The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . Although the Board did not explicitly address this argument, the PTO responds that NAI reads MPEP § 201.11 . . . Nonetheless, we have reviewed MPEP § 201.11 and find that nothing in its text limits the scope of waiver . . . Indeed, § 201.11 does not contemplate all possible consequences of waiving a benefit claim in a particular . . . Although outdated, we refer to MPEP § 201.11 to remain consistent with Appellant's briefs. . . . The subject matter of § 201.11, however, now exists in MPEP § 211. . . .
. . . MPEP § 201.11 III.C. . . .
. . . P, App. 2, Rules 201.10, 201.11; cf. . . .
. . . . § 201.11(a)). . . .
. . . of Patent Examining Procedure defined “co-pending” by simply echoing section 120’s language, MPEP § 201.11 . . . MPEP § 201.11 (3d ed. 1961) (emphases added). . . .
. . . . § 201.11(d)(6). We AFFIRM Hester’s sentence. . . .
. . . of the document, the Clerk of the Circuit Court, as well, has no obligation to collect the tax, §§ 201.11 . . . taxes, the Clerk merely is the on-site agent to receive funds for the Florida Department of Revenue. §§ 201.11 . . .
. . . For example, section 201.11 of the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (“M.P.E.P.”), which provides . . . See, e.g., M.P.E.P. § 201.11 (8th ed. rev.5, Aug. 2006) (“The relationship between the applications is . . .
. . . . § 14-201.11. . . . Stat. § 14-201.11. Compl. ¶¶ 78-92. . . . Stat. § 14-201.11, and subjected him to a hostile and abusive work environment. Compl. ¶¶ 78-86. . . .
. . . . § 201.11. . . .
. . . examiner reviews the priority claims, as instructed by the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure §§ 201.08, 201.11 . . .
. . . § 1.53(d) (using the term “prior application” to refer to the application to be abandoned); MPEP § 201.11 . . . Innovation, 420 F.3d at 1367; MPEP § 201.11 (“If the specific reference is only contained in the application . . .
. . . Rule 201.11. . . . assessing Claimant’s transferability of skills, the ALJ incorrectly cited the Medical-Vocational Rule 201.11 . . .
. . . P, App. 2, § 201.11. Mr. . . .
. . . Section 201.11, USBAC, establishes the criteria for when a building and/or structure is considered “unsafe . . .
. . . . § 201.11(I)(B) (“Only the claims of the continuation-in-part application that are disclosed in the . . .
. . . The ALJ held, accordingly, that Kyle was not disabled under the framework of Medical-Vocational Rule 201.11 . . . Likewise, Rule 201.11 sets forth that an individual closely approaching advanced age (ages 50-55) with . . . Rule 201.11 applies to individuals closely approaching advanced age, 50-55. . . . .
. . . P, App. 2, §§ 201.11 (transferable skills), 202.10 (light work). . . .
. . . . §§ 201.1(c), 201.11(d); see also United States v. Martin, 438 F.3d 621, 625, 633 (6th Cir.2006). . . .
. . . See Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (“MPEP”) § 201.11(I)(A)-(B) (8th ed., rev. 7, July 2008) (regarding . . .
. . . MPEP § 201.11. . . . MPEP § 201.11. . . . MPEP § 201.11. . . . .
. . . Manual of Patent Examining Procedure, § 201.11(II)(B) (8th ed. 2006). . . . MPEP, § 201.11 (3d ed. 1961) (“If the first application issues as a patent, it is sufficient for the . . . In accordance with the PTO’s Manual of Patent Examining Procedure § 201.11, plaintiffs May 15, 2001 patent . . .
. . . Under MPEP § 201.11, the specific reference can be either in the first sentence of the speci-fieation . . . Under MPEP § 201.11, “[w]hen the nonprovisional application is entitled to an earlier U.S. effective . . . MPEP provision requires only that the applicant use a statement “such as” the one provided in Section 201.11 . . . MPEP § 201.11. . . .
. . . MPEP § 201.11. It does not require the applicant to justify its entitlement to that date. Id. . . .
. . . . § 201.11 (2005) and the notice of institution published in the Federal Register, we hereby submit our . . . The citation to 19 C.F.R. § 201.11 (2005), apparently made in error, is to a regulation of the United . . .
. . . . § 201.11 (2005) and the notice of institution published in the Federal Register, we hereby submit our . . . The citation to 19 C.F.R. § 201.11 (2005), apparently made in error, is to a regulation of the United . . .
. . . . § 201.11(a)(3), before an impartial hearing officer (“IHO”) appointed by the local board of education . . . requested and shall result in a determination within 10 school days after the hearing.”); 8 NY.C.R.R. § 201.11 . . . [to] a hearing,” § 1415(k)(3)(A); see 8 N.Y.C.R.R. § 201.11(a)(3), conducted on an “expedited” basis, . . . § 1415(k)(4)(B); 8 N.Y.C.R.R. § 201.11(c). . . .
. . . See 1-201 Weinstein’s FedeRal Evidence § 201.11[2]; compare Cofield, v. Alabama Public Serv. . . .
. . . See also McLaughlin, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 201.11 [1]; Carpenter v. . . .
. . . Of Commerce, Manual of Patent Examining Procedure §§ 201.06, 201.07, 201.08, 201.11 (7th ed.1998, rev . . .
. . . MPEP § 201.11.” . . . MPEP § 201.11. “Abandonment” refers to “express abandonment.” MPEP § 201.11. . . . MPEP § 201.11. . . . Section 201.11 of the MPEP provides: Any claim in a continuation-in-part application which is directed . . . MPEP § 201.11, citing Studiengesellschaft Kohle M.B.H. v. . . .
. . . . § 201.11(d)(4). The government agreed that Lazenby qualified for “safety valve” relief. . . .
. . . Galvan did not qualify for a downward adjustment under § 201.11(b)(2). . . .
. . . Manual of Patent Examining Procedure § 201.11(6th ed., rev. 2 1996) (emphasis added). . 35 U.S.C. § 120 . . .
. . . . § 201.11(d) n.(A)-(D) (1998); see also § 2Dl.ll(e) n.(A) (2003) (providing same result). . . .
. . . a food establishment if the food employee is diagnosed with an infectious agent specified under ¶ 2-201.11 . . .
. . . . § 201.11 (standard for locomotive operation under stationary conditions); id. § 201.12 (standard for . . .
. . . Haddock was not disabled in light of this expert vocational testimony and Rule 201.11 from the medical-vocational . . .
. . . Haddock was not disabled in light of this expert vocational testimony and Rule 201.11 from the medical-vocational . . .
. . . See also James William Moore et ah, Moore’s Federal Practice, §§ 201.11 et seq. (3rd ed.1998); Charles . . .
. . . Transco, 38 F.3d at 557 n. 6, 32 USPQ2d at 1082 n. 6 (quoting the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure § 201.11 . . .
. . . . § 201.11(2), Fla.Stat. (1993). . . .
. . . See Grid Rule 201.11. . . .
. . . See MPEP § 201.11. . . . See MPEP § 201.11. . . . MPEP § 201.11. See P.J. . . .
. . . . §§ 201.11 and 2004 (Item 14). . DX 17. . DX 99. . . .
. . . Based on an exertional capacity for light work, Pulliam’s age, education and work experience, Rules 201.11 . . .
. . . .* * * Under 19 CFR 201.11(a),* * * a party filing an appearance before the ITC is required to state . . .
. . . Under 19 CFR 201.11(a), ... a party filing an appearance before the ITC is required to state its intent . . .
. . . during the February to December 1984 period, the Appeals Council relied upon the framework of Rule 201.11 . . . Rule 201.11, in contrast to the AU’s finding, is based upon an individual with transferable work skills . . .
. . . , Crouchet contends that he is disabled pursuant to the medical-vocational rules, specifically Rule 201.11 . . .
. . . Rule 201.11 of 20 C.F.R. Part 404, Subpart P, Appendix 2, Table 1. Allen appeals. . . .
. . . Id., Rule 201.11. . . .
. . . determination of Paulson’s disability status turns upon which of the three grid rules—201.09, 201.10, or 201.11 . . . See Grid Rule 201.11. . . .
. . . .-05, 199.03, 201.11, 208.49, 212.15, Florida Statutes (1961). . . . .
. . . P, app. 2, Table 1, Rule 201.11, and Table 2, Rules 202.11, 202.12. C. . . . P, app. 2, Table 1, Rule 201.11. . See 20 C.F.R. pt. 404, subpt. . . .
. . . The AU therefore applied Grid Rules 201.03 and 201.11 of Table No. 1 and denied the claim. 20 C.F.R. . . .
. . . appellant had transferable work skills and concluded that appellant was not disabled pursuant to Rule 201.11 . . . contention that he lacked “transferable skills” which would permit a finding of non-disability based on Rule 201.11 . . . transferable to other semi-skilled work, all of which clearly supports the AU’s finding that use of Rule 201.11 . . .
. . . The AU's findings cite Rule 201.11. . . .
. . . as Hartnett then points out (Mem. 12-13): However, assuming that claimant has transferable skills, § 201.11 . . .
. . . CAPABILITY LIMITED TO SEDENTARY WORK AS A RESULT OF SEVERE MEDICALLY DETERMINABLE IMPAIRMENT(S) Rule 201.11 . . . P, app. 2, rule 201.11 (1985). . . .
. . . P, app. 2, table 1, rule 201.11. . . .
. . . Section 404.1569 of Regulations No. 4 and Rule 201.11, Table No. 1 of Appendix 2, Subpart P, Regulations . . . Rule 201.11, Table I. . . .
. . . Claimant’s past work was semi-skilled and that he had transferable skills, the AU applied Vocational Rule 201.11 . . . Part 404 App. 2, § 201.11, which directed a finding of not disabled. . . .
. . . Part 404, Appendix 2, Subpart P, Rules 201.11 and 202.-12, that the claimant was able to perform a number . . .
. . . In particular, it applied Table No. 1, Rule 201.11, which provides that a person is not disabled if he . . .
. . . . § 201.11 [9 C.F.R. § 201.11] Officers, agents and employees of registrants whose registrations have . . .
. . . Part 404, Appendix 2, § 201.03, 201.11, the AU then concluded that plaintiff was not disabled from engaging . . .
. . . ir.. ... . , Not Disabled skills transferable In view of his findings of fact, the AU applied Rule 201.11 . . . Indeed, the answer to this hypothetical question formed the basis of the AU’s application of Rule 201.11 . . .
. . . Appendix 2, Rules 201.10, 201.11. . . .
. . . The ALJ then relied on Rule 201.11 of the Grid Regulations, 20 C.F.R. . . . A finding as to transferable skills is necessary before the Secretary can apply Rule 201.11. . . .
. . . See Rule 201.11 and 201.12, Table No. 1 of Appendix 2, Subpart P. . . .
. . . semi-skilled work, Rule 201.10 of Table 1 provides she is disabled if her skills are not transferable and Rule 201.11 . . .
. . . Rule 201.11, Table No. 1, Appendix 2, Subpart P, Regulations No. 4, on the basis of residual functional . . . Skilled or semiskilled— skills not transferable. do. 201.11 do. do. . . .
. . . The disability examiner further indicated that the rationale for denial of benefits was Rule 201.11 of . . .
. . . See Rules 201.03, 201.07, 201.11, 201.15, 201.-20, 201.22, 201.26, 201.29. . . .
. . . . §§ 201.11-16. . . .
. . . . §§ 201.11, 201.17, most systems apparently do not comply. Tr. 5/5/80, J. . . .
. . . He would still be considered “not disabled,” see Subpart P, App. 2, Table 1, Rule 201.11, since his work . . .
. . . disability would depend upon whether his skills were “transferable” or not; compare rules 201.10 and 201.11 . . .
. . . by an impartial administrative law judge, other duly-appointed officer, or a Commission member, §§ 201.11 . . .
. . . approaching advanced age” or as a “younger individual age 45-49.” 20 C.F.R., Subpart P, App. 2, Rules 201.11 . . .
. . . ALJ made the following findings of fact in determining the plaintiff’s profile corresponded to Rule 201.11 . . . Rule 201.11 directed a finding of “Not Disabled.” . . .
. . . Given these factors, the Law Judge applied Rule 201.11 of Appendix II, which “required” a finding that . . . Compare Rule 201.10 with Rule 201.11. . . . .
. . . . § 201.11, Fla.Stat. (1975). . . .
. . . See 19 C.F.R. 201.9, 201.11(c) (1972). . . . See 19 C.F.R. 201.11, 201.12(b) (1972). . . .
. . . See 19 CFR 201.9, 201.11(c) (1972). . . . See 19 CFR 201.11, 201.12(b) (1972). . . .
. . . So far as the language of sections 201.11, 201.12 and 201.13 is concerned, the scope of the regulations . . . Sections 201.11-13 together provide that “no carrier shall operate any locomotive (stationary or moving . . . F.2d 1310 (1977), arguing that it supports its view that the noise standards specified in sections 201.11 . . . stationary) and railway cars in marshalling yards was preempted by the federal regulation sections 201.11 . . . Not only do sections 201.11, 201.12 and 201.13 apply to locomotives and rail cars but also to sound produced . . .
. . . . § 201.11. . . . also assign to the United States “[t]he note and any security held or judgment taken.” 24 C.F.R. § 201.11 . . . Id. § 201.11(g). . . . the note or any security held or judgment taken must be assigned in its entirety . . . ” 24 C.F.R. § 201.11 . . .
. . . . §§ 201.11, 201.12, 201.13. . 42 U.S.C. § 4916. . Id. . . . . See J.A. at 18, 24-25. . 40 C.F.R. § 201.11. . Id. at § 201.12. . Id. at § 201.13. . . . .
. . . exception request did not meet the requirements for exception under tandem relationships (6 C.F.R. 201.11 . . . (a)(1), recodified at 6 C.F.R. 201.12), essential employees (6 C.F.R. 201.11(a)(2), recodified at 6 C.F.R . . . arbitrary; furthermore, plaintiff contended that it was entitled to the wage increases under 6 C.F.R. 201.11 . . . relationship but granted the 7 percent increase on the basis of the criteria set forth under section 201.11 . . . already in effect, then A&P would enjoy windfall profits in contravention of the intent of section 201.11 . . .
. . . . § 201.11, and those to be utilized in reviewing deferred increases, set out at 6 C.F.R. § 201.17. . . . The exceptions contained in 6 C.F.R. § 201.11 dictate that one of the following situations must be found . . .
. . . . § 201.12 (codification of SEC Rule XII(a)), 201.11(e) (1973); 29 C.F.R. §§ 102.26, 102.41 (1972) ; . . .
. . . the maximum permissible annual aggregate increase (7%) permitted for exception pursuant to Sections 201.11 . . .
. . . See § 201.11, MPEP; and Federico, Commentary on the New Patent Act, at page 33 of Comm., 35 U. . . .
. . . . § 201.11 (1972). . . .
. . . . § 201.11 (a)(9)). . . .
. . . alternatives, the route of a newly filed “continuing application” under § 120 as explained by MPEP § 201.11 . . . See MPEP § 201.11. . . . See Sections 201.07 and 201.11 of the Manual of Patent Examining Practice (MPEP) a publication which, . . .
. . . But in holding that prior approval was required, the court relied on Pay Board regulation § 201.11 which . . . Unlike Pay Board regulation § 201.11, which applies to contracts negotiated after November 14, 1971, . . .
. . . Pay Board Regulations, §§ 201.10, 201.11, 36 Fed.Reg. 21790 (Nov. 13, 1971), 36 Fed.Reg. 25427 (Dec. . . .
. . . On March 28, 1972, the Pay Board granted exception status as provided for in § 201.11(a) (1) of the Pay . . . However, the Pay Board applied a 7% overall limitation as mandated by § 201.11(b) of the same regulations . . . Effective November 14, 1971, Pay Board regulation § 201.11 provided: “In reviewing new contracts and . . . As has been noted above, the adoption of the regulations (here Pay Board regulations §§ 201.10 and 201.11 . . . In support of its claim, the union cites Pay Board regulations effective November 14, 1971, § 201.11: . . .