The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . . §§ 157.36, 157.37. . . . Nor do we agree with the petitioners that 18 C.F.R. § 157.36, which provides that “[i]n considering a . . . Analysis Before we reach the merits of this facial challenge to the validity of §§ 157.36 and 157.37, . . . Accordingly, we do not find § 157.36 invalid on its face. Cf. Amfac Resorts, 282 F.3d at 826-28. . . . On the merits, we hold §§ 157.37 and 157.36 are not facially invalid. . . .
. . . The loan was to be repaid in 84 monthly installments of $157.36 beginning on June 30, 1984. . . .
. . . CLERKS-PRODUCE MANAGERS DIFFERENTIAL Year Clerk's Weekly Produce Weekly Manager's Weekly Differential 1971 125 157.36 . . .
. . . Compare Ill.Ann.Stat. ch. 32 § 157.36 (SmithHurd 1954). . . . .
. . . $48,080.50, the present worth at 6% over a work life of 45 years, to which was added a small increment of $157.36 . . .
. . . the deficiency for 1934, held that the transfers above described were gifts of $222,310.31 and $221,-157.36 . . .
. . . Included in the costs was an item of $157.36 which had been taxed as part of the costs of the case. . . . As we understand it the respondent is objecting to the inclusion of the $157.36 of the costs taxed as . . . We see no merit in the objection to the inclusion of the $157.36 of taxed costs. . . .
. . . Sections 86 and 87 of this act (Smith-Hurd Ill.Stats. c. 32, §§ 157.36, 157.87) provided that upon the . . .