The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XII
MUNICIPALITIES

Chapter 170
SUPPLEMENTAL AND ALTERNATIVE METHOD OF MAKING LOCAL MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 170.20

170.20 Bonds negotiable.—Bonds issued under s. 170.11 shall have all the qualities of negotiable paper under the law merchant, and shall not be invalid for any irregularity or defect in the proceedings for the issue and sale thereof, and shall be incontestable in the hands of bona fide purchasers or holders thereof for value.

History.—s. 20, ch. 9298, 1923; CGL 3041; s. 15, ch. 59-396.

F.S. 170.20 on Google Scholar

F.S. 170.20 on Casetext

Amendments to 170.20

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 170.20

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 170.20.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

DANIELS, v. NEW YORK CITY,, 117 F. Supp. 3d 239 (E.D.N.Y. 2015)

. . . Penal Law § 170.20. . . .

UNITED STATES v. FORNEY, a k a, 537 F. App'x 114 (3d Cir. 2013)

. . . Penal Law §§ 170.20 and 170.30. . . .

BERNSHTEIN, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, HWA,, 496 F. App'x 140 (2d Cir. 2012)

. . . reasonably prudent” officer would have reason to believe that Bernshtein violated New York Penal Law § 170.20 . . .

ROTHENBERG, v. DAUS,, 481 F. App'x 667 (2d Cir. 2012)

. . . Penal Law § 170.20; felony second-degree assault, N.Y. . . .

In R. WELLS,, 463 B.R. 320 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2011)

. . . insurance 9,546.62 IOA 6,971.16 corporate advances 18.00 BPO/Inspections 835.00 paid legal fees ll,170.20 . . .

NNEBE, v. DAUS,, 644 F.3d 147 (2d Cir. 2011)

. . . Stolen Property (5th) — Class A Misdemeanor 170.05 Forgery in the 3rd Degree — Class A Misdemeanor 170.20 . . .

DICKERSON, a Jr. a a v. NAPOLITANO,, 604 F.3d 732 (2d Cir. 2010)

. . . Even though the other plaintiffs were charged with violation of New York Penal Law § 170.20, the fact . . . Davison and Hogans were charged with violation of New York Penal Law § 170.20, which prohibits criminal . . . Davison and Hogans were charged with violations of New York Penal Law § 170.20, a statute that makes . . . Penal Law § 170.20].” (internal quotation marks omitted)). . . . . New York Penal Law § 170.20 provides, in full: A person is guilty of criminal possession of a forged . . .

GRANT, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, 500 F. Supp. 2d 211 (S.D.N.Y. 2007)

. . . Penal Law § 170.20 prohibits possession of a forged instrument; § 165.40 prohibits possession of stolen . . .

CETIK, v. R. GONZALES,, 181 F. App'x 117 (2d Cir. 2006)

. . . third-degree criminal possession of a forged instrument in violation of New York Penal Law (“NYPL”) § 170.20 . . . NYPL § 170.20 punishes a person for “criminal possession of a forged instrument ... when, with knowledge . . . The intent element required for a conviction under § 170.20 is framed in the disjunctive; thus, a person . . . Therefore, if Cetik could have been convicted of a violation of § 170.20 without having committed an . . . The intent to defraud element of § 170.20 clearly satisfies this standard. . . .

SULKOWSKA, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK, A B C, 129 F. Supp. 2d 274 (S.D.N.Y. 2001)

. . . Section 170.20 states: "A person is guilty of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the third . . . NYPL § 170.20 (McKinney's 1999) (emphasis added). . . .

ESTES- EL, v. TOWN OF INDIAN LAKE, J., 954 F. Supp. 527 (N.D.N.Y. 1997)

. . . matter to the grand jury on October 22, 1996, in accordance with New York Criminal Procedure Law § 170.20 . . . New York Criminal Procedure Law § 170.20 provides, in pertinent part, [a]tany time before entry of a . . . N.Y.Crim.Proc.Law § 170.20(2) (McKinney 1993). . . . . New York Criminal Procedure Law § 170.20(1) provides that [i]f at any time before entry of a plea of . . . N.Y.Crim.Proc.Law § 170.20(1) (McKinney 1993). . . . .

UNITED STATES v. E. DELANO,, 55 F.3d 720 (2d Cir. 1995)

. . . 242, 593 N.Y.S.2d 426, 432 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1992) (quoting Commission Staff Notes to Proposed Penal Law § 170.20 . . . 22, 450 N.Y.S.2d 957, 960 (N.Y.Crim.Ct.1982) (quoting Commission Staff Notes to Proposed Penal Law § 170.20 . . . 450 N.Y.S.2d at 960 (internal quotes omitted) (citing Commission Staff Notes to Proposed Penal Law § 170.20 . . .

GRADY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF DUTCHESS COUNTY v. CORBIN, 495 U.S. 508 (U.S. 1990)

. . . Law § 170.20(2) (McKinney 1982), which states: “At any time before entry of a plea of guilty to or commencement . . .

COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. v. UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION,, 830 F.2d 610 (7th Cir. 1987)

. . . . §§ 170.20-21, 49 Fed.Reg. 21,363 (May 21, 1984). . . .

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES,, 476 F. Supp. 1082 (Cust. Ct. 1979)

. . . See, e. g., items 110.15-110.36, item 111.64, items 140.60-140.75, items 170.20-170.46, items 352.10- . . .

v., 83 Cust. Ct. 56 (Cust. Ct. 1979)

. . . See, e.g., items 110.15-110.36, item 111.64, items 140.60-140.75, items 170.20-170.46, items 352.10-352.80 . . .

v., 39 T.C. 333 (T.C. 1962)

. . . feet at 23 cents per foot gave a figure of $1,702 against which the usual 10 percent retainage of $170.20 . . .

BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYEES v. NASHVILLE, C. ST. L. RY., 56 F. Supp. 559 (M.D. Tenn. 1944)

. . . Foremen $170.20 per month Extra Gang Foremen 146.20 per month Extra Gang Laborers 33^ per hour Construction . . . be noted that in some classifications, such as B & B Foremen, the compensation or wage is fixed at $170.20 . . .

BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYEES, v. NASHVILLE, C. ST. L. RY., 56 F. Supp. 552 (M.D. Tenn. 1944)

. . . will be noted that in some classifications, such as B&B Foremen, the compensation or wage is fixed at $170.20 . . .

UNITED STATES v. THOMAS, 52 F. Supp. 571 (E.D. Wash. 1943)

. . . He owed $600 on it and the statement showed he owed $170.20. . . .

EARLL v. PICKEN PICKEN v. EARLL, 113 F.2d 150 (D.C. Cir. 1940)

. . . Calvert, 1894, 138 Ind. 67, 37 N.E. 531. 2 Scott, Trusts (1939) §§ 170.20, 170.21, 244.1. . . . Trusts (1939) § 468. 2 Scott, Trusts (1939) §§ 208.1, 208.-2, 208.3, 208.4. 2 Scott, Trusts (1939) § 170.20 . . .

MARYLAND DREDGING CONTRACTING CO. v. THE UNITED STATES, 66 Ct. Cl. 627 (Ct. Cl. 1929)

. . . For meals furnished Government employees_ 170.20 3. . . .

ARTHUR B. BARRINGER v. THE UNITED STATES, 37 Ct. Cl. 1 (Ct. Cl. 1901)

. . . Judgment will therefore be entered for plaintiff in the sum of $170.20. . . .