The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XI
COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS

Chapter 157
DRAINAGE BY COUNTIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 157.10

157.10 Application to lateral ditches.—The provisions of this chapter with reference to locating, surveying, cutting and maintaining the same, and every other provision of said chapter with reference to such public ditch, drain or canal, are made applicable to all lateral ditches and drains that may be deemed necessary or expedient for the drainage and benefit of lands lying in the vicinity of such public ditch, drain or canal, that may be reached, drained or benefited by lateral ditches or drains.

History.—s. 12, ch. 5201, 1903; GS 959; RGS 1744; CGL 2795.

F.S. 157.10 on Google Scholar

F.S. 157.10 on Casetext

Amendments to 157.10

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 157.10

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 157.10.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE TESLA MOTORS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, 75 F. Supp. 3d 1034 (N.D. Cal. 2014)

. . . slightly, from the pri- or day’s close of $149.58 to $147.86, then soared the next day to close at $157.10 . . .

COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION, LLC, v. ACRES, MORE OR LESS IN PENN TOWNSHIP, YORK COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, LOCATED ON TAX ID OWNED BY P. BROWN M. P. M. LLC, v. Sq. Ft Id E. M. E. M. LLC, v. Id A. Jo A. Jo LLC, v. ID W. J. W. J., 768 F.3d 300 (3d Cir. 2014)

. . . it allows gas companies to circumvent the important notice and hearing requirements of §§ 157.6 and 157.10 . . . formal hearing where they have an opportunity to intervene and protest it. 18 C.F.R. §§ 157.6(d)(2), 157.10 . . . .3d 1090, 1097 (9th Cir.2008) (emphasis added) (citing 18 C.F.R. §§ 157.6(d)(2)(iv), 157.6(d)(3)(v), 157.10 . . .

WILLISTON BASIN INTERSTATE PIPELINE COMPANY, v. AN EXCLUSIVE GAS STORAGE LEASEHOLD AND EASEMENT IN THE CLOVERLY SUBTERRANEAN GEOLOGICAL FORMATION,, 524 F.3d 1090 (9th Cir. 2008)

. . . . § 157.10. . . .

EAST TENNESSEE NATURAL GAS COMPANY, v. F. SAGE K. v. v. A. M. v. M. v. R. A. v. L. Jr. A. v. G. G. V. a k a A. v. H. F. A. v. H. W. A. v. L. A. v. L. A. v. E. A. A. v. D. C. C. v. A. C. v. M. A. C. v. R. A. C. v. S. B. C. v. U. C. v. M. C. v. E. C. C. v. M. C. v. A. C. v. C. Jr. B. v. J. a k a A. v. K. A. v. A. v. A. v. A. v. W. A. v. v. L. J. J. v. v. v. v. D., 361 F.3d 808 (4th Cir. 2004)

. . . . § 157.10, and FERC conducts a public hearing on the application, id. § 157.11. . . .

TAMPA INTERSTATE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, v. FLORIDA GAS TRANSMISSION COMPANY,, 294 F. Supp. 2d 1277 (M.D. Fla. 2003)

. . . . § 157.10(a). . . .

MIDWESTERN GAS TRANSMISSION COMPANY, v. D. McCARTY,, 270 F.3d 536 (7th Cir. 2001)

. . . . § 157.10; United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. . . .

ATLANTA GAS LIGHT COMPANY, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, AMERICAN GAS ASSOCIATION, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, BOARD OF WATER, LIGHT AND SINKING FUND COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF DALTON, GEORGIA, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION,, 140 F.3d 1392 (11th Cir. 1998)

. . . . § 157.10, has a continuing injury sufficient to enliven the suit is less apparent. . . .

DJORDJEVIC, v. POSTMASTER GENERAL, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,, 957 F. Supp. 31 (E.D.N.Y. 1997)

. . . losses in the amount of $400 for the lost currency, $600 for reconstruction of the legal documents, and $157.10 . . .

DJORBJEVIC, v. POSTMASTER GENERAL, U. S. POSTAL SERVICE,, 911 F. Supp. 72 (E.D.N.Y. 1995)

. . . losses in the amount of $400 for the lost currency, $600 for reconstruction of the legal documents, and $157.10 . . .

NATIONAL FUEL GAS SUPPLY CORPORATION, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF STATE OF NEW YORK, A. A. Jr. M. T. M. G., 894 F.2d 571 (2d Cir. 1990)

. . . . §§ 157.9, 157.10. State commissions may intervene as of right. 18 C.F.R. § 385.214. . . .

STUDENT PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP OF NEW JERSEY, v. MONSANTO COMPANY, 727 F. Supp. 876 (D.N.J. 1989)

. . . Plaintiffs are thus entitled to $157.10 for travel expenses, f.Telephone In accord with the reasons set . . . Photocopying $4,577.40 Postage 146.24 Support Staff Overtime - 0 - Expert Witness Fees - 0 - Travel 157.10 . . .

In, 41 B.R. 716 (Bankr. D. Haw. 1984)

. . . Hunt the sum of $157.10 per month for the care, support and maintenance of the children. . . . payments for the period' May 1968 through March 1974 and ordered him to pay a total of $11,154.10 ($157.10 . . .

SEAFARERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA, AFL- CIO, v. UNITED STATES COAST GUARD, B., 736 F.2d 19 (2d Cir. 1984)

. . . . § 157.10-65, supra note 2. . . . The relevant regulation promulgated in accordance with § 673 is 46 C.F.R. § 157.10-65 (1983), which provides . . .

KRASNER, v. DREYFUS CORPORATION GROSS v. DREYFUS CORPORATION UNTERMEYER, Jr. v. DREYFUS LIQUID ASSETS, INC. UNTERMEYER, Jr. v. DREYFUS LIQUID ASSETS, INC., 90 F.R.D. 665 (S.D.N.Y. 1981)

. . . Dannenberg 157.10 14.50 125 175 19,637.50 2,537.50 Burton L. Knapp 7.30 125 912.50 Neil L. . . .

J. McCOMBS, R. d b a A. E. I. v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION,, 570 F.2d 1376 (10th Cir. 1978)

. . . See 18 CFR § 157.10 (January 1, 1969). . . .

In TAYLORVILLE EISNER AGENCY, INC. a H. HOUCHEN, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF PANA, a, 445 F. Supp. 665 (S.D.N.Y. 1977)

. . . IO6V2 §§ 6-7); and corporations, Ill.Rev.Stat. ch. 32 §§ 157.9, 157.10, 157.47, 157.52, 157.55, and 157.55a . . .

UNITED STATES, v. ROCKWELL IMPORT CORP., 564 F.2d 72 (C.C.P.A. 1977)

. . . containing added ingredients such as nuts, fruits, etc., under the provision for confectionery (items 157.10 . . .

v., 65 C.C.P.A. 12 (C.C.P.A. 1977)

. . . containing added ingredients such as nuts, fruits, etc., under the provision for confectionery (items 157.10 . . .

ROCKWELL IMPORT CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES, 422 F. Supp. 279 (Cust. Ct. 1976)

. . . defendant claims, on the basis of the evidence, that the merchandise should be classified first under item 157.10 . . . first, that the imported merchandise if not confectioners’ coating, should be classified under item 157.10 . . . the merchandise is 33% chopped hazelnuts by weight, the merchandise should be classified under item 157.10 . . . producer’s commodity, and as such, would not seem to respond to the designation “candy” under item 157.10 . . . sustained, and defendant’s alternative claims for classification of the subject merchandise under item 157.10 . . .

v., 76 Cust. Ct. 262 (Cust. Ct. 1976)

J. v., 72 Cust. Ct. 53 (Cust. Ct. 1974)

. . . Thus evidence that either item 157.10 or 155.75 is satisfied is Hpso facto’ also evidence that item 182.91 . . . Plaintiff claimed that it was dutiable as “confectionery” under item 157.10 which specifically covered . . . Hence, the importation was held to be properly classifiable under item 157.10 as “confectionery.” . . . claim, the court stated: “Whether item 155.75 [covering sugar, etc.] is narrower in scope than item 157.10 . . .

v., 70 Cust. Ct. 66 (Cust. Ct. 1973)

. . . assessment is erroneous and that the importation is properly dutiable at 14 percent ad valorem under item 157.10 . . . of schedule 1, and subpart B of part 15 of schedule 1 for other provisions covering confectionery). 157.10 . . . Thus evidence that either item 157.10 or 155.75 is satisfied is “ipso facto” also evidence that item . . . powdered candy” which comes within the common meaning of “confectionery” as that term is used in item 157.10 . . . Whether item 155.75 is narrower in scope than item 157.10 need not be reached since the court finds that . . .

Co. v., 62 Cust. Ct. 624 (Cust. Ct. 1969)

. . . The collector classified the importation as confectionery under item 157.10 and assessed it with duty . . . of schedule 1, and subpart B of part 15 of schedule 1 for other provisions covering confectionery) . 157.10 . . . containing added ingredients such as nuts, fruits, etc., under the provision for confectionery (items 157.10 . . .

v., 62 Cust. Ct. 297 (Cust. Ct. 1969)

. . . Plaintiff challenges this classification, claiming that the merchandise is properly classifiable under item 157.10 . . . As a further alternative, plaintiff claims that the candy pellets are classifiable under item 157.10 . . . types of shipping or transportation containers or holders designed for, or capable of, reuse. ******* 157.10 . . . background, plaintiff’s first argument is that the importations are classifiable as candy under item 157.10 . . .

MAY, v. MAY,, 142 So. 2d 110 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1962)

. . . Choctaw Beach, Florida’; that the defendant pay or cause to be paid by allotment or otherwise the sum of $157.10 . . .

UNITED STATES, v HOWARD M. WOOLDRIDGE, U. S., 10 C.M.A. 510 (C.M.A. 1959)

. . . Thus it is clear to me under the statute that the monthly $157.10 allotment checks were for accused’s . . . Photostatic copies of four United States Treasury checks, each in the amount of $157.10, dated, respectively . . .