
. . . Bergulia and Laro for the crime of grand larceny in the second degree in violation of New York Penal Law § 155.40 . . . Penal Law § 155.40(1). . . . Penal Law § 155.40(1). . . .
. . . Penal Law § 155.40 (2008). “Grand larceny in the second degree is a class C felony.” Id. . . . legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see Penal Law §§ 155.35, 155.40 . . .
. . . In 1990, the Hospital Board utilized section 155.40, Florida Statutes, which was enacted in 1982 and . . . future lessee) and that are “in addition to the requirements for any [ ] lease set forth in section 155.40 . . . the contract clause protects a corporation that has contracted with a hospital district under section 155.40 . . . specific purpose of taking control of the public hospital — by contract — as authorized by section 155.40 . . . Given that the very purpose of section 155.40 is to contractually transfer control of public hospitals . . .
. . . Penal Law §§ 70.00(2)-(3), 155.40(1). . . .
. . . convictions: (1) a March 29, 2011 conviction for Grand Larceny, in violation of New York Penal Law § 155.40 . . .
. . . Regardless of the status of other corporations involved in leases under section 155.40, the specific . . .
. . . York state violations: (1) Grand larceny in the second degree, in violation of New York Penal Law § 155.40 . . .
. . . predicate acts were (1) a conspiracy to extort money from Gulinello, in violation of New York Penal Law §§ 155.40 . . .
. . . Penal Law § 155.40(1); and one count of Grand Larceny in the Third Degree under N.Y. . . .
. . . . § 155.40 (5th ed.) (incorporating “any part, no matter how small” from Rogers). . . .
. . . Wolfe, charging him with one count of Grand Larceny in the Second Degree under New York Penal Law § 155.40 . . .
. . . . §§ 155.05 (West 1988), 155.40, 158.20 (West Supp. 1998), 176.25 ($50,000); but see, e. g., §§190.65 . . .
. . . Penal Law §§ 105.13, 155.05, 155.40. . . .
. . . Penal Law §§ 110.00, 155.40. . . . Penal Law §§ 110.00 and 155.40(1) is when a person attempts to intentionally steal property and that . . . Penal Law § 155.40(1), which Defendant cited in the felony complaint, there is no explicit element of . . . Rather, he expressly relied on Section 155.40(1), which does not regard extortion. . . . /2J, not § 155.40[1].]) . . . .
. . . Section 155.40 of the New York Penal Law provides that a person is guilty of grand larceny in the second . . .
. . . Penal Law § 155.40 (hereinafter “Larceny Compl.”). . . . Penal Law § 155.40: "A person is guilty of grand larceny in the second degree when he steals property . . . Penal Law § 155.40. . . . .
. . . In 1982, the legislature enacted section 155.40, Florida Statutes (1983), which authorized independent . . . Furthermore, both the enabling act and section 155.40(4)(b), Florida Statutes, authorize the Authority . . . hospital and consenting to amendment of Memorial’s articles of incorporation, as required by section 155.40 . . .
. . . Degree, a Class D felony, in violation of New York Penal Law Section 110, and subsection 1 of Section 155.40 . . .
. . . Penal Law § 155.40(1)); two counts of grand larceny in the third degree (N.Y. . . . Penal Law §§ 155.40(a), 155.35. . . .
. . . Penal Law § 155.40), one count of burglary in the second degree (N.Y. . . .
. . . New York Penal Law (“Penal Law”) § 190.65(l)(a) Scheme to defraud in the first degree; Penal Law § 155.40 . . . New York Penal Law (“Penal Law”) § 190.65(l)(a) Scheme to defraud in the first degree; Penal Law § 155.40 . . .
. . . Constitution when the public lessor complies with the public finance accountability provisions of s. 155.40 . . . it has adopted authorizing the lease agreements and, more recently, through the adoption of section 155.40 . . . Section 155.40 Exemption In pertinent part, section 155.40 states: (6) Unless otherwise expressly stated . . . Section 155.40(6)-(7), Florida Statutes (2002). . . . 395.3036, there are no legislative findings regarding the public necessity for the exemption in section 155.40 . . .
. . . . § 155.40(1); grand larceny in the third degree, in violation of N.Y. . . .
. . . Penal Law §§ 160.15(3), 160.10(1), 160.05, 155.40. . . .
. . . Gonzalez was convicted, on February 22, 1995, of grand larceny in the second degree (N.Y.Penal Law § 155.40 . . . N.Y.Penal Law § 155.40 (grand larceny in the second degree is a Class C felony); N.Y.Penal Law § 70.00 . . .
. . . Constitution when the public lessor complies with the public finance accountability provisions of s. 155.40 . . .
. . . Penal Law § 155.40 (McKinney 1999); (iv) three counts of grand larceny in the third degree, in violation . . . (emphasis added)); id. § 155.40 (same); id. § 175.35 (prohibiting actions done “with intent to defraud . . .
. . . (codified as later amended at § 155.40(2)(e), Fla. Stat. (1999)). . . . (codified at § 155.40(5)(a)-(b), Fla. Stat. (1999)). . . . (codified at § 155.40(3), Fla. Stat. (1999)). . . . (codified at § 155.40(6), Fla. Stat. (1999)). . . . (codified at § 155.40(7), Fla. Stat. (1999)). . . .
. . . Penal Law § 155.40 (McKinney 1999), following a bench trial in New York State Supreme Court for Kings . . .
. . . with the authority to enter into leases with other not-for-profit corporations by enacting section 155.40 . . . into leases with a nonprofit Florida corporation for the operating of such facilities so existing. § 155.40 . . . Constitution when the public lessor complies with the public finance accountability provisions of s. 155.40 . . . it has adopted authorizing the lease agreements and, more recently, through the adoption of section 155.40 . . . It reflects the need for the leasing scheme created in section 155.40 and explains in its intent language . . . the West Volu-sia Hospital Authority (Authority), a hospital taxing authority, pursuant to section 155.40 . . . Following the 1980 opinion of the Attorney General, the 1982 Legislature enacted section 155.40, Florida . . . Authority decided to enter into a lease and operating agreement (Agreement) as authorized by section 155.40 . . . However, we note that section 155.40 contains no express exemption from public records access. . . . (codified at § 155.40, Fla. Stat. (Supp.1996)). . . . .
. . . In considering whether to lease, the Authority chose to proceed under Section 155.40, Florida Statutes . . . Lessee urges that since section 155.40 was designed to foster competition, it implicitly permits agreements . . .
. . . 155.42 (grand larceny in the first degree (property valued at over $1 million)) with N.Y.Penal Law § 155.40 . . .
. . . 155.42 (grand larceny in the first degree (property valued at over $1 million)) with N.Y.Penal Law § 155.40 . . .
. . . Plaintiffs allege Fisher violated 18 U.S.C. § 1951 and N.Y.Penal Law 155.30(6), 155.35, and 155.40. . . . Plaintiffs allege Curtis violated 18 U.S.C. § 1951 and N.Y.Penal Law 155.30(6), 155.40, and 200.10. . . . Plain- • tiffs allege Ferber violated 18 U.S.C. § 1951 and N.Y.Penal Law 155.30(6), 155.40 and 200.10 . . . Plaintiffs allege Meck-le violated 18 U.S.C. § 1951 and N.Y.Penal Law 155.30(6), 155.40 and 200.10. . . . Plaintiffs allege Kelly violated 18 U.S.C. § 1951 and N.Y.Penal Law 155.30(6), 155.40, and 200.10. . . .
. . . In 1982, the Florida legislature enacted section 155.40, Florida Statutes, authorizing public hospital . . . In 1986, the Northwestern District, acting pursuant to section 155.40, “reorganized” the Everglades Hospital . . . Section 155.40, Florida Statutes, provides, in relevant part: Reorganization of county, district, or . . . See § 155.40, Fla.Stat. (1993). . . . Although section 155.40 provides that a district may reorganize a hospital entity for the purpose of . . .
. . . Penal Law, Section 155.40. . . .
. . . Penal Law § 155.40, grand larceny in the second degree (theft of over $50,000), based on fraudulent Medicaid . . .
. . . . § 155.40 (a Class C felony), concerns the value of the property taken. . . . N.Y.Penal § 155.40(2). . . . .
. . . Court not denied all attorneys' fees to Plaintiffs' counsel, it would have disallowed a total of $535,-155.40 . . .
. . . jury and charged with: three counts of grand larceny in the second degree, in violation of section 155.40 . . .
. . . . §§ 155.30, 155.35, 155.40, 155.45. . . .
. . . . § 1341 (1984), and extortion, New York State Penal Code, §§ 155.05(2)(e)(ii)(ix), 155.30, 155.35, 155.40 . . .
. . . See, e.g., PENAL LAW §§ 155.05(2)(c), 155.35, 155.40 (larceny in second or third degree, Class C & D . . .
. . . . § 155.40. . . .
. . . . § 155.40, Fla.Stat. (Supp.1984). . . . Florida not-for-profit corporation by the directors of the hospital district pursuant to this section 155.40 . . . the district hospital to the corporation to be unlawful; not within the authority given by section 155.40 . . . The judge also ruled section 155.40 unconstitutional. The substance of his judgment says: 1. . . . Special Act does not authorize said transfer and the Defendant’s Special Act prevails over Chapter 155.40 . . .
. . . Penal Law §§ 155.05(2)(e), 155.40 (McKinney 1975)); and mail fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1341 (1982)). . . . extortion (18 U.S.C. § 1951 (1982)); and larceny by extortion in violation of N.Y.Penal Law §§ 155.05, 155.40 . . . Penal Law §§ 155.05(2)(3), 155.40 (McKinney 1975), define "extortion” in terms similar to the federal . . .
. . . That Chapter 155.40 Florida Statutes (1984) does not authorize a District Hospital to deed and transfer . . . The rule expressio unius est exclusio alterius is applicable to Chapter 155.40 Florida Statutes (1984 . . . NORTH BREVARD COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT failed to comply with Chapter 155.40 Florida Statutes (1984) in . . . Chapter 155.40 Florida Statutes as utilized by the Defendants is contrary to the Special Act creating . . . The Defendant’s Special Act prevails over Chapter 155.40 and the Agreement, Deed and Bill of Sale are . . .
. . . Unknown Property No. 525 1973 (7 Months) 1974 Electric $314.65 $636.50 Gas 201.41 365.98 Telephone 84.71 155.40 . . .
. . . .; 125.00 et seq; 135.65, 155.40. . . .
. . . calculated the total to be $205.40, but a review of the figures indicates that the correct total was $155.40 . . .
. . . Section 155.40 states in pertinent part: A person is guilty of grand larceny in the first degree when . . .
. . . petitioner to have drafted and executed an instrument of assumption of the Moffat Tunnel lease at a cost of $155.40 . . .
. . . for enl New Zealand Wellington) nearest port of entry Wilmington, Calif. 3,108 miles @ 5$ per mile_ 155.40 . . . Acc for enl New Zealand Wellington) nearest port of entry Wilmington, Calif. 3108 miles @ per mile_ 155.40 . . .
. . . For 1952, $155.40, with interest from March 15, 1953. . . .
. . . the corporation), acquired 68 shares of its common stock from each of the taxpayers at a price of $155.40 . . . which the corporation on April 17, 1941 acquired 76.5 shares of its common stock from Lowenthal at $155.40 . . . per share, or $11,888.10, and 76 shares of such stock, each from Cogan and Shapiro at $155.40 per share . . . with Manheimer and the trustees by which they purchased the remaining 656 shares owned by them for $155.40 . . . of common stock. from each of the petitioners, as well as from Shapiro, or a total of 204 shares at $155.40 . . .
. . . cost of hauling sand to the new site, over what the hauling to the original site would have cost, $155.40 . . .
. . . shoüld be fixed at four pence per ton, instead of eight pence, at which rate the demurrage would be $155.40 . . .