Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 170.15 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 170.15 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 170.15

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XII
MUNICIPALITIES
Chapter 170
SUPPLEMENTAL AND ALTERNATIVE METHOD OF MAKING LOCAL MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENTS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 170.15
170.15 Expenditures for improvements.The governing authority of any municipality may pay out of its general funds or out of any special fund that may be provided for that purpose such portion of the cost of any improvement as it may deem proper.
History.s. 15, ch. 9298, 1923; CGL 3036; s. 12, ch. 59-396.

F.S. 170.15 on Google Scholar

F.S. 170.15 on Casetext

Amendments to 170.15


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 170.15
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 170.15.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

MURCIA, v. COUNTY OF ORANGE,, 226 F. Supp. 2d 489 (S.D.N.Y. 2002)

. . . Penal Law § 170.15 (McKinney 1998) (forgery); N.Y. Gen. Bus. . . .

MIGIS, v. PEARLE VISION, INC., 944 F. Supp. 508 (N.D. Tex. 1996)

. . . Plaintiff has failed to provide any authority to support her request for $139.47 for Westlaw charges, $170.15 . . .

D. LEDBETTER, v. FIRST STATE BANK TRUST COMPANY,, 85 F.3d 1537 (11th Cir. 1996)

. . . Fratcher, The Law of Trusts § 170.15, p. 369; Comptroller’s Handbook, p. 3. . . . IIA Scott, § 170.15, at p. 371. . . .

J. DONOVAN, v. C. BIERWIRTH, G. A. W. E. V. Jr. T. L., 538 F. Supp. 463 (E.D.N.Y. 1981)

. . . Scott, Law of Trusts § 170.15 at 1340-41 (3d ed. 1967). . . .

NATCO THEATRES, INC. v. RATNER, G., 463 F. Supp. 1124 (S.D.N.Y. 1979)

. . . Penal Law §§ 170.10, 170.15 (McKinney, 1975). . . . .

CAPE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY v. CITY OF COCOA BEACH,, 192 So. 2d 766 (Fla. 1966)

. . . The 1959 amendment to Section 170.15 is cited as the basis for this contention. . . . In the case at bar the deleted portions of Section 170.15 are illustrative of what improvements are considered . . .

YELLOW TRANSIT FREIGHT LINES, INC. v. UNITED STATES Co., 221 F. Supp. 465 (N.D. Tex. 1963)

. . . It does not include a town of the township or New England type.” 49 C.F.R. 170.15 Although this boundary . . . This brings it within § 170.15 as a “* * * city * * * which is recognized as such, under the * * * laws . . . This would include such subordinate elements in § 170.15 as “recognized as such” city, etc. . . . As long as the definition of “municipality” under § 170.15 stands, the complaining Carriers have the . . . By its own regulations, 49 CFR § 170.15, the Interstate Commerce Commission has defined municipality . . . In the case at bar, plaintiffs contend that the Commission was bound by its statement, in 49 C.F.R. 170.15 . . . The statement in 49 CFR 170.15 with reference to the term municipality should not be considered a final . . .

GRIFFITHS DAIRY, v. SQUIRE,, 138 F.2d 758 (9th Cir. 1943)

. . . corporation filed a claim requesting abatement of the assessment of $1,235 and of penalty and interest of $170.15 . . .

c. T., 14 Fla. 325 (Fla. 1873)

. . . Moise & Co. at the date of thgir receiving into their hands the note in suit had all been paid, except $170.15 . . . $2,000, which will be found by computation to have reduced the principal of the old indebtedness to $170.15 . . . Gilchrist swears that it was understood by the Gilchrists and Moise & Co., that all was paid except $170.15 . . .