Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 157.25 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 157.25 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 157.25

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XI
COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS
Chapter 157
DRAINAGE BY COUNTIES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 157.25
157.25 Compensation of committee; irregular assessment corrected.The committee appointed by the county commissioners for the purposes aforesaid shall receive such compensation for their services as may be agreed upon. In the event any of the assessments herein provided for shall be declared illegal by any court on account of any irregularities therein, the said board of county commissioners may make new and other assessments in accordance with the provisions of this chapter, correcting said irregularities until the owners of the lands assessed shall have paid the amount for which they are properly assessable.
History.s. 12, ch. 5378, 1905; RGS 1763; CGL 2814.

F.S. 157.25 on Google Scholar

F.S. 157.25 on Casetext

Amendments to 157.25


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 157.25
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 157.25.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

CHURCH OF OUR SAVIOR, a v. CITY OF JACKSONVILLE BEACH, a, 108 F. Supp. 3d 1259 (M.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . The Church seeks to recover at $416.50 per hour and $157.25 per hour for Dalton and Brink, respectively . . . Katharine Brink The Court finds the $157.25 per hour rate requested for Brink reasonable. . . . The Court has determined that reasonable rates for Dalton, Brink, and Stambaugh are $325 per hour, $157.25 . . .

ZARWASCH- WEISS, v. SKF ECONOMOS USA, INC. SKF USA v., 838 F. Supp. 2d 654 (N.D. Ohio 2012)

. . . Pepper Hamilton billed within a range of $148.75 to $157.25 for the work of legal assistants, charging . . .

OKLAHOMA NATURAL GAS COMPANY, v. APACHE CORPORATION, v. B., 355 F. Supp. 2d 1246 (N.D. Okla. 2004)

. . . Honrs Fees Cheryl Anderson $95 38,5 hrs $ 3,657.50 Debra Baker $80 270.8 hrs $21,664 Kathy Jones $30 157.25 . . .

ELLISON, v. KOPSTEIN, In Z. KOPSTEIN,, 171 B.R. 879 (Bankr. N.D. Cal. 1994)

. . . Paradise Drive; thence leaving said Southeasterly line North 73° 40' East 212.53 feet, South 28° 07' East 157.25 . . .

M. HARRIMAN v. E. I. DU PONT NEMOURS AND COMPANY, a, 411 F. Supp. 133 (D. Del. 1975)

. . . 3rd Quarter................................ 158.00 139.50 4th Quarter ............................... 157.25 . . .

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, a v. MID- CONTINENT CASUALTY COMPANY, a, 518 F.2d 292 (10th Cir. 1975)

. . . adjudication in declaratory actions; general principles of joinder control. 6A Moore, Federal Practice 157.25 . . .

In GYPSUM CASES, 386 F. Supp. 959 (N.D. Cal. 1974)

. . . Review of USG documents and production 157.25 392.80 10. . . .

v., 61 T.C. 737 (T.C. 1974)

. . . The Loew’s common stock was trading on November 29, 1968, for a high-low average price of $157.25 per . . .

UNITED STATES v. JAMES, 301 F. Supp. 107 (W.D. Tex. 1969)

. . . Thurmond claims compensation for 157.25 hours of time spent in open court, at $15.00 per hour, for a . . .

FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION v. TEXACO INC., 377 U.S. 33 (U.S. 1964)

. . . C. 1576, 18 CFR § 157.25; Order No. 232, 25 F. P. C. 379, 26 Fed. . . . Ibid. § 157.25. §157.14 (a) (10) (v). . . .

SUPERIOR OIL COMPANY, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION,, 322 F.2d 601 (9th Cir. 1963)

. . . .” “§ 157.25 Necessary Exhibits, Exhibit B, Contracts, is amended by deleting all the language after . . . now contained in section 154.93 (quoted in note 5 above), and to amend sections 157.14(a) (10), and 157.25 . . .

TEXACO, INC. v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, PAN AMERICAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, SUN OIL COMPANY, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION,, 317 F.2d 796 (10th Cir. 1963)

. . . Order No. 242 also amended §§ 157.14 and 157.25 of the regulations so as to prohibit the consideration . . .

HUNT OIL COMPANY v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, SUPERIOR OIL COMPANY, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, HUMBLE OIL REFINING COMPANY, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION,, 306 F.2d 878 (5th Cir. 1962)

. . . Order No. 242 amended §§ 154.93, 157.14(a), and 157.25 of the FPC Regulations by adding a notice that . . . “(C) § 157.25 Necessary exhibits, Exhibit B, Contracts, is amended by deleting all the language after . . .

MAGNOLIA PETROLEUM COMPANY, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, OHIO OIL COMPANY, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, SUPERIOR OIL COMPANY, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, WEST, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION,, 236 F.2d 785 (5th Cir. 1956)

. . . In addition, Order 174 B, Section 157.25, condemns, in advance, escalator clauses in producer contracts . . .

DANIEL A. DRISCOLL v. THE UNITED STATES, 34 Ct. Cl. 508 (Ct. Cl. 1899)

. . . with all other work required by the terms of said contracts, he has been paid except as to the sum of $157.25 . . . The defense in respect of the $157.25, which was withheld under the forfeiture clause of the contract . . . claimant has been paid the sum of $31,287.75 for said work, leaving due him on said contracts the sum of $157.25 . . . decided as conclusions of law that the claimant recover: On finding 4, being balance due on contract.. $157.25 . . .