Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 157.08 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 157.08 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 157.08

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XI
COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS
Chapter 157
DRAINAGE BY COUNTIES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 157.08
157.08 Assessments; validation.After the special drainage district has been constituted and the assessments have been made and levied by the board of county commissioners, and before awarding the contract for the construction of any such ditch, drain or canal, the board of county commissioners shall, as soon as practicable, issue and sell district drainage bonds for the total amount of such assessments, less the interest charges. Said bonds shall bear interest not to exceed 7.5 percent per annum, payable semiannually, with interest coupons attached thereto, and shall be issued in denominations of not exceeding $1,000. The board of county commissioners shall, in issuing and selling said bonds, and in disbursing the proceeds thereof, act in substantial conformity with the provisions of these statutes applicable to the issue and sale of bonds for the purpose of constructing hard-surfaced highways or public buildings; with the exception, that the assessments for the payment of interest and to provide a sinking fund for the payment of the bonds shall be assessed and collected only upon the taxable property within the boundary of such special drainage district; and the bond trustees shall reside in the county, but not necessarily in the drainage district, but in no case shall district bonds be issued or sold against any drainage district for a greater amount than the assessment imposed upon lands in such district, and the bonds shall be issued in such maturities as will enable them to be paid in installments from time to time as fast as substantial amounts shall accumulate from the collection of the assessments. The validity of all bonds issued under this chapter may be determined and established in the manner provided by law for the validation of bonds issued by cities and municipalities.
History.s. 7, ch. 5035, 1901; GS 956; s. 7, ch. 6457, 1913; s. 2, ch. 6958, 1915; RGS 1741; CGL 2792; s. 9, ch. 73-302.

F.S. 157.08 on Google Scholar

F.S. 157.08 on Casetext

Amendments to 157.08


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 157.08
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 157.08.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

ACOSTA, v. MASTER MAINTENANCE, v., 192 F. Supp. 2d 577 (M.D. La. 2001)

. . . be recommended for approval: • Andrea Ehrhardt (B.10-11) $ 114.40 • Jeanne Ann Larose (B.1233-1252) 157.08 . . .

In McREYNOLDS, Lu, 253 B.R. 54 (Bankr. S.D. Iowa 2000)

. . . That amount yields a monthly average of $157.08. . . .

ALLIS- CHALMERS CORPORATION, v. L. ARNOLD, Jr. v. SULZER BROS. INC., 619 F.2d 44 (9th Cir. 1980)

. . . See also Borchard, Declaratory-Judgments 302, 303 (2d ed. 1941); 6A Moore’s Federal Practice 157.08[3 . . .

HARRIS, v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY GUARANTY COMPANY, a, 569 F.2d 850 (5th Cir. 1978)

. . . Borchard, Declaratory Judgments 298 (2d ed. 1941); 6A Moore’s Federal Practice 157.08[4], at 57-46 to . . .

W. TAMARI, W. W. Co. v. BACHE CO. LEBANON S. A. L. a Co. a, 565 F.2d 1194 (7th Cir. 1977)

. . . been of determinative importance in the exercise of judicial discretion.” (6A Moore’s Federal Practice 157.08 . . .

HANES CORPORATION, a v. MILLARD, 531 F.2d 585 (D.C. Cir. 1976)

. . . Moore, Federal Practice 157.08[2] (1974). . . .

W. J. DILLNER TRANSFER COMPANY, v. McANDREW, Jr., 226 F. Supp. 860 (W.D. Pa. 1963)

. . . Trico Products Corp., 11 F.Supp. 292 (W.D.N.Y.1935); and see Generally, 6 Moore, Federal Practice, ‘¡[157.08 . . .

ROBERTSON v. SALOMON, 144 U.S. 603 (U.S. 1892)

. . . There was a verdict for the plaintiffs, for $157.08 as to certain of the goods, and for the defendant . . . as to certain others of them; whereupon a judgment was entered for the plaintiffs for $157.08 damages . . .