Cases from cite.case.law:

In BEAR STEARNS COMPANIES, INC. SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE, AND ERISA LITIGATION. To, 763 F. Supp. 2d 423 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)

. . . result, on February 13, 2007, Bear Stearns’ stock closed at $160.10 per share, up from a close of $157.30 . . .

AMERICAN GAS ASSOCIATION, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, El ONG, 912 F.2d 1496 (D.C. Cir. 1990)

. . . Issue of Pregranted Abandonment of Firm Service at 8; see also AGD I, 824 F.2d at 1015 n. 17; 18 CFR § 157.30 . . .

UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, v. M V POINT DOVER,, 756 F.2d 1223 (5th Cir. 1985)

. . . . § 157.30-10 (1980), and (iii) the vessel breached its duty to exercise due diligence to make the vessel . . . asserts'that the failure to have a licensed engineer on board the vessel was a violation of 46 C.F.R. § 157.30 . . . See supra, p. 1225 for text of clause. . 46 C.F.R. § 157.30-10 (1980) states in pertinent part: Officers . . .

J. A. JONES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY a v. SOUTHERN STRESS WIRE CORPORATION a T., 575 F. Supp. 365 (N.D. Ga. 1982)

. . . Block, 175 F.Supp. 798 (D.C.Ga.1959) (fees of $2,000 and expenses of $157.30 taxed against fund of $10,000 . . .

MORAN MARITIME ASSOCIATES, v. UNITED STATES COAST GUARD,, 526 F. Supp. 335 (D.D.C. 1981)

. . . . § 157.30-40 (1980), against certain unmanned, oil-carrying “tank barges” in tow by tugboats constitutes . . . The regulation upon which the plaintiffs rely, 46 C.F.R. § 157.30-40 (1980), permits smaller “coastwise . . . Plaintiffs contend that the established Coast Guard interpretation of 46 C.F.R. § 157.30-40 (and its . . . The explicit language of 46 C.F.R. § 157.30-40 contradicts the meaning the plaintiffs seek to attach . . . Plaintiffs attach great significance to the “regulatory history” of 46 C.F.R. § 157.30-40, which they . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. SILVA,, 272 F. Supp. 46 (S.D. Cal. 1967)

. . . United States authorized to enforce the navigation or inspection laws of the United States.” 46 C.F.R. 157.30 . . . Silva, violated 46 U.S.C. § 224a, and 46 C.F.R. 157.30-10, because his “Vessel sailed short one mate” . . . THE CONSTRUCTION AND LEGAL EFFECT OF 46 C.F.R. 157.30-10: Under subdivision (9) of 46 U.S.C. § 224a, . . . The dispositive question becomes; Does the regulation in this action (46 C.F.R. 157.30-10) so extend . . . The Coast Guard regulation (46 C.F.R. 157.30-10) in effect takes away that exemption and in so doing . . .

H. ROWE, Jr. G. v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, v. H. ROWE, Jr. G. HODGE, E. t a H. H. t a v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY,, 375 F.2d 215 (4th Cir. 1967)

. . . because the Hodge son had failed to comply (and in fact could not have complied) with §§ 24.10-3 and 157.30 . . .

UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, v. H. ROWE, Jr. G. E. t a S. C. t a S. C. H. H. t a H. ROWE, Jr. H. Jr. H. Jr. G. v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY,, 249 F. Supp. 993 (E.D. Va. 1966)

. . . Rowes were passengers for hire, they were required to be piloted by a licensed operator under 46 C.F.R. 157.30 . . .

H. ROWE, Jr. G. v. S. BROOKS E., 329 F.2d 35 (4th Cir. 1964)

. . . Title 46, C.F.R. 157.30-30, so far as pertinent, provides that— “Every motor boat * * * while carrying . . .

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. VALLEY MORRIS PLAN, COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. MORRIS PLAN COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA,, 305 F.2d 610 (9th Cir. 1962)

. . . and there is an overpayment in income and excess profits taxes for the year 1953 in the amount of $157.30 . . .

SAVANNAH BANK TRUST COMPANY OF SAVANNAH, v. BLOCK R. M. W., 175 F. Supp. 798 (S.D. Ga. 1959)

. . . Plaintiff is also awarded its expenses in the amount of $157.30 from the fund. . . .

DE LANEY v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER In WHITE, 185 F.2d 246 (10th Cir. 1950)

. . . Remington on Bankruptcy, 4th E.d., Supp., Yol. 6, § 2808; Collier on Bankruptcy, 14th Ed., Vol. 3, Par. 157.30 . . .